K.Z. Snow's Blog, page 20

February 23, 2012

Yo.


Coming April 4 from Dreamspinner Press.
2 likes ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 23, 2012 06:43

February 22, 2012

Let's talk body parts.

Thanks to a recent indulgence if mine called the Kindle, I've been reading quite a bit in recent weeks -- more than I should, really, because reading a lot can mean writing too little.

Anyway, I've been noticing recurring instances of unintentional anatomical misinformation and/or abuse.

First, many authors (hell, many people in general) seem to be under the impression there's a "thick vein" running along the underside of a penis. Now, I've never been the proud owner of penis, except when I've held a man in thrall (usually for the amount of time it took him to get off), and I've never been a medical student, but I had begun to suspect some time ago that this dense tubular structure was not, in fact, a vein.

Nagged by doubt, I looked into it (well, not literally).

Sorry to say, fellow writers, you need to consign the Mighty Penis Vein to the erotic-romance biohazard scrap heap. That tubular structure is the corpus spongiosum, a column of sponge-like tissue that fills with blood during an erection, keeping the urethra -- which runs through it -- open. (That bit is from Web M.D.) Wikipedia describes the corpus spongiosum as "expandable erectile tissue."

Then there are lips. No, not netherlips. They're in m/f erotic romance, and I haven't read any in years (in part because of phrases like netherlips).  I mean the lips that ring a person's mouth.

In every story I've read, characters bite/nibble/chew their lips. Frequently. This is no exaggeration. A chapter can't go by, it seems, without some (usually nervous) guy treating his poor lips like slabs of peanut brittle.

As a result, I've declared a moratorium on lip-biting in my own books -- unless, of course, one character is doing it to another. But no more self-cannibalism!

So what body parts in romance fiction have you seen mislabeled, ill-treated, or behaving in strange ways? I seem to have become hyper-aware of this stuff, but I'm hoping it will teach me some lessons. 'Cause I'm sure I've been guilty too!

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 22, 2012 17:12

February 20, 2012

Linkage, Good & Bad


An oft-overlooked segment of the non-heterosexual world is comprised of gender-queer (or questioning) and transgendered persons. But the Embrace the Rainbow blog seeks to change that. ('Bout time!)
Their mission is to:foster awareness of the issues facing trans*, gender queer and questioning people;increase understanding through education and open discussion/s;pay it forward, by encouraging acceptance and support in others. 
The refreshingly plainspoken Teddypig has called out All Romance eBooks for THIS smarmy twist on the definition of romance.
W-T-F? I must lead a more sheltered life than I realized, because I had no idea ARe is now in the porn business. (God, those titles alone make my stomach clench!) The fact their YA/Juvenile category also contains this crap is especially bothersome.
Maybe it's time to find another place to shop for ebooks . . .
On a brighter book-related note, SFWA has announced its 2012 Nebula Award Nominees. The Nebula is a prestigious award that carries a lot of weight within the publishing industry and among readers of science fiction and fantasy. Does the awards committee shun books with GLBTQ content? I can't say for sure, but I doubt it. *ahem*
Finally, my newest Jackson Spey / Adin Swift novel, Carny's Magic, seems to have found a home. I'm withholding details until all the contract stuff is finalized.  
3 likes ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 20, 2012 08:21

February 16, 2012

Research can be a blast!

I proudly present polka legend "Whoopee" John Wilfahrt (real name!) of New Ulm, Minnesota. (Yes, I knew about him long before I began my WIP. And yes, you will be ready to kill me before this book is finished!)

 Dare ya not to chuckle if you listen to this. :-D

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 16, 2012 10:43

February 14, 2012

Thoughts on Series

I don't tend to read series books. And after a recent disappointment, I'm even less inclined to give any of them a go.

For a series to remain engaging, its author needs to strike a delicate balance between variety and predictability. Variety keeps it interesting; predictability makes it comforting. Poppy Z. Brite's Liquor stories exemplify, for me, series fiction done right. None of those tales ever let me down. None contained any jarringly unpleasant surprises. Reading each novel, novella, and short was like revisiting a dear group of friends in a beloved place and knowing we were about to have fun together -- the best possible reunion.

So what can ruin a series? I believe it's the loss of one of those essential elements mentioned above. An author can squelch reader interest by dishing up the same old same-old, like Anita Blake repeatedly boinking her way through paranormal populations. Or an author can undermine the comfort factor by throwing in something the reader hadn't bargained for and can't accept.

I  just encountered what for me was a series killer, and it's related to the element of predictability. A single development, even a single incident, can have this power. I've come to think of such unexpected departures as "game changers."

For many followers of the Adrien English Mysteries, Jake's physical abuse of Adrien was a game changer. A huge one. It made those readers distrustful, even contemptuous, of the relationship arc that was central to the series. It colored (or discolored) their attitudes toward the main characters. It made those readers wary of how the series would proceed. But Josh Lanyon is an exceptionally shrewd and talented writer. He managed to smooth most readers' ruffled feathers. Fans forgave Jake and, however grudgingly, afforded him a second chance.

I've just been knocked out of a series by a game-changer. And I can confidently say "knocked out of" because, based on blurbs I've read, this development won't be resolved to my satisfaction.

