Steven James's Blog, page 202
January 11, 2013
Can you share some insight on how best to determine when to stop doing research? How much is enough? It's so fascinating to learn more, I could keep going forever it seems!
Over-researching a novel is common, and it’s an easy trap to fall into. It happened to me when I was writing Placebo.
I was researching quantum mechanics so that I could render that part of the storyline, and finally I realized that I’d read more than enough books, watched more than enough documentaries, and visited more than enough quantum mechanics websites to last a lifetime. I remember stopping in the middle of a book, just shaking my head.
I’d gotten sucked into doing the very thing I’ve warned aspiring novelists not to do. That’s not the only time it’s happened, but it was the most recent and the most jarring.
So, how do we avoid that? When can we tell if we’ve done enough research? Here are three guidelines. Remember:
1. You’re writing a novel and not a research paper. Story matters more than anything. Readers aren’t coming to your book for information, but for entertainment. Resist the urge to show off how much you know—or how familiar you’ve become with Wikipedia. Yes, you’ll want to get the details right, but you don’t have to become an expert on every aspect of your tale—you just have to know the people who are. Brain-picking is not only essential, it’s also fun.
2. Research is an ongoing process that needs to happen while we write our novels, not beforehand. As we write, we will always come up with questions and have to go back to the Internet, the library, or the expert that we dug up somewhere to verify information. Don’t look at research as a separate part of the writing process or as something that precedes it, but rather as something that parallels it.
3. Believability trumps accuracy. In other words, as long as we can come up with a stunning believable scene that even those who are experts in the field would accept, we don’t have to make the events possible, accurate, or well-researched.
I usually visit the location that my novel is set in early in my writing process. Then, when the story has taken shape, I will usually go back to the location again to fact check what I need to in order to nail down the details, the drive times, the sunset and sunrise, and things of that nature.
If you ever start wondering if you’re researching too much, you are. Put all of that aside and get working on your story.
I was researching quantum mechanics so that I could render that part of the storyline, and finally I realized that I’d read more than enough books, watched more than enough documentaries, and visited more than enough quantum mechanics websites to last a lifetime. I remember stopping in the middle of a book, just shaking my head.
I’d gotten sucked into doing the very thing I’ve warned aspiring novelists not to do. That’s not the only time it’s happened, but it was the most recent and the most jarring.
So, how do we avoid that? When can we tell if we’ve done enough research? Here are three guidelines. Remember:
1. You’re writing a novel and not a research paper. Story matters more than anything. Readers aren’t coming to your book for information, but for entertainment. Resist the urge to show off how much you know—or how familiar you’ve become with Wikipedia. Yes, you’ll want to get the details right, but you don’t have to become an expert on every aspect of your tale—you just have to know the people who are. Brain-picking is not only essential, it’s also fun.
2. Research is an ongoing process that needs to happen while we write our novels, not beforehand. As we write, we will always come up with questions and have to go back to the Internet, the library, or the expert that we dug up somewhere to verify information. Don’t look at research as a separate part of the writing process or as something that precedes it, but rather as something that parallels it.
3. Believability trumps accuracy. In other words, as long as we can come up with a stunning believable scene that even those who are experts in the field would accept, we don’t have to make the events possible, accurate, or well-researched.
I usually visit the location that my novel is set in early in my writing process. Then, when the story has taken shape, I will usually go back to the location again to fact check what I need to in order to nail down the details, the drive times, the sunset and sunrise, and things of that nature.
If you ever start wondering if you’re researching too much, you are. Put all of that aside and get working on your story.
Published on January 11, 2013 08:55
January 2, 2013
How much time is the process between the first ideas for a story and writing the first word of the actual novel on paper? How much time do you spend working on the idea before you start writing the book?
For me, the first idea that I have IS the beginning of my writing. Since I’m an organic writer and don’t outline my novels, I’m not sure of any other way to look at it. I believe in pursuing rabbit trails that the ideas take me down. It’s all part of the creative process.
In his book “On Writing” (which I recommend), Stephen King compares writing a story to unearthing an archeological dig. He believes the story is intact and he’s just there to brush it off and uncover it.
This is a helpful illustration for me of the writing process. I find an idea and I brush away at it to see where it might lead, and then I think of something else that might be clearly related or that might be quite different indeed. Then I brush that off to see if they’re connected in some way that hadn’t been apparent at first, or if maybe they lead me into a different direction entirely. Every idea is a doorway to the next.
