Tyler Colins's Blog, page 54
March 9, 2020
Yeah, More Shameless Self Promotion – Forever Poi
Hey-ho, it’s Rey posting on Day One of the promotion for Forever Poi – the fourth book in the Triple Threat Investigation Agency series.
It’s available for 99 cents, a bargain (take from a gal who LOVES to shop!).
The three of us private eyes at Triple Threat Investigation Agency (that name, by the by, was my awesome idea) are hired to find the culprit that torched two Chinatown art galleries . . . and left two charred bodies in the rubble. There’s a slew of suspects: a haughty gallery owner with a questionable past, an art consultant as treacherous as she is beautiful, a risk-happy photographer who lives on the edge, and an aspiring manager with a dicey history. All have viable motives: a major insurance pay-out, an ugly relationship break-up, vengeance, and/or a cover-up for past transgressions.
If you’re interested in learning how we solved this challenging case, here are some Amazon links I managed to get for you (I’m getting’ pretty good at this kinda stuff)
https://www.amazon.com/Tyler-Colins/e/B01KHOZAL2%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
March 7, 2020
Seri—ously … ?
Hi, it’s Linda. The Boss had “stuff” to take care of today, so I stepped in. Given the three of us at the Triple Threat Investigation Agency have had cases with multiple murders/murderers, we thought it might be interesting to look at serial killers.
While the murderers in The Connecticut Corpse Caper, Can You Hula like Hilo Hattie?, Coco’s Nuts, and Forever Poi did kill a few people who crossed their paths, we never truly viewed them as “serial killers” (or SKs, as Rey likes to call them). They executed people for specific reasons. The National Institute of Justice, by the way, defines a serial killer—SK—as a person who has committed two or more separate murders, generally with some psychological and/or sadistic sexual aspect. Wikipedia defines an SK as someone who has killed three or more people.
There was a time—the latter part of the 20th century specifically—when there appeared to be a glut of them. Remember Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, John Wayne Gacy, The Zodiac Killer, The Hillside Stranglers . . . ?
Did you know, though, that the number of serial killers has dropped 85% in 30 years? In fact, the FBI says they account for less that 1% of killings. (I wonder if the writers of Criminal Minds considered that.) Some of the reasons were that the latter part of the 20th century had turbulent times, people moved frequently, and hitchhiking was common. Finding victims wasn’t overly difficult. Moreover, computerized databases and data banks, and utilizing DNA for forensic purposes, didn’t exist until more recently. Add to that: longer prison sentences and reduced parole, as well as the abundance of security cameras.
In case you were wondering as to the types of SKs, there are said to be four major ones.
Visionary
These serial killers hear—and respond to—voices or visions, which compel them to murder certain types of people. Visionaries tend to be psychotic.
Mission-Oriented
This one experiences a need to kill certain people that fall under a given group (call girls, women/wives, transient workers, those with certain religious alliances or a particular race, as examples), but this type isn’t considered psychopathic or psychotic.
These former two tend to be focused on the act of killing and do so swiftly.
Power- & Control-Oriented
This SK experiences sexual gratification by dominating and humiliating victims. Sociopaths, they live by their own rules and guidelines. They also like to play God by being in control of life and death. Many famous serial killers fall under his category.
Hedonistic
This one experiences a connection between violence and sexual gratification. Feeling pleasure from the act, he/she has “eroticized” the experience. A hedonistic killer takes the time to torture or mutilate a victim. You’ll find this type of serial killer in novels and movies.
These former two are focused on the process of killing; they enjoy torturing their victims and derive delight from the slow deaths they produce.
Based on interviews and subjective data, not every serial killer falls under one type and many are more than one type.
Eighty percent of SKs are white males between the ages of 25-34 and are charismatic, bright, and mobile. Their killings, at least initially, tend to be meticulously planned. They also develop over time and learn from mistakes so that they can “improve” their killing methods/styles. Women SKs, by the way, do exist and generally tend to kill for the same reasons as their male counterparts. Unless they have a male partner, however, they don’t tend to sexually assault or physically maim their victims.
Another general fact: many were mistreated or neglected as children and many abuse drugs and alcohol.
Other labels include “organized” versus “disorganized” and “asocial” versus “non-social”, but the majority appear to be organized and non-social.
There’s simply too much information to impart in a post, but as gruesome as some of it can be, it’s also—as Mr. Spock would say—fascinating. If you’re interested, I’d highly recommend you go googling.
