Ted A. Roberts's Blog, page 5

FREE KINDLE EBOOK GIVEAWAY!!

Starting tomorrow, July 27th (or, at midnight tonight), I will be hosting a FREE Kindle Ebook giveaway for my first book in the 'Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Teaching Series,' which is called: "Brotherly Love: The Gospel of Jesus Christ." If you haven't had an opportunity to read this book yet, I highly encourage you to do so. This promotion will only last five days (ending on the 31st of this month), so don't hesitate! ... Oh, and if you like what you read, drop me a line and let me know!

Also, if you desire more information on this book, please visit its official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/broth...

Thanks, Ted Roberts; Author of:
'Brotherly Love: The Gospel of Jesus Christ;'
'Blaming God! Is It Really His Fault?;' and
'In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start.

New book now available for purchase!

'In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual from the Very Start' is now available for purchase at my official sales webpage: https://www.createspace.com/7341125

Here is the book description: The main purpose of this book is to not only point out that there are indeed metaphoric teachings within the Christian Bible, but to also show how we can actually trace these said metaphors right to the very beginning of time! Since the topic of metaphoric understandings will also be covered in two other books (in this three part topic within the Seeking the Everlasting Gospel teaching series − see page 4), the 'beginning' will only be spoken on here, to show folks that this extraordinary idea can certainly be traced back a long, long way; especially since some people feel that metaphors, idioms, parables, and all such like similitude's, may have only come briefly into existence during the early church period − if at all! Or, if some folks have already figured that those things were in there to begin with, their thoughts will simply be strengthened. Finally, it'll be pointed out, along with other ideas, the differences of both the natural and the spiritual camps of understanding of the Written Word of God. And, again, that will be accomplished by talking about the Beginning...

About the author:
Ted Roberts has not only sat under an extremely gifted ministry during his youth, but he has also been studying the Written Word of God, along with History, for the past 30 years. Wishing to search, meditate on, and examine the Written Word as much as possible, and as in-depth as possible (along with historical documentations that actually complement the Divine Text) the author's wish is that he can please his Lord in the quest of helping others to understand the richness of God's vast repertoire, and to help people travel the road that the Apostle Paul explains as thus: Ephesians 3:17-19 That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God.

For more information, and to read the first three chapters, please visit 'In the Beginning's' official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

New Book Is Almost Here!

Hey, friends! I just wanted to let everybody know that we are approaching the day for the launching of my new book: "In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start ... The Spiritual Side of Creation, Part 1." I've actually ordered my proof copy today, and it should arrive in the mail by next week. Once I look it over and approve it, then it immediately will be put up for sale. For more information on the book, and to be able to read some sample chapters, please visit my book's official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

Chapter 3: The Old Testament's Reliability, and the Vision of the Allegorical Tabernacle in the Wilderness...From 'In the Beginning'

Chapter 3: The Old Testament's Reliability, and the Vision of the Allegorical Tabernacle in the Wilderness ... from ‘In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start - The Spiritual Side of Creation, Part I.’ An upcoming Christian, Theological Book, by Ted Roberts, concerning Idioms, Metaphors, Parables, Similitude's, and Allegories, which can be traced all the way to the very beginning of time! And, of which, we can see our own salvation’s plan within . . . Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Ministries, Houston, TX, Digging Scriptures for Truth, ©copyright 2017 by Ted Roberts www.seekingthegospel.com

At this time, I feel that it's essential to discuss a modern scholastic problem (which a lot of folks are having these days) in that they are believing the Old Testament isn't really for a New Testament church. After all, it's only written for and meant for the Hebraic peoples of long, long ago − so, what possible use could it serve us in this modern age? I do believe that this is a necessary road to travel if we are to take any messages in the Old Testament seriously − especially if we can but consider any of them helpful for our salvation.

What we must realize is that there is really only ONE Testament of God and not two. It's simply the 'Testament of God.' It is divided, however, into two separate camps of thoughts and lifestyles. One camp we will call "natural understandings" and "natural prophetic fulfillment." The second camp we will call "spiritual understandings" and "spiritual prophetic fulfillment." And yet, we will find the natural and spiritual explanations and understandings in both of what we call the New and the Old Testaments, simply because they really are one and the same. What is referred to as the New Testament today is merely a flashlight that shines onto the 'spiritual' understandings that are hidden within the Old. In fact, you won't find any new teachings within the New that wasn't already written and expressed in the Old: it's just that the New Testament digs up things that a lot of folks didn't (and, sometimes, still don't) know is there in the Old. Even some of the Old Testament folks themselves didn't always see them – such as in Daniel 12:8-9 and Colossians 1:26.*19 And it took Jesus and His disciples (including Paul) to show the world the hidden messages that were locked away in the Old . . . So, to sum up this entire thought, I'll say this: The Old Testament, in definitive terms, is the observance (in seeing, understanding), in living (experiencing), and in worshiping (bodily) of God through naturalistic means; and, the New Testament, in definitive terms, is the observance (again, in seeing, understanding), and in living (experiencing) of God through spiritual means – which has no dealings with the fleshly world, at all, in either our carnal senses, or in the practice of worship rituals which deal with the natural body on any level whatever.*20

I know that this reasoning may seem absurd to a lot of folks (even to those who have read their Bibles for many years), but when viewed with an open mind, we will be able to see that the idea of the Old Testament (in its natural interpretations, practices and renderings), can be very open and plain for all the world to see and understand − similar, in fact, to the showbread that was lain upon the table in the first compartment of the Tabernacle in the Wilderness . . . And, yes, I am referring to that Tabernacle/Temple/Tent which, in the days of Moses and Aaron, was constructed during their wilderness sojourning before they ever arrived at the Promised Land, and that we can read extreme details of in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, in which the actual Tabernacle was both being constructed and used. As we shall see, during this chapter, Paul actually compares this Tabernacle allegorically (and, specifically, concerning the two very important compartments [rooms] that were within this Tent), to the two Testaments/ Covenants of God with His people.

Again, the bread on the table, in the first compartment of the Tabernacle, was lain bare, to where any priest could come in and see it, and partake of it. Which bread, by the way, actually decayed after a week's time.*21 But, the other bread (the hidden understandings, metaphorically speaking) were placed within the second compartment − called the Holy of Holies − and inside the Ark of the Covenant, to where only the high priest alone, and only once a year, could come into that section. But, being hidden away inside the Ark, as that bread was, the priest, who entered thereunto once a year, never did see it or eat it – especially considering the fact that it wouldn't even be available to eat (again, allegorically speaking) until the New Testament would finally commence on the Day of Pentecost . . . That hidden bread − i.e. that 'hidden manna' − which, as I've said, was inside of the Ark (inside the golden pot within*22), actually represented the 'true' bread (the 'Living' Word of God), which contains the effects of eternal life.

Please understand, I am highly spiritualizing this bread for us today. The bread (in the Tabernacle in the Wilderness) that was both placed onto the table, in the first compartment, and the bread which was placed inside the golden pot (which, in turn, was placed into the Ark of the Covenant), in the second compartment, were actual, small loaves of bread. Of course, the bread on the table had to be replaced weekly, but the bread in the Ark never had to be replaced, because it never rotted. What has become of this bread now, God only knows! It may still be stuck inside the Ark for all we know, wherever that's located, or God may have already allowed it to decay since it had served its purpose all those years ago. At this day and time it really doesn't matter, because we are to focus, instead, on the 'spiritually understood' bread that these actual loaves merely represented. Therefore, the literal, natural loaves are now irrelevant; for, it's, again, the understanding of what they represented that should concern us now . . . Jesus compared Himself (that is, His body) to the bread inside the Ark – offering it for the people to actually eat.*23 And, so, therefore, eating His body today, as we should know, is done by eating the Word of God – yet, not literally. That is, by allowing it to not only become a part of us (in taking over our minds through deep meditation upon the Word – which, in turn, should change us on how we live our everyday lives), but also by allowing the Holy Spirit to bring the Word to life for us [turning it into the Living Word] in clearer understandings of what God's trying to convey to His children as it instructs them on how to love one another in a much better way than what mere flesh (i.e. the mind and spirit of man) can demonstrate; which, then, brings upon them eternal life.

1 John 3:14
We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.

Friends, that's what all this is about! This is why I begun this entire 'Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Teaching Series,' in my first book, on explaining all the ins and outs of brotherly love, because it's the very Gospel of Jesus Christ; and, it's what will raise us from death unto life.

Proverbs 13:13
Whoso despiseth the word [i.e. the Word of God] shall be destroyed: but he that feareth the commandment [again, the Word of God] shall be rewarded.

John 12:50a
And I know that his commandment [again, the Word of God] is life everlasting...

John 15:12
This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.

Galatians 5:14
For all the law is fulfilled in ONE WORD [i.e. the Word of God], even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

This is eating the true Bread of Life . . . Also, it shouldn't seem a strange thing that I'm making metaphorical comparisons to the Tabernacle in the Wilderness to the Testaments/Covenants of God, for Paul himself does the very same thing in Hebrews chapter 9. In fact, in the very last verse of chapter 8, Paul makes it clear as to why he is even going to be covering this Tabernacle in the next chapter:

Hebrews 8:13
In that he saith, A new covenant [Testament], he hath made the first old [i.e. Old Testament Covenant]. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away [making way for the New].

Then, immediately, in chapter 9 (the very next verse), and as a follow-up, he begins covering the Tabernacle:

Hebrews 9:1-3
Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary. For there was a tabernacle made; the first [compartment; metaphorically the Old Covenant/Testament], wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. And after the second veil, the tabernacle [the second compartment; metaphorically the New Covenant/ Testament] which is called the Holiest of all.

I do not believe that it was a coincidence that Paul was speaking on the Covenants (or, and much rather, the Testaments) when also speaking on the Tabernacle that Moses pitched in the wilderness. Surely, we know that there has been two Covenants, just as there are two Testaments, right? Let's see when the first ceased:

Hebrews 9:16-17
For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Here, we are given the exact time of when the first Covenant (or, Testament) had ended. That is, Jesus, the Living Testator (i.e. the Living Testament), ended the first Covenant and Testament with His passing on the cross. We must realize, then, that the second had to come into play soon afterwards. In fact, our best candidate for the right day (as I've mentioned) would be the Day of Pentecost. But, if this is the case, then it raises more questions, such as: If the first Covenant (or, Testament) ended with Jesus dying on the cross, then why do I say that there is no separation of Old and New Testaments? For, surely, His death made a separation of the Old and New. I'm saying this because the relevant messages of the Old Testament – i.e. the messages which primarily concern and effect Christians since the Day of Pentecost, all the way down to us today – had actually changed into 'spiritually understood' messages, whereas it once was only 'naturally understood' for the Old Testament folks; because, that (i.e. the naturally understood passages) is what effected and concerned them in their day and time. Therefore, the scriptural words themselves were the exact same for them as it is for us! It's certainly separated on that score, but are still one and the same because the words, as I've said, are the same words. God had taken the very same text, and unearthed (if I may so say it that way) the hidden meanings that were buried within, and revealed them by revelation through His Son Jesus, and His Son's disciples − the Apostles – for a New Testament audience. Therefore, the separation, if we find one (and, yes, I really do believe that there is one), is demonstrated in this sense. That's what makes it two-fold, in the fact that from the same manual we can get both natural and spiritual meanings*24 . . . Now, going back to Hebrews 9:1-3, we see a very good spiritual (or, rather metaphorical) picture of God's Covenants/ Testaments in play, and by Him using the Tabernacle for the illustration of them. The first compartment (which I am using, metaphorically, as the first Covenant − or, first Testament − had (amongst the candlestick and alter of incense) the table with the showbread lain upon. Now, let's think about that for a moment. Why was it called Showbread? Believe it or not, that's a subject that has much debate about it. A lot of scholars contend that the original meaning was that it simply meant "Bread of Presence," since it was laid out before the Lord, for God to see it. Albert Barnes, in his Notes on the Bible, says this:

"The Hebrew phrase rendered “show-bread” means properly “bread of faces,” or “bread of presence.” The Septuagint renders it "artous enōpious" - foreplaced loaves. In the New Testament it is "hē prothesis tōn artōn" - “the placing of bread;” and in Symmachus, “bread of proposition,” or placing. Why it was called “bread of presence” has been a subject on which expositors have been much divided. Some have held that it was because it was “before,” or in the presence of the symbol of the divine presence in the tabernacle, though in another department; some that it was because it was set there to be seen by people, rather than to be seen by God..."

As for what I see in the scriptures, I am more inclined to believe the latter thoughts on this; namely, that the bread was set there to be seen by the people, rather than by God – of whom the bread was in the continual presence of anyways. But, why do I say this? Well, as we can see in that this bread decayed once a week, it really represented what is temporal and natural, whereas the bread that was in the second compartment [the Holiest of all], and inside of the Ark of the Covenant (which, as we've seen, never did rot, nor decay), it therefore represented that which is eternal . . . For further study on the hidden manna, please read Exodus 16:31-35; but, especially in 16:32b, where it says: "Fill an omer of it [manna/bread] to be kept for your generations; that they may see the bread wherewith I have fed you in the wilderness." The only way that they could see it, after all those years, is if it didn't decay . . . So, then, the bread in Covenant [or, Testament] number one was only natural, and did decay after a short time. It was the 'showbread' that could (and still can) be seen and understood by just about anybody; that is, in metaphorical terms, it's a comparing of that bread with the 'Written' Word of God. But, the bread which is in the second compartment cannot be seen but by those of whom God chooses to bring into the second Covenant, because the understanding of it is hidden to natural observances. That would make the second Covenant/Testament to be everlasting and eternal. That is, in metaphorical terms, a comparing of that bread with the 'Living' Word of God.

Now, I'd like to speak further on the words Testament and Covenant themselves, for it could seem to some that I may have been a bit cavalier in my usage of the terms. I am well aware of the controversy over the two words, in that a lot of scholars aren't convinced that the words really have the same meaning. As can be seen from my above statements, I certainly am using them as to meaning the same − despite the fact that the modern dictionary does give the words more than one meaning (well, at least the word Testament, anyway) . . . Let's quickly define the terms:

Covenant (Beriyth), H1285, from Strong's Hebrew Dictionary:
[From the Old Testament] From H1262 (in the sense of cutting (like H1254)); a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh): - confederacy, [con-]feder[-ate], covenant, league . . . AMG's Annotated Strong's Dictionaries, © 2009 A.D., adds this: "Covenant, Treaty, Alliance; an Agreement between persons; God making a Covenant with humankind." . . . [The English word 'Testament' cannot be found occupying any space in the KJV Old Testament according to the 2001's 'Strongest Strong's Exhaustive Concordance to the Bible.']

Covenant/Testament (Diatheke), G1242, from Strong's Greek Dictionary:
[From the New Testament (By the way, in the King James Version, both English words − covenant and testament − derive from the very same Greek word)] From G1303; properly a disposition, that is, (specifically) a contract (especially a devisory will): - covenant, testament . . . AMG's Annotated Strong's Dictionaries, © 2009 A.D., adds this: "A Covenant, i.e. a mutual Agreement or mutual Promises upon mutual conditions. In the NT [New Testament], spoken of God's Covenants with men; i.e. the divine promises conditioned on obedience; Of the Abrahamic Covenant; Of the Mosaic Covenant; Of the New Covenant promised of old, and sanctioned by the blood of Christ."

Covenant, from Webster's Dictionary
(published 1828; public domain):
To come; a coming together; a meeting or agreement of minds... 1) A mutual consent or agreement of two or more persons, to do or to forbear some act or thing; a contract; stipulation. A covenant is created by deed in writing, sealed and executed; or it may be implied in the contract. 2) A writing containing the terms of agreement or contract between parties; or the clause of agreement in a deed containing the covenant. 3) In theology, the covenant of works, is that implied in the commands, prohibitions, and promises of God; the promise of God to man.

Testament, from Webster's Dictionary:
1) A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament, to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. 2) The name of each general division of the canonical books of the sacred Scriptures; as the Old Testament; the New Testament. The name is equivalent to covenant, and in our use of it, we apply it to the books which contain the old and new dispensations; that of Moses, and that of Jesus Christ.
Firstly, let's again consider that, in the King James Version, both English words Covenant and Testament come from only one Greek word: Diatheke. So, what does that tell us? That it's extremely possible that this was no mere coincidence on the part of the Translators, and that the words must surely have been very similar, if not the very same meaning.

Testament, from Easton's Bible Dictionary*25
[The word 'Testament'] occurs twelve times in the New Testament (Hebrews 9:15, etc.) as the rendering of the Greek diatheke, which is twenty times rendered “covenant” in the Authorized Version, and always so in the Revised Version.

It would seem, however, that most modern commentators today, which I read from, insists that the word Testament is mainly in usage with a dying person's last will and testament toward their beneficiaries, and therefore does not have the same meaning as Covenant. I believe that this is due, in part, to some misunderstanding about a couple of passages in Hebrews . . . Let's once again quote this passage, that I had quoted earlier, to see what I am meaning:

Hebrews 9:16-17
For where a testament [diatheke] is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

These passages are implying, simply, that the Old Covenant itself ceased to exist when Jesus died upon the cross; and had, also at that time, made available the New Covenant to commence: which actually didn't do so until the Day of Pentecost . . . However, both Covenants/Testaments certainly did contain benefits and promises; so, and with that in mind, if one wanted to argue the fact that just like a dying person's last will and testament (and also considering the fact that Covenants commence with death, and with the shedding of blood), that the word Testament certainly can fit in with that tradition − that is, with a last will and testament − then I'd say fine to that comparison, of which I certainly have no problem with! But, even so (and just as the KJV, Authorized Bible Version, shows – which, unlike some Biblical commentators insist on, I believe was no mistake on the Translators' part), I believe that both words are still one and the same.*26 Especially since The Old Testament/ Covenant was commenced with death and the shedding of blood − since we must consider the animal sacrifices (and especially with the shedding of a lamb's blood) which commenced the Old Covenant − just like it did, later, the New − considering that Jesus is likened to the Lamb that was sacrificed for the New Testament.

