Chuck Wendig's Blog, page 278

March 28, 2011

Baby Madness: A Conversation

Sometimes I think, when the baby comes, I'm going to go outside and move my butt in a sweeping motion and clear a concave indentation in the dirt like some kind of nesting sunfish. And then I'm going to stick my wife, my newborn son, and myself into this shallow hole and it will be there that we raise the child until he is… well, somewhere between 4 years and 42 years old.


Reliable information on baby-rearing — or, more specifically, baby-not-accidentally-killing — is as hard to come by as an honest politician or a unicorn wearing the flesh of his enemies.


It begins, of course, with crib bumpers.


Crib bumpers, to those who don't know, are padded "bumpers" that line the inside base of the crib along the bars so… well, reportedly so the infant doesn't whack his head or get his soft little multi-plated lizard skull stuck between the bars, but really it's so Mom and Dad can ooh-and-ahh over the pretty little rocket ships or bears or fiery demon skulls that represent the nursery's triumphant decor.


We bought a sheet set for the crib, and it came with crib bumpers which we, as completely unaware parents, thought: "Well, that's fine."


Except, it's totally not fine. Apparently.


Here's how the conversation begins.


"Oh, crib bumpers?" the experts say. "Those, yeah. Ooooh. Those will kill your baby."


"These pillowy things? Soft? Downy? The pillows will kill the child, but the wooden bars of the crib will not? Are you sure? Is this opposite day?"


"Totally sure. They can fall on the baby and the baby will suffocate. Plus, the cords might get undone and the baby will strangle himself. Also, the crib bumpers may prevent oxygen from properly recycling, and the baby may intake too much carbon dioxide. And that may be one of the causes of SIDS."


Blink, blink. "Wait, oxygen may not… recycle? Because of crib bumpers? Is oxygen heavier than I think? I mean, it's not mercury. Are crib bumpers, like, the opposite of plants? Do they have some sinister mechanism by which oxygen is eaten and carbon dioxide is exhaled onto my baby's head? Or maybe crib bumpers are full of cats. Cats who leap out and steal the baby's breath."


"Could be, expectant father. Could be."


"Okay." Throw crib bumpers into a burn barrel, then. "Fuck those dirty crib bumpers. Whew. Those menacing baby-killers are long gone. Hey, why are they still allowed to sell them, anyway? I mean, the baby industry is ten kinds of obsessed with safety, understandably so. Shit, a baby's car seat has an expiration date. Like milk. Or love. My seat-belts don't even have an expiration date. So, why are they allowed to sell crib bumpers to an unsuspecting populace?"


"Hell if I know."


"Oh. Well. So, speaking of car seats, we're going to go to this thing the hospital is having where they check the car seat to make sure it's locked in, and I was wondering, will they also check the placement of the mirror on the headrest of the backseat –"


"Mirror? Oh, no. You can't put a mirror there."


"No, no, it's okay, it's some… baby product bullshit, a, a… kind of soft-flexible mirror thing so we can see the baby from the front seat since they have to be rear-facing until they're a year old –"


"Now it's two years old."


"Two?"


"Two. And we're considering making it 20."


"20?!"


"Can never be too safe. But back to the mirror: you have to destroy that mirror. It, like the crib bumpers, may destroy your child. Think of it like a witch. Kill it with fire. See, if you're in an accident, the car seat is designed so it flips upward, and your baby's face will hit the headrest."


"That seems dangerous."


"The headrest is soft."


"Mine's kind of hard."


"Well, soften it up. Also: the mirror could also become a dangerous projectile. In fact, anything in your car can become a bullet. Get rid of everything that isn't nailed down."


"Wow. Got it. Anything else I should know?"


"You're wife's not eating any lunchmeat, right?"


"Lunchmeat? What the hell is wrong with lunchmeat?"


"Listeria. Causes listeriosis. Will pass through to the baby. Plus, Mom is very susceptible at this point. Her immune system is that of a very sad panda. Just think of that."


"That sounds awful. It must be kind of common, this listeriosis."


"Nope. Not so much. About 2500 cases, 500 of which die. Annually."


"And all those are pregnant ladies?"


"Oh, no. About 27% of 'em. Round up to 700 affected."


Blink, blink. "The population of America is 307 million people. That's…" Does some quick math on fingers and toesies. "Less than 0.001%."


"Well, sure. But you don't want your wife and baby getting sick."


"No. No! No. It's just… doesn't she have roughly the same chance of getting struck by lightning?"


"Oh yeah. And even then, only 10% chance of dying. But don't you dare send her out in a storm. There's a billion things you need to worry about. Key word: worry. She's not eating sushi, right?"


"No. She's not. But she'd kill a dude right now for a slice of hamachi, some brie cheese and a dirty martini."


"Sushi is home to parasites. Well. Not really. It's very rare. And we don't even know if a parasitic infection will easily cross the placental wall. Oh! And fish has lots of powerful nutrients. And wine is loaded with antioxidants which a baby may need. But if your wife eats sushi or drinks wine, she will be shunned by the tribe for reckless child endangerment."


"I think my Mom probably drank when I was in the womb."


"And doesn't that explain a lot?"


Pause. "Yeah."


"Here, let's see what else you've got in your baby registry. Mm. Hmm. Okay. I see you've got these baby bottles, they're supposed to help with colic?"


"Yeah. Something about reflux."


"Oooh, sorry. We still don't really know what colic is. It may be genetic. It's definitely a developmental phase. Not much you can do except weather the storm. These bottles? Pbbt. Won't fix crap."


"But they say –"


"I SAID WON'T FIX CRAP."


"You don't have to be so loud about it. Jeez. So, okay, why do they say it may help with colic if colic is just some weird thing that happens like a curse cast upon our child by a surly warlock? I mean, really, shouldn't that be illegal? It's like buying a box of Captain Crunch that promises you'll get laid or something."


"Life's tough, dipshit. You can't go around believing everything you read."


"That's not very nice calling me dipshit like that. And it's really starting to feel like I can't believe anything I read. I mean, damn. Breastfeeding? Natural labor? Pitocin? Autism? Circumcision?"


"Rocky road. Total minefield. You're gonna breastfeed, right?"


"Well. Yeah. I mean, not me personally. My wife will do the actual boob… process. But if not, if it doesn't work out, I know there's formula you can buy…"


"Formula. Sure. Might as well just punch your baby in the face."


"I don't want to do that! But I hear some women can't breastfeed."


