Paul Levinson's Blog: Levinson at Large, page 302
August 24, 2014
Ray Donovan 2.7: The Party from Hell


Ray and Terry nearly come to blows over Terry's need to sell the gym and move to Ireland. Mickey makes things worse in this exchange, too, by pointing out that Ray has been using Terry's gym to launder money. Bunchy feels poorly treated by Ray, too. Abby is finally driven to the arms of the cop - likely this time to be consummated - and Bridget is furious with Ray, too, after he forbids her to see Marvin Gaye Washington. So furious, indeed, that she alerts Ray that something suspicious is going on with Abby.
In the end, the only one still on good terms with Ray is Conor. In a great closing scene, the two dance to Aerosmith's "Walk this Way". This is highly significant, too. With all the rampant breakdown around them, there is still a profound tie between father and son, Ray and Conor. In that sense, at least so far, Ray has improved the relationship that he as a son had and had with Mickey.
No FBI in this show. No Ezra and no Avi or Lena. Just family - for at least 90% of the episode - which is what Ray Donovan excels in showing in all its magnificent dysfunction. Just about everyone at the party did something wrong, or something to aggravate the situation. Everyone except Conor - but he contributed, too, by having a birthday.
See also Ray Donovan 2.1: Back in Business ... Ray Donovan 2.4: The Bad Guy ... Ray Donovan 2.5: Wool Over Eyes
And see also Ray Donovan Debuts with Originality and Flair ... Ray Donovan 1.2: His Assistants and his Family ... Ray Donovan 1.3: Mickey ... Ray Donovan 1.7 and Whitey Bulger ... Ray Donovan 1.8: Poetry and Death ... Ray Donovan Season 1 Finale: The Beginning of Redemption

does have some FBI agents
#SFWApro Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 24, 2014 19:36
August 21, 2014
Rectify Season 2 Finale: Talk about Cliff Hangers!

Here's what I think is about clear as day about what happened to Hanna, revealed before the cliff-hanger.
Daniel didn't kill her. He tells the truth about happened before he says he killed her, just to get the plea deal on the way. And the truth is that he watched as George and Trey and who knows who else actually killed Hanna. But he didn't kill her. Indeed, he put her legs back together in a more modest position and covered her private parts with wildflowers. That was the aftermath of a depraved act, but the depravity was in what Daniel saw not what he did.
And he feels guilty because he was frozen. He also feels guilty about what he did to Teddy, Jr last week (in narrative time, last season in terms of when we saw it). His admission to Tawney is not enough to relieve him of all of this guilt, which is why he wants to leave.

But here's where we are, and what we'll have to wait on until the next season. George's body is found in the river. That's good. But Teddy, Jr. - who, even if I try hard, I just can't feel sorry for - tells the sheriff about the coffee grounds, which information is duly passed on the Prosecutor.
So will this kill the plea deal? I'd guess that it will. Which will keep Daniel home and in the mix. And he'll be liable not only for a retrial for Hanna's murder, but a new trial for his assault on Teddy, Jr.
A fine, excruciating set-up indeed for Season 3. Bring it on!
See also Rectify 2.1: Indelible ... Rectify 2.2: True Real Time ... Rectify 2.3: Daniel's Motives ... Rectify 2.4: Jekyll and Hyde ... Rectify 2.6: Rare Education ... Rectify 2.7: The Plot Thickens ... Rectify 2.8: The Plea Bargain and the Smart Phone ... Rectify 2.9: Dancing in the Dark
And see also Rectify: Sheer and Shattering Poetry ... Rectify 1.5: Balloon Man ... Rectify Season 1 Finale: Searingly Anti-Climactic

another kind of capital punishment
#SFWApro
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 21, 2014 21:46
The Bridge 2.7: Major Business