[image error]Meanwhile, our latest case, Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha, may—possibly—feature an SK. This crafty and creative individual is certainly keeping us, and our police pals, on our private-eye toes.
March 3, 2020
Thank you Jay
A humble heartfelt thank you to James J. Cudney IV—Jay—who is featuring my post re caregiving on his blog, This is My Truth Now (https://thisismytruthnow.com/), on March 6th.
[image error]
[image error]Consideration and Respect for the Elderly–CAREgiving will be in the “Tips & Advice” section, which not only features posts/articles about “General Life”, but “Products & Services” and “Readers & Authors”.
I’ve known Jay, a fellow [talented] blogger and writer—among other things—for quite some time now. A personable fellow, he always proves supportive and helpful (and is definitely best-friend material).
I urge you to check out his blog and website, as well as his books; he’s written a number of them and they’ve all received fantastic reviews (as a mystery lover, I’m particularly fond of his Braxton Campus Mysteries).
Thanks again, my friend.
February 28, 2020
While we’re Chatting about Characters …
Just wanted to touch upon character “depth and development” a bit more today . . . give more of that proverbial food for thought.
[image error]When it comes to detailing our characters (villains included), we want to provide:
enough facts and features to paint a vivid picture layers to create complexity and intensity.
We don’t, however, want to offer so many details and components that we deliver an abstract depiction, one that lends itself to an unbelievable and/or non-“seeable” person.
Consider the factors most relevant to your characters, those that make them come to life for your readers. Do we need to know every facial feature? Of course not. Just those that impart details that build on—add dimension to—the character/villain.
For example, let’s take a gander at types of:
eyes – monolid, hooded, almond-shaped, close-set …
Ronald’s sad kelp-brown eyes scanned the reception area.
lips – thin, wide, full, bow-shaped …
Her perpetually pouty lips drew into a tight line when she noticed the ever-irascible Detective Smith had entered the lobby.
noses – fleshy, turned-up, narrow, flat, Roman, bumpy …
The intern’s ski-slope nose had an odd jagged scar running down the left side.
chins – double, pointed, long, fleshy, scarred, pimply …
Unable to meet Jason’s intense crow-black eyes, the man spoke to his strong square chin.
eyebrows – S-shaped, thin, rounded, tattooed, hard-angled, soft-angled ….
Roger eyed the professor’s thin plucked eyebrows and absently noted how they seemed eternally arched.
What about arms, legs, body shapes? There are so many options available!
thin, slender, slim, short, flabby, zaftig, curvaceous, shapely, voluptuous, colossal, fat, skeletal, tiny, large, vast, frail, fragile …
What about the clothes and jewelry characters/villains wear . . . or don’t wear? Telling or not?
Sam Evans III zipped up his Alexander McQueen satin bomber jacket and glanced at his Luminox titanium watch. His arc-shaped lips pulled into a frown.
Lenny looked at his Timex watch and a loud sigh pushed past flabby lips. Anxiously, he adjusted the collar of his loud-print polyester shirt.
She tossed the diamond-encrusted watch onto the corner of the handcrafted desk as her slender frame sank back into the plush contour chair.
If you have an overabundance of attractive or secretive characters, take it further. Attractive in what way? Pretty? Handsome? Comely? Secretive in what way? Reserved? Reticent? Cagey? What differentiates them?
Having edited numerous manuscripts, it seems that characters are often taken for granted by the writer. He/she knows what the they look like, but the readers don’t because the delivery is lacking. Hence my “nudge” for more selective—appropriate—word choices.
[image error]Get to know your thesaurus. It offers a wealth of alternatives to the flat and mundane. Consider those words the colors you can utilize to paint your characters alive.
February 26, 2020
Clumsy Characters = Chaos
Perhaps a little dramatic a heading, but the fact is that if characters are described/portrayed in a vague or awkwardly constructed fashion, the result will lend itself to chaos, also known as confusion.
What’s makes for vague or awkward characters?
Those that have:
minimal descriptions 
they all have eyes and are either male or female, but there’s not much more to let us know what they look like
similar descriptions all have dark eyes and are tall
identical speech patterns they utilize the same jargon/slang or sound the same
alike reactions their eyes open wide with confusion or fear (regardless whether they’re detectives, criminals, boys, girls, teachers or waitstaff)
stereotypical personalities/appearances/mannerisms they read like characters found in countless dramas, novels, soap operas
little or no depth come across as vapid or weak (there’s no backbone or spirit, not even a hint of personality).
If characters come across as dull or lackluster, readers won’t be inspired to continue reading.