"Mommy over there is pre-built to feed your little monkeyface right from her mammy-glands. It's free, for one. And by the time the kid's four years old, you'll have spent enough money on formula where you could've just bought a small boat or a komodo dragon. The boob makes powerful antibodies that kid needs. Trust me, unless she's some kind of troglodytic cave mutant, she can breast-feed like a champ. Those teats are for milkin'. Besides, you don't want your wife to feel like an incomplete mother, do you? If one drop of formula crosses that kid's lips, she will be stoned to death in the town square."


"But I was formula-fed."


"And again, just look at you. You're basically a chimp. With designer glasses."


"Shut up."


"Let's talk labor. You're going natural, right?"


"If we can. But we realize that no plan survives contact with the enemy, so…"


"So you must want your wife to again be an incomplete woman? If you let her have a medically-managed birth, goblins will come. And they will steal her fallopian tubes. And from them they shall craft their terrible goblin weapons. Go natural. Women have been having children naturally for, ohh, let's just call it 10,000 years. Only relatively recently has the medical establishment decided to treat birth like a medical crisis rather than a natural event. You know what's in an epidural? Kool-Aid and heroin. When they give the mother an epidural, they must also give her Pitocin to ameliorate the contractions, and they create more painful contractions, so. When they back off of the epidural in time for the birth, the contractions feel ten times worse than if mommy never had an epidural. Not only does the epidural possibly damage the infant's nursing reflex upon birth but Pitocin might also have a connection with autism."


"Autism? Oh, shit. Really?"


"Ehhh. Ennnh. We don't really know. But it sounds good. And people like to raise the question, and any time there's a question, it's just easier to default to the answer being yes. For instance, Could there be sharks in your toilet? Ehhh. We don't know. Could be. So why take the chance? Poop in a potted plant, like I do."


"Potted plant. Got it. Okay, but — all this stuff is bad, but aren't doctors supposed to, y'know, tend to the health of people? This sounds like it's the opposite of that. Doctors can only do good."


"Sure, sure. They're like Superman and Santa Claus. Oh, you're cute, little naive round-headed ape-man with your scary beard and your fantasies of being a cherished writer. Doctors are people. And people are basically scum. Listen, doctors really like two things: one, expensive pharmaceuticals and two, expensive medical treatments. You know who is a highly-paid person at your hospital? The anesthesiologist. Fuck the brain surgeons, that guy is the rock star. You don't go to him for a fix, you're maybe losing the hospital some sweet, sweet cash. Money makes the world go 'round."


"That is awfully cynical. Doctors aren't evil."


"No! But they're selfish and stupid just like everyone else. Remember Thalidomide?"


"What, the flipper baby thing? Well. That wasn't actually prescribed, it was on clinical trial in this country. That's not fair to blame on doctors."


"I'm just saying. Doctors aren't perfect. They got to get paid, son."


"Who are you, Omar from the Wire?"


"You trust your doctors so much, why do they perform circumcisions?"


"What? Because it's a medical procedure that… you know. Does stuff. Good… stuff. I mean, hey, I'm totally circumcised. Wait, you're going to use that to insult me again, aren't you?"


"The medical establishment will not recommend a circumcision. Go on. Call your pediatrician. He'll tell you there's no medically valid reason to go chopping up your kid's winky like it's an octopus salad."


"So! Hah. That means doctors do have ethics."


"Well, until you tell them you'll still pay them to go Ginsu on your boy's pee-pee-meat. Flash some cash, he'll whip out the meat cleaver good and quick. Where's your ethics now, pink boy?"


"Pink boy?"


"It sounded good at the time."


"I hate you so much."


"I'm just trying to help."


"You're not helping. You're hurting. This is too confusing. Everything is just worry and agita and fear and uncertainty and komodo dragons. Dude, I just watched this sorta documentary, Babies? And in it, they showed a baby in Africa, and that kid was rolling around in the dirt and letting dogs French kiss him and he was splashing around in a little stream and he seemed healthy and happy. In fact, there's 307 million people in this country alone. And they're all alive. Happy, well, I dunno, but they're all here, and they were born with epidurals and without epidurals, and some of them breast-fed and some of them didn't, and Moms drank wine and Dads learned a thousand different breathing techniques and whether it's a big dangerous industry or a giant baby-hating conspiracy, we're all here and alive and it seems like as long as you try to do the right thing however you see it you're probably going to be fine, because haters gonna hate and life is poop and dear gods, I need a nap or I'm going to poop in a potted plant somewhere."


"Good luck, Dad."


"I seriously hate you with the heat of an exploding sun."


And, scene.


Goddamn crib bumpers.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 28, 2011 21:01

March 27, 2011

Beware Of Writer II: Revenge Of The Teenage Penmonkey From Mars


See that guy over there? The one in the alleyway with no pants, his big beard braided with bird bones? The guy twitching like he's covered in ants? The dude stabbing an invisible demon with an invisible knife?


Now, see this guy here? Ahh, the writer. Sitting at his desk. Typing away. Clickity-clack. Clackity-click. Coffee by his side. Hair slightly mussed. Writing about murders and lost love and space opera.


Let's say you have a choice to cozy up to one of these two individuals. Hang out with them for a day.


The one you'd choose would seem obvious.


And that's where you're fucked.


Seriously. Choose the Charlie Manson-looking motherfucker every time. He wears his crazy on his sleeve, same way he wears his poop on the outside of his body. But the writer? The writer hides his crazy. It's like a little secret present inside filled with bees. A Pandora's Box deep in the writer's troubled heart.


It is time, once again, to beware of writer.


Your Attention Is Our Creative Heroin

Newsflash: we are needy little goblins.


Makes sense when you think about it. Our work — and thus, our lives — becomes geared toward seeking the approval of others. We'll kill a dude just for the chance to have an agent request a full manuscript. It's not just editors, agents, publishers, and producers. It's the audience. We tell you we write because we love it, but the dark reality is we write because we need you to love us.


If you don't justify our existence, we will wither like a frost-bitten petunia. We are junkies for your love and appreciation. The other night, I had my wife sit in front of the computer and read something I'd wrote. Thirty seconds in, I said, "You didn't laugh."


"What?" she asked.


"That part there. It was supposed to be funny. You didn't laugh. Means it's not funny."


"It was funny."


Squint. Shift. Twitch. "But you didn't laugh."


"I smiled. I laughed inside." She saw the tendons in my neck standing out. Wet eyes trembling like those of a sad Japanime samurai girl. "Listen, if I'm going to read this, you can't stand there over my shoulder."


"Okay," I said, not actually moving.