Fausto has David killed. This is a significant moment, because Fausto does this after he hears Marco's explanation for why Marco didn't do it. Fausto clearly sees through Marco's rationalization. And now Marco is even more indebted to Fausto, whether he wants this or not.Hank admits to Sonya that he killed her sister's killer. Although Hank genuinely apologizes to Sonya - who says she became a cop before she so admired Hank - the elephant in the room is that Hank doesn't need to apologize. Yeah, he took matters into his own hand, but ridding the world of a sick psycho multi-killer requires no apology.Adriana's lady lover is apparently brutally murdered, though she's able to kill her attacker. I say "apparently," because you never know for sure on television, unless someone's head is blown cleanly off, and even then you can't be 100% sure. But Adriana and Daniel are clearly being drawn into the deadly center of this season's narrative, which is good for the story.Marco sleeps with the mother of the woman that Linder has been taking care of, if I got that right in the dark bar and after. Not only good to see Marco get some loving, but also excellent that Linder is being drawn into the center of this season's story, too, rather than being in the distant outskirts as he was last season.All in all, this is a much tighter season than last year's, in which there was a strong central story and a lot of interesting, almost disparate threads around the edges. This year, it's increasingly clear that most or all of characters are on the same page, which makes the remaining episodes especially important and intriguing.
See also The Bridge 2.1: What Motivates Sonya? ... The Bridge 2.2: First-Class Serial Killer ... The Bridge 2.3: Marco's Dilemma ... The Bridge 2.4: Marco Redeemed and Mr. Writ Large ... The Bridge 2.5: The Soul of the Not-Killer
And see also The Bridge Opens Brooding and Valent ... The Bridge 1.2: A Tale of Two Beds ... The Bridge 1.6: Revelations ... The Bridge 1.7: A Killer and a Reluctant Professor ... The Bridge 1.8: Some Dark Poetic Justice ... The Bridge 1.9: Trade-Off ... The Bridge 1.10: Charlotte's Evolution ... The Bridge 1.11: Put to the Test ... The Bridge Season 1 Finale: Marco Joins Mackey and Agnew

another kind of crime story
#SFWApro
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 21, 2014 13:18
August 20, 2014
Tyrant 1.9: Tariq

First, it's clever indeed to mask Barry's gathering coup with the lie that Tariq is plotting a coup against Jamal. This works for Barry because, as he tells us later, Tariq betrayed Barry's father Khaled, when Tariq attacked the Sheikh's people to undermine the peace Khaled was close to successfully negotiating with the Sheikh.
Barry plays this Tariq-coup card perfectly, not only with Jamal but with Leila, who is as ready to believe as is Jamal that Tariq is plotting to overthrow her husband. What Barry has going for him at this critical juncture, of course, is the trust that Jamal and Leila now have for him, since Barry in fact put the final nail in the Sheikh's coffin, at the crucial moment.
Which of the two - Jamal or Leila - will guess or see the truth first? Likely Leila, not only because she's smarter than Jamal, but also because she a little more distance from the events. The depth of Jamal's commitment to Barry is clearly seen when Jamal warns Tariq not to slander his good brother - a deliciously ironic moment, since the jailing of Tariq that led to his verbal slashing of Barry is part of the very plot by Barry to take Jamal's place.
But what will or would Leila do if and when she realizes what's actually going on? As I mentioned last week, I think a part of Leila may not be completely sad to see Jamal gone, especially with Barry in his place and Molly gone back to the states. She feels guilty now that her denial of Jamal's daydream of retiring to the Maldives put Jamal in such a vulnerable position, but just how far this guilt will go remains unclear.
All of this - including how Leila feels about this - hinges on what will happen to Jamal after the coup. I can't see Barry killing him - he doesn't even want Tariq killed. But if the coup succeeds, which I'd say is likely, can Barry afford to have Jamal hanging around? Or will Jamal go, with or without Leila, to the Maldives - or, who knows, to the United States?
Should be a great season finale next week.
See also: Tyrant: Compelling Debut ... Tyrant 1.2: The Brother's Speech and His Wife ... Tyrant 1.3: A New Leaf? ... Tyrant 1.4: Close to the Bone ...Tyrant 1.6: Don't Mess with Jamal ... Tyrant 1.7-8: Coup
#SFWApro

Published on August 20, 2014 17:41
August 18, 2014
Falling Skies 4.9: To the Moon, Anne, To the Moon!