Now, summarizing on the manna, just like the natural example before it, which literally was nestled inside the golden pot (way back in that day and time), this spiritual bread (which that bread merely represented) never decays, nor rots; and, Jesus (as I had already said) compared Himself to that bread that had come down from Heaven (and, in turn, was placed into the Ark – and, not on the table in the first compartment!), comparing it to His own body – which He had offered for folks to eat; for, again, it does not decay . . . The folks of the Old Testament ate bread that was only on the show-table; that is – allegorically speaking – of what could be seen out in the open by the whole world; though, it had lasted but for a week, and was temporal. It was the only bread that they could eat, not having access to the hidden manna in the other compartment; but, it wasn't enough to sustain them for eternity,*27 because that temporal bread wasn't capable (and, neither is it now capable for us), as the other is, to give them eternal life. But, again, that was the only thing available to them at that day and time. So, if we can but eat of the bread inside the Ark (that hidden manna; that heavenly bread; that angel food – which IS available to us in our day and time), then we will never die! As was said, that hidden bread represents the Living Word of God (which is more powerful than the Written Word – because, it's what brings the Written Word to life); that is, the spiritually understood Word will raise us from death unto life, causing our 'inward man Jesus' to quicken (i.e. to come to life). Can the 'naturally' understood – the natural bread − do this for us? Let's watch how this works:

Hebrews 4:12
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

Let's think about this . . . We learn, from Ephesians 6:17, that the Word of God is compared to a sword – which is true, and is what most folks are already familiar with. Yet here, Paul (the same author from the Ephesians letter) says that the Word of God is sharper than a two-edged sword. How can that be, if the Word is that sword? We must realize that Paul is here, rather than from the Ephesians letter, making reference to the Living Word of God, whilst Ephesians makes reference to the Written Word of God, which has two edges; that is, the Written Word (as referenced in Ephesians) has two edges: the Old and New Testaments. Therefore, we see (from Hebrews) that not only is the Living Word more powerful than the Written Word, but, too, it's strong enough (as Paul also says therein) to separate the soul from the spirit – meaning, specifically, the inward man from the outward man – as one is the creature of the Old Covenant, and the other is the creature of the New Covenant . . . Let's see just exactly how this works...

1 Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man [outward man] receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

So, if there is a natural man who can only understand things of a fleshly nature, is there, then, a spiritual man who understands things of a spiritual nature?

1 Corinthians 15:40
There are also celestial [heavenly/spiritual] bodies, and bodies terrestrial [earthly/fleshly]: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.

Let's define this deeper:

1 Corinthians 15:45-50
And so it is written, The first man Adam [of the Old Testament] was made a living soul; the last Adam [Jesus, of the New Testament] was made a quickening spirit [remember Hebrews 4:12, and of the separation of the soul and spirit!]. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural [Adam wasn't spiritual, but natural]; and afterward that which is spiritual [Jesus, however, was spiritual]. The first man is of the earth, earthy [fleshly, carnal]: the second man is the Lord from heaven [spiritual]. As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy [Old Testament creatures, who are nothing more than 'outward man,' are only fleshly, and can see only fleshly things]: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly [New Testament folks, who are 'inward man,' observes things of a spiritual nature]. And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly [This can and will happen to us, just as it did Adam and Jesus, our first examples]. Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God [an old minded creature, along with his carnal ordinances, cannot enter into the second compartment in a spiritually understood Tabernacle in the Wilderness]; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

This is what the Living Word will do for us as opposed to what the Written Word has done. And, this tells us how the Living Word can separate a soul from a spirit; or, and much rather, it shows us the difference between a living soul and a quickening spirit . . . Yes, my friends, there is definitely a huge difference!

As I will certainly cover more on these two creatures in some upcoming books (and, especially since I don't want the topic of it to overshadow our present one), I will leave the matter for now . . . But, I will say this in summary before doing so, that the Old Testament is for an old creature, an old man, an outward man, who will observe things only with a carnal, fleshly mind, and does not understand things of a spiritual nature, and can only worship fleshly, too; whereas the New Testament is for the new creature, a new man, an inward man, who observes the spiritual understandings of the Word of God, applies them to his life as God meant for him to understand them in His Mystery. He observes them spiritually, and understands them with the Mind of Christ; and, therefore, worships God in spirit and in truth, without the institutions of outward rituals, called carnal ordinances. Hence, and from another angle, we have our separation of the Old and New Testaments; for, and again, it's not to be seen or understood merely as old books, but it is to be seen as either living a lifestyle carnally and naturally, or − and much better − as spiritual and heavenly . . . It takes time, and with the Spirit of God training us, for us to be able to cross that line from the Old to the New...

Again, to sum up what we've been saying thus far (in this present chapter), there are two separate books, called the Old and New Testaments. And, within both of them, we can view natural and spiritual interpretations . . . However, that's not what defines the Old and New Testaments, since they are two separate covenants for two different time periods – because, within each, folks lived different kinds of existences: namely, one had a natural existence whilst the other has a spiritual existence; one was a natural Kingdom, and the other is a Spiritual Kingdom. Therefore, our separation of the two Testaments are found within the confines of one being stuck in the natural, and the other aspiring to the spiritual. However, since they both tell of the same story (a progressive story, which begins at the bottom, then elevates to the top), we see both Testaments as to being one big, single Testament – especially since all that was needed to be said was already defined in the book called the Old, and was merely enlightened, by extremely gifted teachers sent by God, in what we call the New . . . This assessment will not only be continued to be defined within this present book, but will also filter throughout my other upcoming books, too.

Now, to end this chapter, let's learn about pivoting scriptures. Pivoting scriptures? Yes, pivoting . . . As we've been learning that we have both natural and spiritual understandings within the Written Word of God, a lot of times we can find this situation in the very same passages! That is, a passage that we can read naturally, we can turn right around and read that very same passage spiritually. This new thought is actually setting us up for the next upcoming chapter, where we shall discuss seeing examples of this in the very first chapter of Genesis . . . Now, that I have said all this, I will be able to introduce my readers to the spiritual beginning, which is cloaked in mystery and dark sayings...

END NOTES for Chapter 3
The Old Testament's Reliability, and the Vision of the Allegorical Tabernacle in the Wilderness

*19. Such as in Daniel 12:8-9 and Colossians 1:26...
Daniel 12:8-9
And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.

Colossians 1:26
Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints.

And, let's again consider Matthew's words (especially at the end of verse 35):

Matthew 13:34-35
All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.

*20. Which has no dealings with ... the practice of worship rituals which deal with the natural body on any level whatever...
I will deal with this bold statement of mine, and in detail, in my upcoming book, entitled: 'Carnal Ordinances: The Naturalistic World That Had Come To An End.'

*21. Which bread, by the way, actually decayed after a week's time...
As we read in Exodus chapter 16, the manna that fell down from the sky with the morning dew, and of which substance the children of Israel in the wilderness made small cakes or loaves of bread with, was a very natural substance, and was very delicate, for it not only became rancid with the strong afternoon sun, which came out strongly later in the day, but the manna also became worm infested and stunk heavily. Neither could any extra of it be stored overnight (even away from the sun) to where it could be worked with the following day. Not only so, but all the people had to eat what they had gathered that day, and retrieve fresh batches each morning. We cannot imagine that even when they baked the stuff, and made cakes and loaves of bread out of it, that it would last very long before it rotted, as well. Neither can we be certain of how long it lasted once cooked; but, we do know that several baked loaves of it lasted an entire week upon the table in the first compartment of the Tabernacle for worship purposes. Now, whether that bread was just sturdy enough to last that long on its own, or whether God simply blessed it to have this longevity, we cannot say for sure. But, we can ascertain, from Leviticus, that God wished for the priests to actually eat the week old bread before placing fresh loaves thereon.

Leviticus 24:5-9
And thou shalt take fine flour, and bake twelve cakes thereof: two tenth deals shall be in one cake. And thou shalt set them in two rows, six on a row, upon the pure table before the LORD. And thou shalt put pure frankincense upon each row, that it may be on the bread for a memorial, even an offering made by fire unto the LORD. Every sabbath [after one week] he shall set it in order before the LORD continually, being taken from the children of Israel by an everlasting covenant. And it shall be Aaron's and his sons'; and they shall eat it in the holy place: for it is most holy unto him of the offerings of the LORD made by fire by a perpetual statute.

*22. Inside the golden pot within...
Of the things that we've been speaking, the Apostle Paul maps all of this out for us in Hebrews chapter 9 – please read the whole chapter for a better understanding. But, specifically, concerning the manna inside the golden pot, we read:

Hebrews 9:3-4
And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all [i.e. the second compartment in the Tabernacle]; Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant.

*23. Jesus compared His body to the bread ... offering it for the people to actually eat...
We see how this works by comparing these scriptures:

John 6:48
I am that bread of life.

John 6:51
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

John 6:53
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
.
John 1:14a
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us...

By putting all of these verses together, we will begin forming a picture. A picture that, in this present book, I will try and be vague about. Not that I'm trying to hide anything, or that I don't have an understanding as to what they're implying, it's just that I am saving the full thrust, and the deep kernel of the matter, for my future book (as I've mentioned in an earlier End Note), entitled: 'Carnal Ordinances: The Naturalistic World That Had Come To An End.' Once revealed there, it'll be seen clearly why I had chose to wait to explain the details therein; for it – truly – takes a while to explain, and I certainly don't want that topic to overshadow this present one. So, for now, I will simply point out the obvious connection of Bread, Word, and Flesh – which all three paint a picture of the body of Christ; i.e. the Living Word ... I'm sure that a lot of folks already know where I'm going with this; but, again, I want to be very careful not to expound any further, for I'm already saying too much about the Carnal Ordinances in here, and I really don't want to spoil the fun of my upcoming book!

*24. From the same manual we can get both natural and spiritual meanings...
My dad used to warn me not to over-spiritualize the Bible away. In fact, I remember one man, that got up to speak in a house-meeting I attended years ago, who said that Jesus Himself was only a parable, and that He never actually existed in the flesh! There are some Creation Scientists who are extremely leery of anybody 'spiritualizing' the Bible at all – especially in the first chapters of Genesis – and are warning folks not to listen to anybody who does this, for many of them do say, admittedly, that Genesis is nothing more than a moral lesson, which holds no historic value. Therefore, they continue to say, the stories in them, though inspired by God, are mere parables [i.e. fables, in their estimation] that do not reflect any actual events of any historical personages. Much the same, as many of them continue to think, of when Jesus told His parables, telling only simple stories which conveyed moralistic lessons only; even though His parables, as they apparently are unaware, did contain historic truths. Without doubt, such thoughts can certainly open the door for complete evolutionist thinking – seeing the need for scientific explanations for our natural beginnings if those folks believe that the Bible fails in that area. In such a predicament, it is therefore easy to rely upon secular scientists (who were not directed by God – nor who had the Bible in mind to explain their theories by) to start explaining this planet's origins. But, there's a problem with that, because, just as Phillip E. Johnson, in his wonderful book 'Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds,' [1997 InterVarsity Press], points out to us that modern mainstream scientific views of a Deity demand that evolutionist processes did not have God in mind. He then, in chapter 1, on page 15, begins to amply quote the 1995 official position statement of the American National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT); which, even though giving the routine example about how life evolved, added that the process was 'unsupervised,' and 'impersonal.' Which certainly shows us that mainstream evolutional science does not comply with Genesis chapter one, or that they anywhere near believe that God had anything to do with this planet's origins. And, even though many Christians think that there's perfect harmony between evolutional science and the Bible, the mainstream evolutionists, however, completely disagrees. And, not only did these secular scientists not have God in mind whilst making their views known, but many of them even began their premise that He, along with His Bible, should be left out of the equation at all costs! Therefore, if examined closely, their conclusions are the complete opposite to what we read in God's Written Word – especially when we carefully analyze the compared data between the two views ... But, and even though that were the case, after years of consideration to Mr. Johnson's concerns, the NABT, after a few bouts amongst themselves, had finally decided to drop the words 'unsupervised' and 'impersonal' from their initial statement; though, not all of them wanted to. This crusade, to drop the words was, surprisingly, championed by Dr Eugenie C. Scott, one of the biggest opponents to the Creationist world scientific view. You can read her own words, and to her reasons why she campaigned the idea, at this website: ncse.com/library-resource/science-rel.... However, and even though they've reluctantly dropped the two words, it does not change the fact that they still see it the same way that they always have! ... Even though I certainly do not agree with the American National Association of Biology Teachers' initial assessment, this is not the book to produce the cons of such an idea. However, I will certainly recommend for my readers Phillip E. Johnson's well written book, which I have just mentioned, along with another of his that I found most intriguing, called 'Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law and Education,' [1995 InterVarsity Press] ... On another note, I want to prove, in this present book, that there is a satisfactory middle ground for both the spiritualizing of the scriptures and the naturalizing. I also feel that just like somebody can over-spiritualize them, one can also over simplify by naturalizing them too much, as well. This is why, as I've said earlier, that God wishes for us to rightly divide the Bible into its natural and spiritual camps. I feel that I've given sufficient proof, by quoting the Written Word, that there are scriptures therein that have to be spiritualized, to where there can be no other way of getting around them. But, too, I certainly feel that if one were to take away the natural, historical interpretations, then one can miss out on truths, also. Both are equally important to the salvation of man, because one of them (the natural) is a step toward the other (the spiritual); though, as I've stated in an earlier chapter, it's the spiritual implications which actually lead to eternal life – such as obtaining pure, agape, Godly love (which – again, as I've explained in my first book – is a spiritual love): of which, the natural cannot obtain, nor produce. Not only so, but we must also remember that without any natural implications, the spiritual road could never even be reached to begin with. Therefore, one without the other is completely impossible. In most cases, before there can ever be any spiritual interpretations, the natural examples have to exist first so that we can obtain the proper understanding. This is why the natural interpretations are also termed as 'similitude's,' in that one is similar to the other; and, they belong to one another. This mirrors perfectly the balance of God, in that there are 'two's' of things in nature, such as two eyes, two legs, two arms, male and female, hot and cold, left and right, forward and backward, up and down, north and south, east and west, good and evil, night and day, happy and sad, sane and insane, love and hate, hard and soft, etc ... just as there is natural and spiritual, old and new Testaments, old and new Covenants...

*25. Easton's Bible Dictionary...
'E-Sword, the Sword of the Lord with an electronic edge,' says: "Easton's Bible Dictionary [published in 1897, public domain] provides informative explanations of histories, people and customs of the Bible. It is an excellent and readily understandable source of information for the student and layperson and one of Matthew George Easton's most significant literary achievements."

*26. Both words are still one and the same...
William Tyndale also translates diatheke as 'Testament' in his translation of the book of Hebrews; however, J.P. Green Sr., in his Literal Translation, does not. He translates the word as 'Covenant' instead. In fact, Easton's Bible Dictionary further has this to say about the matter:

Covenant, from Easton's Bible Dictionary:
A contract or agreement between two parties. In the Old Testament the Hebrew word berith is always thus translated ... The corresponding word in the New Testament Greek is diatheke, which is, however, rendered “testament” generally in the Authorized Version. It ought to be rendered, just as the word berith of the Old Testament, “covenant.”

This should not cause us any problems, for I think the argument is just splitting hairs! Frankly, I cannot see why we cannot see both Testament and Covenant as to being the same word. God made a Covenant with Moses on Sinai, and it became the 'official' commencement of the Testament of God, which we now call the Old Testament – especially when blood was spilt by sacrificing a lamb offering to commence that Covenant [Hebrews 9:18 – Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood]. Then, in the same manner, when the Lamb of God (Jesus) was sacrificed on the cross, with the spilling of that Lamb's blood, it allowed the New Testament/Covenant to commence on the Day of Pentecost, as the last will and testament of Jesus Christ, who did, indeed, die ... Praise be to God, though, that He rose again! ... Too, we do not have technical difficulties in also recognizing that the book of Genesis was enveloped within that Old Testament/Covenant, just as we shouldn't have any problems in including the Four Gospels into our New Testament books ... First of all, and just like Paul points out in Romans 5:14, death had reigned from Adam to Moses (for this was before the actual Written Law, and its official commencement); but, it certainly doesn't mean that God wasn't still working with those folks prior to Moses within the confines of that particular Covenant and Law. In fact, we see traces of that Law as far back as Adam, when God told him not to eat of the forbidden fruit [Genesis 2:16-17]. Indeed, the basic sense of what God told him is certainly found in the Ten Commandments, since that forbidden fruit wasn't actual, literal fruit; but, that fruit was none other than the fruit of the flesh, which we read about in Galatians 5:19-21 – which is the exact opposite, and is in opposition to the fruits of the Spirit: Galatians 5:22-23. And, as far as including the Four Gospels in the New Testament/Covenant, we can do so (despite me saying that it officially commenced when Jesus died on the cross and with the outpouring of the Holy Ghost on the Day of Pentecost) because Christ came to not only fulfill (bring to a close) the Old Testament/Covenant, but also to teach the ways of the New – just as John the Baptist prepared folks for the New, because all those people were right at the doorstep of the next Testament ... On a side note, and as we will see in an upcoming End Note for chapter 10 of this present book, Jesus was already in the 2nd Covenant prior to his death on the cross ... Really? Yes; but, He was the only one there at that particular time. I'll give you a hint: Jesus said so Himself in John 3:13c ... Let that whet your appetite!