Make your characters compelling, appealing. There should be “something” about them—something that attracts us to them as readers (or “viewers”, as we do visualize the scenes). Or repels us. If you’re going to have a villain, make him or her chillingly evil or sad, or compassionate—but memorable.
Think of fictional persons who’ve captured our/your attention: Columbo / Steve McGarrett / Alex Delaware / Jack Torrance / Macbeth / Hamlet / Elizabeth Benet / Jessica Fletcher …
[image error]The writer in me always likens the creation of a character to the painting [completion] of a canvas. The final picture should captivating, powerful.
Generally, we like [love] characters who are trustworthy and supportive, keep promises and play fair, and have objectives [and missions] we can relate to or empathize with, among many other attributes. Additional likable qualities: they love animals, are helpful, stand their ground, and fight for unfairness [without complaint]. And it never hurts if they’re really good-looking and fit, funny/witty, and [relatively] brave. Think: personality. What makes a character tick? What makes him/her resonate? Think of everyday folks who have that je ne sais quoi.
That said, don’t go overboard and make characters overly good or villains excessively bad. We all have failings, but we all have virtues.
Give your central character(s)—the protagonist(s)—an intriguing skill/talent or pastime. Maybe your hero/heroine is a detective with a remarkable track record. He/she has many friends, can fight well (has fists like a prizefighter) but only engages in a skirmish when absolutely necessary. He/she is attractive, tall, slim, and fit/toned. But so are lots of detectives. So provide dimension. Perhaps he/she scuba dives on the weekends and volunteers at a homeless shelter two nights a week? Perhaps he/she takes cooking classes? What’s your character’s history and background? What motivates him or her? Paint that detailed/vivid picture! Give that character something to make him/her, yes, stand out.
And don’t forget to give your protagonists the odd challenges. Let them feel and express feelings. Dilemmas and issues occur in real life that feed on/off emotions; the same should hold true for fictional characters.
More on character development in the future. Happy painting!
February 21, 2020
It’s All About Almost
I’m giving the gals, particularly ever-enthusiastic Rey, a break from posting. Given I haven’t touched upon editing recently, maybe it’s time to do so again.
In my editing travels, I’ve discovered that “about” and “almost” are two frequently overused words. New writers, in particular, seem to adore them. An abundance of these two words, however, is not always in the story’s—or writer’s—favor.
Both certainly serve viable purposes, but they can also be weak words that lend themselves to a flat storyline.
About (adverb, preposition)
It’s about time you showed up. 
designates anger or impatience
He was about ready to explode. doesn’t add anything
The story is about a teacher and his class. yes, okay, doable
The childhood story reveals how a well-loved teacher encourages his keen, young students. a little more dynamic . . . maybe?
Almost (adverb)
I’ve almost had it with him. designates anger or impatience
Jason was almost scared. was he or wasn’t he?
It’s almost noon. okay, but stating it’s five minutes before noon is more specific
The thief wavered and almost climbed back down. did he or didn’t he? (hopefully, the next sentence/paragraph will provide more information)
The detective shot the culprit in the head; he died almost instantly. the suggestion is he lingered (perhaps something [eventful] transpired in that second or two?)
[image error]An assessing ear helps: yours. Read each sentence aloud. Listen. Attentively. Do they work—are they stronger or weaker for adding “about” or “almost”? Would they keep the reader interested? Or might they create a “zzzzz” effect?
She was almost fearful of what might happen. ech
She had a fearful look on her face. okay, but not very dynamic
Fear flickered in her sapphire-blue eyes. more descriptive, more visual
Words make [and sometimes break] your writing. Be specific. Be detailed, but don’t go overboard. Take a simple sentence and build on it. A high-rise is fine; there’s no need to go for a skyscraper.
Detective Smith looked up at her partner and almost smiled when he was about to pass her a coffee.
Detective Smith smiled cheerfully as she accepted the mug of steaming coffee from her chuckling partner.
Detective Smith’s fern-green eyes glistened as a cheerful smile pulled at her glossy lips; she accepted the huge mug of steaming Kona coffee from her grinning partner, Jack Blake.
A cheerful smile played upon young Detective Smith’s sensual . . .
. . . and on it goes. You determine how descriptive you want to be.
Envision your story, characters, and events. Paint a vivid picture. Make the action come alive. Don’t just reel those readers in . . . yank them!
As said, “about” and “almost” serve their purpose, but you have to recognize when they do and when they simply serve as unnecessary [snoozy] padding.
