Bobby Michaels's Blog, page 2
June 23, 2008
What's wrong with porn?
I'm sure for many of you the answer to this question is-nothing. And I might agree with you except for some very disturbing things I've seen in porn recently. Now I have a confession to make. I watch almost every kind of porn there is. And yes that includes straight bisexual and lesbian, though very little lesbian. And I have noticed a disturbing situation especially in straight porn. It concerns cum. In gay films I see cum almost worshiped. It does not appear as if a guy shoots his load in or on another guy as some kind of punishment or a way to say you disgust me. But that is exactly what I see in straight porn. Guys who are supposed to be hot for females instead treat them like their little less than a toilet. I'm wondering what this says about straight males and how they really feel about women. I'm not saying the guys do this in real life, as they probably never get laid began in their life. But what one wonders is what kind of fantasies they have as they watch these films?
It has taken me a while to get to this point. The women in the women's movement have said for a long time that port is degrading to women. I can see that it is. The strange thing is, gay porn worships the male. Every part of him including (if you're watching the right film) his piss and his cum. Evidently, as researchers into relationships have discovered, gay relationships tend to be the most equal. And I guess our porn reflects that. So move over and hand me some lube, I've got this little film I want to show you...
RimPig
It has taken me a while to get to this point. The women in the women's movement have said for a long time that port is degrading to women. I can see that it is. The strange thing is, gay porn worships the male. Every part of him including (if you're watching the right film) his piss and his cum. Evidently, as researchers into relationships have discovered, gay relationships tend to be the most equal. And I guess our porn reflects that. So move over and hand me some lube, I've got this little film I want to show you...
RimPig
What's wrong with porn?
I'm sure for many of you the answer to this question is-nothing. And I might agree with you except for some very disturbing things I've seen in porn recently. Now I have a confession to make. I watch almost every kind of porn there is. And yes that includes straight bisexual and lesbian, though very little lesbian. And I have noticed a disturbing situation especially in straight porn. It concerns cum. In gay films I see cum almost worshiped. It does not appear as if a guy shoots his load in or on another guy as some kind of punishment or a way to say you disgust me. But that is exactly what I see in straight porn. Guys who are supposed to be hot for females instead treat them like their little less than a toilet. I'm wondering what this says about straight males and how they really feel about women. I'm not saying the guys do this in real life, as they probably never get laid began in their life. But what one wonders is what kind of fantasies they have as they watch these films?
It has taken me a while to get to this point. The women in the women's movement have said for a long time that port is degrading to women. I can see that it is. The strange thing is, gay porn worships the male. Every part of him including (if you're watching the right film) his piss and his cum. Evidently, as researchers into relationships have discovered, gay relationships tend to be the most equal. And I guess our porn reflects that. So move over and hand me some lube, I've got this little film I want to show you...
RimPig
It has taken me a while to get to this point. The women in the women's movement have said for a long time that port is degrading to women. I can see that it is. The strange thing is, gay porn worships the male. Every part of him including (if you're watching the right film) his piss and his cum. Evidently, as researchers into relationships have discovered, gay relationships tend to be the most equal. And I guess our porn reflects that. So move over and hand me some lube, I've got this little film I want to show you...
RimPig
In memoriam-George Carlin
For many of my generation George Carlin was the epitome of the counterculture. He said the things we didn't dare say, he verbalized the things we thought. Along with Richard Pryor, he was one of the bookends who provided us with a vision of who we were. Not only did he make us laugh, he made us think.
Following the death of his wife he seemed to turn more bitter and cynical. But that is understandable. All of us have become more bitter and cynical in the preceding years.
May he rest in peace.
RimPig
Following the death of his wife he seemed to turn more bitter and cynical. But that is understandable. All of us have become more bitter and cynical in the preceding years.
May he rest in peace.
RimPig
In memoriam-George Carlin
For many of my generation George Carlin was the epitome of the counterculture. He said the things we didn't dare say, he verbalized the things we thought. Along with Richard Pryor, he was one of the bookends who provided us with a vision of who we were. Not only did he make us laugh, he made us think.