I’ve been collecting ideas for years and have them in my files on my computer. It’s really not possible to track backward to the genesis of the ideas that I use in my books, but usually writing a novel takes me six months to a year and all that time I’m continually looking back over my ideas to see which ones I can weave into the story.
I have first tier and second tier ideas, character traits and quirks, discarded ideas from previous books, scene descriptions I’ve come up with while I’m sitting in traffic, and so on. At this point in time I probably have hundreds of pages of scrap ideas.
Writing a story is not a straight, step-by-step process. It’s always an interplay of responding to the unfolding narrative, going back and forth from my idea files to the story, and watching how everything merges and reforms itself into the final product. It’s a dance, and I’m just here to help introduce the two partners, and then listen to the music and watch them take it from there.
In his book “On Writing” (which I recommend), Stephen King compares writing a story to unearthing an archeological dig. He believes the story is intact and he’s just there to brush it off and uncover it.
This is a helpful illustration for me of the writing process. I find an idea and I brush away at it to see where it might lead, and then I think of something else that might be clearly related or that might be quite different indeed. Then I brush that off to see if they’re connected in some way that hadn’t been apparent at first, or if maybe they lead me into a different direction entirely. Every idea is a doorway to the next.
I’ve been collecting ideas for years and have them in my files on my computer. It’s really not possible to track backward to the genesis of the ideas that I use in my books, but usually writing a novel takes me six months to a year and all that time I’m continually looking back over my ideas to see which ones I can weave into the story.
I have first tier and second tier ideas, character traits and quirks, discarded ideas from previous books, scene descriptions I’ve come up with while I’m sitting in traffic, and so on. At this point in time I probably have hundreds of pages of scrap ideas.
Writing a story is not a straight, step-by-step process. It’s always an interplay of responding to the unfolding narrative, going back and forth from my idea files to the story, and watching how everything merges and reforms itself into the final product. It’s a dance, and I’m just here to help introduce the two partners, and then listen to the music and watch them take it from there.
Published on January 02, 2013 07:41
April 21, 2012
Why I Wrote Quest for Celestia

When I was in college and became a Christian, someone ended up handing me a copy of The Pilgrim’s Progress, a book that John Bunyan wrote while he was serving a twelve-year prison sentence for preaching the Gospel without permission.
From a literary perspective, his book was a groundbreaking achievement—it was one of the first (if not the first) novel-length allegories ever printed, and according to some scholars, for more than two hundred years it was the second-best selling book in the world, trailing only the Bible.
Even though I’m not typically a fan of “the classics,” I read it and it really impacted me. I’m no theologian, but the narrative-based look at the Christian life connected with me in a way no sermon ever had. The story made sense not just to my mind, but to my storyteller’s heart.
However, honestly, the book is hard to get through. With its archaic language, heavy-handed moralizing, and blatantly obvious allegorical lessons, it’s almost inaccessible to modern readers.
So, a few years ago when I was exploring writing a fantasy novel for teens, I decided to reimagine John Bunyan’s tale, not through the eyes of a preacher, but through the eyes of a storyteller.
As a stand-alone fantasy adventure story, Quest for Celestia takes readers on an epic journey through a land of giants, dragons, danger and deception. While John Bunyan’s themes, images, and fragments of thought have certainly found their way into this story, it’s not just a retelling of his allegory, it’s a completely new vision of the quest he tried to encapsulate in his tale.
Stories live only as long as they’re retold or remembered. I hope Quest for Celestia will introduce a whole new generation to the fantastical, mythic story that spans the ages, the story that John Bunyan was imprisoned for telling to the world.
Published on April 21, 2012 06:34
February 13, 2012
Annoying Names in Novels
When authors try to be clever it annoys me to no end.
I would rather my readers spend their time immersed in my stories than looking for hidden meaning in the names or locations, so I was floored when one of my readers pointed out one time that the name Sevren (a villain who first appears in The Pawn) is Nerves spelled backward.
Man, I hadn't noticed that, and I never would have used the name if I had.
Why? Because when readers see that, they'll naturally start looking for more of the same and that would get in the way of their engagement with the story.
I've seen authors use Angela to represent—guess what?—an angelic, good character, my, how unobtrusive that is. Or Diablo as the name for a character who . . . well, you get it.
Yes, I know, Natasha spelled backward is "Ah, Satan" and could be your devil worshipping character, but please don't fall into that trap.