Anne, sometimes the voice of reason, thinks it's a crazy, unworkable idea. But Tom talk her into it, even before they're formally married, in a nice ceremony performed old reliable Weaver. But it's good to see the moon brought into Falling Skies.
The moon, unsurprisingly, has been the focus of some of the best science fiction ever written, ranging from Robert Heinlein's Moon is Harsh Mistress to David S. Michaels and Daniel Brenton's Red Moon, the best science fiction novel that you probably never heard of. And what's not to like about the moon as part of the story of Falling Skies? It's a great locale because, after all, we indeed actually set foot on it in 1969, and a few times after, though nowhere nearly enough.
Indeed, the Espheni use of the moon can be seen as a good argument for us to get cracking as a species and get ourself on the moon in a more permanent way. If we had actually done that by now in our reality, we might have seen the Espheni approaching before they wreaked havoc on us, and might have even be able to take out their base.
But, then, there would gave been no Falling Skies, and though I wouldn't have missed the show all that much earlier this season, it's finally come alive in the month of August. Looks like some good episodes ahead this season and next.
See Red Moon: The Best Novel You Likely Never Heard Of
See also Falling Skies 4.1: Weak Start ... Falling Skies 4.2: Enemy of my Enemy ... Falling Skies 4.3: Still Falling ... Falling Skies 4.5: Cloudy ...Falling Skies 4.7: Massacre Indeed ... Falling Skies 4.8: Spike ... Falling Skies Espheni: How to Pronounce?
And see also Falling Skies 3.1-2: It's the Acting ... Falling Skies 3.3: The Smile ... Falling Skies 3.4: Hal vs. Ben ... Falling Skies 3.6: The Masons ...Falling Skies 3.7: The Mole and a Likely Answer ... Falling Skies 3.8: Back Cracked Home ... Falling Skies Season 3 Finale: Dust in Hand
And see also Falling Skies Returns ... Falling Skies 2.6: Ben's Motives ... Falling Skies Second Season Finale
And see also Falling Skies 1.1-2 ... Falling Skies 1.3 meets Puppet Masters ... Falling Skies 1.4: Drizzle ... Falling Skies 1.5: Ben ... Falling Skies 1.6: Fifth Column ... Falling Skies 1.7: The Fate of Traitors ... Falling Skies 1.8: Weaver's Story ... Falling Skies Concludes First Season
#SFWApro

no moon, no aliens, but other strange stuff Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 18, 2014 14:22
August 17, 2014
Falling Skies Espheni: How to Pronounce

Hal pronounces it exactly as written - as it it were spelled Esfeni - but his father Tom goes for the more Yiddish pronunciation, Eshpheni, almost Eshphveni. Both have extensive experience with these alien overlords, so both would be in a good position to know how to pronounce their name. Who is right, father or son?
It's tempting to think Tom is right, and Hal is doing the same thing to Eshphveni as Barry White did to "shtick" in his 1973 hit, "Never, Never Gonna Give Ya Up," where he sang out, "Quittin' just ain't my stick." Not to beat the late, great Barry over the head with a stick about this, but that's a pretty bad (in a bad way) rendition of shtick, tantamount to saying someone is a "smuck" when you mean he's a "schmuck".
It's also reminiscent to me of the mispronunciation of a friend's name, Wachtel, in which the "ch" is supposed to be pronounced the same as the "ch" in Chanuka, itself often mispronounced Hanukah. Lots of people, who can't do that "ch" sound, pronounce Wachtel's name as if it were spelled Watchtel - like a watch. Others go for "Wacktel," as if it were spelled "Woktel," like a wok. Some just give up completely and go for Wa'tel, which does have an adventurous Arabic flavor.
But back to Falling Skies, how can we find out the right way to pronounce Espheni? The Volm pronounce it the way Tom does, but they're are not a reliable resource, because they have their own issues with the murderous aliens. Neither are humans who have been taken over by them, since that happened to Tom and Hal, and the two have such distinctly different pronunciations.
We could look for an Espheni pronouncing his or her own name - that is, the name of their people - but, alas, the alien species is apparently not able to vocalize, except for a grunt or two when they're wounded.
I think I'm going to go with Tom's pronunciation. He's after all the father. And Weaver pronounces it like Tom, too. And Hal's pronunciation also reminds me of another friend, who years ago said he wanted to get a nosh in perfect pronunciation, but then blew it by saying he was in the mood for a "nish," that delicious potato concoction otherwise pronounced "knish" with the "k" and the "n" both prominent.
See also Falling Skies 4.1: Weak Start ... Falling Skies 4.2: Enemy of my Enemy ... Falling Skies 4.3: Still Falling ... Falling Skies 4.5: Cloudy ...Falling Skies 4.7: Massacre Indeed ... Falling Skies 4.8: Spike
And see also Falling Skies 3.1-2: It's the Acting ... Falling Skies 3.3: The Smile ... Falling Skies 3.4: Hal vs. Ben ... Falling Skies 3.6: The Masons ...Falling Skies 3.7: The Mole and a Likely Answer ... Falling Skies 3.8: Back Cracked Home ... Falling Skies Season 3 Finale: Dust in Hand
And see also Falling Skies Returns ... Falling Skies 2.6: Ben's Motives ... Falling Skies Second Season Finale
And see also Falling Skies 1.1-2 ... Falling Skies 1.3 meets Puppet Masters ... Falling Skies 1.4: Drizzle ... Falling Skies 1.5: Ben ... Falling Skies 1.6: Fifth Column ... Falling Skies 1.7: The Fate of Traitors ... Falling Skies 1.8: Weaver's Story ... Falling Skies Concludes First Season
#SFWApro