Following the death of his wife he seemed to turn more bitter and cynical. But that is understandable. All of us have become more bitter and cynical in the preceding years.
May he rest in peace.
RimPig
Following the death of his wife he seemed to turn more bitter and cynical. But that is understandable. All of us have become more bitter and cynical in the preceding years.
May he rest in peace.
RimPig
May 26, 2008
MEMORIAL DAY- 2008
Like so many holidays in this country that have become nothing but excuses for commerce, Memorial Day has likewise become a day to sell furniture, major appliances, and automobiles. People are home from work but with very little understanding of why. In some areas of the country it is the start of the major tourist season. Here in South Florida it marks the end of the major tourist season (nobody, not even the people who live here, really want to be here during the hot muggy summer and hurricane season.)
But that is not what this day is all about. Originally called Decoration Day, it was meant to be a day to decorate the graves of soldiers who had fallen in the great Civil War. It was meant to be a time to remember the ultimate sacrifice these young men had made to preserve our nation as a whole.
Later, it became a holiday to remember the fallen in all our wars.
Just as when I was growing up, we are involved in yet another bloody, useless war far away from our own shores but killing our soldiers nonetheless. Like so many other Americans, I am left with a dilemma. I hate this war, I want to see all of those who foisted this war on our country with their lies put on trial and executed for treason. I want those captains of industry who have made obscene profits from this war executed as well for they all had their hand as accomplices in the murder of more than 4000 innocent American lives.
On the other hand, there is not enough that we as Americans can do to a honor the brave men and women of our armed forces who have put themselves in harm's way for us. But the only true way to a honor the fallen of all our wars is to stop dishonoring their sacrifice by constantly involving ourselves in more wars to kill more soldiers. We need to find a way that there will be no more new graves dug at Arlington. We need to find a way to engage with other nations of the world in peace. We need to find a way that the call for the ultimate sacrifice of life is no longer a necessary part of any nation's foreign policy.
General George S. Patton, once defined war in this way, " the idea of war is not to die for your country but to get the other guy to die for his." This idea needs to be rooted out all the world's consciousness. It is never the people who decide for war who actually go and fight those wars. The ones responsible never face the consequences of their decision. If George Bush and Saddam Hussein had to meet in a man to man combat, we would not have 4000 dead and more than 100,000 severely wounded soldiers of our armed forces. We might have been lucky and gotten rid of both of them at the same time.
Every war that this country has fought has been deemed to be inevitable at the time. 20, 30, 40, 50, years later historians 'prove' that the war could have been avoided. We have become so brilliant in the last half century that it didn't take but four years for the people of this country to figure out how unnecessary the war is we are presently engaged in are. The only problem is that the politicians and the industrialists who profit from this war cannot let go of it.
If you really want to do on are too were fallen troops, go to the polls in November and throw the bastards out. Then demand of the new legislators and leaders in the executive branch of government that they create war crimes trials for all of them. Make sure that people understand that if they engage this country in war so that they can increase their profits or their power they will pay with their lives. This will stop people and make them think of peaceful ways of resolving conflict first.
RimPig
But that is not what this day is all about. Originally called Decoration Day, it was meant to be a day to decorate the graves of soldiers who had fallen in the great Civil War. It was meant to be a time to remember the ultimate sacrifice these young men had made to preserve our nation as a whole.
Later, it became a holiday to remember the fallen in all our wars.
Just as when I was growing up, we are involved in yet another bloody, useless war far away from our own shores but killing our soldiers nonetheless. Like so many other Americans, I am left with a dilemma. I hate this war, I want to see all of those who foisted this war on our country with their lies put on trial and executed for treason. I want those captains of industry who have made obscene profits from this war executed as well for they all had their hand as accomplices in the murder of more than 4000 innocent American lives.