She rolled her eyes. Kept reading. Finally, I couldn't take it. I said, "I will give you fifty dollars and a foot massage if you just laugh sometime in the next 30 seconds. Let me sweeten the pot. If you don't do it, I will know that you don't love me, and more importantly, you don't love my writing. My only response will be to run to the bathroom and drown myself in the toilet."


The lady knows the drill. She accepted the deal. Twenty-eight seconds later, a convincing little laugh. I could've licked the computer screen that felt so good. Creative heroin, indeed.


We Bite When Cornered, And Also, When Not Cornered

We look harmless. But we're like hooded cobras. Very angry humans, we writer-folk. Not sure why, exactly. Maybe all those words get caught up in the pipes and chutes of our brain-plumbing, causing something along the lines of a spiritual arterial blockage.


A whole dictionary full of profanity and rage gumming up our think-machine.


Doesn't take much to set a writer off. You tell us, "You know, I don't like pie as much as I used to," and next thing you know you're wiping a gob of spit from your eye. Gets worse if you try to talk to us about writerly things. "I don't think writers should self-pub–" but before you finish that sentence, we've broken a laptop over your head and shanked you in the jugular with a fountain pen.


In your blood we shall ink our first bestseller.


You Can See Our Libraries From Space

We like books the way crackheads like crack rock.


We collect books. We hoard them. Anybody who has ever moved from house to house with a writer in tow learns a very unfortunate lesson, very fast: books are the heaviest substance known to man. You'll be thankful you get to move a fire-safe filled with dumbbells after you move 50 boxes of our books. Many of which we've never even read. Or we didn't even like. Go ahead. Try to take one of our books away. "You didn't even like this book," you'll say. "You said you hated it. That you wanted to find the author and shove this book so far up his ass he could taste his own shit-shellacked prose."


"But I might like it someday."


"We're getting rid of the book," you'll say, and you'll reach for it.


"YOU CAN'T STEAL MY DREAMS," you'll cry, then tip over the bookshelf. When the cops drag you away, you'll casually note how much those feet look like the Wicked Witch's feet from beneath Dorothy's house.


We're Probably Drunk

That coffee cup next to the desk? That's probably wine in there. Or whisky.


Or paint thinner.


Yeah.


You Shall Be Destroyed! (Uhh, In Our Heads)

Revenge is a dish best served to a character who is secretly you inside a book we're writing and in that book the dish is actually a platter full of scorpions and then you the character eats them and the scorpions sting your mouth and throat and they keep stinging you and your pants fall down and you slip screaming into a trough full of horseshit and all the townsfolk gather to laugh at you and throw Justin Bieber CDs at your head and finally the scorpions have babies inside your colon. The End.


Uhh. What I mean is, you know that disclaimer you read inside books? "Any resemblance to real persons living or dead is purely coincidental…?" That one? Coincidental, my left nut. We may not punish you in reality, but ye gods and little fishies, watch what we will do to you in our fiction.


"This character sounds like me. He looks like me."


"I'm sure it's just coincidence."


"My name is Burt Smith. The character's name is Bert Smythe."


"Still. It's a… common name?"


"He shows up in Chapter Seven, then is promptly beaten to death by a pack of housewives with double dildos. One of them says something about child support. Then they pee on his corpse."


"Well, your ex-wife did write the book, Burt. Maybe you want to pay that money after all."


Spoilery Spoil Heads Are We

"That guy did it," we'll say, pointing to some character on the TV. Or we'll say, "She's going to shoot him… right now." Or, "No, you think she's a hooker, but actually, she's a he. And he's a space elf."


Sadly, we're usually right. We don't mean to me. It's not because we're smart. It's more because we're obsessives. We watch a metric butt-ton of films. We consume gallons of television. We read a billion books and a trillion comic books. We play video games till our fingers look like rotten kielbasa. We write this shit. For a living. We know the tricks. We know structure. We know about Chekov's gun and the bomb under the table and the act turns and the subtle-not-so-subtle clues. And we'll blurt them out uncontrollably. Probably because we're so goddamn needy.


We may be trying to impress you. Answer unclear, ask again later.


We won't spoil things we've already seen. Well, not unless we didn't like it.


"The unicorn killed her," we'll tell you.


You'll punch us in the shoulder but we always feel justified. As if it's not a spoiler if we think it sucks.


Man, we're jerks.


As Writers, We're Very Easily Distracte — Oooh Shiny!

When we're supposed to be writing, we're distracted by everything else: video games, the dogs, the vacuum cleaner, somebody else's book, our genitals, a loaded handgun.


When we're supposed to be doing something other than writing, we're distracted by the writing.


"Honey, can you put the keyboard aside and stop typing for a minute?"


"Fine. Fine. What is it, you chirping harridan?"


"Well, you've been writing for the last fifteen minutes and I'd rather you be doing that thing you're supposed to be doing? You know? Feeding the baby?" (Or, washing the clothes, driving the car, inserting the nuclear fuel rods into the containment unit, loading the handgun, etc.)


Our Stories Grow Like Viagra-Charged Erections

We are not only lying liars who lie, but we're also wanton embellishers — the narrative equivalent of someone who cannot stop bedazzling an otherwise boring denim jacket.


When we're telling a story, feign interest. Because that's how you get the truth out of us. If you start to drift off — you start going through the mail, you stare off at a distant nowhere point, rivulets of drool begin creeping down your chin — we will crank the volume knob on the story louder and louder until we regain your interest. "I was at the post office today," we'll start. "Man, the line was crazy."


"Nn-hnn," you'll say, paying only half attention.


Our eyes will narrow. We're suspicious. Okay. Fine. Fine. You want to play it that way? Done. "The guy in front of me smelled." This is true. This is part of the story. But then, we add: "He smelled like a corpse stuffed with a dozen Italian hoagies. He smelled like a dead guy exuding hoagie oil from his pores. I almost threw up." Ah. Ah-ha. Yes. We've started to hook you. You'll look up.


"Really?" you'll ask.


"Oh yeah. And then he was mauled by a bear."


"A bear."


"Yep. A Kodiak bear. Not a record-breaker or anything."


(We don't want to seem like we're embellishing, after all.)


"And where did this bear come from?"


Pause. "Uhhh. A hang-glider."


"He came down from a hang-glider."


"I took it too far, didn't I."


"Probably."


Of course, on the other side…


We Have Judged Your Story, And We Have Found It… Lacking

We wish the rest of the world would embellish. Everybody tells stories. We're just dicks about it because we think we're the experts. We're not. We're just bloviating gas-bags. (But don't tell us that.)