no mispronunciations here
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 17, 2014 12:02
August 14, 2014
Rectify 2.9: Dancing in the Dark

Last week, in Rectify 2.8, it looked like the book was pretty much closing on the Daniel and Tawny chapter. But tonight's episode ends with the two of them dancing alone and tenderly in a room late at night. The way they got there is also significant - Tawny lost her baby, which was the all-but-irreversible obstacle to she and Daniel getting together.
They're not together yet - just dancing in the quiet of night isn't quite together - but this move also could be the basis for reversing another turn of events. Last week, it looked as if Daniel, by insisting on no time served, was saying no to the plea deal. This week, the state's offer has changed to just Daniel banished from the state of Georgia - an offer that is not without its appeal to Daniel, given his high load of guilt.
Amantha of course doesn't want Daniel to do this. He can't even bring himself to tell his mother he's considering this. Jon tells Amantha that he'll talk Daniel into rejecting the deal - but Daniel is not that easy to be talked out of anything. Will the availability of Tawny - if she's now available - change his mind? It's more likely than anything else to get him not to want to leave Georgia, unless she leaves with him.
Meanwhile, the sheriff is finally beginning to look into George's absence, and this may well provide the key to what happened on that fateful night. The season finale is next week, and I've to say I've enjoyed every episode this season nothing less than immensely.
See also Rectify 2.1: Indelible ... Rectify 2.2: True Real Time ... Rectify 2.3: Daniel's Motives ... Rectify 2.4: Jekyll and Hyde ... Rectify 2.6: Rare Education ... Rectify 2.7: The Plot Thickens ... Rectify 2.8: The Plea Bargain and the Smart Phone
And see also Rectify: Sheer and Shattering Poetry ... Rectify 1.5: Balloon Man ... Rectify Season 1 Finale: Searingly Anti-Climactic