*27. It wasn't enough to sustain them for eternity...
John 6:48-51 (Jesus speaking)
I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna [natural bread] in the wilderness, and are dead. [However,] This [i.e. Jesus, Himself] is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread [i.e. the Living Word] which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

Visit this upcoming book's official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

Chapter 2: What is the Bible Really all About? - From 'In the Beginning.'

Chapter 2: What is the Bible Really all About?..., from ‘In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start - The Spiritual Side of Creation, Part I.’ An upcoming Christian, Theological Book, by Ted Roberts, concerning Idioms, Metaphors, Parables, Similitude's, and Allegories, which can be traced all the way to the very beginning of time! And, of which, we can see our own salvation’s plan within . . . Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Ministries, Houston, TX, Digging Scriptures for Truth, ©copyright 2017 by Ted Roberts www.seekingthegospel.com

Ask yourself a question: what is the Bible really about? What is it trying to say to me, personally, for my salvation? Is it simply a book of morals? Of how to be a good person? A book of rules and regulations? A good history lesson? Or, is it only a book of poetry and literature, meant to be a better source of entertainment than Shakespeare?

Even though the Written Word of God is a book of morals; even though it does tell me how to be a good person; even though it has rules and regulations; even though it relays accurate histories; and even though it is chock-full of poetry and literature that reads better than Shakespeare, the Bible is much more than all these things combined! More importantly, it is a spiritual manual, telling the potential student of light how to become a child of the living God; of how He resurrects us unto life eternal; and, of how we can transform into the very image of Jesus Christ. Is not then the spiritual meanings more valuable to me for my salvation than the natural, historical meanings? Ultimately, can the natural, historical understandings of the scriptures save my soul?

Please, do not misunderstand me here, for I am perfectly aware of the historic and scientific value of the Written Word of God − and that value is substantial! Not only so, but such things (as the natural, historical, and scientific explanations that are written within, and accurately portrayed) can be a tremendous launching pad to get folks to the right place in their lives to where God can start working with them spiritually. In fact, it's really a necessary step for many people. As one team of Biblical Archaeologists*12 has pointed out, such natural illustrations (in this case, literally digging up facts that support the scriptures) certainly are helpful, because many folks have lost their faith in the Bible, since there has been tremendous success from others (from some Atheists and some Evolutionists*13) whose main function, it would seem, is to destroy our trust in the Written Word of God. They truly are out there − hard at work − trying desperately to destroy people's faith in the Biblical text by supposedly proving that the Bible's not accurate at all (either scientifically or historically), and is therefore a false document in its representation of those fields. If these said Evolutionistic teachers and Atheists can successfully destroy people's faith in the Bible (ripping it up piece by piece!), then they could destroy people's faith in God's own existence, too.

However, what I was trying to point out, was that after we can straighten up from such unscrupulous propaganda from non-believers, then we need to jump to the next step in our walk with God; and, that's not only a personal relationship with Him − and not only that we try to get into Christ − but that we, also, have Christ get into us. This is why I say that it's more important to understand what God is saying to us in His Mysteries, than what He has said in His History.

As I've already pointed out, that even though it's of extreme importance to learn of what had been in the past, and even understand what is to become of our future, God, however, is mostly concerned with what is happening for us right now − today!*14 − and of how we can transform into His image, and of how we are to obtain His Divine Nature, so that we'll be able to treat one another, in proper fashion, with agape love.*15 What can be more important than that? Would it be more important for us to dwell on a past that has already come and gone? Or, of us dwelling on a future that hasn't even come yet? I'm declaring boldly that the scriptures are MAINLY focused on whom we should be in our present walk with God. That is, they are metaphorically speaking to a Christian of just how we are to have a personal relationship with Him at this present time. Not the past. Not the future. But, here and now! Though the scriptures use elements of our past to shape us (as it culminates, ultimately, into whom we are to become in the future), its main focus, again, is on us at this present time, on us as Christian individuals, and of how we treat one another with love and respect, rather than participating in man's religion − or even in worldly, ungodly events. To me, this is THE most important thing that a striving Christian should be focused on and concerned about: of how to please the Lord with their life, and with their walk; of how to become a living epistle that is to be read of all mankind; of how to love one another as He loves us. History cannot teach us that firsthand; gaining knowledge of future events cannot teach us that; but, by obtaining the Spirit of Truth, God can lead us, and can teach us, to strive for the High Calling, which is only in Christ Jesus. And it is to these things that I believe the metaphorical, parablistic teachings of the scriptures are focused. Even though they also teach us about past events and future events, they only do so to help us learn of what not to become − such as past mistakes that are not to be repeated, and of what some individuals will become in their future because of these past mistakes. Concentration then grips onto the Elect of what's expected of them for their current walk: the correct and narrow path that leads to Christ today.

Now, on to deeper matters: Let's observe some very curious scriptures in our Bibles, and let us see how metaphors are used therein, and then talk more about how they should be understood:

Song of Solomon 4:12,15
A garden inclosed is my sister, my spouse; a spring shut up, a fountain sealed. [15] A fountain of gardens, a well of living waters, and streams from Lebanon.

Psalms 1:3
And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.

Ezekiel 17:24
And all the trees of the field shall know that I the LORD have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I the LORD have spoken and have done it.

Psalms 52:8a
But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God...

Proverbs 11:30a
The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life...

Psalms 92:12-14
The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon. Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts of our God. They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and flourishing.

Mark 8:24
And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking.

And, finally . . .

Genesis 2:8-9 (Which brings us back to the beginning)
And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

By reading these scriptures, we can clearly see that just because the Bible mentions gardens and trees, the only understanding of them therein cannot only be taken at face value; or, rather, that all the passages that mention these are simply to be seen as natural, which we would find within a natural setting . . . Even though I am making some observations on natural greenery, this is not, obviously, the theme of this book − even though trees and a garden are certainly included in the beginning of God's carefully planned work. I merely wanted to point out just a very small portion of scriptures that cannot be taken at natural face value, but that can be seen, instead, within a parablistic light . . . But, again, why does God wish to convey his great messages in parables? Even though we've already been over this, I'd like to approach that question from another angle. Consider the following passages:

Ecclesiastes 3:11
He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.

Ecclesiastes 8:17
Then I beheld all the work of God, that a man cannot find out the work that is done under the sun: because though a man labour to seek it out, yet he shall not find it; yea further; though a wise man think to know it, yet shall he not be able to find it.

So, if that's the case, then why, pray tell, do we study to show ourselves approved if we labour in vain and won't be able to find out about God anyway? Or, rather, what God's work and plans are for the occupants of the Earth, and of the Kingdom. Well, what can be gleaned from the above two scriptures is that those who were trying to seek God's plan were not only doing so with the mind and spirit of man, but (as I've pointed out in chapter 1) they were also doing so with the wrong intent in their heart. We know that God's ways are not our ways, and neither His thoughts ours;*16 so then, we must find out how to make His thoughts and ways ours in order to find out exactly what His plans will be for us − to have a vision of the workings of His Kingdom − and, too, of how we are supposed to grow into the full stature of Christ. We must also realize that not all men and women have the mind of Christ to think with, and not all have the spirit of God within them as a guide . . . Let's see this play out:

Ecclesiastes 4:1
So I returned, and considered all the oppressions that are done under the sun: and behold the tears of such as were oppressed, and they had no comforter; and on the side of their oppressors there was power; but they had no comforter.

These people, whose only function was to think and act with the only thing that they had in them up until that time − that is, having only the mind and spirit of man (i.e. having only fleshly knowledge, wisdom, and understanding) − were not only unable to find out about the ways of God, but, too, they were being plagued by the oppressor: which, in this case, was nothing more than their own carnal flesh;*17 which was blinding their eyes from the workings of God, and of which was keeping them from serving and worshipping God in the way that man was initially meant to do. And, because of that, they could not, and cannot, nor shall they ever be able to gain access into His Kingdom, or be able to be showered with real truth . . . That is, nobody can without the comforter as their guide.

Saint John 14:26
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost,*18 whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

We have need of the Comforter to teach us of God's ways, and to make God's ways our ways, and His thoughts our thoughts. It will feed the mind of Christ, which will be with us from that day forward...

1 Corinthians 2:16b
...we have the mind of Christ.

...allowing us to grow into the full stature of Christ...

Ephesians 4:13
Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ.

...and with the knowledge of God − instead of merely having man's knowledge.

END NOTES for Chapter 2
What is the Bible Really all About?

*12. One team of Biblical Archaeologists...
This is in reference to the Wyatt family; and, in particular, Mary Nell Wyatt, writing in A.D. 1993 for her late husband Ron Wyatt (who actually passed in 1999). Mr. Wyatt was a controversial, Biblical Archaeologist, who worked in the field from around the mid 1960's until the 1990's. My quote is rough, at best; but, the idea is what was meant ... Here is the web address for the actual quote: wyattnewsletters.com/ articles/faith.htm ... We will speak more on the Wyatt family in the upcoming chapters of this book.

*13. From some Atheists and some Evolutionists...
I am, by no means, insinuating that if a person is an Atheist or an Evolutionist that it automatically causes them to launch a campaign to destroy people's trust in the Bible, or even in God Himself. However, and it must be admitted to, that the people who do these types of enterprises certainly come from such factions. After all, your premise must begin in the belief that there is no God in order to launch a campaign against His followers for believing in Him and His Word. Of course, there are other factions who do the same, but it would seem that these two are the most influential for doing such a thing to begin with [For more information on this Evolutionistic stance, please see "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," a movie by Ben Stein. Also, for help in seeing this, please view the Creation Seminar series by Dr. Kent Hovind: 2peter3.com] ... It must also be admitted to that there has been much success in these areas, for a lot of Christians have been buying into the propaganda that has been laid out by these said factions. These anti-Biblical thoughts certainly have made their way into the modern church, for I myself have heard it said, on several occasions, that man's hands have contaminated our Bibles, and therefore the Written Word, as it has been passed down to us today, cannot be trusted, since man's dirty hands have tampered with it. And, that belief, in turn, leads a lot of folks into utter confusion ... Confusion, of which, God is not responsible for, but man is:

1 Corinthians 14:33
For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

I find such arguments flawed, especially considering that if God is truly God, then He is MORE than capable of preserving His Word fully intact, even if He used man for its composition. Not only so, but such thoughts makes the Bible itself a liar when it says such things as:

Matthew 24:35
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

But, He didn't add the clause in there that said: "But, hopefully, it won't be contaminated, along the way, by man. In that case − sorry!" What are we to say, then, if man did contaminate it? Whoops? Oh, well?

2 Peter 1:20-21
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation [i.e. man didn't create scripture from their vain imaginations]. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

The People's New Testament:
That no prophecy ... is of any private interpretation. Is not an interpretation of the knowledge and feelings of the prophet, but of the will of God. The next verse [21] shows that this is the meaning. No scriptural prophecy is due to the will of man, but all came from men speaking from God when moved by the Holy Spirit. Prophecy is God's word, not the words of man.

2 Timothy 3:16-17
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

So, how much scripture is given by the inspiration of God? Some? Nope – all! If that's not true, then as 2nd Timothy describes (or, much rather, as the Apostle Paul describes), it cannot be beneficial for reproof, correction, or instruction in righteousness, so that the man of God could be perfect (that is, complete), nor thoroughly furnished unto all good works; or, rather, and as the KJV expresses it, 'throughly' furnished unto all good works. If just a little leaven leavens the entire lump of natural bread [Galatians 5:9], then how much more with the Word of God, the spiritual bread? Which, incidentally, is what Galatians 5:9 was really trying to say to begin with, and in a metaphorical way [Also, see Matthew 16:11-12]. I mean, either the Written Word is God's Word or it's not, right? Who are we to decide which parts of the Bible are inspired by God and which aren't? When did God make us that kind of a judge?

Romans 11:33-34
O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out [by fleshly minded men]! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?

And, also:

Isaiah 40:12-13
Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meted out heaven with the span, and comprehended the dust of the earth in a measure, and weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance? Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him?

Do we have the skills to determine, without the Spirit of God as our guide, what is even right or wrong in this life without the Bible? Especially when we've all fallen short of the glory [Romans 3:23]? ... Now, this is not saying that every English translation out there are perfect translations. There's an entire study even on that score as to how God truly translated His Word into an acceptable English. As Benson Bobrick (author of the wonderful book, entitled: "Wide as the Waters: The Story of the English Bible and the Revolution it Inspired," 2001 A.D., Penguin Books) had pointed out, on the back, in the book's description: "In the beginning was the Word of God. And that Word was Hebrew and Greek." We must therefore seek God's ultimate Word in the original languages, and then try and match them up with the best possible English translations. This may seem a tough task ahead for any potential student of the Bible – especially since we have none of the original autographs at our disposal. And, yet, we must realize that it's not an impossible task – and, God can certainly give us analytical abilities to interpret His Word properly, if we can but ask with reverence, and can await these answers with patience. And, all the while, we must realize that, as I have pointed out in chapter 1 of this present book, God has done it that way on purpose, to hide His truths from the wise and the prudent [Matthew 11:25]. That is, those who are wise in their own eyes − in fleshly wisdom.

1 Corinthians 3:19
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

Now, I certainly do realize that I've made some really bold statements about the Bible's accuracy – some may even think me nearing fanaticism in my approach! But, I, by no means, am sorry for what I've expressed thus far over God's ability of perfectly preserving His Word intact. However, some of what I've said may appear contradictory, especially with my explanation that God's accuracy does not lie in any single translation into a person's own language, the vernacular – making it appear as if man did, indeed, contaminate the English translations after all. But, that's not what I'm saying. For many, many years, even the Hebrew Bible went through this same predicament. Before the Authoritative Masoretic Version of the Hebrew scriptures came into existence in the tenth century A.D. – particularly by Aaron ben Moses ben Asher (whose version became the basis for modern critical editions of the Hebrew Bible, and was also the text used for translation by William Tyndale, the King James Bible Editors, and even the more recent J.P. Green Sr. Literal Version), there was a surmountable problem with other Hebrew Bibles Versions of those days [who were not, obviously, as concerned with Biblical preservation as the Masoretes tradition]; of which other versions had become corrupted because man wished to improve on God's text – especially when they felt there were mistakes within, simply because it either didn't comply with their beliefs, or with what they considered their own common sense. This is no different for the many English Versions at our disposal today; and, that's why there's a great amount of confusion in this world over which version is proper for us to use – since so many variations have been produced. Of course, I am officially reserving the full study of this topic for my upcoming book, 'The Bible is not a Buffet,' but I need to continue to say a few things on this herein for clarity of what I've already said. Again, the problem of man trying to improve on what was set out before them, in written form, has led to many corrupt versions (both today in our varied Bible Versions, and even in olden days with the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts), and it was these kind of corruptions that had led the aforementioned Aaron ben Moses ben Asher, in the tenth century A.D., to finally come out with an Authorized Version of the Hebrew and Aramaic scriptures that everybody could actually agree on. The premise of the Masoretes tradition was simple: for many years (and even before ben Asher's famous Authorized Version came to be – and despite all the corrupted versions that were being made on all sides of them) they took great pains to ensure that spelling and wording of the original scriptures did not change. Even what man had considered obvious imperfections were copied to the very letter (for more information on the history and tradition of the unbiased Masoretic Text, please see 'Reader's Digest: The Bible Through the Ages,' pages 266-269; and, too, wikipedia has good things to say about the subject). Their task very much paid off, and even when the famous Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in the twentieth century A.D., and when compared with the Masoretic Text (especially with the fully intact, great Isaiah scroll of the Dead Sea), scholars were shocked to find there to be [after sifting through both works with intense analysis] only a 5 percent difference in the compared texts: which were simply spelling variants and sentence placements. Even though the pros and cons of this comparison varies amongst credited scholars and theologians (though all of them admit to the incredible accuracy of two documents that were composed about a thousand years apart!), this 5 percent is certainly confirmed by some of them as to being an incredible feat – and no less than an historical miracle – especially considering that the two documents in question were the same, word for word! This is confirmed by Gleason Archer, Jr., a credited scholar himself, in his book, called: 'A Survey of Old Testament Introduction,' Moody Press Chicago 1964 and 1994, on pages 25 and 29. He had also cleverly stated, in response that errors had crept into our Bibles, that there's a great difference between a document which was wrong at the start and a document which was right at the start but was miscopied; insinuating that just because there have been errors in Bible versions (or, even totally corrupt versions in existence), it certainly doesn't mean that the original texts were so; and, neither does this imply that God didn't preserve His Word unscathed, or that there isn't a way to sift through all the mess to find it. Mr. Archer concluded that even in the best manuscripts, where we find obvious slips of the pen and variations of spelling, that it doesn't mean it's enough to affect God's message to His people in the slightest. I will also add that this kind of reasoning (that is, in justifying the few so-called 'errors' that one will find in variant older manuscripts), is also true for the Greek New Testament manuscripts, in that a wonderful case can be made in favor of these documents, too. One can find further logical reasoning for Biblical accuracy and preservation in the highly acclaimed book by Lee Strobel, called, 'The Case for Christ (Harper Collins, Zondervan, 1998),' in chapter 3 during his interview with Dr. Bruce Metzger ... Again, we will investigate these kinds of claims, and in better detail, in my upcoming book on that subject ... But, even so, what is to be said of all the folks who used the 'corrupted' Hebrew scriptures instead the Masoretic text? Especially before the ben Asher family composed the best of all of them? Did these people simply miss out? Nay; but, as God has always (even in terrible life situations) opened up people's eyes to His hidden truths, He was certainly more than capable, in this situation, of helping people to understand where and when man tried to corrupt these texts; and, it did not affect those folks in being able to obtain the kernel of the Word of truth – much the same for us today when faced with the problem of which Bible Version to use:

John 10:4-5
And when he [the good shepherd] putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his [God's] voice. And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.

Even when somebody is using a version that has terrible mistakes in it (and, yes, there are many out there that have massive mistakes within!), God can still show His own voice therein...