You'll finish up your five minute story: "… and then Jenkins gave the boss a look like, whatever, and he went back into his office. Then we all went to lunch."


"That's it?"


"What do you mean?"


"I mean, that's all you got? That's the story?"


You frown. "What the hell were you expecting?"


"I give that story a D-plus. C'mon. It had no third act turn. The escalation was mostly a flat line from zero to zero, and I didn't see a lick of character development. Jenkins didn't have any kind of catharsis. God. Couldn't you have thrown in a screaming porn star or a ninja or something?"


"You know, I don't think that's particularly fair –"


"A SCREAMING PORN STAR OR A NINJA OR YOU WILL GET THE HOSE."


See? Beware of writer.


The first "Beware Of Writer" post can be found here. That post is this blog's easily most popular, having gotten by now over 200,000 looky-loos by you, The Internet Public, and collecting 139 comments. Thanks, you crazy cats and kittens, for checking it out. If you like the post, spread the love.


 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 27, 2011 21:01

March 25, 2011

Sucker Punch: Lessons Learned

Sucker Punch is five kinds of awesome mixed with ten kinds of terrible.


More on that in a moment.


I had a gift card for a local movie theater, and I was sitting around reading reviews of the movie, and I thought, well, fuck it. I know the wife doesn't want to see it. I know I have two hours. And I know that if it's good, I'll want to have seen it in a theater, and if it's bad, well, I didn't pay shit for the ticket.


Two caveats:


First, if you saw and enjoyed Sucker Punch, don't let me poo poo on your parade. Let your freaky geeky flag fly and shout your love to the world. Please don't take anything I say as an insult.


Second, here there be spoilers. Light spoilers, very light, but spoilers just the same.


So, here we are.


The first five, ten minutes of the film are some of the most visually arresting five minutes I've seen in a movie in a long time, and they pack an emotional, erm, sucker punch. It's hyper-stylized and very sad, and I don't say it as an insult when I say it has the kind of kinetic power of some of David Fincher's music videos (Janie's Got A Gun, f'rex).


Unfortunately, the movie fails to really live up to the narrative oomph felt in the first act. The movie is about… 20 minutes of actual story, and a not-terrible story at that, crammed into a two-hour movie.


So, what fills the other two hours?


Masturbatory tech demos.


Zach Snyder is a fucking whup-ass director. The man makes visuals his squealing piggy. His work, as they say, has a real pretty mouth. The action scenes are cogent, too. They're clear. I know what's happening. They are elegantly choreographed and the effects will kick your teeth in.


The issue is, the action sequences mean nothing in terms of the narrative. No, really. They're pit-stops. Outright fantasies. The film has in effect three layers of "reality," ala Inception — first layer is the real world asylum, second layer is the fantasy brothel that stands in for the asylum, and the third layer are the various rabbit holes of action. (It's the best I can put it, sorry.) The first layer is one we see very, very little of. The second is the setpiece of the movie so it is more or less our "baseline." The third layer…


Well, that's where we get into troubled water. All the awesome shit you see in the commercial takes place in this third layer. Hyper-psycho action sequences painted in the ejaculations of geeks everywhere. But what happens in these layers has no bearing on the first or second layer. None. It's just… hot teen girls kicking ass for ten minutes. Doesn't matter if they get hurt (they don't). Doesn't make a lick of difference if they achieve their goal (and we're given no reason to believe they cannot achieve their goals because they are a stone's throw from immortal). There's not even a real strong metaphorical connection.


The action sequences, of which there are several, are without context, without meaning, and entirely without stakes. We learn nothing about the characters. We gain nothing in the story.


This makes these the most boring action sequences you have perhaps ever seen.


No, really. I found my mind wandering to grocery lists. Not kidding. Every once in a while I'd perk back up and nod toward some cool move — "Oh, that was neat" — before checking back out again.


What exists beyond these action sequences is where the movie lives, and it's not a bad movie. It is, at times, kind of awesome. Plus: Carla Gugino and Jena Malone! Mmm.


But again, we're talking 20, maybe 30 minutes of a two-hour flick.


Ultimately, that makes this a hot mess and something of a big disappointment, but since I was expecting it to be kind of awful, it actually came out somewhere in the "mmm, okay?" department.


Even still, I don't like to outright pan a film if I can't learn lessons from it. As a storyteller, you can learn as much from problem stories as you can from the best stories. Sometimes more.


So, three quick things I took away:


First: the school of cool has to stop. Just because something is awesome does not excuse its existence in the story. This movie offers a thousand darlings that should've been killed. It's like Snyder had some sort of epileptic fit where he swallowed his tongue and had a fantasy involving every fanboy trope known to man: steampunk clockwork nazi zombies mecha samurai katana handgun gatling gun dragons orcs sailor moon tiny skirts hot girls robots sci-fi fantasy horror zeppelins hookers jon hamm. At first appraisal, that sounds super-cool. In reality, it is a dude painting with an uncontrolled hand.


Second: we need to know the stakes. Stakes are incredibly important in storytelling. The audience needs to know, If X happens, Y will not. Or, if X doesn't happen, Y will fuck some shit up. We have to see potential consequence. We require want, need, fear, and the actions born of that. The action sequences that make up the bulk of the movie have no stakes. None. And that makes them very dull, indeed.


Third: context matters. In novel writing, you hear advice that says to start with a bang, like a movie. That's hard to pull off, and here's why: for an action scene to work, it has to be more than just action. It has to have context. We have to know our characters. We have to have, like above, stakes. We need some thread, some throughline, to carry us through and give the action meaning.


Is it a bad movie? No, probably not. Snyder can really direct and, when he has material to direct, it's incredible. Here, though, there's just not a lot of there there, as the saying goes. It's a bit too hollow, a bit too shallow, which ultimately starts to drain it of its fun. So much so it just gets tireless.


Though, again, your mileage may vary.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 25, 2011 11:55

Flash Fiction Challenge: The Portrait


Go visit last week's flash fiction challenge — BABY PULP! It's easily my favorite, so check out the stories.


Okay, so. See that photo?


When the wife and I were in San Francisco, we stopped in a kooky little antique store up near the Marina. It was truly eclectic, like many are, and particularly like many in the city of San Francisco are, and contained within were any number of strange delights and wonders. But then I found that portrait up there. Now, one suspects that the portrait — which clearly portrays a boy who is not, erm, precisely human — is Photoshopped and isn't actually a real antique. But let's be honest: that's not the most interesting interpretation of that story, is it?