another kind of capital punishment
#SFWApro
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 14, 2014 22:24
Obama Weak in Protecting Citizens and Journalists in Ferguson
Obama's words an hour ago about what has been going on in Ferguson, Missouri were better than nothing, but a little late and, typically, a little weak.
The situation in Ferguson could not be more clearcut: Under the First Amendment, people have the right to peaceably assemble to protest, which means not being teargassed, and not have police who look like an invading force in Iraq point all kinds of military weapons at you. Under the First Amendment, reporters have the right - the obligation - to convey what is happening before them to the American people, and not be arrested as happened to two reporters (one of whom works for the Washington Post - African-American, perhaps not coincidentally). When citizens and journalists are threatened and arrested by local police, it is the duty of the President to send in the National Guard to protect the people and physically restrain the police when necessary.
All of this, of course, in addition to the apparent murder of Michael Brown requiring justice.
It's unfortunately not surprising that Obama has done so little to protect the people in Ferguson. He said little or nothing when the out of control cop pepper sprayed an innocent student in California during the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. He said nothing against Michael Bloomberg's consistent use of New York police to trample on the rights of citizens, journalists, and citizen journalists during Occupy Wall Street. As I described at length in New New Media, it's a good thing that courageous people recorded some of this police misconduct on their phones.
MSNBC did a great job last night in providing live, ongoing coverage of the events in Ferguson. Not so much the New York Times, which put the Ferguson story below the fold in today's edition, with Iraq on top (fair enough, maybe), accompanied by stories about the Bloomberg era at Rikers, poverty in America, and college sports (totally ridiculous!). Perhaps if the arrested reporter had been working for the New York Times, the events in Ferguson would have received better coverage from the newspaper of record.
This is not the first time in American history that the Federal government has been required to step in when the local authorities have been violating the law to the peril of its citizens. Eisenhower did it in the 1950s, and Kennedy in the 1960s, to protect citizens who were being blocked by local authorities from attending their schools. In both cases, the National Guard was sent in to literally push the local authorities aside.
As Obama concludes his second term, he might want to think about this. At this point, regarding the protection of the constitutional rights of American citizens, he not only has been no JFK, he's been no Eisenhower. But there's still time for Obama to do the right thing. I urge him to do so - as Representative John Lewis and others in the legislative branch have requested - before further damage is done to the American people.
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
The situation in Ferguson could not be more clearcut: Under the First Amendment, people have the right to peaceably assemble to protest, which means not being teargassed, and not have police who look like an invading force in Iraq point all kinds of military weapons at you. Under the First Amendment, reporters have the right - the obligation - to convey what is happening before them to the American people, and not be arrested as happened to two reporters (one of whom works for the Washington Post - African-American, perhaps not coincidentally). When citizens and journalists are threatened and arrested by local police, it is the duty of the President to send in the National Guard to protect the people and physically restrain the police when necessary.
All of this, of course, in addition to the apparent murder of Michael Brown requiring justice.
It's unfortunately not surprising that Obama has done so little to protect the people in Ferguson. He said little or nothing when the out of control cop pepper sprayed an innocent student in California during the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. He said nothing against Michael Bloomberg's consistent use of New York police to trample on the rights of citizens, journalists, and citizen journalists during Occupy Wall Street. As I described at length in New New Media, it's a good thing that courageous people recorded some of this police misconduct on their phones.
MSNBC did a great job last night in providing live, ongoing coverage of the events in Ferguson. Not so much the New York Times, which put the Ferguson story below the fold in today's edition, with Iraq on top (fair enough, maybe), accompanied by stories about the Bloomberg era at Rikers, poverty in America, and college sports (totally ridiculous!). Perhaps if the arrested reporter had been working for the New York Times, the events in Ferguson would have received better coverage from the newspaper of record.
This is not the first time in American history that the Federal government has been required to step in when the local authorities have been violating the law to the peril of its citizens. Eisenhower did it in the 1950s, and Kennedy in the 1960s, to protect citizens who were being blocked by local authorities from attending their schools. In both cases, the National Guard was sent in to literally push the local authorities aside.
As Obama concludes his second term, he might want to think about this. At this point, regarding the protection of the constitutional rights of American citizens, he not only has been no JFK, he's been no Eisenhower. But there's still time for Obama to do the right thing. I urge him to do so - as Representative John Lewis and others in the legislative branch have requested - before further damage is done to the American people.
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on August 14, 2014 12:04
August 12, 2014
Tyrant 1.7-8: Coup