Psalms 139:8
If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there.

But, who is to say that, like us today, there weren't better versions for folks to use during these olden times (in both the Hebrew texts, and in the Greek New Testament texts)? I'm certainly not insinuating otherwise; for, as I've already stated concerning the Masoretic Text (and even in the mentioning of the wonderful preservation of the New Testament manuscripts), I do believe that God's Word, in an acceptable and uncontaminated form, wasn't as hard to obtain throughout church history as many people like to make it seem. But, the terrible and corrupt versions, like I've also been saying, have always been there, challenging people's faith in God's ability to preserve His Word intact ... But, that still shouldn't give us excuses for our continued usage of these bad Bible Versions. Surely, if and when God deals with us on this score, we should flee from things that have other voices within. Especially in our own day and age when Biblical Science is at such a high pitch, and when we truly have the freedom to choose the right version. So, Why dally? Why linger? Why tolerate thin pieces that have very little substance? When God speaks, we must act ... But (and I am fully aware of this), we can only do so when God makes this obvious to us. There is no shame in just doing the best that we can when we are uncertain. I am only speaking roughly (if I am speaking roughly at all) of when we actually know to do better, and we willingly stay behind for terrible reasons, such as laziness or unconcern ... However, and please understand me, I, by no means, am trying to say anything bad about folks who continue to view the Bible as nothing more than a corruption from man. Believe it or not, there was a point in my life when I thought so, as well. And, as far as any arguments that can be made against the notion of having a pure Bible (which isn't corrupted by man), I may have thought of just about every reason myself as to why man did interfere, to where we can't get the complete truth, or a pure Bible, even if we tried. Thankfully, though, the Lord intervened on my thoughts, and has enlightened me to the truth of this matter – else, I would still be stuck on contrary thoughts ... But, on the other hand, I also know that there are folks out there who aren't just confused on this matter, but who are actually going out of their way to destroy people's faith and trust in, not only the Bible, but in God Himself. As to those individuals, of whom I've described in chapter 1 of this book − that is, those who are wise in their own eyes, and who have a Pharisee spirit about them − then, I say, that they will never come to the knowledge of the truth [2 Timothy 3:7], no matter how hard they may try. And, yet, God can still help those folks if He so wishes to. But, unto those who have a pure heart (even if they are simply confused at the moment), then I say that the task ahead will not be one of too much difficulty if we try and keep an open mind; for, if we have a love for God, and a love and a desire to know the truth (simply because it can better our lives), then He will lead us and guide us into that truth very smoothly (even if slowly) − for such is His will, that all His true children will walk into the light of the knowledge of God [2 Corinthians 4:6] ... Not only so, but even if we continue to use a corrupted Bible Version (in saying that God just simply didn't deliver us from it, and we remained in ignorance of that fact), then I am certain that a person can still make it to be with God in the afterlife. After all, perfect Godly love is the core matter of life eternal, and not the usage of the correct Bible Version – even though the right version could teach us of that love in a clearer way. I'm confident, though, that God will lead His sheep into the directions that pleases Him – in not only choosing certain Bible Versions (which may be contrary to what we choose), but also to what church denominations that they decide to attend – whether we approve of that individual's movements or not. We need to be careful, therefore, on whom we judge unworthy ... I will be covering the reason why God allowed some supposed 'mistakes' (which, we will see, weren't really mistakes) to creep into our English translations (especially in the King James Version) in an upcoming End Note, for chapter 8, called: 'But, what is permissible for us, is the scrutinizing of these 'added' words...' Being of a similar topic (and actually completing this one – though, also, covering italicized words within translations), we will continue this discussion there, at this later End Note, which this present End Note has already begun speaking on...

*14. What is happening right now − today!...
In reference to us focusing on what's important for a Christian presently, let's consider the following verses ... Even though, technically, these verses were written about two thousand years ago (and some even older than that), the theme is the same − that is, on how God's children should focus on the here and now − and of their current walk with God. Remember, the only thing that exists for us is now. The past is gone and the future doesn't exist yet. This is what the teachers of the Bible were trying to have their students learn. Even though educated on the past, and alert to the future, they nevertheless threw greater importance onto the present:

James 4:13-14
Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.

Luke 12:16-21
And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided? So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.

Proverbs 27:1
Boast not thyself of to morrow; for thou knowest not what a day may bring forth.

Hebrews 3:12-13
Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.

Romans 13:11
And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.

Hebrews 3:6-8b
But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end. Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, Harden not your hearts...

*15. So that we'll be able to treat one another, in proper fashion, with agape love...
In fact, the main reason that we are made into His image, and obtain the Divine Nature (of which nature Peter speaks on in 2nd Peter 1:4) is so that we'll be able to treat one another with the proper respect, and with Godly Love − which the Greek refers to as Agape. A lot of folks believe that we try to better ourselves so that we can become better than anybody else. And, yet, the scriptures plainly teach us that we only better ourselves so that we can help others to come up unto that same position as we. That is, we become better by humbling ourselves, and by preferring others above us ... I fully cover this subject in my first book in my teaching series, called: "Brotherly Love: The Gospel of Jesus Christ."

*16. We know that God's ways are not our ways, and neither His thoughts ours...
Isaiah 55:8-9
For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

*17. The oppressor: which, in this case, was nothing more than their own carnal flesh...
One can certainly argue that this oppressor was the devil himself. But, since I don't want to get off onto that long trail here, in this book (for I will do so in great detail in a set of upcoming books − within the Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Teaching Series, entitled: "The Evil Side of Creation" − and especially in part 2 of that series, in the book entitled: Satan, the Devil, and Hell), I will simply say for the moment that it's not extremely important to identify the oppressor at this time − though, that's certainly not saying, in the least, that the subject itself is not important. This is just not the right book to discuss it, for that's not the direction, herein, that I am wanting to head. But, I will simply say that whomever or whatever he (or it) is, that he/it certainly wasn't good! But, too, it must be admitted that the King James Version does not simply say 'oppressor' in the singular sense, but does, instead, imply 'oppressors' in the plural − indicating more than one, showing that perhaps it's not a single Being doing this. And, even though both the J.P. Green translation and the New International Version agree with the plural usage of the word, one may actually see my point as non-important, seeing as somebody could easily throw in the speculation that they may have been the devil along with his demonic cronies in tow. Ironically, though, the original Hebrew word âshaq, that's translated as Oppressors, doesn't even indicate any Beings whatsoever.

Âshaq, H6231, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary:
A primitive root; to press upon, that is, oppress, defraud, violate, overflow: - get deceitfully, deceive, defraud, drink up, (use) oppress ([-ion], -or), do violence (wrong).

This simply indicates the 'action' of oppression; that is, it's the bad situations one will find themselves in rather than pointing a finger at any Being, showing us how the word 'oppressors' can be in the plural. But, even though this is the result of one oppressed, it certainly can be argued that it was caused by a Being in the first place – which can be true enough – and is a point that I wouldn't dispute in the least, as it shows us that some 'force' is actually behind these oppressions, leading us right back around to the argument of whom it may be. But, the fact remains that there can be many speculations as to whom or what, as I will certainly, and thoroughly, explore in my upcoming set of books (that is, 'The Evil Side of Creation"), where I will show why I'm pointing fingers at the flesh as the culprit; or, much rather, the fleshly knowledge, wisdom, and understanding of man.

*18. Nobody can without the comforter as their guide ... the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost...
Romans 8:9
But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

Visit this upcoming book's official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

Chapter 1: God Created... From 'In the Beginning.'

Chapter 1: God Created..., from ‘In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start - The Spiritual Side of Creation, Part I.’ An upcoming Christian, Theological Book, by Ted Roberts, concerning Idioms, Metaphors, Parables, Similitude's, and Allegories, which can be traced all the way to the very beginning of time! And, of which, we can see our own salvation’s plan within . . . Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Ministries, Houston, TX, Digging Scriptures for Truth, ©copyright 2017 by Ted Roberts www.seekingthegospel.com

The main purpose of this book is to not only point out that there are indeed metaphoric teachings within the Christian Bible, but to also show how we can actually trace these said metaphors right to the very beginning of time! Since I will be covering the topic of metaphoric understandings in two other books (in this three part topic within the Seeking the Everlasting Gospel series − see page 4), I will only be covering 'the beginning' here, to show folks that this extraordinary idea can certainly be traced back a long, long way; especially since some people feel that metaphors, idioms, parables, and all such like similitude's, may have only come briefly into existence during the early church period − if at all! Or, I'll simply strengthen some folks' thoughts who already figured that those things were in there to begin with. Therefore, I am going to be pointing out, along with other ideas, the differences of both the spiritual and the natural camps of understanding of the Written Word of God. And, again, I shall do so by talking about the Beginning...

In the Beginning . . . God indeed created some wondrous and fantastic things, had He not? But, what exactly did God create? A literal, natural Heaven and Earth? Well, I for one think that there's no mistaking that God had created everything that our natural eye can see. For one to say that Genesis chapter 1 is a blueprint for the natural creation (that is, for all that we can scientifically observe), is a very good conclusion − one that's hard to dispute. In fact, there are a number of Creation Scientists*2 who have spent years in scientific research and study of our natural Earth and the surrounding heavens, and have come to some fantastic conclusions by using Genesis' first chapters as a literal, natural explanation of how God actually did it. Their analytic studies (though sometimes varied from one Creation Scientist to another), can't only withstand against those who cannot see the Bible as scientifically accurate, but with proper observations of the natural Earth, we can, in my opinion, prove that God created everything just as He says in the first part of Genesis.

However, in this book, my main focus is not on the natural creation, which did indeed happen in the way that it says that it did (and there are many good books already in print on that subject that expounds upon this*3), but, rather, this is a study about the spiritual − the "invisible" – side of creation; a subject that only a few have explored, but is just as important as the natural counterpart . . . Nay! But, perhaps, is even of greater importance − for it paints a more vivid picture for the believer, illustrating their next step in their spiritual development, and a more solid ground for salvation.

Colossians 1:16-17
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Yes, the invisible side of the creation, of what natural man and even science cannot see. For, I believe that the invisible side of creation was made along with, and at the same time, as the natural creation − and even today is still being used to convert new Christian souls over to God. And, we shall see, as we continue to plod along, of how that exactly works.

However, taking the Bible in only a naturalistic manner is what most Christians will do. And, by saying Christians, I am meaning those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, and who try to apply those teachings to their lives. But is this always the only route to take with the scriptures? Is this the only way to interpret the Written Word of God? That is, naturalistically? For instance, by saying that Noah's Ark, the flood, and even the Tower of Babel were literal, naturally observed events would be, in my opinion, a very good truth to expound upon − that is, as opposed to them just being simple moral stories with no historical value. As my belief furthers itself, I actually can see that the Ark of Noah is a literal, natural boat, and can even see that the flood was real enough to have actually overtaken the entire planet, being true historical events.*4 But, even if we can take these events as historically accurate, are we supposed take every single instance or thought ever written in the Bible as naturally interpreted events? No, we cannot. Why? Here is why:

Matthew 13:34-35
All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.

Quoting . . .

Psalms 78:2-3
I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us.

Now, just what is a parable?

Parable, H4912, from Strong's Hebrew Dictionary (published 1890; public domain):
A pithy maxim, usually of a metaphorical nature; hence a simile (as an adage, poem, discourse): - byword, like, parable, proverb.*5

By reading these, we can see that a parable should not be taken naturally. If you do take every thought in the Bible as naturally understood only, you may be in danger of misunderstanding a particular thought, and could read something in the Bible that's not even there − not being able to see past the shadowy examples that hide spiritual truths, which are heavenly sayings . . . For example:

Saint John 3:12 (Jesus talking with Nicodemus)
If I have told you earthly things [natural things], and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?

There are obviously heavenly meanings as there are earthly meanings. But, if this is so, then which scriptures do we now see as metaphorical, and which do we take as natural or historical? Let us see what the Apostle Paul teaches us...

2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

God can actually divide His Words of Truth for us into their proper perspectives, and into their rightful camps of spiritual and natural. The Bible has truth − granted! − and IS truth; but, the scriptures must be divided properly, the spiritual from the natural, to see exactly what deep things God is trying to tell His children. Let Him give us an ear to hear,*6 let Him circumcise our ears*7 and our hearts,*8 so that we will be able to receive the proper Word of Truth; and let's not take everything written therein as simple tales, and at natural face value only – and, all in the wrong places. These parables (as can be seen in Psalms 78:2-3) were given shadowy meanings − and, so strong are these shadows that even the most dedicated Christians can sometimes miss them. Yet, then again, we do not receive the understanding of them automatically, nor overnight; but we learn them over time, as the Spirit sees proper to give us insight.

Now, let's dig even deeper; and, I will make notes [within brackets] along the way in these next quoted scriptures:

1 Corinthians 2:6-14
Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect [mature in Christ]: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought [nothing]: But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden [invisible] wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory [again, see Psalms 78:2-3; and, too, this will show us how metaphors were developed at the beginning of His entire work]: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him [i.e. parablistic metaphors, with the deep meanings of God, hidden in shadowy sayings]. But God hath revealed them unto us [the Elect] by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God [hidden things, hidden from carnal minds]. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God [that is, when we get an ear to hear]. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth [only the Holy Ghost can teach us these things]; comparing spiritual things with spiritual [spiritually understood things]. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

What can be said of all this? Can we not see that there are hidden messages in God's Written Word? But why? If that is really so, then why would He hide them? Why couldn't all His truths be thrown out in plain sight for the whole world to see? . . . Let's take that question to the next step:

Matthew 13:10-17
And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He [Jesus] answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you [the Elect] to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven [which are hidden messages], but to them [the non-Elect] it is not given. For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias [Isaiah], which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them [which is something that God, obviously, does NOT want to do!]. But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear. For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

Now, let's go even further with these thoughts:

Isaiah 29:9-14
Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink. For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep [not literally dead, but dead to God's truths], and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered. And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book [i.e. the Word of God] that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed: And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men: Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid.

Now, we need to analyze the scriptures that we just went over − not only Isaiah 29:9-14, but also Matthew 13:10-17, and even 1st Corinthians 2:6-14. Surely, we can see now that the Bible certainly does hold hidden messages. But hidden to whom? And, again, why? . . . Let's first try and figure out whom the 'princes of this world' are from 1st Corinthians, and then see if they coincide with the 'bad guys' of Isaiah; and, indeed, with those to whom Jesus wanted to hide the spiritual meanings from during His ministry.

First, who were, or are, the 'princes of this world?' Now, the first thought that comes to our minds are worldly, political leaders. For instance, Caesar of Rome. Or, even his cronies throughout the Empire − even down to Pontius Pilate himself . . . But, to this assessment, I'd have to disagree . . . Let's consider Paul's words:

1 Corinthians 2:6-8
Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.

As we should remember, Pontius Pilate actually found no fault with Jesus, and had wanted to let him go. But, there was another group of folks that wouldn't let Pilate do so.

St. John 19:12
And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him [Jesus]: but the Jews [instigated by the Jewish religious leaders – the main antagonists!] cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar.

We can see plainly here that Pilate's hands were being forced. But, by whom? If Pilate was the person who ordered the execution, doesn't that make him the Prince of whom Paul said (in 1st Corinthians) that he wouldn't have crucified Him had he known the wisdom of God? Well, the scriptures just above verse 12, in St. John 19, may hold the key:

John 19:10-11
Then saith Pilate unto him [Jesus], Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.

So saying, those who actually delivered Jesus to be crucified are the responsible and guilty party. Having said this, can it make any sense to say that the Jewish leaders of Jesus' day were considered the princes of this world? Well, we can trace, all the way back to the Garden of Eden, where mankind wanted to be something that they are not. In Adam and Eve's case, they wanted to be as gods. In the Pharisees' case, they wanted power − and power they did wield − so much so, that they crucified the Lord of glory. So, yes, it would make sense to say that these are the same men that Isaiah spoke about in Isaiah 29:9-14, who were blind to the truths of God; and, is also the same men to whom Jesus purposely hid truths from, by masking them behind the institution of parables. Even if during the instance in scripture, when Jesus spoke his parable in Matthew chapter 13, didn't actually say that the Pharisees were present − or even the Scribes or Sadducees − we do know that they tried their best, during Jesus' ministry, to be involved in what He was doing, simply to try and find something that He said or did to their disliking, so that they could hold it against him in the near future . . . We also should consider his ending statement:

Matthew 13:9
Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Naturally, most folks have ears! But, we know that he meant (metaphorically) that those who had ears to hear spiritual things, let them so hear. But, as for folks who had darkened hearts, and were only there for ill intent, their eyes and ears were closed, as Isaiah points out in Isaiah 29:9-14. If we are to say that the religious leaders (or even their henchmen) weren't in the crowd that had gathered in Matthew 13:2, then why did Jesus find it necessary to even make that statement in verse 9? That is, "Who hath ears to hear, let him hear?" Nay; but, since folks were there with evil intentions, as much as they could be, Jesus spoke to the crowd in parables (metaphors), just as it was prophesied of Him in Psalms 78:2, and confirmed in Matthew 13:34-35.
Considering these things, can we truly say that all of God's truths are out in the open to where ANYBODY can hear and understand? Or, should we say, rather, that God's truths (His real truths) are hidden behind the curtain of spiritually understood parables and metaphors − meant only for the true children of God (the Elect) to understand? Therefore, and if that is really true, we better roll up our sleeves and get to work on asking God to help us to decipher His hidden Word. Do we really want to be left in the dark on His truths?