So, your task is:


Write some flash fiction about that portrait. Will you write about the monster in the picture? Or the photographer? Or the poor couple who buys the portrait? Or some other unseen angle?


Is it real? Is it fake? Will you write horror? Humor? Urban fantasy? Noir? Some weird mish-mash of genres that remains unexpected? Fuck it, go nuts.


You have 1000 words. (Though next week's challenge? I'm giving you only 100.)


You have one week. (Next week's challenge, you get one day.)


As always, post the stories at your blogs. Link to the stories here in the comments. And, if you'd be so kind, link to here from somewhere within your own post.


Once more, you've got till next Friday morning.


Please to enjoy.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 25, 2011 03:44

March 23, 2011

Books Are The Tits

In fact, books are not only the tits, but it'd maybe be neat if tits were also books, because then in addition to playing with them, you could also read them.


No, I don't know what I'm talking about.


What I do know is this: I've had some good weeks of reading, and I know I've got good weeks coming up. First, I read Stephen Blackmoore's DEAD THINGS, which is a book you can't buy yet and will be available in… erm, 2012? But fuck it, you need to know about it now. It is urban crime fantasy that is brutal, bloody, and pretty damn hilarious. A very cinematic book, too. Opens with a bang, ends with… well, let's just go with a much bigger bang. It's got mages, ghosts, Santa Muerte, fire elementals, murder, Tasers, and snark.


Then I just read Joe Lansdale's DEVIL RED. Hap and Leonard, the two protagonists, are the clown princes of moral darkness. If you haven't read any Hap and Leonard, well, what the hell is wrong with you? Do you hate fun? Are you allergic to good books? C'mon. Go grab SAVAGE SEASON and read the — what's he got, now? Ten books about those two good ol' boys? Hap is kind of a… what, a liberal softie who can't help but be a bad-ass, and Leonard is his gay black vet buddy who breaks even worse bad on folks and is twice as funny as any other protagonist you've read. DEVIL RED, like VANILLA RIDE, gets back to the darker heart of these two characters. Funny. Sad. Violent as fuck.


Then, after that, I'll soon get to read the newest from Robert McCammon: THE FIVE. Been eager to read this for a long time, since it's his first horror book in a good while. McCammon, if you don't know, is my favorite writer. If you tell me you haven't read anything of his, beware. I may push you down some steps.


Anyway. I like sites like Goodreads well enough, but I never really use or explore the site to its maximum — social networks with such specificity are very cool, but they sometimes lack in context.


So, here we are. And here I am, asking you: what are you reading right now? Are you digging it? Or, what did you just finish reading? Give recommendations if you care to. Let's talk the books that currently exist in your ecosystem. Fiction, non-fiction, whatever. Hell, if you're reading something self-published or "indie," share that, too. Anything you got, we want to know about it.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 23, 2011 21:01

March 22, 2011

Revisiting The Culinary Canon

Yesterday, I made the kind of hamburgers that, upon tasting them, made a happy wet spot in the front of my trousers. It was as if I had shaved flesh from the thigh of a chubby angel and gently seared it on my Weber grill. That told me, "Okay. Nailed it. You have your hamburger recipe. It's time to move on."


Couple weeks back, I said to you crazy kids, "food me." (That is not meant to sound salacious, in a R-rated movie on FX or AMC where they replaced all instances of the word 'fuck' with 'food,' as in, 'Yippie-Kay-Ay, Motherfooder way.) I said, with my family growing by one here in the next few months, it's going to be important to have a bunch of recipes nailed down to my preferences rather than be some kind of home cook gourmet dilettante prancing around the kitchen with a bottle of liquid nitrogen and a mortician's rubber apron. Though, to be clear, I look fucking hot in a rubber apron.


I said, "Hey, I need to figure out this family's culinary canon." Just as everyone has family recipes — "This is Grammaw's Barbecue Tree Grub Salsa! With picante horse scrotum!" — I too want to start getting down the so-called ultimate versions of certain recipes for here in Der Wendighaus before the heir to Der Wendighaus shows up and pitches a spanner into the gears.


You folks leapt to the fore.


You threw a major mega-awesome heapful of recipes into the pot.


You can find those magnificent recipes here.


But no, I'm not done.


I still need more. More. MOAR.


(Hey, sorry. I'm needy. Deal with it.)


Here's the deal, then. I've nailed down a bunch of recipes now that I'm pretty comfortable with. I've got burgers down. I'm good with mac and cheese, papaya salad, prime rib, chili, sloppy Joes. I can make eggs that'll jump up off the plate and kick your teeth in. I've got a canon forming.


But, as noted, I need more.


I'm looking to nail down recipes for the following (in no particular order):



Meatloaf.
Fried chicken.
Beef stew.
Mashed potatoes.
Potato salad.
Spaghetti sauce.
Chicken and dumplings.
Chocolate chip cookies.
Chicken noodle soup.
Brownies.
Pierogies.
Korma (chicken, lamb, whatever).
Thai curry (red, yellow, green, whatever).

I'm not necessarily asking for recipes. Should you have a recipe for one or several of these that you care to share, suh-weet. Feel free to drop into comments, point me to a link, or even write it to me via email. But what I'm also looking for is just… any little tidbits of information you have about these dishes that you feel is critical. An ingredient, maybe — "I thicken my mashed potatoes with an eyedropper full of milk from a witch's nipple." A technique, perhaps. "I bake my brownies in a used jockstrap to give them that humid, swampy stink of a football player's salty nether-quarters. Can you say Umami?"


See, you gotta understand, I'm not trying to make my mother's recipes. I'm not trying to make your recipes. I'm trying to make my recipes. I grab from here, I steal from there, and I experiment until I get the recipe I want. Then, I laser-engrave it into my brain. With an actual laser. It hurts a lot. I think I damaged my cerebral cortex. Whenever the dishwasher kicks on, I pee myself and do a little dance. Damn lasers.


Oh! If you want that burger recipe, it's taken mostly from the Weber grill app. It's pretty easy:


Pound and a half of 80/20 ground beef. Mix in a li'l dollop of ketchup, mustard, Worchestershire sauce, Frank's hot sauce. Mix in a dash of salt, pepper, oregano, chili powder, thyme. Form into patties. Divot with a spoon. Cook on the grill for four minutes per side, toward the very end, pile on top a little cairn of grated Gouda cheese, let melt with the grill closed. Made the juiciest, most flavorful burger I've ever made.


It is the bee's tits, that burger.