Martyn was about to learn what the impact would be. Martyn listened intently to hear what the impact would be. Martyn perused the multi-paged report to ascertain what the financial impact would be.
Helena took note at the way everyone was seated, almost confused at the seating arrangements. Confused, Helena observed how everyone was seated at the bare dining table. Who’d decided that?
It’s not about almost accomplishing an outcome; it’s making it happen. You can do it. It’s merely a matter of application mixed with perseverance and determination. Remember, Rome wasn’t built in a day . . . great writing takes time to realize.
It’s almost the weekend and I’m almost certain you’re about to have an awesome one. I certainly almost am. Cheers.
February 19, 2020
The Mystery of the Latter Years
Hey-ho, it’s Rey. The Boss is working on an editing assignment today. Linda and Cousin Jilly are a bit miffed that I got post patrol today, but I didn’t exactly hear them eagerly volunteer. I’m so enjoying this now, I can’t help but jump at the chance to blog.
Our boss likes those Nancy Drew mysteries so much (says they help “calm” her during major bouts of stress), I got motivated and borrowed a few. I really got to like them; small wonder, seeing as I’m a private eye. He-he.
Seems, though, that the young amateur sleuths are like forever 18. That gave me an awesome, fun idea! Why not feature the young detective and her best chums, Bess Marvin and George Fayne—years later.
What would they be doing at the age of 30? Still traveling around the world solving mysteries, enjoying those not-too-shabby allowances? Linda and JJ liked the idea, so they’re not miffed anymore. Here’s our take, starting with my BFF.
Linda :
[image error]Nancy decided to go to law school in her early 20s and then partnered with her father for a couple of years. At 30, Nancy opted for criminal law, and recently set her sights on becoming a DA. Ned Nickerson stopped pining for her after graduating from university (when she turned down his marriage proposal not once but thrice). Multi-skilled and never shying from challenges, she’s also working on a part-time medical degree.
Bess married Dave Evans, her sweetheart, and had three children. They moved to a small town in Iowa, where he currently serves as a high-school football coach. She remains a stay-at-home mom, designing and sewing clothes for the family when she’s not preparing meals based on famous chefs’ recipes (she has a cookbook collection that, at last count, stood at 589).
George studied Sports Management and opened a small sports marketing firm. She did so well, she moved to NYC at the age of 27 to open an agency. She just married a well-known sports announcer, who shall remain nameless for the time being (the wedding was made known to a select few, given a very messy divorce). George and hubby have just adopted two Shelties—Moon and Stone—and a cross-eyed tabby named Larkspur.
JJ :
Nancy had no desire to marry Ned Nickerson, despite his persistent proposals. She actually ended up marrying Detective Bridge Blackwood, who she met when solving a mystery that involved her housekeeper’s kidnapping. When Blackwood didn’t agree with her decision to pursue a career as a police officer, she divorced him and has had no regrets. She’s currently—and most happily—a Maine Police Trooper.
[image error]Bess threw off that towel of timidity and opted for pursuing a business career. She moved to Los Angeles at the age of 20, where she attended culinary school. Proving a talented cook, she opened a small diner—with much success. She’s now a well-known Food Network star with a weekly half-hour show called “Bess in Show”.
George moved to Paris to study art. She’d always been a decent sketcher, but had never had the time—or the inclination—to do anything with that talent until she met an aspiring watercolor painter at a family picnic. Jean-Pierre swept George off her feet and she followed him to France. One thing led to another and both are doing exceptionally well, thanks to the three-story gallery they opened last year.
Me (Rey) :
Nancy opened a professional P.I. agency when her dad agreed to finance it. It proved successful. How could it not, considering she’d made a name for herself, not just locally, but around the world? The agency did so well in fact that two years ago she opened an office in Seattle and there’ll be one in Los Angeles soon. She married Ned a few months after he graduated university, but the marriage only lasted a year. They’re still friends, though. Sorta.
Bess became a plus-figure model at the age of 20 when a famous fashion photographer bumped into her—literally—as she was leaving an ice-cream shop. Her triple-scoop cone ended up on his Prada shoes. They both found it funny and Fate (Cupid) stepped in. She’s still modeling and has just opened a boutique in Boston, where she moved with the photographer after they got married last year.
[image error]George is still living in River Heights and enjoying her job as a phys-ed teacher. She married Burt Eddleton, who owns his own electronics shop. This “unadventurous” life suits her just fine. She stays in touch with Nancy and Bess, and the three are planning on taking a ten-day Caribbean cruise.
Yeah, 18 is fun . . . but not forever.