On the other hand, there is not enough that we as Americans can do to a honor the brave men and women of our armed forces who have put themselves in harm's way for us. But the only true way to a honor the fallen of all our wars is to stop dishonoring their sacrifice by constantly involving ourselves in more wars to kill more soldiers. We need to find a way that there will be no more new graves dug at Arlington. We need to find a way to engage with other nations of the world in peace. We need to find a way that the call for the ultimate sacrifice of life is no longer a necessary part of any nation's foreign policy.
General George S. Patton, once defined war in this way, " the idea of war is not to die for your country but to get the other guy to die for his." This idea needs to be rooted out all the world's consciousness. It is never the people who decide for war who actually go and fight those wars. The ones responsible never face the consequences of their decision. If George Bush and Saddam Hussein had to meet in a man to man combat, we would not have 4000 dead and more than 100,000 severely wounded soldiers of our armed forces. We might have been lucky and gotten rid of both of them at the same time.
Every war that this country has fought has been deemed to be inevitable at the time. 20, 30, 40, 50, years later historians 'prove' that the war could have been avoided. We have become so brilliant in the last half century that it didn't take but four years for the people of this country to figure out how unnecessary the war is we are presently engaged in are. The only problem is that the politicians and the industrialists who profit from this war cannot let go of it.
If you really want to do on are too were fallen troops, go to the polls in November and throw the bastards out. Then demand of the new legislators and leaders in the executive branch of government that they create war crimes trials for all of them. Make sure that people understand that if they engage this country in war so that they can increase their profits or their power they will pay with their lives. This will stop people and make them think of peaceful ways of resolving conflict first.
RimPig
May 25, 2008
MEMORIAL DAY- 2008
Like so many holidays in this country that have become nothing but excuses for commerce, Memorial Day has likewise become a day to sell furniture, major appliances, and automobiles. People are home from work but with very little understanding of why. In some areas of the country it is the start of the major tourist season. Here in South Florida it marks the end of the major tourist season (nobody, not even the people who live here, really want to be here during the hot muggy summer and hurricane season.)
But that is not what this day is all about. Originally called Decoration Day, it was meant to be a day to decorate the graves of soldiers who had fallen in the great Civil War. It was meant to be a time to remember the ultimate sacrifice these young men had made to preserve our nation as a whole.
Later, it became a holiday to remember the fallen in all our wars.
Just as when I was growing up, we are involved in yet another bloody, useless war far away from our own shores but killing our soldiers nonetheless. Like so many other Americans, I am left with a dilemma. I hate this war, I want to see all of those who foisted this war on our country with their lies put on trial and executed for treason. I want those captains of industry who have made obscene profits from this war executed as well for they all had their hand as accomplices in the murder of more than 4000 innocent American lives.
On the other hand, there is not enough that we as Americans can do to a honor the brave men and women of our armed forces who have put themselves in harm's way for us. But the only true way to a honor the fallen of all our wars is to stop dishonoring their sacrifice by constantly involving ourselves in more wars to kill more soldiers. We need to find a way that there will be no more new graves dug at Arlington. We need to find a way to engage with other nations of the world in peace. We need to find a way that the call for the ultimate sacrifice of life is no longer a necessary part of any nation's foreign policy.
General George S. Patton, once defined war in this way, " the idea of war is not to die for your country but to get the other guy to die for his." This idea needs to be rooted out all the world's consciousness. It is never the people who decide for war who actually go and fight those wars. The ones responsible never face the consequences of their decision. If George Bush and Saddam Hussein had to meet in a man to man combat, we would not have 4000 dead and more than 100,000 severely wounded soldiers of our armed forces. We might have been lucky and gotten rid of both of them at the same time.
Every war that this country has fought has been deemed to be inevitable at the time. 20, 30, 40, 50, years later historians 'prove' that the war could have been avoided. We have become so brilliant in the last half century that it didn't take but four years for the people of this country to figure out how unnecessary the war is we are presently engaged in are. The only problem is that the politicians and the industrialists who profit from this war cannot let go of it.