Anyway.


If you add anything into the culinary canon of the Wendighaus cookbook, whether it's a recipe, an ingredient, a tip, a trick, a marriage proposal, a hate-filled rant, or a doodle of a pair of boobies, I'll take it and offer a quivering Jell-O mold of gratitude.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 22, 2011 21:01

March 21, 2011

Jumpstarting A Stalled Novel


You whip the old nag with a coat hanger.


"Move, you dang horse!" you shout, frothing over with piss and vinegar. You kick it. You pitch pebbles at its head. You hook cables to a car battery and stick 'em up its equine nether quarters and jam some voltage deep into the beast. And still it doth not move. Not a whinny. Not a tail-flick. You nicker at it. You pull your hair. You mumble something about this is why cars replaced you dipshits. You give up and stomp off.


Are you done? With your little poopy-pants hissy-shit-fit over there?


First, that's not a horse. It's not even a dead horse. It's just a bundle of old blankets. You're embarrassing yourself. Everyone can see what you're doing. Plus, your underwear is showing. Tighty-whiteys? Really? With your name and the day of the week stitched in the hemming? For shame.


Second, that bundle of old blankets is a stand-in for something else. Come on, don't lie. You're a desperate novelist (or screenwriter or transmedia cyborg) and that heap of smelly fabric is a representation — a living emblem — of your stalled-out story. The old nag just won't move and you think, "Well, you can just nuzzle my turgid teat, you stubborn old coot of a tale." You lay blame upon it, heaping sins atop the pile the way they used to fill up old goats with present sins. But it's not the story's fault. It's your fault. The story doesn't exist outside you. Your characters don't do things you don't want despite what so many writers will tell you. It's all you. That hill of nasty blankets will only move if you pick them up and move them. It's your story. You have authorial agency.


Your story has stalled out because you stalled out. You are the reason that yet another unfinished novel will get shoved into the teetering tower of forgotten stories, reverse-Jenga-style.


And I'm here to jumpstart your heart-shaped derriere and shove your brain back into the game.


Your manuscript needs a cranked-up jolt of adrenalin. For that, I got a buncha tips to jam into your aorta. The first bunch is all about you as a writer and changing your habits. The second batch is about things you can do inside the story to kick free the story scree and get the whole thing moving again.


Think of this as a narrative laxative.


Flip It, Switch It

Sometimes, our brains get vaporlock. We're idiots, us writers. A gaggle — nay, a mighty parliament — of OCD assholes. A handful of "stupid writer tricks" will go a long way into fooling yourself into overcoming your own tangled web of foolish fuck-brained folly. Here's one: make a change as to your writing habits. Maybe for a day. Maybe for a week. Do you normally write in your office? Go write at the dining room table. Or at a Starbucks. Or at a Hungarian bathhouse. Do you write in the morning? Write at night. If you write on a laptop, switch to a desktop, or an iPad, or write a chapter long-hand. Sometimes, jostling your habits shakes loose some of the bad juju that's gumming up the novel.


Discover Your Incubation Chamber

I have three primary incubation chambers: the shower, the lawn-mower, and outside taking a walk. No, these are not the places that I secretly masturbate. Sure, you could diddle your happy buttons on a riding mower, but dang, man, I have a push mower. Plus, I don't need the squirrels judging me. No, an incubation chamber is my fancy made-up term for "a place you go or a practice you undertake where you can zone out and think." In other words, you need to find time to let the story incubate. Take time. Bandy some shit around. Play the "what if?" game. "What if my protagonist became his own grandfather and then committed suicide inside Hitler's bunker?" A good place to incubate stories? Right before bed. Set your brain like a slow-cooker. Introduce a problem or question, then go to sleep. Low and slow like beef brisket, bitches.


No Author Is An Island, Dumbass

Don't internalize. Contact somebody. Call 'em. Write 'em. Just have a chat to discuss. Creativity lives on agitation. Call up a writer buddy and tell her the problem and see if you can't work through it. Doesn't have to be a writer, either. Any conversation can free it. Surely you have friends? You're not just some mournful cave troll, right? Who do you normally call with your problems? If you were to call somebody and say, "Hey, okay, so. Ahhh, here's the deal. I have four dead strippers. I am goosed to the nines on mescaline. This isn't my shirt. And I think I'm on the Disneyworld monorail. What do I do?" — who would that person be? Identify them. Whoever it is that would help you with four stripper corpses is also the same person who can help you talk through your novel's plot problems. Frankly, put that dude on your payroll, but quick.


A Little Dab Will Do You

Dear sweet chemical intervention. Hey, I'm not advocating illicit substances, but I do think that sometimes a mildly modified state of perception can be a win for a writer. It can be the machete to cut down through all the built-up bullshit inside your story. Caffeine is good to get the pistons firing. Liquor is good not necessarily during writing, but I'm not averse to a little responsible drinking after-hours where you can jot some notes down in a notebook or puzzle out some story problems in conversation with a buddy while under the influence of some adult beverages. Exercising releases other powerful chemicals, too, which can be good. Maybe take a little St. John's Wort? Or eat a piece of chocolate for Chrissakes. Just a little stimulant. Bzzt. Zzzzt. Zap. No meth, though. I mean, seriously. You ever see a meth-head? Ghouls.


Write A Masturbatory Love Letter

You loved this idea once upon a time. You adored the book. I know you did, because we made fun of you on the playground. "You and the novel, sittin' in the tree. H-A-N-D-J-O-B. First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes the Tijuana donkey show." I think that's how the rhyme goes. Anyway. This sounds super stupid, but bear with me: you need to fall back in love with the novel again. Write a letter. Or an email. Or a goddamn postcard, I don't care. Start reminding yourself the things you loved about this book. Jot down why you wanted to write the thing in the first goddamn place. Surprise, surprise: you'll find old reasons, yes, but you'll discover some new reasons to love it all over again.


Envision The Cover

This? The epitome of shallow, but fuck it. I know, blah blah blah, you're writing the book because you love the story, but sometimes you can't help but look forward and get geeked while imagining some silly future shit. "On my wedding day, angels will descend from heaven and bring with them seven harpsichords." "When my son is born, a wise shaman baboon will proclaim him the chosen one to rule the jungle." "The first time I have sex, the hooker I nail will have two vaginas, and one of those vaginas will dispense chocolate coins." So, hey, if what gets you going is looking forward and thinking, "Man, this book is going to look bitching on the shelves at Your Favorite Indie Bookstore," then do that.