However, I have heard it said several times before that the Bible is open, and plainly understood, and that we don't need some Bible expert to help us understand what God says plainly to the whole world. Well, as far as that thought is concerned, I think that the Pharisees would have disagreed! But, and at the same time, I'm certainly not downing those folks who believe this. After all, we do have statements by the Apostle John that says things on this wise:

1 John 2:27
But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

But, allow me to also point out another set of scriptures:

Romans 10:13-15
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
And, also:

1 Corinthians 1:21
For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

So, do we need a preacher to enlighten us, or not? I will say that the folks, of whom read 1st John 2:27, and have understood John to mean that we have no need of preachers to teach us truths concerning the Bible (and especially hidden truths in the Bible), are, in my estimation, misunderstanding what's being said by John. The funny thing is, a lot of people who say that we don't need a called Biblical teacher to teach us truths about God's Words are claiming to be preachers themselves. Seriously, if we are having ministers teaching such ideas, then I'd have to ask what possessed them to contradict the job of a preacher in the first place? Wouldn't preaching such a thing be refuting their own words, since they are preaching and teaching against preaching and teaching? But, I will certainly agree that we don't need preachers like the Pharisees. And, believe you me, there are many preachers out there with that kind of a spirit! Those are the ministers (princes of this 'religious' world) who are actually contradicting God's Word, and of whom God has blinded the eyes of, and of whom God hides His hidden truths from on purpose . . . And, did you notice how I snuck in the statement "princes of this 'religious' world?" For, that is my assessment of whom the 'princes of the world' are from Paul's letter; that is, not being of this 'ungodly' world, but rather of the 'religious' world. And, there are some like this today − 'princes of this present religious world' − who have the same spirit that the Pharisees had all those years ago . . . Surely, there is nothing new under the sun.*9

Now, back to what John meant, in 1st John 2:27, is that we have no need for a man to teach us who is NOT anointed with the Spirit of Truth. This gives us our perfect balance between 1st John 2:27, Romans 10:13-15, and 1st Corinthians 1:21, in that one passage says that we don't need a man to teach us, and the others paint a picture that we do. When we first come to the Lord, we aren't at the point of being teachers ourselves, but are in need of being taught.*10 And, as John points out, it is very true that the Spirit of Truth (i.e. the Holy Spirit, when it is in teaching form) is the true teacher, in that it will line up with an anointed teacher of God (even though they are human), and ring true in our hearts (having a spiritual ear to hear what's being said). However, if we are of the spirit of Pharisee, then no matter what's being said, we will be blind to truths, seeing as we have no Spirit of Truth (the anointing) abiding within us, and we will not be able to receive anything − no matter what kind of preacher is speaking! Therefore, we have no need that a man of his own flesh and speaking teach us; for, when a person preaches from the very throne of God, it's not him speaking anymore, but God is speaking through him...

John 7:38
He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly*11 shall flow rivers of living water.

Again, let's not take this naturally, but rather metaphorically (as I point out in detail in my End Note for Belly], that when an anointed preacher of God speaks, rivers of living water will proceed out of him. Could a Pharisee do this? And, notice, too, what is said in the very next verse:

John 7:39a
But this spake he of the Spirit...

Again, this is the anointing, the Spirit of Truth, which proceeds out of a true teacher of God, and not a Pharisee. This is where truth springs from when we are anointed by God. But, without this anointing, we have no need for a man (that is, just man alone, and without God's assistance) to teach us anything. So, in other words, if a person is not anointed to teach or preach, then listening to them would be a complete waste of our time. This is the theme of what John was meaning − it's the anointing of Christ that compels truth to be conveyed. And, without it, we have no need for a natural man to teach us anything.

END NOTES for Chapter 1
God Created...

*2. A number of Creation Scientists...
For example, Dr. Carl Baugh: creationevidence.org
Ken Ham: answersingenesis.org
Dr. Kent Hovind: 2peter3.com
Eric Hovind: creationtoday.org
Dr. Walt Brown: creationscience.com
Dr. Henry Morris: icr.org
Dr. Duane Gish: creation.com ... and, etc.

*3. There are many good books already in print on that subject that expounds upon this...
Of course, the short list of gentlemen, of whose names I give in the previous End Note, entitled: "A number of Creation Scientists," would be the leading writers and commentators on these subjects. I know that there are many others who contribute to this wonderful research, but these are the scientists who head the list for me; and, I highly recommend their work to any of my readers who have an interest in studying the subject of the natural creation. And, even though every one of them are experts in their own fields, and that I enjoy them one and all, I would suggest (if you are new to this subject) to first listen and watch the Creation Seminars (eight in number) of Dr. Kent Hovind. They are available for purchase in DVD format at his official website: 2peter3.com; or, are available for viewing on his official YouTube channel, at:
www.youtube.com/channel/UCxiEtqPja47n...
(I know, it's a crazy address!). Or, you can simply do a search on YouTube for them. Once you reach his official YouTube page, simply scroll downward until you see 'Creation Seminar.' ... Also, I want to point out that even though I agree with a lot of these men's scientific assessments, that I do not necessarily agree with everything that they say, nor with their other doctrinal or futuristic insights into the scriptures. However, I feel that this is no cause to totally ignore other people's thoughts on the Written Word of God − that is, if not all of their views matches the person concerned. If a person is dedicated to God, and is doing their best to serve Him, I think that God will enlighten them on His Word in many areas, and especially of what He wants them to know; though, He may not enlighten them on all areas of scripture ... In our continued endeavor to learn as much as we can about God's Word (and, indeed, as I point out on pages 5-6 of this book), we must realize that a sincere Christian would never try and deceive God's children with what they teach; but, and because we are all housed within flesh, we are apt to make mistakes (myself included in this!), and we must be patient with teachers, to try and discern God's truths with the Spirit of Christ that He has placed within us ... But, and on the other side of this thought, there are many who teach who have the spirit of a Pharisee (in that they are all for themselves, and are in it only for self-gain). These people may certainly have been blinded by God to His truths on purpose [2nd Thessalonians 2:7-12] ... For more information on this, please keep reading in chapter 1 of this present Book, for I truly get into the subject about those who have this spirit of a Pharisee.

*4. And were true historical events...
Again, and as I have done in two previous End Notes, I will recommend the Creation Scientists that I have listed for full explanations on these areas of history. Their arguments (or, rather, apologetics) for the historical accuracy of a world-wide flood (if given time, and observed with an open mind) will be seen to be extremely adequate, and a major contribution to the world of scientific and historic study.

*5. Parable / Proverb...
I can appreciate this Strong's entry for advancing so quickly to the point of explanation. But, for the average layman, these small details could cause further confusion for some of us who don't use words like 'pithy,' 'maxim,' 'simile,' 'adage,' or 'byword' in our everyday vocabulary ... Therefore, I will expound:

Pithy, from Webster's Dictionary (published 1828; public domain): 1) Containing concentrated force; forcible; energetic; as a pithy word or expression. 2) Uttering energetic words or expressions.

Maxim, from Webster's Dictionary: An established principle or proposition ... generally received or admitted as true. It is nearly the same in popular usage, as axiom in philosophy ... Axiom: A self evident truth, or a proposition whose truth is so evident at first sight, that no process of reasoning or demonstration can make it plainer.

Proverb, from Webster's Dictionary: 1) A short sentence often repeated, expressing a well known truth or common fact, ascertained by experience or observation; a maxim of wisdom. 3) In Scripture, it sometimes signifies a moral sentence or maxim that is enigmatical; a dark saying of the wise that requires interpretation. Proverbs 1.

Metaphor, from Webster's Dictionary: A short similitude [simile] ... reduced to a single word; or a word expressing similitude without the signs of comparison. Thus "that man is a fox," is a metaphor; but "that man is like a fox," is a similitude or comparison.

Simile, from Webster's Dictionary: In rhetoric, similitude; a comparison of two things which, however different in other respects, have some strong point or points of resemblance.

Adage, from Webster's Dictionary: A proverb ... a wise observation handed down from antiquity.

Byword, from Webster's Dictionary: A common saying; a proverb.

Therefore, in usage of these explanations, we can come to a clearer understanding of Strong's definition for the word parable: "A pithy [an energetic expression] maxim [A true, established principle or proposition], usually of a metaphorical nature [a figure of speech not to be taken literally]; hence a simile [similar comparison of two things] (as an adage [old proverb], poem, discourse): - byword [proverb of antiquity], like, parable, proverb." So, basically, what we come up with for parables are nothing more than metaphors! Which, again, are symbolic words that, as they convey truths, aren't to be taken literally ... But, even so, I need to add a postscript to these thoughts – especially since I will be quoting the following sentence very soon in the main part of the book: "By reading these [i.e. Strong's Dictionary meanings for 'parable'], we can see that a parable should not be taken naturally." Keep in mind, while reading this, that just because something is spiritual, rather than natural, that it doesn't automatically make the metaphor itself unrealistic; or, that it can't also be physically tangible – as if a parable were nothing more than a simple, moral lesson only, which has no basis in reality. Indeed, one of the definitions, according to the Webster's 1828 dictionary for Parable, has us believing that it's quite possible for a parable to be mere fiction: "A fable or allegorical relation or representation of something real in life or nature, from which a moral is drawn for instruction." As we will continue to see in the upcoming chapters of this book (as I slowly build my case), parables and metaphors actually go much, much deeper. But, that's not to say that this Webster's Dictionary meaning should be tossed out the door. He was giving round-about meanings to fit different situations in life; and, a 'fabled story' was only one possible definition. The two others included 'an allegorical relation,' or even a 'representation of something real in life or nature' ... As I hope to show in this book, nothing in the Bible is a fable, or unreal – even though there are moralistic lessons to be learned thereby ... Also, and on another note, one will see my general usage of the word 'metaphor' throughout. I've decided to primarily use this word when describing 'spiritually understood' verses in the Biblical text. Even though there's a small array of other words that the Bible uses – and, I will also use them, too – such as parable, proverb, allegory, figure, and etc. (and, even though they're in the same immediate family with one another, each one has some differences to them, which can be viewed in Webster's Dictionary), I primarily wanted to try and simplify these thoughts as best as possible in this present book for the reader. So, with that in mind, I have rounded all of them off with the simple word 'metaphor' for several reasons: 1) it's a modern word that most folks can relate to and understand; 2) these other words (and, basically, as I've said in point 1) aren't in general use in today's society; 3) I'm merely wanting to point out, by the usage of this word, that there are many verses in the Bible that should be looked upon in deeper ways; 'metaphor' seemed the best word for a general sense; and 4) usage of all these other descriptive words can get a little confusing; but, we are to simply understand (as I've said several times before – and, to which all of these other descriptive words are basically saying), is that there are some double-meanings to what we're reading in the sacred text; of which wording demands further research than what a mere, quick reading would produce ... Therefore, I will conclude that my take of a metaphor is that it's an illustrated explanation (of a very real and tangible person, place or thing – or even a situation – though they are of the spiritual realm) that is demonstrated colorfully by the usage of natural things or elements (that are at our disposal, and of which we can relate to) for easier understandings. And this is working within the confines of our earlier Webster's Dictionary meaning for metaphor; well, at least the first part of it, when saying that it's "A short similitude [simile] reduced to a single word." But then, who also proceeded to describe that when the metaphor becomes a full length comparison of two things, then it actually becomes a full-fledged simile. Despite that, however, they still work hand-in-hand with each other, and it all falls into the category of metaphor. This wide-viewed definition to our word simply tells us that it's a non-literal explanation to many Biblical situations which actually have 'heavenly meanings' rather than mere literalistic and natural interpretations.

*6. An ear to hear...
Revelation 2:7a
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches...

This phrase is repeated in Revelation 2:11; 2:17; 2:29; 3:6; 3:13; 3:22; and 13:9.

*7. Circumcise our ears...
Jeremiah 6:10
To whom shall I speak, and give warning, that they may hear? behold, their ear is uncircumcised, and they cannot hearken: behold, the word of the LORD is unto them a reproach; they have no delight in it.

Acts 7:51
Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.

*8. Circumcise our hearts...
Jeremiah 9:26c
...all the house of Israel are uncircumcised in the heart.

Ezekiel 44:7a
In that ye have brought into my sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart...

Ezekiel 44:9
Thus saith the Lord GOD; No stranger, uncircumcised in heart, nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary, of any stranger that is among the children of Israel.

*9. There is nothing new under the sun...
Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.

*10. Are in need of being taught...
Paul even illustrates this point to some who, being in God's services for a while, were still in need of teaching:

Hebrews 5:12
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat.

And, of course, the thought must arise: who would teach these folks if there is no need for teachers that are of mankind?

*11. Out of his belly...
As you continue reading down from this point (in the main part of the book), Jesus, as it is told by John (in verse 39 of the Gospel of John, chapter 7), meant for his true listeners to understand that He was speaking of the Holy Spirit (or, much rather, the Spirit of Truth − in flowing with Godly wisdom and Godly words) when He told of the living waters proceeding out of their bellies. If we use these passages correctly, and metaphorically, we won't be picturing natural water spewing out from people's stomachs! By mentioning the Spirit, in a similitude of natural water, Jesus, in this passage, demands us to look upon this thought spiritually, rather than naturally ... But, even so, what does the belly supposed to represent in this instance? Well, for one, let's simply go to the original Greek meaning for belly...

Belly (Koilia), G2836, from Strong's Greek Dictionary: A cavity, that is ... the abdomen.
Cavity, from Webster's Dictionary: A hollow place; hollowness; an opening; as the cavity of the mouth or throat. This is a word of very general signification.

Abdomen, from Webster's Dictionary: The lower belly or that part of the body which lies between the thorax and the bottom of the pelvis.

Of, course, that's the natural interpretation. But, let's continue:

Belly, G2836, continued from Strong's Greek Dictionary: ...by implication the matrix...
Matrix (Rechem), H7358, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary: the womb.

Womb, from Webster's Dictionary:
1) The uterus or matrix of a female; that part where the young of an animal is conceived and nourished till its birth. 2) The place where any thing is produced. 3) Any large or deep cavity.

Belly, G2836, continued from Strong's Greek Dictionary: ...figuratively the heart: - belly, womb.

Of course, this last entry for Strong's definition of Belly is very interesting, and obviously on the right track for what we are seeking. As I'm pointing out in this book, Jesus loved using metaphors to teach; and, He certainly meant for the children of God to catch these things when He spoke − especially in making references to water spewing forth from our bellies! Necessarily, Strong's often gives definitions for both the natural and spiritual meanings for words. In this case, the natural definition is stomach; but, when it comes to the spiritual meaning (or, as it says, figuratively), it gives reference to the heart. Of course, being figurative, we aren't going to make the mistake in thinking that this means our natural heart. The best thing that our natural hearts do is in pumping our natural blood; but, a metaphorical heart can certainly do more than that. And, in trying to make our connection (from belly to heart), we need also to use the other definitions that Strong's gave, such as Cavity, and Matrix − seeing as one is defined as "A hollowed opening," and the other is "A deep cavity where something is produced." So saying, the heart (when metaphorically looked upon) can show us how there can certainly be something planted within our unfilled mass by God's Holy Spirit, which works on the inside of us; and will, eventually, show up on the outside for those who can observe it. Therefore, and in anticipation of that, we must admit that the most functioning item within our natural bodies (which God will make use of for His Kingdom) is our mind − which is another definition, metaphorically, for heart ... Taking for instance:

Matthew 5:8
Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.

We cannot take this passage to mean that only folks who don't have a 'heart disease' will see God; but, metaphorically, we have to agree that it will be those whose minds are pure. Especially when Strong's defines heart as thus:

Heart (Kardia), G2588, from Strong's Greek Dictionary: The heart, that is, (figuratively) the thoughts or feelings (mind).

So, and in seeing these things, we can understand Jesus' words to mean that when God fills us with His Spirit (when we were before empty of anything Godly), He can now use us as His instruments to deploy Godly words, which will flow out of us like living waters ... and, again, living waters is certainly a reference to the Holy Spirit. See, for instance, Isaiah 44:3 and 1Corinthians 12:13.

Visit the official webpage for this upcoming book: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

'In the Beginning: It was Spiritual from the Very Start' NEW BOOK coming soon - The Introduction...

THE INTRODUCTION, from ‘In the Beginning: It Was Spiritual From the Very Start - The Spiritual Side of Creation, Part I.’ An upcoming Christian, Theological Book, by Ted Roberts, concerning Idioms, Metaphors, Parables, Similitude's, and Allegories, which can be traced all the way to the very beginning of time! And, of which, we can see our own salvation’s plan within . . . Seeking the Everlasting Gospel Ministries, Houston, TX, Digging Scriptures for Truth, ©copyright 2017 by Ted Roberts www.seekingthegospel.com

A lot of folks aren't aware that I have actually been writing the Seeking the Everlasting Gospel teaching series since the year 2000 A.D, but were heretofore unpublished. However, I actually had a two page essay on Biblical doctrine written as early as 1999. Not only so, but I'd say from around 2006 I had a lot of the material written (or begun) in my teaching series, and by 2011 I had something written on just about every subject that I intend on covering . . . well, thus far, anyway . . . This mounts up to around 20 books worth of material for the foreseeable future! However, I have been going behind myself editing and updating the texts. Even though God's Word doesn't change, I've certainly progressed in my education on the Bible and History, and am wanting to make what I had written previously as perfect as I can, whilst adding new End Notes to make sure I cover every ground on these subjects as possible.

Besides this, and even before I began writing these things, I believe that God had given me certain insight to these said subjects in the form of the Sun, Moon, and Stars: which, incidentally, will be the third book title for "The Spiritual Side of Creation," in this particular part of my Bible teaching series. This had culminated into some charts that I drew up, the first two by hand in A.D. 1996, then a better drawing by computer design in 2006 (which drawings I am sharing within this Introduction). Please note, however, that even though these 'heavenly' elements are sometimes used to demonstrate teachings about astrology, I have no, nor ever had any intention to walk the steps that lead into that world of thought. Nay! − but, much to the contrary − I am instead using them (just as the Christian Bible uses them) to illustrate such natural phenomenon in comparison to deeper metaphoric understandings of God's Word − which the purpose of this present book is thus engaged.