If you really want to do on are too were fallen troops, go to the polls in November and throw the bastards out. Then demand of the new legislators and leaders in the executive branch of government that they create war crimes trials for all of them. Make sure that people understand that if they engage this country in war so that they can increase their profits or their power they will pay with their lives. This will stop people and make them think of peaceful ways of resolving conflict first.
RimPig
But that is not what this day is all about. Originally called Decoration Day, it was meant to be a day to decorate the graves of soldiers who had fallen in the great Civil War. It was meant to be a time to remember the ultimate sacrifice these young men had made to preserve our nation as a whole.
Later, it became a holiday to remember the fallen in all our wars.
Just as when I was growing up, we are involved in yet another bloody, useless war far away from our own shores but killing our soldiers nonetheless. Like so many other Americans, I am left with a dilemma. I hate this war, I want to see all of those who foisted this war on our country with their lies put on trial and executed for treason. I want those captains of industry who have made obscene profits from this war executed as well for they all had their hand as accomplices in the murder of more than 4000 innocent American lives.
On the other hand, there is not enough that we as Americans can do to a honor the brave men and women of our armed forces who have put themselves in harm's way for us. But the only true way to a honor the fallen of all our wars is to stop dishonoring their sacrifice by constantly involving ourselves in more wars to kill more soldiers. We need to find a way that there will be no more new graves dug at Arlington. We need to find a way to engage with other nations of the world in peace. We need to find a way that the call for the ultimate sacrifice of life is no longer a necessary part of any nation's foreign policy.
General George S. Patton, once defined war in this way, " the idea of war is not to die for your country but to get the other guy to die for his." This idea needs to be rooted out all the world's consciousness. It is never the people who decide for war who actually go and fight those wars. The ones responsible never face the consequences of their decision. If George Bush and Saddam Hussein had to meet in a man to man combat, we would not have 4000 dead and more than 100,000 severely wounded soldiers of our armed forces. We might have been lucky and gotten rid of both of them at the same time.
Every war that this country has fought has been deemed to be inevitable at the time. 20, 30, 40, 50, years later historians 'prove' that the war could have been avoided. We have become so brilliant in the last half century that it didn't take but four years for the people of this country to figure out how unnecessary the war is we are presently engaged in are. The only problem is that the politicians and the industrialists who profit from this war cannot let go of it.
If you really want to do on are too were fallen troops, go to the polls in November and throw the bastards out. Then demand of the new legislators and leaders in the executive branch of government that they create war crimes trials for all of them. Make sure that people understand that if they engage this country in war so that they can increase their profits or their power they will pay with their lives. This will stop people and make them think of peaceful ways of resolving conflict first.
RimPig
May 15, 2008
WHY CAN'T WE TALK TO CHINA?
The heartbreaking images of parents sitting and waiting for the bodies of their children to be pulled from the rubble of schools has, moved each of us in some way. As we watch day after day the aftermath of the horrendous earthquake in China, I'm sure that each of us is moved to reach out in some way to the Chinese people who are suffering so much.
Why is it then that there is no way to express to the Chinese government as an individual your care and concern for what their people are going through?
I went searching on the Internet and found an embassy in both Washington, DC and New York city. There are websites for these embassies of the People's Republic of China as there are for the three consulates which the government also maintains in this country. But not one of the web sites has a means of contact. There was a contact button on the web site of the New York City embassy but when you click on it it tells you this function has been removed.
What is the People's Republic of China afraid of? Criticism? Certainly they've earned that for their handling of the Tibet issue. But you would think that a country that wants to show itself off by hosting the Olympic Games would have someone with better public relations sense. You cannot stifle dissent or criticism from the rest of the world if you're going to be a part of that world. Nor should you cut yourself off, from any possible sympathy or concern with the plight of your people.
Perhaps the Chinese government will learn a lesson from what is happening in Burma. The military junta there is reaping a whirlwind of international condemnation and deservedly so for their foot dragging on allowing aid into the country for the victims of the cyclone. China could well squander the world sympathy for their misfortune by refusing to open themselves to expressions of that sympathy from the rest of the world.