Jamal was at his most powerful at the end of 1.5, when he apparently killed the Sheikh. We find in 1.6 that he didn't quite do it. And it takes Barry to step up and make the murder complete. This epitomizes the relationship between Jamal and Barry that is at the heart of this series: Jamal is an incomplete tyrant. He needs Barry to lead fully and effectively, including killing a mortal enemy.
But Barry doesn't see things that way, and his killing of the Sheikh, to clean up his brother's mess, pushes him over an edge he was already hovering close to. Jamal may need Barry, but what does Barry get from Jamal? Not much, except deadly predicaments that Barry has to think his and the country's way out of. And that being the case, wouldn't it be easier for Barry if Jamal wasn't there at all - leaving the country totally Barry's to rule?
The irony is that Jamal was the verge of going to the Maldives, if not with his wife than with the beautiful blonde American. He was already all too ready to leave Abuddin anyway. But with the Sheikh out of the way, he can stay. He kills the blonde, presumably to leave no trace - other than his wife Leila - of his desire to leave the country. But what that murder most shows is the depravity of Jamal. The attempted killing of the Sheikh at least had a political motive. The smothering of the blonde has a much greater ratio of sociopathy.
Leila has a crucial role in the near future of all of this, as well. She was proud of Jamal when he told her what he did to the Sheikh. Her thoughts about Barry when Jamal tells her what Barry did to the Sheikh were not as clear, but there was presumably some admiration there, too.
So, with Molly out of the country, and Jamal pushed out of the Presidency by Barry, what will Leila do? Likely try to get together with Barry - if the story goes that far in that direction, which will be fun indeed to see.
See also: Tyrant: Compelling Debut ... Tyrant 1.2: The Brother's Speech and His Wife ... Tyrant 1.3: A New Leaf? ... Tyrant 1.4: Close to the Bone ... Tyrant 1.6: Don't Mess with Jamal
#SFWApro

Published on August 12, 2014 20:44
Tyrant 1.6-7: Coup

Jamal was at his most powerful at the end of 1.5, when he apparently killed the Sheikh. We find in 1.6 that he didn't quite do it. And it takes Barry to step up and make the murder complete. This epitomizes the relationship between Jamal and Barry that is at the heart of this series: Jamal is an incomplete tyrant. He needs Barry to lead fully and effectively, including killing a mortal enemy.
But Barry doesn't see things that way, and his killing of the Sheikh, to clean up his brother's mess, pushes him over an edge he was already hovering close to. Jamal may need Barry, but what does Barry get from Jamal? Not much, except deadly predicaments that Barry has to think his and the country's way out of. And that being the case, wouldn't it be easier for Barry if Jamal wasn't there at all - leaving the country totally Barry's to rule?
The irony is that Jamal was the verge of going to the Maldives, if not with his wife than with the beautiful blonde American. He was already all too ready to leave Abuddin anyway. But with the Sheikh out of the way, he can stay. He kills the blonde, presumably to leave no trace - other than his wife Leila - of his desire to leave the country. But what that murder most shows is the depravity of Jamal. The attempted killing of the Sheikh at least had a political motive. The smothering of the blonde has a much greater ratio of sociopathy.
Leila has a crucial role in the near future of all of this, as well. She was proud of Jamal when he told her what he did to the Sheikh. Her thoughts about Barry when Jamal tells her what Barry did to the Sheikh were not as clear, but there was presumably some admiration there, too.
So, with Molly out of the country, and Jamal pushed out of the Presidency by Barry, what will Leila do? Likely try to get together with Barry - if the story goes that far in that direction, which will be fun indeed to see.
See also: Tyrant: Compelling Debut ... Tyrant 1.2: The Brother's Speech and His Wife ... Tyrant 1.3: A New Leaf? ... Tyrant 1.4: Close to the Bone ... Tyrant 1.5: Don't Mess with Jamal
#SFWApro

Published on August 12, 2014 20:44
Levinson at Large
At present, I'll be automatically porting over blog posts from my main blog, Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress. These consist of literate (I hope) reviews of mostly television, with some reviews of mov
At present, I'll be automatically porting over blog posts from my main blog, Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress. These consist of literate (I hope) reviews of mostly television, with some reviews of movies, books, music, and discussions of politics and world events mixed in. You'll also find links to my Light On Light Through podcast.
...more
- Paul Levinson's profile
- 342 followers