Even though I have been reading and studying my Bible since I was 15 years of age (which was back in 1986), I did not understand the picture that I believe God began to show me just a few years afterwards. Indeed, from a personal experience that I had with God back in 1996, when I was aged 25, the scriptures suddenly began to open up to me in a way that I had never dreamt possible! I had compared the experience to viewing Stereogram hidden image pictures − that is, those pictures that have a repeated design all over the page to where, when you focus your eyes in such a way, a 3-D image, which was deeply hidden, suddenly pops out that wasn't noticeable before. Therefore, I had begun to see a somewhat clearer picture of what had ultimately led to the 'Salvation of Man' chart, which I finally updated by computer design, as I've mentioned, in A.D. 2006.

Of course, it has taken me these many years to see and understand the things that God was at first showing me − and even now I am still learning! Truly, I am amongst the number who believe that there is no man in existence who knows all there is to know about God, or even can expound to the very last sentence the full meaning of our Bibles. This is why I shudder to think that there are many who say we don't even need God's Written Word today, and that we should toss it into the trash can! Have we really figured out all that is written therein? I say nay! So, let's keep studying.

"In the Bible there is enough clarity to enlighten the Elect, and enough obscurity to humble them."
− Blaise Pascal

"Holy Scripture excels all branches of learning in the very way it speaks; for with one and the same expression, while it recounts history it utters a mystery."
− Gregory the Great

What I have written herein, and, indeed!, as in all my writings, is but a small portion of God's greatness that He was kind enough to enlighten me on. This is my lot, my small portion; and, happy am I to receive and to share.

As I've mentioned, most of the Seeking the Everlasting Gospel series has already been written; and, for about the past 15 years, I have been going back and forth over my writings (whenever God was kind enough to enlighten me a bit more on His Word), editing, rewriting, adding, subtracting, starting new subjects, and so-forth – hence, the updated dates that are seen on the first page. Therefore, and with that in mind, and even though I had first wrote this present book back in December of 2000 A.D. (on the topic of metaphors being as old as the Bible itself), I felt it necessary to continue to explain, throughout my other writings also, that there are parablistic understandings to be gained from a lot of scripture throughout the Bible − since I assumed that when I did finally publish these writings some folks may not read this book first, and I felt the need to explain certain things on that score further just in case, since I feel that the understanding of metaphoric usage to be of extreme importance in Biblical research. Indeed, I even cover such jargon in "Brotherly Love: The Gospel of Jesus Christ," the first book in my teaching series to get published.

So, in conclusion to those thoughts, I must apologize to the reader if it seems that the continual mentioning of such an idea seems to get repetitious in my texts (and, indeed, if they find some things repeated a second or third time in my other books, as well); but, such explanations, I hope the reader will see, is a road that must be fully driven if one is to inhale the massive spectrum and enlightenment that God offers those who desire Godly knowledge, wisdom, and understanding (Proverbs 2:6*1). This present work, however, and the two other books that will follow in the "Spiritual Side of Creation" part of my teaching series, are actually the most detailed on that subject. And, hopefully, by the time the third book is published (again, in the "Spiritual Side of Creation" part of this series), the idea of metaphors, idioms, parables, etc., will be seen as a necessary ingredient into the understanding of God's Word.

Now, as to the 'Salvation of Man' chart itself (as developed in 2006), and as to its meaning, there is no way that it can be fully explained within this present book – i.e. this introduction to the base meaning of the chart. The full explanation is the core and foundation of all my writings combined! Therefore, I ask for patience as I delve into that matter one subject at a time − or, much rather, one book at a time.

Ted Roberts
2016

END NOTE for THE INTRODUCTION

*1. Godly knowledge, wisdom, and understanding...

Proverbs 2:6
For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.

I have come to feel that the combination of these three elements (i.e. Godly Knowledge, Wisdom, and Understanding) will be the vehicle that God will use to further our salvation along. That is, to arrive at its completeness ... I also feel, as Paul describes in his letters, that these elements are in accordance to the Breadth, Length, Depth, and the Height of Godliness − of where we need to eventually be in His Kingdom:

Ephesians 3:17-19
That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge [i.e. passes fleshly knowledge], that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God.

This present book will certainly be the introduction to the understanding of these things (again, Godly Knowledge, Wisdom, and Understanding); and, as I will (not only within this volume, but also in my other books to come) expound upon this idea further, and to show their importance in our walk with God, I will also show how it differs (as much as North differs from South), from FLESHLY Knowledge, Wisdom, and Understanding.

...To read more, please visit my official webpage: http://www.seekingthegospel.com/inthe...

NEW BOOK COMING SOON!

Just letting you guys know that as of yesterday, I have finished the first rough draft of my third book (which is in the 'Seeking the Everlasting Gospel' teaching series), and had written my final chapter therein. Of course, it's not over yet! I still have to go back and add some more End Notes, and to do some serious editing. But, this is good news to me. It's always nice to near the end of a project! Certainly, I will keep all of you posted as to its completion, giving y'all updates, and showing the title and book cover as soon as possible...

End Notes for Chapter 2: Is God in Absolute Control?

*God intervenes one hundred percent with most of the life forms on this planet...
My wording in this sentence may seem a bit odd, and curiously placed. Unfortunately, it probably won't make much sense at this point in the book, and as to why I even said it this way, until the reader digs deeper into the pages . . . As will be seen later, the 100% estimation will be concerning, primarily, the elect of God, whilst leaving the ungodly with 0% to 75% intervention from the Master's hand (that's a huge estimation, no doubt!); depending, that is, on how much He needs them for His temporal employ . . . I hope to convey that even though I believe God is a major, major part of a Christian's life (more so than what most folks realize – i.e. He is their everything!), that it does not dictate, even in the slightest (according to the theme of this book), that all of it revolves around trials and tribulations. Later on, in Chapter 3, I do illustrate that point. Basically, as we live this life, we see that it is full of ups and downs . . . Or, I should say, filled with both trials and blessings from the Master's hand . . . But, like I said, keep reading, and this will all make better sense later on.

*Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible...
Published in 1810-1826; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
Adam Clarke (b. 1760–1762, d. August 28, 1832) was a British Methodist theologian and Biblical scholar. He was born in the townland of Moybeg Kirley near Tobermore in Northern Ireland . . . He is chiefly remembered for writing a commentary on the Bible which took him 40 years to complete and which was a primary Methodist theological resource for two centuries . . . It may be the most comprehensive commentary on the Bible ever prepared by one man. By himself he produced nearly half as much material as the scores of scholars who collaborated on the twelve-volume The Interpreters’ Bible.

*The Treasury of David, by Charles Haddon (CH) Spurgeon...
Published in 1869-1885; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
Charles Haddon (CH) Spurgeon (19 June 1834 – 31 January 1892) was a British Particular Baptist preacher. Spurgeon remains highly influential among Christians of various denominations, among whom he is known as the "Prince of Preachers". He was a strong figure in the Reformed Baptist tradition, defending the Church in agreement with the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith understanding, and opposing the liberal and pragmatic theological tendencies in the Church of his day . . . Spurgeon was the pastor of the congregation of the New Park Street Chapel (later the Metropolitan Tabernacle) in London for 38 years. He was part of several controversies with the Baptist Union of Great Britain and later he left the denomination over doctrinal convictions. In 1867, he started a charity organisation which is now called Spurgeon's and works globally. He also founded Spurgeon's College, which was named after him posthumously . . . Spurgeon was a prolific author of many types of works including sermons, an autobiography, commentaries, books on prayer, devotionals, magazines, poetry, hymns and more. Many sermons were transcribed as he spoke and were translated into many languages during his lifetime. Spurgeon produced powerful sermons of penetrating thought and precise exposition. His oratory skills held his listeners spellbound in the Metropolitan Tabernacle and many Christians hold his writings in exceptionally high regard among devotional literature.

*John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible...
Published in 1748-1763; 1809; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
John Gill (23 November 1697 – 14 October 1771) was an English Baptist pastor, Biblical scholar, and theologian who held to a firm Calvinistic soteriology. Born in Kettering, Northamptonshire, he attended Kettering Grammar School where he mastered the Latin classics and learned Greek by age 11. He continued self-study in everything from logic to Hebrew, his love for the latter remaining throughout his life . . . John Gill was the first major writing Baptist theologian, his work retaining influence into the 21st century.

*Isaiah 45:7...
In consideration of this verse, of God actually creating evil, I must say a few things on that here at this point. Even though I breeze through it in the main part of this book (since this certainly isn't our main topic; and, especially since I will be tackling this controversial issue head-on in the second part of this particular series [in my book entitled: Satan, the Devil, and Hell], which will be our main focus then), I must, however, speak on it somewhat here in this End Note, considering that such an important matter as this is – which, incidentally, does coincide directly with the topic at hand – it, therefore, just simply cannot be ignored. So, let's consider, according to Biblehub.com, when it lists parallel verses for Isaiah 45:7 from other translations, of the 22 different Bible versions compared, that only 10 of them use the English word evil for the Hebrew word Ra; insinuating that what God created, as opposed to wicked evil, was (as some suggested) disaster or calamity. This is completely understandable, since we all know of the goodness of God, and that it is impossible for Him to bask in anything bad; or, for Him to even look upon sin. Therefore, these other versions, which say disaster or calamity, are, instead, suggesting some other type of bad things (such as, for instance, natural disasters), rather than actual wicked evil . . . But, are they really justified in using a word other than evil in their translations? What does Strong's Hebrew Dictionary have to say about the Hebrew word Ra?
Ra, # H7451, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary
From H7489; bad or (as noun) evil (naturally or morally). This includes the second (feminine) form; as adjective or noun: - adversity, affliction, bad, calamity, + displease (-ure), distress, evil ([-favouredness], man, thing), + exceedingly, great, grief (-vous), harm, heavy, hurt (-ful), ill (favoured), + mark, mischief, (-vous), misery, naught (-ty), noisome, + not please, sad (-ly), sore, sorrow, trouble, vex, wicked (-ly, -ness, one), worse (-st) wretchedness, wrong. [Including feminine ra’ah; as adjective or noun.]
Well, the official definition certainly went a bit further than just some random calamities (such as mere natural disasters), especially when the entry included things like: Natural or moral evil; wicked; and wretchedness. Calamity, however, was mentioned only once during the course . . . Let's dig even deeper, though, and consult another source – one that takes word study to a whole new level:
AMG's Annotated Strong's Dictionaries
© 2003
An adjective meaning bad, evil. The basic meaning of this word [Ra] displays ten or more various shades of the meaning of evil according to its contextual usage. It means bad in a moral and ethical sense and is used to describe, along with good, the entire spectrum of good and evil; hence, it depicts evil in an absolute, negative sense, as when it describes the tree of knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:9; 3:5; 22) . . . The word takes on the aspect of something disagreeable, unwholesome, or harmful . . . In a literal sense, the word depicts something that is of poor quality or even ugly in appearance . . . Used as a noun, the word indicates realities that are inherently evil, wicked, or bad . . . The noun also depicts people of wickedness, that is, wicked people.
And, that was just a small taste of what this extended dictionary relates about this word. But, since I am only allowed to use small portions of this reference herein, because of copyright concerns, I would definitely recommend this wonderful and extremely useful study guide to all my serious readers . . . Even though calamity is certainly one of the word's meanings, it is, by far, the mildest of its definitions. Basically speaking, God created evil – in all of its varied forms – including, as we've read, wickedness! . . . But, if this is really so (which it certainly appears to be!) could this cause a problem for the Christians? Absolutely not! Do we not know that there isn't anything made that was made that wasn't by the hand of God? [see, again, Colossians 1:16-17] Our Lord had created everything, and set all things into motion – but, even if it can be proven that He created evil in the first place, it certainly doesn't mean that He is evil Himself, or that He takes pleasure in it! I have absolutely no problem in knowing that God, indeed, created evil – including wicked evil . . . But, again, this is but a small taste of what I'll be covering in Part 2 of this series. And, I know that this has probably raised more questions than what I have answered. But, for now, let's allow what I have just written to sink in – especially the official Strong's Dictionary meanings to the complex Hebrew word Ra. And, perhaps, as we plod along in this present book, the realization of what I have just presented will make more sense...

*Geneva Bible Translation Notes...
Published in 1599; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
The Geneva Bible is one of the most historically significant translations of the Bible into English, preceding the King James translation by 51 years. It was the primary Bible of 16th century English Protestantism and was the Bible used by William Shakespeare, Oliver Cromwell, John Knox, John Donne, and John Bunyan, author of Pilgrim's Progress (1678). It was one of the Bibles taken to America on the Mayflower (Pilgrim Hall Museum and Dr. Jiang have collected several Bibles of Mayflower passengers). The Geneva Bible was used by many English Dissenters, and it was still respected by Oliver Cromwell's soldiers at the time of the English Civil War, in the booklet "Cromwell's Soldiers' Pocket Bible" . . . This version of the Bible is significant because, for the very first time, a mechanically printed, mass-produced Bible was made available directly to the general public which came with a variety of scriptural study guides and aids (collectively called an apparatus), which included verse citations that allow the reader to cross-reference one verse with numerous relevant verses in the rest of the Bible, introductions to each book of the Bible that acted to summarize all of the material that each book would cover, maps, tables, woodcut illustrations, indices, as well as other included features — all of which would eventually lead to the reputation of the Geneva Bible as history's very first study Bible. Because the language of the Geneva Bible was more forceful and vigorous, most readers strongly preferred this version to the Great Bible. In the words of Cleland Boyd McAfee, "it drove the Great Bible off the field by sheer power of excellence."

*Albert Barne's Notes on the Bible...
Published in 1847-85; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
Albert Barnes (December 1, 1798 – December 24, 1870) was an American theologian, born in Rome, New York. He graduated from Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, in 1820, and from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1823. Barnes was ordained as a Presbyterian minister by the presbytery of Elizabethtown, New Jersey, in 1825, and was the pastor successively of the Presbyterian Church in Morristown, New Jersey (1825–1830), and of the First Presbyterian Church of Philadelphia (1830–1868).

*Poor Man's Commentary by Robert Hawker...
Published in 1805; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
Robert Hawker (1753–1827) was an Anglican priest in Devon vicar of Charles Church, Plymouth. Called "Star of the West" for his popular preaching, he was known as an evangelical and author. The Cornish poet Robert Stephen Hawker was his grandson . . . He was a man of great frame, burly, strong and with blue eyes that sparkled and a fresh complexion. His humour was deep and razor sharp and his wit popular although he had a solemn exterior and in conversation would resort to silence while contemplating a difficult retort. He played the violin well and was an excellent scholar. Almost as soon as he arrived as curate he started writing and poured out over the year a long list of books, volumes of sermons, a theological treatise, a popular commentary, a guide to communion and also books of lessons in reading and writing for the schools. For a work of his on the divinity of Christ (combating the rise of Unitarianism) the University of Edinburgh conferred upon him a degree of Doctor of Divinity in 1792. He also produced the “Poor Man’s Morning and Evening Portions” that were used long after his death.

*Unless the Spirit first draw us...
St. John 6:44a [Jesus speaking]
No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him...
This passage certainly insinuates, without a doubt, that we are unable to come to God unless we are first called; or drawn . . . nay, pulled! We, who are born into carnality, have to be pulled into His service, else we would not come to Him at all.
Draw, Strong's Greek Dictionary
helkuo, #G1670: to drag (literally or figuratively): - draw.
AMG's Annotated Strong's Dictionaries
© 2003
To draw or drag; of persons: to drag, to force before magistrates; or out of a place; metaphorically to draw, induce to come.
This word can certainly take on the aspects of literally forcing somebody to go to a place where they did not wish to go. But, can that make any sense? Especially when most folks are taught that what God actually does is that He woos the potential Christian into His fold; i.e. drawing in a gentle manner. But, can this really be the case? . . . Like other rabbit trails in this book, I don't want to really go down this one at this point in time; but, do know this, that there are actually two schools of thought on this particular subject. I threw these thoughts in here (a hit and run) just to show the possibility of God literally dragging us into His service – which is a thought that is contrary to a lot of beliefs about God. But, know this, dear reader, that there is nothing good in us (other than what God places within) to where if we really had the initial choice (that is, a life-changing choice), then I'm convinced that none of us would make the right decision if it wasn't for God pushing us in...
Romans 3:23
For ALL have sinned, and come short of the glory of God...
(continued on next page...)
If we've all fallen short, then how can we have the strength to pull ourselves in? But, even though this scripture seems to be bad – as if nobody is going to make it to be with God – Paul adds these sentences just afterwards:
Romans 3:24-25
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God.
Meaning, that salvation is only possible through Christ Jesus; and we cannot, therefore (being the flesh-mongers that we are), enter into His kingdom upon our own merits; so, God, knowing that His ways and thoughts are the exact opposite of ours, has to drag us thereunto . . . Now, on another note (and looking at this from a different view), that process of dragging may actually be in a pleasant manner: we can certainly, upon our first real encounter with God, experience His wonderful Spirit, and feel like we want to love and to save the entire world! But, then, after a few days, when that feeling has left, it's then extremely possible for the old, carnal man to start waking up, and, after seeing what has happened, begins to tug us into the other direction – questioning our new found life-style – as if asking us: "What have you done?" The initial calling is on an individual basis, and doesn't happen the same for one as it does for another. On one hand, God can actually force people into His kingdom by pushing the old man aside for a short time – an invasion, if you will! – and for others, it's a very smooth birthing process, where there is acceptance and compliance to a higher degree. This only shows how God can take a simple word, like helkuo, translated as 'draw' in the KJV, and can actually apply it to both a smooth wooing (which can continue to be smooth), but can also imply a hostile take-over that, once the old man wakes up and realizes what is happening, will only go kicking and screaming into the right direction.
2 Corinthians 4:15-16
For all things are for your sakes, that the abundant grace might through the thanksgiving of many redound to the glory of God. For which cause we faint not; but though our outward man perish [i.e. the old, nasty man – i.e. our fleshly natures], yet the inward man [i.e. what is born of God] is renewed day by day.
Of course, there is so much more to say on all of this; but, like my other rabbit trails, this is temporary food for thought...