China needs to learn that there is no benefit from a lack of communication. Only consequences.
RimPig
Why is it then that there is no way to express to the Chinese government as an individual your care and concern for what their people are going through?
I went searching on the Internet and found an embassy in both Washington, DC and New York city. There are websites for these embassies of the People's Republic of China as there are for the three consulates which the government also maintains in this country. But not one of the web sites has a means of contact. There was a contact button on the web site of the New York City embassy but when you click on it it tells you this function has been removed.
What is the People's Republic of China afraid of? Criticism? Certainly they've earned that for their handling of the Tibet issue. But you would think that a country that wants to show itself off by hosting the Olympic Games would have someone with better public relations sense. You cannot stifle dissent or criticism from the rest of the world if you're going to be a part of that world. Nor should you cut yourself off, from any possible sympathy or concern with the plight of your people.
Perhaps the Chinese government will learn a lesson from what is happening in Burma. The military junta there is reaping a whirlwind of international condemnation and deservedly so for their foot dragging on allowing aid into the country for the victims of the cyclone. China could well squander the world sympathy for their misfortune by refusing to open themselves to expressions of that sympathy from the rest of the world.
China needs to learn that there is no benefit from a lack of communication. Only consequences.
RimPig
WHY CAN'T WE TALK TO CHINA?
The heartbreaking images of parents sitting and waiting for the bodies of their children to be pulled from the rubble of schools has, moved each of us in some way. As we watch day after day the aftermath of the horrendous earthquake in China, I'm sure that each of us is moved to reach out in some way to the Chinese people who are suffering so much.
Why is it then that there is no way to express to the Chinese government as an individual your care and concern for what their people are going through?
I went searching on the Internet and found an embassy in both Washington, DC and New York city. There are websites for these embassies of the People's Republic of China as there are for the three consulates which the government also maintains in this country. But not one of the web sites has a means of contact. There was a contact button on the web site of the New York City embassy but when you click on it it tells you this function has been removed.
What is the People's Republic of China afraid of? Criticism? Certainly they've earned that for their handling of the Tibet issue. But you would think that a country that wants to show itself off by hosting the Olympic Games would have someone with better public relations sense. You cannot stifle dissent or criticism from the rest of the world if you're going to be a part of that world. Nor should you cut yourself off, from any possible sympathy or concern with the plight of your people.
Perhaps the Chinese government will learn a lesson from what is happening in Burma. The military junta there is reaping a whirlwind of international condemnation and deservedly so for their foot dragging on allowing aid into the country for the victims of the cyclone. China could well squander the world sympathy for their misfortune by refusing to open themselves to expressions of that sympathy from the rest of the world.
China needs to learn that there is no benefit from a lack of communication. Only consequences.
RimPig
Why is it then that there is no way to express to the Chinese government as an individual your care and concern for what their people are going through?
I went searching on the Internet and found an embassy in both Washington, DC and New York city. There are websites for these embassies of the People's Republic of China as there are for the three consulates which the government also maintains in this country. But not one of the web sites has a means of contact. There was a contact button on the web site of the New York City embassy but when you click on it it tells you this function has been removed.
What is the People's Republic of China afraid of? Criticism? Certainly they've earned that for their handling of the Tibet issue. But you would think that a country that wants to show itself off by hosting the Olympic Games would have someone with better public relations sense. You cannot stifle dissent or criticism from the rest of the world if you're going to be a part of that world. Nor should you cut yourself off, from any possible sympathy or concern with the plight of your people.
Perhaps the Chinese government will learn a lesson from what is happening in Burma. The military junta there is reaping a whirlwind of international condemnation and deservedly so for their foot dragging on allowing aid into the country for the victims of the cyclone. China could well squander the world sympathy for their misfortune by refusing to open themselves to expressions of that sympathy from the rest of the world.
China needs to learn that there is no benefit from a lack of communication. Only consequences.
RimPig
April 9, 2008
TAKE YOUR GUNS TO WORK!
