R. Albert Mohler Jr.'s Blog, page 281

The Briefing 05-09-16

Obama Administration demands unconditional surrender from NC on transgender bathroom law New York Times (Eric Lichtblau and Richard Fausset) — U.S. Warns North Carolina That Transgender Bill Violates Civil Rights LawsWashington Times (Bradford Richardson) — Justice Dept. to N.C. universities: Break transgender bathroom law or lose millions in funding

Brave new world: Scientists double life expectancy of embryos outside the womb, blurring ethical linesWashington Post (Rachel Feltman) — Scientists double life expectancy for embryos in petri dishes, raising ethical concernsWall Street Journal (Ron Winslow) — Scientists Grow Embryos for Up to 13 Days Outside the Uterus

The Briefing 05-06-16

Crisis in the sciences: Science magazine flags widespread flaws in scientific researchNew Scientist (Sonia van Gilder Cooke) — Why so much science research is flawed – and what to do about it

Agnostic scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson says its very probable the universe is a simulationBusiness Insider (Kevin Loria) — Neil deGrasse Tyson thinks there’s a ‘very high’ chance the universe is just a simulation

Do our senses lie to us? Scientist perceives the world around us is nothing like we perceiveThe Atlantic (Amanda Gefter) — The Case Against Reality

Scientism and the Cult of Science: How science is replacing religion in the public squareFirst Things (William A. Wilson) — Scientific Regress

Crisis in American Democracy

For nearly two and a half centuries, Americans have enjoyed the enormous privilege and responsibility of forming our own government—a privilege rarely experienced throughout most of human history. For most of history, humanity has struggled with the question of how to respond to a government that was essentially forced upon them. But Americans have often struggled with a very different reality; how do we rightly respond to the government that we choose? 

To put all of this in historical perspective, the Framers of the American experiment understood that a representative democracy built on the principle of limited government would require certain virtues of its citizens. These would include a restraint of passions and an upholding of traditional moral virtues, without which democracy would not be possible. As the idea of limited government implies, the citizenry would be required to carry out the social responsibilities of the community without the intrusion of government and, thus, citizens would be expected to have the moral integrity necessary for such an arrangement. The Framers of the American Republic also agreed that it would be impossible to have a representative democracy and a limited government if the people did not elect leaders who embodied the virtues of the citizenry while also respecting and protecting society’s pre-political institutions: marriage and family, the church, and the local community.

Thus, the idea of a limited government requires that society uphold and pursue the health of its most basic institutions. When a civil society is weak, government becomes strong. When the family breaks down, government grows stronger. When the essential institutions of society are no longer respected, government demands that respect for itself. That is a recipe for tyranny.

Much of this was essentially affirmed until the early decades of the 20th century when progressivists began promoting an agenda that fundamentally redefined the role of the federal government in public life. By the middle of the 20th century, the Democratic Party had essentially embraced this progressivist agenda, becoming committed to an increasingly powerful government—a government whose powers exceeded those enumerated in the Constitution. At the same time, the Democratic Party also began advocating for a basic redefinition of the morality that shaped the common culture. By and large, however, the Republican Party continued to maintain a commitment to the vision of America’s founders, advocating for a traditional understanding of morality while also upholding the principle of limited government.

By the 1980s, the two parties represented two very different worldviews and two very different visions of American government. For decades, each party has acted rather predictably and in ways that accord with their fundamental principles. All of that, however, has now changed.

The 2016 presidential campaign has developed in an entirely unpredictable manner and, in many respects, represents a crisis in American democracy. This crisis is not limited to either party. Bernie Sanders, the Independent senator from Vermont, has won several stunning victories in the primary season over presumed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. While it is still extremely likely that Clinton will become the Democratic nominee, Sanders support among voters represents a populist flirtation with Democratic Socialism. This pattern is something few Democrats could have imagined just one year ago. What this foray into Democratic Socialism represents, then, is a radical adjustment of the Democratic Party’s basic economic principles. Thus, even if Hillary Clinton becomes the nominee, the process will likely drag her even further to the left, eventually redefining the Democratic Party before our very eyes.

But if it is remarkable to see what is happening in the Democratic Party, it is absolutely shocking to see what is happening among Republicans. Traditionally, the Republican Party has established its reputation by standing for the principles advocated by the American Founders—limited government upheld by the health of society’s primary institutions such as marriage, family, and community. Yet Donald Trump, the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party, represents virtually everything the Republican Party has typically defined itself over against. Clearly, both political parties are now redefining themselves. What is not clear is where each party will ultimately end up. What is also not clear is whether the American experiment can survive such radical political change.

As already noted, the American experiment in limited government requires that the citizenry and those who hold public office honor certain moral virtues and respect the institutions that are crucial for a society to rightly function. Yet, we now find ourselves in a situation where the three leading candidates for president show little to no respect for such institutions in their articulations of public policy.