February 16, 2020
Day 7 – Hulaing Along
Can You Hula Like Hilo Hattie is free for one more day.
It’s Linda today—Rey’s on monk-seal volunteer duty today and JJ’s meeting up with a former beau. In case you missed Rey’s rundown yesterday, let me provide one.
In Hula, we established the Triple Threat Investigation Agency. That name, by the by, was my BFF’s idea. You can’t argue with Rey when she gets an idea in her head—it’s like trying to pry a Black Friday sale item from an avid, rabid cut-rate-price shopper.
We have our first official paying assignment: to discover the secret of an elderly millionaire’s young wife. It seems clear-cut—until she’s found murdered, floating in the beautiful sapphire waters of a deserted beach. The three of us endeavor to uncover the killer amid a cast of curious characters and find a few secrets, not all belonging to the deceased wife, as well as a number of bodies.
While piecing together the puzzle, we end up taking a few detours—to the sordid and dodgy domains of drug pushers, informants, and gangs. Serious game players, these folks play for serious keeps.
Here are some Amazon links The Boss provided:
https://www.amazon.ca/Hula-Hattie-Triple-Threat-Mystery-ebook/dp/B01KEEBNOS
https://www.amazon.com/Tyler-Colins/e/B01KHOZAL2%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
Aloha Sunday!
[image error]
February 15, 2020
Day 6 – Looks Like another Shameless Saturday of Self-Promotion
Can You Hula Like Hilo Hattie is still available for free. Yes, f-r-e-e (a marrrvelous word, if I do say so myself).
Hey, it’s Rey. If you’re wondering what Hula is about, let me give you a quick rundown.
Now living in Hawaii (like, how sweet is that?) we take on our first official—super exciting—case. As professional private eyes, we have to uncover the secret of this elderly millionaire’s pretty young thing, uh, wife. There’s a twist: pretty young wifey is found dead on a deserted beach. And there’s a secret all right, one of many (and they’re not all hers).
As we’re collecting clues, we kinda end up with a collection of bodies . . . and a mass of suspects. There’s a whacked-out druggie, a weird drug dealer or two, and a tetchy gang member or three. Yeah, we make a few enemies, but we also form some friendships. It’s all part of the P.I. learning curve.
What seems a straightforward task becomes anything but. Thanks to a crazy week in Connecticut however, we’re used to dealing with murderers and quirky (crazy) personalities. And we have enough faith in our budding talents to persevere and solve this challenging case. It’s one heckuva fun ride, though. Maybe you’d like to accompany us on it? You won’t be disappointed (my personal opinion only, of course).
Here are some Amazon links courtesy of The Boss (they look kinda messy to me, but whatever):
https://www.amazon.ca/Hula-Hattie-Triple-Threat-Mystery-ebook/dp/B01KEEBNOS
https://www.amazon.com/Tyler-Colins/e/B01KHOZAL2%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
Have an awesome Saturday everyone.
[image error]
Please note: $0.99 promotions are active only in the US and UK stores, and free promotions are available in all Amazon marketplaces!
February 14, 2020
Day 5 – Gotta Love Shameless Self-Promotion and What Better Day . . .
. . . than Valentine’s Day!
Maybe you’d love to partake of the discount / free promotion for The Connecticut Corpse Caper and Can You Hula Like Hilo Hattie?
Promotion price for both are yes, indeedy-do: FREE
Caper: A haunted antebellum mansion, several corpses, and a slew of suspects inspire JJ, Rey and Linda, to become P.I.s. In fact, they so loved being amateur sleuths, the trio moves to beautiful Hawaii and opens the Triple Threat Investigation Agency—with respectable success.
Hula: Our aspiring private eyes take on their first official case: discovering the “secret” of an elderly millionaire’s young wife. All appears straightforward enough—until the wife is found murdered on the lovely oceanside. As Jill (JJ), Rey and Linda determine to uncover the killer amid a cast of curious, unconventional characters, they stumble across more than one “secret” and trip over a few bodies . . . and don’t they just love the challenge(s)!
Here are various Amazon links (because I love to cover all bases):
https://www.amazon.ca/Connecticut-Corpse-Triple-Threat-Mystery-ebook/dp/B01KEDWHMG
https://www.amazon.ca/Hula-Hattie-Triple-Threat-Mystery-ebook/dp/B01KEEBNOS
https://www.amazon.com/Tyler-Colins/e/B01KHOZAL2%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
I hope you love reading them as much as I loved writing them.
Happy Valentine’s Day everyone!
xox
[image error]