*Not trying to get caught up in the Predestination vs Free-will debate...
One may laugh at my statement here, for, surely, I will be touching on that subject herein, even though I am trying to tread lightly with it. It's a fact that a lot of folks (or, at least some) are very uncomfortable with the subject, and it's because (at least, this is the way I see it) that they don't completely understand it. As one minister pointed out (and this I got second hand), no person can truly understand the depth of the subject with their human mind! Be that as it may (and whether that is even true or not), it stands to reason that it's a subject that cannot be ignored. Why? Well, the Bible does speak on it, even calling it by its name in several places [see, for example, Romans 8:29-30] and is therefore worthy of our attention. But, even so, I – as I've said – am going to try and dance around it as much as possible in this present work. Is that because I'm afraid of the subject myself? Nay; but is because, first of all, it's not our main topic here (even if it hits on it in some respect), and secondly, it's a dominating topic that would take an entire book to speak on; which, incidentally, is what I fully intend on doing in the near future.

*Nor of what satan's in-depth role is in all of this commotion...
Just like the Predestination vs Free-will topic, I will simply hit and miss, herein, on the subject of satan. And, also, like the Predestination subject, I certainly will be covering this bad-boy's role in an upcoming book. In fact, and as I have pointed out already in this present title (and I'm sure that I'll continue to do so a few more times), I will be speaking on such subjects as satan, the devil, and hell, in much detail in the 2nd part of the Evil Side of Creation series; in the book, entitled (you've guessed it!): Satan, the Devil, and Hell . . . In the meantime, though, I will give you some food for thought – even if it may seem cruel to my readers for dangling this carrot in front of their eyes, and then ripping it away! But, I must point out, for the sake of the flow of this present work, that nowhere in scripture can it be found that satan did anything without the express permission of God to begin with. Am I sure about that? Take, for example, the incident in Job 1:6-12; but, especially in verse 12, which reads: "And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of the LORD." . . . This situation, far from being easy to understand – considering the traditional view of satan in popular Biblical Theology – demands that we ask some uncomfortable questions, such as: "How did satan convince God to allow him to hurt one of His subjects? Can God even be persuaded by the wiles of satan? Why did such a bad-boy like satan have to get God's permission to even hurt somebody to begin with? Being evil as he is, as is taught to us, wouldn't he simply have done so without such permission? And, not only so, but by even speaking to God about it in the first place, didn't he run the risk of God stopping him?" . . . Now, I know for certain that I can't just hit and run like this, for I know of a certainty that my questions will bring up too many more questions that must be answered in order for this thought to be satisfactory for most readers. But, I promise to answer such questions in better detail in part 2. Please understand that this subject (just like that of Predestination) is just too big and dominating to discuss in small detail, and will overshadow the present topic at hand; they will need entire books just to scrape the surfaces . . . However, and at the same time, this short End Note will at least show the possibility that even satan needs to be given power by God (ordained by God) in order to do the things that he does; and proves, further, that God is the only power source in existence . . . Also, keeping in mind, about wrestling with principalities and powers in high places...
Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
...that we must recognize that it was God Himself who ordained it so:
Colossians 1:16-17
For by him were ALL things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him ALL things consist.
Again, there is no power source other than God!

*Matthew Henry's Commentary on the whole Bible...
Published in 1708-1714; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
Matthew Henry (18 October 1662 – 22 June 1714) was a Nonconformist minister and author, born in Wales but spending much of his life in England . . . Matthew Henry's well-known six-volume Exposition of the Old and New Testaments (1708–10) or Complete Commentary, provides an exhaustive verse by verse study of the Bible. covering the whole of the Old Testament, and the Gospels and Acts in the New Testament. After the author's death, the work was finished (Romans through Revelation) by thirteen other nonconformist ministers, partly based upon notes taken by Henry's hearers, and edited by George Burder and John Hughes in 1811 . . . Famous evangelical Protestant preachers such as George Whitefield and Charles Spurgeon used and heartily commended the work, with Whitefield reading it through four times – the last time on his knees. Spurgeon stated, "Every minister ought to read it entirely and carefully through once at least." John Wesley wrote of Henry: "He is allowed by all competent judges, to have been a person of strong understanding, of various learning, of solid piety, and much experience in the ways of God."

*The People's New Testament...
Published in 1889; public domain.
www.swordsearcher.com/christian-autho...
The following biographical sketch of B. W. Johnson was written by J. H. Garrison in 1891, before Johnson's death in 1894: "BARTON W. JOHNSON was born in 1833, in a log cabin on a clearing in Tazewell County, Illinois. His ancestry, on both sides, is of stock which had settled in this country before the Revolution; his father's parents were South Carolinians; his mother was born in Tennessee. His early education was such as could be obtained in a backwoods school, on a farm, and from the few books he could buy or borrow. In his eighteenth year he commenced to study at Walnut Grove Academy, now Eureka College, where he attended for two years. Then, after teaching for one year, he went to Bethany College in 1854. At that time the college was presided over by Alexander Campbell, aided by such professors as R. Milligan, W. K. Pendleton, R. Richardson, and others of less note. In 1856 he graduated in a class of twenty-seven, the honors of which were divided between him and W. A. Hall, of Tennessee . . . In the fall of 1856, be engaged in a school in Bloomington, Ill., preaching on Sundays in the vicinity. The next year he took a position in Eureka College, where he remained in all seven years, two years as its president. In 1863, he acted as corresponding and financial secretary of the American Missionary Society, and was re-elected to that position at the convention of 1864, but he declined to continue, having accepted the chair of mathematics in Bethany College. Here he remained two years, until after the death of Alexander Campbell, when he returned to the west. After a pastoral charge at Lincoln, Ill., he accepted the presidency of Oskaloosa College, in connection with the care of the Church at Oskaloosa. A failure of health compelled him to cease teaching two years later, but he continued to preach for the congregation for four more years. In the meantime, THE EVANGELIST, long published as a monthly, had assumed a weekly form, and he became its editor. For about sixteen years he has been engaged in editorial work; on THE EVANGELIST, in Oskaloosa and Chicago, and subsequently on the CHRISTIAN-EVANGELIST in St. Louis. In the meantime he has written several books which have had a wide circulation: The Vision of the Ages, Commentary on John, The People's New Testament, in two octavo volumes, and the successive volumes of the Christian Lesson Commentary, from 1886 to the present time. In the summer of 1858 he was united in marriage to Miss Sarah S. Allen, of Bloomington, Ill., who has made him a devoted and self-sacrificing companion. Three children, all living, have been borne to the marriage. In his Bible studies he had been made to feel the need of a personal knowledge of the places mentioned in the Bible, of the people, manners and scenes of the east; and hence, in the summer of 1889 he crossed the Atlantic. During his absence of between four and five months, he visited Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Italy, Greece, Turkey in Asia, Palestine and Egypt. The enforced absence from his desk was of great advantage to his health, which had become somewhat impaired by his arduous labors. If his life is spared, additional volumes will in due time appear from his pen, which are already in preparation."

*John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on the Bible...
Published in 1755-1766; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
John Wesley (28 June 1703 – 2 March 1791) was an Anglican cleric and theologian who, with his brother Charles and fellow cleric George Whitefield, founded Methodism . . . Educated at Charterhouse School and Oxford University, Wesley was elected a fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford in 1726 and ordained a priest two years later. He led the "Holy Club", a society formed for the purpose of study and the pursuit of a devout Christian life; it had been founded by his brother Charles, and counted George Whitefield among its members. After an unsuccessful ministry of two years at Savannah in the Georgia Colony, Wesley returned to London and joined a religious society led by Moravian Christians. On 24 May 1738 he experienced what has come to be called his evangelical conversion, when he felt his "heart strangely warmed". He subsequently departed from the Moravians, beginning his own ministry . . . A key step in the development of Wesley's ministry was, like Whitefield, to travel and preach outdoors. In contrast to Whitefield's Calvinism, Wesley embraced the Arminian doctrines that dominated the Church of England at the time. Moving across Great Britain and Ireland, he helped form and organise small Christian groups that developed intensive and personal accountability, discipleship and religious instruction. Most importantly, he appointed itinerant, unordained evangelists to travel and preach as he did and to care for these groups of people. Under Wesley's direction, Methodists became leaders in many social issues of the day, including prison reform and the abolition of slavery . . . Although he was not a systematic theologian, Wesley argued for the notion of Christian perfection and against Calvinism—and, in particular, against its doctrine of predestination. He held that, in this life, Christians could achieve a state where the love of God "reigned supreme in their hearts", giving them outward holiness. His evangelicalism, firmly grounded in sacramental theology, maintained that means of grace were the manner by which God sanctifies and transforms the believer, encouraging people to experience Jesus Christ personally . . . Throughout his life, Wesley remained within the established Anglican church, insisting that the Methodist movement lay well within its tradition. In his early ministry, Wesley was barred from preaching in many parish churches and the Methodists were persecuted; he later became widely respected and, by the end of his life, had been described as "the best loved man in England". In 2002, he was placed at number 50 in the BBC's poll of the 100 Greatest Britons.

*The Biblical Illustrator, by Joseph S. Exell...
Published in 1900; public domain.
http://www.biblesupport.com/e-sword-d...
Joseph S. Exell edited and compiled the 56 volume Biblical Illustrator commentary. You will recognize him as the co-editor of the famous Pulpit Commentary (this commentary is even larger than the Pulpit Commentary). This remarkable work is the triumph of a life devoted to Biblical research and study. Assisted by a small army of students, the Exell draws on the rich stores of great minds since the beginning of New Testament times . . . The Biblical Illustrator brings Scripture to life in a unique, illuminating way. While other commentaries explain a Bible passage doctrinally, this work illustrates the Bible with a collection of: illustrations; outlines; anecodtes; history; poems; expositions; geography; sermons; Bible backgrounds; and homiletics, for nearly every verse in the Bible. This massive commentary was originally intended for preachers needing help with sermon preperation (because who else in that day had time to wade through such a lengthy commentary?). But today, the Biblical Illustrator provides life application, illumination, inspiriation, doctrine, devotion, and practical content for all who teach, preach, and study the Bible . . . The Biblical Illustrator includes material from hundreds of famous authors of the day, including: Lightfoot; F.B. Meyer; Spurgeon; Barnes; Matthew Henry; D.L. Moody; John Trapp; J.C. Ryle; Alexander MacLaren; Thomas Manton; Handley; C.G. Moule; John Wesley; and Adam Clark.

*Which Jonah ended up calling hell!...
Jonah 2:2
And said, I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the LORD, and he heard me; out of the belly of HELL cried I, and thou heardest my voice.
This is more food for thought for the upcoming 2nd part of this Teaching Series, in that Jonah was in the belly of the whale, and not in the center of the earth, when he declared that he was in hell!

*If those decisions go against God's will...
To bring up a point about God's will, I am going to quickly choose the subject of prayer. First of all, let's see what Jesus says about one particular case concerning prayer:
Matthew 21:22
And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
I, by no means, am really trying to tackle the vast subject of prayer in this End Note; nor, indeed, in this book. Even though it's a simple concept, there are so many aspects about it, that books and books have been dedicated to the topic – and they may have only scratched the surface with them! But, here, I am only trying to make a particular point – only one, in the thousands of avenues that this topic could turn . . . In our example scripture, many people are fooling themselves this very day by thinking that God is a magical genie, to where you can rub the magic lamp and be granted three wishes . . . Well, maybe more, because this verse just said that ALL things, WHATSOEVER we ask in prayer, we're going to get! Well, that's good, because I'm sure 'ol Johnny would like a new Porsche! Perhaps, a yacht! And, let's go ahead and throw in a mansion in there while we're at it! You see where this can go? You see, I should ask, where this has gone? Not only so, but we need to be careful of what we wish for, because God can surely grant these things; but, then, we must certainly ask: what did we sacrifice to get them? [Matthew 6:19-20; Proverbs 28:20; Hebrews 13:5-6; 1 Timothy 6:10-11] If one is to truly know the Spirit of God, and God's intention with mankind, then they should know that this is the furthest thing from God's mind for His people . . . Does all this mean, therefore, that God doesn't want us to have any money? Of course He wants us to have money! How else can we live and eat, or take care of our families? [1Timothy 5:8] I'm sorry if that's the impression that I'm giving – but that's not what I'm meaning; I'm speaking of spoiling His children with unneeded excess, which can harm a child [I speak further on this concept – that is, about the damaging effects of excess – later on, on the first two pages of Chapter 9]. He certainly blesses certain folks with money, but those people always end up giving in His name; so, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that God will not be responsible for wealth distributed for worldly, fleshly gain – unless it ends up serving a complex purpose. But, that purpose would never be to spoil the elect! . . . Just like our own kids, whom we don't want to spoil, there are limitations to what we are to ask; limitations, that is, of what we should ask . . . Now, let's counteract this with another scripture:
1 John 5:14
And this is the confidence that we have in him, that, if we ask any thing ACCORDING TO HIS WILL, he heareth us.
This is a bit different. Here, John is plainly saying that when we ask according to His will, then he hears us . . . Now, I guess somebody can come back on this and say that it was God's will for the elect to get that Porsche, yacht, and mansion; but, even though I disagree, we won't pursue that avenue in this book (but, I intend on doing so in another). But, here, the point I am trying to get across is that both Matthew and John were correct in what they were saying; it's just that John filled in a little more detail, to show that there's more to prayer than just asking for materialistic things to fulfill our fleshly desires and lusts thereby! All things – even prayers – are according to God's will, and not by our will, or our fleshly lusts. We must realize that our own will is very self-serving. These new thoughts will now bring us to where this subject really needs to go, and that is to a point where we, again, begin to learn to pray according to God's will, as opposed to the will of the flesh. So, now we're getting somewhere! Looking at things from this new perspective will change the course of our walk with God to a better and higher plateau – guaranteed! This would be a very new and exciting experience for a lot of folks; and, so our duty (that is, if we are wanting to obtain this higher and closer walk with Him) is to strive (in new prayer) for the Lord to show us how to walk this more narrow path...

*Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary...
Published in 1871; public domain.
Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia
The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary refers to a Biblical commentary entitled: 'A Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible,' prepared by Robert Jamieson, Andrew Robert Fausset and David Brown and published in 1871; and derived works from this initial publication, in differing numbers of volumes and abridgements. The commentary uses the King James Version of the Bible as its text . . . Robert Jamieson D.D. (1802–1880) was a minister at St. Paul’s Church, Provanmill in Glasgow. Andrew Fausset, A.M. (1821–1910) was rector of St. Cuthbert’s Church in York. David Brown (1803–1897) was a Free Church of Scotland minister at St. James, Glasgow, and professor of theology at Free Church College of the University of Aberdeen.
The writers described their work as: "humble effort to make Scripture expound itself." and prayed: "May the Blessed Lord who has caused all holy Scriptures to be written for our learning, bless this . . . effort . . . and make it an instrument towards the conversion of sinners and the edification of saints, to the glory of His great name and the hastening of His kingdom! Amen."

*The wicked spirits are at God's commandment...
This claim may seem ridiculous to a lot of folks. Even though I placed this herein, I'm not really wanting to get off onto that subject in this book – just as I expressed about satan – simply because I will get into extreme detail in the other parts to this Evil Side of Creation series on them; and, too, it's just not the main purpose of what I'm trying to convey here. In the meantime, chew on the thought, for I whole-heartedly agree with the premise – obviously – else I would not have placed the thought within.

Page 32
*Nothing can be done in heaven, in earth, or hell, but either by his immediate energy or permission...
This is reminiscent of an earlier End Note, with the topic being "Nor of what satan's in-depth role is in all of this commotion," in stating that satan could do nothing of his own will, but had to submit to the authority of God, and who only went on a rampage against Job when God gave His permission for him to do so.

Chapter 2: Is God in Absolute Control?

Romans 13:1
Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Let verse 1 of Romans chapter 13 sink in a bit . . . What exactly are the higher powers? But, more importantly, we must digest the second and third parts of that passage: "there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God." This, of course, will also depend on our interpretation of how much power God has over this universe, this planet, and our very lives. I addressed this question earlier, Remember? How much does God intervene with our lives? Well, I will tell you for sure that this book assumes that God intervenes one hundred percent with most of the life forms on this planet.* Is that a bad assumption? Well, if we are to believe the scriptures, then we have no choice but to believe it . . . Let's observe:

Psalms 46:7-10
The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah. Come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth. He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire. Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.

Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible*
(on Psalms 46:8)
See empires destroyed and regenerated; and in such a way as to show that a supernatural agency has been at work. By the hand of God alone could these great changes be effected.

The Treasury of David*
(on Psalms 46:9)
His voice quiets the tumult of war, and calls for the silence of peace. However remote and barbarous the tribe, he awes the people into rest. He crushes the great powers till they cannot provoke strife again.

Colossians 1:16-17
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible*
(on Colossians 1:16)
All things were created . . . for Him: that is, for his pleasure, that he may take delight and complacency in them, and in his own perfections displayed by them; and for his service and use, as the angels, to worship him and minister to him and for others, he sends them to: elect men are made to serve and glorify him with their bodies and spirits, which are his; and even the non-elect are made to subserve his mediatorial kingdom and interest; yea, the whole world is built and kept in being purely on his account, until he has finished the great affair of the salvation of his people.