Boom Goes The Dynamite

Blow something up. (In the story.) Plunge the plunger. Light the fuse. Stephen King did this in The Stand, by the way, to jump start that stalled novel. He couldn't quite figure out how to move the story forward and felt that the characters were… well, lost. So, in the second act he blew up the Free Zone with dynamite. Now, you don't need to rely on an actual explosion in the text. "Explosion" is just another way of saying "Some properly dramatic shit that shakes everything up." A murder. A breakup. The assassination of Santa Claus. The next Biblical deluge. The appearance of a cyborg orangutan from the future.


Feng Shui That Motherfucker

Feng Shui is probably bullshit. "This room has no flow. The chi is getting all gummed up in my heating vents. I need a mirror on that wall. I need something red on the opposing wall. In the corner? A duck carved from lava rock. In the other corner? Tom Arnold. And from the ceiling fan we must hang ribbons woven of my own chest hair and dyed with the blood of the infidel." Still, there's something there that's altogether less mystical. "Hey, the arrangement of this room isn't right; things feel off." That can happen in the novel. So, rearrange some stuff. Start the novel at a different point. Change the flow. Move the timeline around — Chapter 5 is now Chapter 2. May require a little rewriting to bridge it, but just some minor rearrangement can feel productive. Rewriting and readjustment can be good voodoo.


Flip It, Switch It: Part II: Revenge Of The Switch-Faced Flippenator

Another flip, another switch. Change the point-of-view. Change the tense. Maybe you're writing in third-person but it feels like you'd write it more easily in the first. Or, could be that writing past-tense isn't as urgent as what you'd get out of the present. Yeah, sure, this requires rewriting, but, uhh, shut up. Nobody said this shit wasn't work. Look at it this way: sometimes you gotta break something to fix something.


Turn Left And Take A Narrative Day Trip

Deviate. Deviate big. Start writing in a different direction. Pick a new character to follow. Explore some untold aspect of the storyworld. Create a sub-plot out of thin air involving submarines and the Christmas gifting habits of human-squid hybrids. See that door ahead? Forget it. Turn left and kick a hole in the wall. Walk through that. No, you may not use this stuff. Or maybe it'll open up the novel in the same way that knocking down a wall in your house might open up a room. You gotta try something.


Shut Up And Put Your Back Into It

Alternately, if none of the above crap works, just shut up and do the time. Write through it. Flail about like a beached carp on your keyboard. Vomit words. Make shit up. Spasm. Smash together sentences with the grace and aplomb of a drunken moose. Writing isn't magic. The end result may feel that way, but it's just putting one word in front of the other. Do that until you feel the novel find its groove. It'll happen. I swear. You might even go back and look at those vibrating word-spasms and think, "That was actually better than I thought. I expected literature on par with the holy books penned by a tribe of trilobites, but this is at least on the level of what a headless chicken could manage if you stuck a fountain pen in his neck stump." There's this feeling in exercise where you hit the wall but then, if you keep pushing past it, you suddenly get a surge of go-juice again. This is like that. Keep writing until you're out of the dark and into the light.


Oh, and stop whining about it.


Howabout you, word nerds? What tricks do you use to fool your brain into lubricating the arthritic joints of that sluggish nag you call a manuscript? Share and share alike.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 21, 2011 21:01

March 20, 2011

The Care And Feeding Of Your Favorite Authors

Mmm. The $0.99 e-book kerfuffle continues, and continues. And also: continues.


Some required reading, before I yammer.


Zoe Winters asks, "Does low-balling attract the wrong kind of reader?"


Cat Valente points out that if you're willing to plunk down $5.99 for a latte, you should be willing to shell out more than a piddly buck on an e-published novel.


And finally, sticking the landing, Scalzi makes the electronic publishing BINGO card.


Go on. Go, read those.


I'll wait.


Back already? Excellent. Here, have a cookie and a coconut water.


So. Do I think that, at its core, a buck is too cheap for novel-length fiction? I do.


Do I think that self-publishers saw the larger prices put forth by big publishers and decided to counterbalance too dramatically with a race-to-the-bottom price? I do.


Do I think that $0.99 represents something of a slippery slope for book values? Do I think readers are accustomed to, even in the cheapest used book format, paying more than a buck for fiction? Do I think that publishing is a totally different ball-game than the music industry and that ultimately you can't compare the two meaningfully in part because musicians have other ways of earning out while writers have only one, which is the value of their words, and nobody long-term can sustain bottoming-out story values? Do I think that alpacas are part of a giant fuzzy-headed pyramid scheme?


I do.


But that's not what I'm talking about.


Really, this is inside baseball. I'm sure readers at some level are aware of this and have an opinion, but the larger readership does not yet understand it. My mother doesn't know about it, and my mother is a voracious reader. None of the authors she reads price their books like that. Frankly, they may never. Will we start to see Jodi Picoult and Stephen King throwing around $0.99 e-books? I'm not sold on that.


What this is about is that it's hard out there for a pimp writer.


I don't have stats, but from what I can tell, it's getting harder to make a living as a writer. The money is down. The work isn't there. Part of it is the recession, but it goes deeper: the Internet democritized content and creation but it also softened the value of that content. Maybe it's a supply and demand thing. The marketplace is flooded with storytellers. At this point we're like wandering troubadours. We swarm your town. You throw us your bread-scraps and we move on. Maybe it's an illusion. Maybe we're all floating around on yachts and I just didn't realize it.


It may be true that you consider a dollar a reasonable price point for fiction. It may be true that you don't feel any responsibility to the marketplace now or in the future.


But hopefully, it's not true that you don't care about authors. Authors are awesome. Batshit crazy, maybe. Functional alcoholics, most certainly. But they're fulfilling a critical task that mankind has needed filled since forever: they're telling stories. And that's some pretty nifty shit.


Here's what I'm exhorting. I'm asking that you take care of your authors. Think of them, perhaps, as little whisky-guzzling Tamagotchi. They require care and feeding lest they wither and die in a cubicle farm.


If you find an author you like, support them.


What does this mean?


It means, if they have other books? Buy 'em. Now. Right away. It means, get on social media and say, "Hey, this book, this author? Some hot shit right here." Ultimately, it means you're spreading the word and trying to keep it so that they can buy things like food and mortgages and Bourbon. See an author at a con? Buy him a drink. Does the author have a Cafepress store? Buy something from it. Or donate on his donate button. Become a fan. Expect good storytelling in return. This is doubly true if you're buying books at a bottom-dollar price. You do that and you like what you got out of the deal, then it's up to you to make sure they don't starve in a gutter somewhere while wasting away from a Bourbonless life tuberculosis.


