Rose Sinclair's Blog, page 9

February 4, 2020

The Address of Your Soul

In this short article, I’ll explain how looking at LGBTQ+ labeling as addresses is a really good way to not forget that “micro-labeling’s” focus on intersectionality is not only completely normal but actually a healthy thing.

I’ve always loved the term intersectionality. I think it’s a brilliant word that gives you a visual right off the bat. It was coined black feminist scholar Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in 1989.

“Stay in your lane” also fits this instantly understandable visual. While to me...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 04, 2020 14:21

February 1, 2020

Mission Statement Change

Some big changes are going to how we run as a blog.

I’ve been thinking about publishing as an end destination. But in my experience, it’s the journey that frustrates authors. Makes conditions in which they end up quitting the thing they love. And I’ve been looking to change that. Create a paradigm shift.

Working as a team is my go-to. That’s probably no surprise if you look at my novels, or at the Fuck Yeah Asexual blog, or Creative Aces Publishing. But the tricky thing with partnerships is...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2020 15:55

January 14, 2020

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. Its introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the sexual. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make erotic be a single note. 

The book definitely is not an introduction to asexuality,...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. Its introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the sexual. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make erotic be a single note. 

The book definitely is not an introduction to asexuality,...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. Its introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the sexual. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make erotic be a single note. 

The book definitely is not an introduction to asexuality,...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. Its introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the sexual. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make erotic be a single note. 

The book definitely is not an introduction to asexuality,...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. It’s introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the “sexual”. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make ‘erotic’ be a single note.

The bookdefinitelyis not an introduction to...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. It’s introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the “sexual”. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make ‘erotic’ be a single note.

The bookdefinitelyis not an introduction to...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. It’s introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the “sexual”. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make ‘erotic’ be a single note.

The bookdefinitelyis not an introduction to...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05

[image error]

As you can imagine this book discusses erotics with a focus on asexuality. It’s introduction focused on how the meaning of erotic had changed since Freud and how more modern queer theorists define it to mean more than simply the “sexual”. The great thing but about it hitting such a specific note is this discussion is all but nonexistent when it comes to social ace places. It asks what are we missing when we make ‘erotic’ be a single note.

The bookdefinitelyis not an introduction to...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 14, 2020 14:05