If anyone doesn't believe that Florida is a backward Neanderthal southern state more akin to Mississippi or Louisiana, today's action by the Florida legislature should be proof. By a vote of 26 to 13 the Florida senate approved a measure that would allow Floridians to bring their personal weapons to work with them as long as they have permits to carry concealed weapons. The bill would allow them to keep the weapon locked in their vehicle in the parking lot of their employment.
The most insane thing about this bill is that supposedly it is for self protection. But from who? If the gun is locked in your car out in the parking lot and some one enters your workplace with a gun in their hand, how are you expected to get out to the parking lot I lock your car and get your gun to protect yourself?
Of course this bill was sponsored by the National Rifle Association. But it was also pushed by some unions. I guess the postal workers union was one of them.
I wish someone could tell me what earthly good our becoming one of the most well armed countries on the face of the earth is doing us. Every year violent gun crimes rise in this country. The people killed (mostly children) as collateral damage in gun violence increases. And all because people fear other people with guns. Maybe if there weren't so fucking many of them, there would be less to fear.
But like the NRA always argues, people have our right to hunt at work.
If there was ever a reason I'm glad to be retired finally, this is it!
RimPig
The most insane thing about this bill is that supposedly it is for self protection. But from who? If the gun is locked in your car out in the parking lot and some one enters your workplace with a gun in their hand, how are you expected to get out to the parking lot I lock your car and get your gun to protect yourself?
Of course this bill was sponsored by the National Rifle Association. But it was also pushed by some unions. I guess the postal workers union was one of them.
I wish someone could tell me what earthly good our becoming one of the most well armed countries on the face of the earth is doing us. Every year violent gun crimes rise in this country. The people killed (mostly children) as collateral damage in gun violence increases. And all because people fear other people with guns. Maybe if there weren't so fucking many of them, there would be less to fear.
But like the NRA always argues, people have our right to hunt at work.
If there was ever a reason I'm glad to be retired finally, this is it!
RimPig
TAKE YOUR GUNS TO WORK!
If anyone doesn't believe that Florida is a backward Neanderthal southern state more akin to Mississippi or Louisiana, today's action by the Florida legislature should be proof. By a vote of 26 to 13 the Florida senate approved a measure that would allow Floridians to bring their personal weapons to work with them as long as they have permits to carry concealed weapons. The bill would allow them to keep the weapon locked in their vehicle in the parking lot of their employment.
The most insane thing about this bill is that supposedly it is for self protection. But from who? If the gun is locked in your car out in the parking lot and some one enters your workplace with a gun in their hand, how are you expected to get out to the parking lot I lock your car and get your gun to protect yourself?
Of course this bill was sponsored by the National Rifle Association. But it was also pushed by some unions. I guess the postal workers union was one of them.
I wish someone could tell me what earthly good our becoming one of the most well armed countries on the face of the earth is doing us. Every year violent gun crimes rise in this country. The people killed (mostly children) as collateral damage in gun violence increases. And all because people fear other people with guns. Maybe if there weren't so fucking many of them, there would be less to fear.
But like the NRA always argues, people have our right to hunt at work.
If there was ever a reason I'm glad to be retired finally, this is it!
RimPig
The most insane thing about this bill is that supposedly it is for self protection. But from who? If the gun is locked in your car out in the parking lot and some one enters your workplace with a gun in their hand, how are you expected to get out to the parking lot I lock your car and get your gun to protect yourself?
Of course this bill was sponsored by the National Rifle Association. But it was also pushed by some unions. I guess the postal workers union was one of them.
I wish someone could tell me what earthly good our becoming one of the most well armed countries on the face of the earth is doing us. Every year violent gun crimes rise in this country. The people killed (mostly children) as collateral damage in gun violence increases. And all because people fear other people with guns. Maybe if there weren't so fucking many of them, there would be less to fear.
But like the NRA always argues, people have our right to hunt at work.
If there was ever a reason I'm glad to be retired finally, this is it!
RimPig
Bobby Michaels's Blog
- Bobby Michaels's profile
- 119 followers
Bobby Michaels isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