Yes, you could use the name "Marie Annette" for a character who's being used as a puppet. The name looks okay on the page, but say it aloud and you'll notice that it sounds the same as "marionette." As soon as readers notice this, what do you think they'll naturally do?
Yes, of course, they'll start analyzing every name, every location, to see what you, the clever author, are using them to represent. And when that happens readers are no longer in the story itself, but looking at it from the outside in and you've shot yourself in the foot.
Why do this to yourself?
Just use normal names.
Don't let anything get in the way of the story.
Published on February 13, 2012 08:16
January 2, 2012
Interview with Penguin Books

Check out my interview with Penguin Books who recently published the mass market edition of The Bishop.
Published on January 02, 2012 08:14
Check out my interview with Penguin Books who recently pu...

Check out my interview with Penguin Books who recently published the mass market edition of The Bishop.
Published on January 02, 2012 08:14
December 27, 2011
Spreading the News
Our cyberworld is connecting people better than ever believed possible. It has allowed me to interact with readers of my books like never before. Each day, I hear from people around the world who have read my books. Some have questions. Some have a bone to pick. Some simply loved the books and wanted to let me know. Well, just as the Web allows people to connect, it can also cause them to drown. With millions of other websites out there, millions of other authors, it's easy to get lost. If you're looking for a practical way to help spread the word about my books, consider one of these easy things to do:
1. Word of mouth—always the best.
2. "Like" Steven James on Facebook at sjamesauthor.
3. Post an online book review. (A single review can go a long way. Copy and paste it to Amazon, Barnes & Noble, CBD and Goodreads.)
4. Make sure your book stores and libraries carry my books. If not, request them to do so.
Thanks for your support!
Published on December 27, 2011 07:58
Our cyberworld is connecting people better than ever beli...
Our cyberworld is connecting people better than ever believed possible. It has allowed me to interact with readers of my books like never before. Each day, I hear from people around the world who have read my books. Some have questions. Some have a bone to pick. Some simply loved the books and wanted to let me know. Well, just as the Web allows people to connect, it can also cause them to drown. With millions of other websites out there, millions of other authors, it's easy to get lost. If you're looking for a practical way to help spread the word about my books, consider one of these easy things to do:
1. Word of mouth—always the best.
2. "Like" Steven James on Facebook at sjamesauthor.
3. Post an online book review. (A single review can go a long way. Copy and paste it to Amazon, Barnes & Noble, CBD and Goodreads.)
4. Make sure your book stores and libraries carry my books. If not, request them to do so.
Thanks for your support!
Published on December 27, 2011 07:58
December 1, 2011
Fifteen Suspense Movies You Haven’t Seen But Need To
Well, everyone, there are lots of great thriller films I could recommend (and I will someday), but I thought for now I’d pass along some of the little-known gems that are all on my all-time favorite movies list. Enjoy! (Use your discretion, of course. Some of these are rated R for a reason.)
15. A Murder of Crows14. Night Train13. Following12. Black Book11. The Cry of the Owl10. Fear9. Blink8. Best Laid Plans7. Dahmer6. Joshua5. The Dead Girl4. Enduring Love3. 11:142. Blood Simple1. Hard Candy
What other recommendations do you have?
15. A Murder of Crows14. Night Train13. Following12. Black Book11. The Cry of the Owl10. Fear9. Blink8. Best Laid Plans7. Dahmer6. Joshua5. The Dead Girl4. Enduring Love3. 11:142. Blood Simple1. Hard Candy
What other recommendations do you have?
Published on December 01, 2011 14:03
Fifteen Suspense Movies You Haven't Seen But Need To
Well, everyone, there are lots of great thriller films I could recommend (and I will someday), but I thought for now I'd pass along some of the little-known gems that are all on my all-time favorite movies list. Enjoy! (Use your discretion, of course. Some of these are rated R for a reason.)
15. A Murder of Crows14. Night Train13. Following12. Black Book11. The Cry of the Owl10. Fear9. Blink8. Best Laid Plans7. Dahmer6. Joshua5. The Dead Girl4. Enduring Love3. 11:142. Blood Simple1. Hard Candy
What other recommendations do you have?
15. A Murder of Crows14. Night Train13. Following12. Black Book11. The Cry of the Owl10. Fear9. Blink8. Best Laid Plans7. Dahmer6. Joshua5. The Dead Girl4. Enduring Love3. 11:142. Blood Simple1. Hard Candy
What other recommendations do you have?
Published on December 01, 2011 14:03