1 Timothy 6:14-16
That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and ONLY POTENTATE, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on 1 Timothy 6:15)
And only Potentate . . . or, Governor of the whole world, which can be said of none but himself: he is the Governor among the nations, and over all the nations of the earth; his kingdom rules over all other kingdoms; and he has his power and government from himself, whereas all other potentates have their power from him, as follows: the King of kings, and Lord of lords; from whom they receive their sceptres, crowns, and kingdoms; by whom they reign, and are continued in their power; for he sets up kings, and removes kings at his pleasure, and to him they must be accountable for all their administrations another day; and at present they are under his influence, and at his control; he has their hearts, and their counsels, as well as kingdoms, in his hands, and under his overruling providence; and causes all to answer his wise and eternal purposes.

1 Chronicles 29:10-12
Wherefore David blessed the LORD before all the congregation: and David said, Blessed be thou, LORD God of Israel our father, for ever and ever. Thine, O LORD, is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, and thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on 1 Chronicles 29:12)
"Both riches and honour come of thee": Whatever of either the children of men have is not owing to their merits, nor to their diligence and industry, and wise conduct, but to the providence of God, Ecclesiastes 9:11, so the gods with the Heathens are said to be givers of riches: "and thou reignest over all": govern the world by wisdom, and dispose all things in it for the best. "in thine hand is power and might": to do whatsoever he pleaseth. "and in thine hand it is to make great": in worldly things, and so in spiritual. "and to give strength unto all": against their enemies, and to do the will and work of God; of all which David had had an experience.

Isaiah 45:7*
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

Geneva Bible Translation Notes*
(on Isaiah 45:7)
I send peace and war, prosperity and adversity.

Job 12:9-10
Who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the LORD hath wrought this? In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on Job 12:9-10)
In whose hand is the soul of every living thing . . . Of every animal, of every brute creature, as distinct from man, in the next clause: the life of everyone of them is from him, and it is continued by him as long as he pleases, nor can it be taken away without his leave; two sparrows, which are not worth more than a farthing, not one of them falls to the ground, or dies without the knowledge and will of God, Matthew 10:29; of the soul or spirit of beasts, see Ecclesiastes 3:21.

Albert Barne's Notes on the Bible*
(on Job 12:9-10)
In whose hand is the soul of every living thing . . . The idea is, that all are under the control of God. He gives life, and health, and happiness when he pleases, and when he chooses he takes them away. His sovereignty is manifested, says Job, in the inferior creation, or among the beasts of the field, the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of heaven.

Proverbs 19:21
There are many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.

Geneva Bible Translation Notes
(on Proverbs 19:21)
Man's device will not have success, unless God governs it, whose purpose is unchangeable.

Isaiah 14:24
The LORD of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on Isaiah 14:24)
surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; as he had shaped and schemed it, and drew the form and image in his own mind, or fixed and settled it there, so should it be done in due time, as every thing is that is determined by the Lord; and this shows that nothing is casual, or comes by chance, but everything as it is purposed of God; and that as everything comes to pass which he has resolved, so every such resolution proceeds from thought, and is the produce of the highest wisdom and prudence . . . And as I have purposed, so it shall stand; or "counselled"; within himself, for he does all things according to the counsel of his will; and which always stands firm, sure, and unalterable, let what devices soever be in the heart of man.

1 Samuel 2:6-7
The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up. The LORD maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.

Poor Man's Commentary by Robert Hawker*
(on 1 Samuel 2:6-7)
These are all so many beautiful repetitions of the same important doctrine, in asserting God’s sovereignty over all things, both in the kingdoms of providence, and of grace.

Psalms 50:10-11
For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine.

Albert Barne's Notes on the Bible
(on Psalms 50:10-11)
It is a beautiful and impressive thought, that the “property” in all these animals - in all living things on the earth - is in God, and that he has a right to dispose of them as he pleases. What man owns, he owns under God, and has no right to complain when God comes and asserts his superior claim to dispose of it at his pleasure. God has never given to man the absolute proprietorship in “any” thing; nor does he invade our rights when he comes and claims what we possess, or when in any way he removes what is most valuable to us. Compare Job 1:21: "And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD."

If one is to not know that God is supreme and omnipotent, then one does not know God! For further research, also see Luke 1:37; Jeremiah 32:27; Isaiah 40:28; Job 42:2; Isaiah 44:24; Revelation 19:6; and Jeremiah 10:12.

Considering a God like this, can we truly say that it's impossible for Him to intervene in our lives? But, wouldn't that interfere with free-will, though? No, it doesn't. God must certainly intrude in on our flesh-feast if we are ever to learn about Him, right? Does not the scripture say that we cannot even come to Him unless the Spirit first draw us?* If God didn't intervene even at that moment, then there is truly no hope for any of us! And, if He first draw us, what's to stop Him from participating in our lives afterwards? So, to balance and make sense of all these things – and I will walk the tightrope here in not trying to get caught up in the Predestination vs Free-will debate*, nor of what satan's in-depth role is in all of this commotion* (for I shall cover both subjects in upcoming books) – I will certainly be as informative as possible in my present task on this vast subject.

Now, let's dig even deeper to see that God can truly intervene in our personal lives...

Proverbs 20:24
Man's goings are of the LORD; how can a man then understand his own way?

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on Proverbs 20:24)
Man's goings are of the Lord . . . In a natural and literal sense, the instruments of going are of the Lord; the act of motion from place to place is not without the concourse of his providence; as in him we live, and move, and have our being, so "in and by him we move"; he preserves our going out and coming in; and as the preservation, so the success and prosperity of journeying are owing to his providence, and the whole is under his care and direction: and so likewise, in a civil sense, all the civil concerns, business, and actions of life, are guided by his providence; there is a time for every purpose under heaven, and the success of all depends on a divine blessing; and things are with every man in civil life according to the providence of God, and as it is his pleasure they should be; and it is by him they are directed to take this and the other step, the issue of which is according to his will: and this may be applied to men's goings in a spiritual and religious sense.

Adam Clark's Commentary on the Bible
(on Proverbs 20:24)
Man’s goings are of the Lord - He, by his providence, governs all the great concerns of the world. Man often traverses these operations; but he does it to his own damage. An old writer quaintly says: 'They who will carve for themselves shall cut their fingers.'

Albert Barnes Notes on the Bible
(on Proverbs 20:24)
The order of a man’s life is a mystery even to himself. He knows not where he is going, or for what God is educating him.

Matthew Henry's Commentary on the whole Bible*
(on Proverbs 20:24)
We are here taught that in all our affairs, 1. We have a necessary and constant dependence upon God. All our natural actions depend upon his providence, all our spiritual actions upon his grace. The best man is no better than God makes him; and every creature is that to us which it is the will of God that it should be. Our enterprises succeed, not as we desire and design, but as God directs and disposes. The goings even of a strong man (so the word signifies) are of the Lord, for his strength is weakness without God, nor is the battle always to the strong . . . 2. We have no foresight of future events, and therefore know not how to forecast for them: How can a man understand his own way? How can he tell what will befall him, since God's counsels concerning him are secret, and therefore how can he of himself contrive what to do without divine direction? We so little understand our own way that we know not what is good for ourselves, and therefore we must make a virtue of necessity, and commit our way unto the Lord, in whose hand it is, follow the guidance and submit to the disposal of Providence.

So much that one little scripture can say! But, let's continue:

1 Corinthians 6:19-20
What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

The People's New Testament*
(on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
Ye are not your own. But members of Christ, and hence have not the right to use our bodies to our own pleasure. Ye are bought with a price. Christ paid the price, even his blood. Hence, since both body and spirit are God's, both should be used to glorify him. The fact that we are his, purchased, parts of his spiritual temple, makes the obligation imperative to consecrate the body and spirit to his service.

John Wesley's Explanatory Notes*
(on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
And even your body is not, strictly speaking, your own even this is the temple of the Holy Ghost - Dedicated to him, and inhabited by him.

Albert Barnes Notes on the Bible
(on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
We are purchased; we belong to God; we are his by redemption; by a precious price paid; and we are bound, therefore, to devote ourselves, body, soul, and spirit, as he directs, to the glory of his name, not to the gratification of the flesh.

The Biblical Illustrator*
(on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
Ye are not your own: To be “our own” is our very greatest ambition. To be our own masters, that is nature . . . God has been pleased so to order it, that no man can truly say, “I am my own”; “Know ye not that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are,” &c . . . Of all the happy conditions upon earth, the happiest is to give up the whole heart to an authority which the whole heart can quite love and respect . . . God’s property in you: A father has a right to his child, but God has done more than made you His child, for He has given you the spirit of a child, to cry “Abba Father.” . . . Christ has more than a right to His body, being the Head, and we all members in particular; so that each condition of life teaches us with one common voice, “Ye are not your own.”

Adam Clark's Commentary on the Bible
(on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
And ye are not your own? - Ye have no right over yourselves, to dispose either of your body, or any of its members, as you may think proper or lawful; you are bound to God, and to him you are accountable.
But what about my right to choose my own will? I, for one, do believe in free-will, but that it has its limitations. What do I mean? Well, let's consider Jonah, who had made up his mind that he was going to go against a direct order from God and not go to Nineveh to preach. His own free-will told him no, but even though he made that free-will choice, God, on the other hand, intervened with that decision, and ended up changing Jonah's mind about preaching there because of a tribulation that God sent him through, which Jonah ended up calling hell! – Jonah 2:2* – that is, considering the severity of the trial in which he endured. Jonah then, after spending a few days in the whale's belly, made a new choice – choosing, instead, to do God's will . . . So, what does that mean? It means that we can make our own decisions, but if they are the wrong decisions, and if those decisions go against God's will*, then He will end up changing our minds for us. Does He really do that? And, if so, is that wrong for Him to do? And just because this happened to Jonah, does it necessarily mean that it'll happen to us?

Romans 9:20-21
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

It's not too hard to interpret Paul's words here. Simply put, God has complete control over His creation, to do with it as He sees fit, or as He pleases. And, while trying to explain these kinds of thoughts all during chapter 9 of Romans, Paul was very tempted to say – and actually did say:

Romans 9:14
What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

What would prompt him to even ask such a question? Surely, he knew that others would ask it. And, his answer? God forbid! In other words, No! – there is no unrighteousness with God. Simply put, God is God, and there is none other beside Him. He is before all things, and by Him all things consist. He has the power to intervene with our lives, and make them go into directions that pleases Him . . . Does that take away our free-will? Again, no, it does not. But, our freedom is limited when we make stupid decisions. Decisions, that is, that will end up harming us, or destroying us; or, and more especially, decisions that would end up harming other people . . . Folks, this works in the very same manner as a parent gives limited freedom to their own child. In that, if something will harm the child, the parent will step in and dictate the situation. Only, God does this on a much larger scale.

Therefore, with all this in mind, it's not crazy to think that God intervenes and interferes with our lives. It's not crazy to think that He can lead and guide our steps. And, it's not crazy to say that if we aren't following His will, that he can make us change our minds so that we do the right things.

But, even if this is so – that is, leading and guiding, and intervening in people's lives – what about those who don't serve God? Can God control their movements as well?

Isaiah 10:5-6
O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine indignation. I will send him against an hypocritical nation, and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge, to take the spoil, and to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets.

Albert Barnes Notes on the Bible
(on Isaiah 10:5)
The Hebrew would bear the interpretation that the Assyrian was, an object against which God was angry; but the former is evidently the sense of the passage, as denoting that the Assyrian was the agent by which he would express his anger against a guilty people.

Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary
(on Isaiah 10:5-19)
The king of Assyria, in his pride, thought to act by his own will. The tyrants of the world are tools of Providence. God designs to correct his people for their hypocrisy, and bring them nearer to him . . . The Assyrian boasts what great things he has done to other nations, by his own policy and power. He knows not that it is God who makes him what he is, and puts the staff into his hand . . . When God brings his people into trouble, it is to bring sin to their remembrance, and humble them, and to awaken them to a sense of their duty; this must be the fruit, even the taking away of sin.

Judges 2:14
And the anger of the LORD was hot against Israel, and he delivered them into the hands of spoilers that spoiled them, and he sold them into the hands of their enemies round about, so that they could not any longer stand before their enemies.

Joshua 11:20
For it was of the LORD to harden their hearts, that they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly, and that they might have no favour, but that he might destroy them, as the LORD commanded Moses.

Deuteronomy 32:8
When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.

John Wesley's Explanatory Notes
(on Deuteronomy 32:8)
And therefore he so guided the hearts of several people, that the posterity of Canaan, which was accursed of God, and devoted to ruin, should be seated in that country which God intended for the children of Israel, that so when their iniquities were ripe, they might be rooted out, and the Israelites come in their stead.

Psalms 75:7
But God is the judge: he putteth down one, and setteth up another.

The Treasury of David
(on Psalms 75:7)
“But God is the judge.” Even now he is actually judging. His seat is not vacant; his authority is not abdicated; the Lord reigneth evermore “He putteth down one, and setteth up another.” Empires rise and fall at his bidding. A dungeon here, and there a throne, his will assigns. Assyria yields to Babylon, and Babylon, to the Medes. Kings are but puppets in his hand; they serve his purpose when they rise and when they fall. A certain author has issued a work called “Historic Ninepins,” a fit name of scorn for all the great ones of the earth. God only is; all power belongs to him; all else is shadow, coming and going, unsubstantial, misty, dream-like.

Ezra 1:1-2
Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying, Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.

Geneva Bible Translations Notes
(on Ezra 1:2)
For he was chief monarch and had many nations under his dominion, which this heathen king confesses to have received from the living God.

Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary
(on Ezra 1:1-4)
God governs the world by his influence on the spirits of men; whatever good they do, God stirs up their spirits to do it.

Daniel 4:34-35
And at the end of the days I Nebuchadnezzar lifted up mine eyes unto heaven, and mine understanding returned unto me, and I blessed the most High, and I praised and honoured him that liveth for ever, whose dominion is an everlasting dominion, and his kingdom is from generation to generation: And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on Daniel 4:35)
He [God] disposes of men on earth, and puts them into such stations, and such conditions and circumstances, and appoints them such business and services, as he thinks meet . . . The "inhabitants of the earth" are the men of it, as before, with whom he does as he pleases in things temporal and civil, making some rich, and others poor; raising some to great honour and dignity, while others live in meanness, poverty, and disgrace . . . he does what he will with his own; he bestows grace and glory on whomsoever he pleases, as free grace gifts, without any merit of the creature, according to his sovereign will and pleasure.

Acts 17:23-28 (Paul speaking)
For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us: For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary*
(on Acts 17:26-27)
And hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation — The apostle here opposes both Stoical Fate and Epicurean Chance, ascribing the periods and localities in which men and nations flourish to the sovereign will and prearrangements of a living God.

Acts 4:26-28
The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ. For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done.

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
(on Acts 4:28)
And thy counsel determined before to be done: God's decrees are from eternity; there is nothing comes to pass in time but what he has beforetime determined should be done, either by effecting it himself, or doing it by others, or suffering it to be done, as in the case here. Whatever was done to Christ, either by Jews or Gentiles, by Herod or Pontius Pilate, was according to the secret will of God, the covenant he made with Christ, and the council of peace that was between them both: what they wickedly did, God designed for good, and hereby brought about the redemption and salvation of his people: this neither makes God the author of sin, nor excuses the sinful actions of men, or infringes the liberty of their wills in acting.

Deuteronomy 8:18
But thou shalt remember the LORD thy God: for it is he that giveth thee power to get wealth, that he may establish his covenant which he sware unto thy fathers, as it is this day.

Geneva Bible Translation Notes
(on Deuteronomy 8:18)
If things concerning this life proceed only from God's mercy, how much more do spiritual gifts and everlasting life.

Deuteronomy 7:15
And the LORD will take away from thee all sickness, and will put none of the evil diseases of Egypt, which thou knowest, upon thee; but WILL lay them upon all them that hate thee.

Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary
(on Deuteronomy 7:15)
Diseases are God's servants; they go where he sends them, and do what he bids them . . . God will do his own work in his own method and time; and we may be sure that they are always the best.

John Wesley's Explanatory Notes
(on Deuteronomy 7:15)
[Repeating Matthew Henry] Diseases are God's servants, which go where he sends them, and do what he bids them.

He even, at times, controls individual people:

1 Samuel 16:14
But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit FROM the LORD troubled him.

Geneva Bible Translation Notes
(on 1 Samuel 16:14)
The wicked spirits are at God's commandment* to execute his will against the wicked.

Also, seen in 1 Samuel 16:16; and 19:9.

Exodus 9:12a
And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh...

Poor Man's Commentary by Robert Hawker
(on 1 Exodus 9:12a)
Observe the change of expression. Upon several instances before, it is said that Pharaoh hardened his own heart: but here it is said, that the Lord hardened it.

Also seen in Exodus 10:20; 10:27; 11:10; and 14:8.

1 Kings 22:23
Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee.

Adam Clark's Commentary on the Bible
(on 1 Kings 22:23)
The Lord hath put a lying spirit - He hath permitted or suffered a lying spirit to influence thy prophets. Is it requisite again to remind the reader that the Scriptures repeatedly represent God as doing what, in the course of his providence, he only permits or suffers to be done? Nothing can be done in heaven, in earth, or hell, but either by his immediate energy or permission*. This is the reason why the Scripture speaks as above.

2 Chronicles 18:22
Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil against thee.

I want to point out that God can, and does, exercise complete control over His entire creation. And if that is so – as the scriptures that I used dictate – then can it be absurd for me to say that it was by the power of God that on that certain day at my job the folks were being cruel in the morning and were as gentle as lambs in the afternoon? Can it really be that God was using this example for my benefit and education? And, especially, so that I could pass this knowledge on for the sake of others?