This fundamental redefinition of the American political landscape requires Christians to think carefully about their political responsibility. Make no mistake; we cannot avoid that responsibility. Even refusing to vote is itself a vote because it privileges those who do vote and increases the value of each ballot. In truth, we bear a political responsibility that cannot be dismissed or delegated to others. Every Christian must be ready to responsibly steward his or her vote at the polls.

To put the matter bluntly, we are now confronted with the reality that, in November, Hillary Clinton will likely be the Democratic nominee and Donald Trump the Republican nominee. This poses a significant problem for many Christians who believe they cannot, in good conscience, vote for either candidate. As a result, Christians are going to need a lot of careful political reflection in order to steward their vote and their political responsibility in this election cycle.

Headlines from around the world tell us that other representative democracies are at a similar moment of redefinition. Political turmoil now marks the United Kingdom and also nations like France and other key American allies. Perhaps democracy itself is now facing a crucial hour of decision and a crucial season of testing. It is no exaggeration to say that democracy is being tested around the world; it is certainly being tested here at home. Yet if this is a moment of testing for democracy, it is also a crucial moment for Christian witness. This election cycle is going to be a particular test for American Christians—and we are about to find out if Christians are up to this challenge.

The Briefing 05-05-16

Moral opportunists seek to overturn amendments that protect tax payers from funding abortionFive Thirty Eight (Madaleine Schwartz) — Abortion Clinics In Blue States Are Closing, TooBloomberg (Esme E. Deprez) — Abortion Clinics Are Closing at a Record PaceNPR (Jasmine Garsd) — Should The U.S. Reconsider Its Stand On Foreign Aid For Abortion Clinics?

The disappearance of moral courage in America is leading to a collapse of libertyNational Review (David French) — Small Acts of Cowardice Are Destroying Our CultureAmerican Conservative (Rod Dreher) — Targeting Target

Death of moral courage: Former SS guard admits witnessing atrocities, standing by in silenceNew York Times (Melissa Eddy) — Former Auschwitz Guard Apologizes at Trial in Germany

The Briefing 05-04-16

Crisis in American democracy: Indiana primary seals radical redefinition of political landscapeNew York Times (Jonathan Martin and Patrick Healy) — Donald Trump All but Clinches G.O.P. Race With Indiana Win; Ted Cruz Quits

The Briefing 05-03-16

A majority of millennials reject capitalism and support Bernie. Is this the future of America?Washington Post (Max Ehrenfreund) — A majority of millennials now reject capitalism, poll showsFinancial Times (Jacob Weisberg) — Bernie Sanders sends a mixed message to Democrats

The language of postmodernity: why the phrase "I feel like..." undermines the truthNew York Times (Molly Worthen) — Stop Saying ‘I Feel Like’

Can you legislate morality? Why the U.S. has in the past and should continue to in the futureLos Angeles Times (Deborah L. Rhode) — Why is adultery still a crime?

The Briefing 05-02-16

SCOTUS's liberal direction a product of Hollywood's influence on Washington, not the reverseUSA Today (Richard Wolf) — Supreme Court, without Scalia, leaning liberal for second year

Confusion in moral chaos: GOP Congressman inadvertently passes measure to register women for the draftMSNBC (Steve Benen) — Debate over women, selective service takes an unexpected turn

French millennials toy with anarchy under the false promises of utopian politicsNew York Times (Adam Nossiter) — Once Hopeful for Harmony, a Philosopher Voices Discord in France

Exodus 7:1-13

The Briefing 04-29-16

What happens when a baby is bribed with graham crackers? Their sin nature is revealed.Washington Post (Ana Swanson) — The disturbing thing scientists learned when they bribed babies with graham crackers

Lying comes naturally to young children even though it takes more energy than truth tellingAssociated Press (Seth Borenstein) — We all lie, scientists say, but politicians even more so

Study shows parents who give their kids early sips of alcohol open gateway to alcohol abuseNew York Times (Perrie Klass) — Offering Kids a Taste of Alcohol

Failure to launch: 65% of Italians aged 18 to 34 still live with their parentsThe Telegraph (Nick Squires) — Italy's 'big babies': court orders father to pay for upkeep of 28-year-old son

400 years ago two literary giants, Shakespeare and Cervantez, died on the same dayNew York Times (Louis Bayard) — William Shakespeare, Playwright and Poet, Is Dead at 52BBC (James Badcock Madrid) — Is it fair for Shakespeare to overshadow Cervantes?

The Briefing 04-28-16

In this presidential race we are witnessing an unprecedented redefinition of both political partiesWall Street Journal (Gerald F. Seib) — As Election Gets Chippy, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Tighten Their Grip

Ted Cruz announces VP running mate Carly Fiorina hoping to alter Republican race

Campus collision: NCAA urged to divest from all religious schools with anti-LGBT policiesUSA Today (Erik Brady and Scott Gleeson) — When religion and the LGBT collegiate athlete collideInside Higher Ed (Jake New) — Waiting for the NCAA

A tragic moral lesson: Former Speaker of the House now a convicted felon in sexual abuse caseCNN (Tal Kopan) — Dennis Hastert gets 15 months in prison in hush money case