Writers are part of your creative ecosystem. Don't damage that ecosystem. Give back to it. I know that writers need you. I hope that it turns out that you need writers, too.


This has been a public service announcement from the Bourbon Distilleries of America.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 20, 2011 21:01

March 18, 2011

Flash Fiction Challenge: Baby Pulp

And we're back.


Once again, with last week's challenge (The Hotel), you crazy emmereffers came out of the woodwork and did up some amazingly cool stuff. And, once again, it's time to re-up the stash. I mean, re-up the flash fiction challenge. Ready for another go?


Okay, so, as you may know, the wife and I are expecting our first progeny — Der Wendigspawn — in the next few months. Which means my life has become suddenly and swiftly baby-focused. Everything is crib-nursery-Pooh-poo-bottle-milk-breast-how-many-centimeters-dilated-diaper-Nuk-Bjorn-Boppy-headasplode. On this subject I've been commiserating with fellow expectant father-dude, Anthony "Pulptone" Schiavino. We half-joke that, come summer, people are going to see us online at 3AM, drunk, delirious, feeding our respective infants. We will be the protagonists in some crazy baby-related stories.


Then, he said this:


"…there needs to be flash fiction pulp based around babies. Lord only knows what people would come up with."


Oh, snap.


And a flash fiction challenge was born.


Your challenge, should you choose to accept it:


BABY PULP FLASH FICTION.


It must be baby-centered.


It must be pulp. Pulp is, of course, a kind of lurid, cheap, fastly-produced genre fiction. Men's Adventure! Noir! Space opera! Superhero! Detective! And so on, and so forth. So, in other words: baby noir! Baby superhero! Baby space opera! Baby adventure! Detective baby!


Baby Pulp.


And that's it.


Please, no porny baby stories. I just — I mean — c'mon, no. These tales don't need to be in good taste, but I don't want any visits from PedoBear, you hear me?


Once again, you have 1000 words.


You have one week.


Post at your own blogs, drop a link in your blog to here, and drop a link to your blogged fiction in the comments below. Then at the end of the week I'll tally it all up right here in this post.


Now get that pacifier out of your mouth. It's time to fill the flash fiction diapers.


BOOM.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 18, 2011 04:11

March 17, 2011

"Sequelitis" (A Visit From The Mighty Russel D. McLean)


Ladies and gentlemen,


I am not Chuck Wendig.


Chuck Wendig is in this box here [points to large wooden box wrapped in chains. The box shifts as though something is struggling to get out]. But don't worry. I've left him a couple of airholes.


I think.


Anyway, my name is Russel D McLean. If you have any trouble understanding me, don't worry. That's because I'm Scottish. I'm also a writer – author of two noir novels, the second of which, THE LOST SISTER, has just been released upon your United States. In celebration I'm doing a series of invasions of other author's blogs in a manic attempt to shill… uh, I mean spread the beautiful word.


Anyway, while Chuck's locked away I figured I'd talk a little about sequels. Because, ya know, the new book is kind of a sequel (or at least the second in a sequence that started with THE GOOD SON) and I found myself thinking a lot about what that meant.


A sequel has to achieve a lot of stuff. It has to pull in new readers while pleasing old ones. It has to remain true to established facts while giving something new. It has to stand on its own and yet acknowledge the past.


It has to do something different.


Oh, yes. That's the one that most people forget. While it's considered the safe action to rehash old glories – see National Treasure 2, The Mummy 2 etc etc – what you wind up doing is boring people. Because while people think they want the same experience, what the really need is that same sense of excitement and unpredictability they got the first time round. It's just tougher to put that into words than it is to say, "more of the same please".


Why is THE GODFATHER PART II considered a perfect sequel? It expands upon and gives new life and new perspective on the first movie while still telling its own perfectly logical narrative. You could see GFII on its own, conceivably, and catch up to this world without having seen the original. Sure, some of the grandeur would be lost, but you wouldn't be so confused as to throw the movie away and then batter your head against a brick wall until your brains dribbled out your ears.


Sequels.


They're tough.


And not just when it comes to movies.


With THE LOST SISTER – which is a novel, not a movie* – I wanted to tell two stories. First there is the story that stands on its own. The one about the missing girl. Mary Furst, a girl who has no apparent reason to run away, is missing. There are questions about her disappearance, facts that don't add up. As Our Hero – J McNee – digs into her life, he uncovers some very uncomfortable truths.


That's my A story. And sure it could have been enough to hold the book by itself. After all, we established our hero in book 1 and if you want, you can keep a series character static. Many people enjoy that kind of thing. Some writers do it wonderfully. Robert B Parker kept Spencer is stasis for decades. Lee Child rarely changes Reacher or gives us any more about him than we need to know.


But I'm not that kind of writer. I need to let my characters change. Be affected by events. So THE LOST SISTER became a chance for me to explore my central character and find more about what makes him tick. I wanted him to confront some of his own choices over the course of the book, to see things in the case that made him question his own ideals and motivations. I wanted there to be something different in his outlook by the end of the book. In short, I wanted to tell a different kind of story with the same characters. Because otherwise… what's the point? It's like eating lukewarm leftovers. There's something in there you recognise, but really it's not the same.


I also wanted to explore the supporting cast and to see how they reacted in different situations. People I hadn't expected to see again. Susan Bright, for example, who was supposed to be a throwaway character in THE GOOD SON and became something far more important. And David Burns, local "businessman" who is one of my favourite characters to write for: a man who does bad things for what he believes to be all the right reasons.


THE LOST SISTER changes all of these characters by the end of the book. Not all of them get to "learn" from their experiences, of course. I think we're all lucky that I'm not God. Because as cruel as He can (allegedly) be, I think I'd be even worse in charge, winding folks up just see how they'd react. But then that's the job of a writer – wind those characters up and watch them go!


Word so far on THE LOST SISTER – both at home and now in the US – has been positive. I like to think that it's a good sequel, that it does more than rehash former glories, that it changes things for our characters, that it presents with new challenges and new situations. I'll tell you what, I had a bloody ball writing it.


The Lost Sister is out now from St Martin's/Minotaur as shiny hardcover or e-book.


*At least, not yet, if any prospective producers out there are listening…


– THE LOST SISTER at Amazon, and B&N


Russel D. McLean is an author, reviewer and general miscreant from Dundee, Scotland. You can read more about him here, at his website and author page. Click the pic to follow him on Twitter.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 17, 2011 09:00