Here's how I see it. When a reader commits to a series, she sees herself (however subconsciously) as entering into a kind of contract with the author. We all have different clauses in our series contracts, because we all have different requirements for a fulfilling reading experience. My contract for the Liquor series, for example, could have been worded like this: "I will remain a devotee of Rickey and G-man as long as their creator doesn't a.) break them up, b.) pull them out of the restaurant business, or c.) move them from New Orleans."

For me, one of the main draws for Frank Tuttle's eponymous Markhat series was the main character, Markhat the finder. He was wry and reckless and often moody. His only steadfast companion was a three-legged cat, and his BFF was an ancient conjure-woman, an amusing and grizzled crone known as Mama Hog. In other words, Markhat was a lovable loner constantly on the verge of becoming a lovable loser. I adored him that way.

A main character like this in an urban fantasy series is a delightful, refreshing change of pace. Cool, thought I. It will be possible to lose myself in this marvelously inventive world without slogging through any of the romantic bullshit that turns other UF series from crisp to soggy and from unique to derivative in three shakes of a butt.

Eagerly, I wrote up a contract. My first clause was: "I will remain an enthusiastic devotee of Markhat as long as he isn't saddled with a girlfriend or, worse yet, a wife."

What happens after I'm nearly four books into my investment? You got it. Then, to add insult to injury, the author seemingly killed off this "love interest" in a satisfyingly grisly way . . . but brought the bitch back! That book had the most tragic HEA of any I've ever encountered.

The Markhat series game-changer is way too much for me to accommodate. The contract has been breached. From now on, I think I'll stick to stand-alones. Unless, of course, another Liquor story is released. :)

Oh . . . and Happy Valentine's Day.

 •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 14, 2012 10:34

February 8, 2012

The One Million Mom Watch

Okay, all you leftist would-be destroyers of Family Values, I've decided to give you a regular kick in your (probably bare) butts on behalf of OMM. The following alerts are from their Facebook page. Nothing has been edited. However, space considerations have forced me to shorten certain rants messages. Ellipses indicate deleted blather text.


Alert No. 1 ~ "OMM isn't going anywhere sowe need your help! Occasionally we will be on break to do a clean sweep ofnegative comments. As you can see many bigoted minded liberals who hateChristians because of our faith are spamming our facebook page.  . . . Please help us by reporting these comments, andunderstanding that we will not be able to delete them all. You can also help byshowing these lost, narrow minded liberal the true love of Jesus Christ. Thankyou!" ['Cause, you know, deleting those comments is what Jesus would do. I even asked him just to make sure.]
Alert No. 2 ~ "Recently Macy's Department store mailed itsnewest catalogue out to many Americans. In the hopes of making sales, insteadthey offended many customers in the process. The back cover looks like just aregular advertisement for their wedding registry service, but there is onemajor difference. When you take a closer look you see the cake topper of twomen instead of the traditional man and woman. The ad also includes a licenseplate that reads "I do" and hearts scattered everywhere.  . . .  This is inappropriate marketing . . ." [Goes without saying. Everybody knows Macy's has no gay customers. I even asked them just to make sure.]
Alert No. 3 ~ "The separation between church and state is called the rapture." [I even asked the Divine Rapture Committee just to make sure.]
Finally, let us not forget to "SAY NO TO GIRL SCOUTCOOKIES" and to CONGRATULATE HOME DEPOT for "silently dropping public support for the homosexual agenda."
WTG, OMM! We'll turn those bigots around yet!


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 08, 2012 21:19

February 6, 2012

Bouncin' Bob's Polka Doodles


Inspiration comes in the strangest forms . . .
I'm usually not able to remember what prompted me to writecertain stories. The question arises occasionally, and I never know how toanswer it. I do recall that Mobry's Dickand Abercrombie Zombie began astitles. (The former was further fed by my fascination with the movies The Illusionist and The Prestige.) But other stories were born from some nebulous cloudof observations that stuck in my head, the contents of which I'm not consciouslyaware of.
But this one is still fresh.
Last weekend, as I lazed about reading and watching TV, I cameupon some obscure cable show called "Sissy Melznick's Polka Party." Well, thatwasn't its name —I can't remember its name—but it was similar to that. As youprobably know, cable/satellite providers usually offer some shows that havelocal appeal. Around here, we get a lot of rural fare: farm shows andfishing shows and, yes, old-time music shows that hearken back to LawrenceWelk.   Ididn't flip past the Polka Party. I actually watched it. And enjoyed it! Dancing hasbeen an integral part of my life since childhood, and the polka has been anintegral part of my dancing experience. All my relatives are dancing fools. Hell, Iprobably learned to polka right after I started walking. Among people of German or Polish heritage, the polka rules.
It's probably the happiest music in the world.


So there I sat (or half-reclined, because I was in the bedroom), watching dozens of old farts dressed to the nines skipping and shuffling arounda hall or pavilion somewhere. They were having a good ol' time. The bands themselves were pretty colorful too, in their own humble way. I couldn't stop grinning. Or keeping time with the music.
Suddenly, I knew I wanted to write about what I was seeing. 
That means Nelly Queen will be about a sweet man in his mid to late twenties with a droll, self-deprecating sense of humor who plays clarinet in a polka band. It's a local but much beloved group called Bouncin' Bob's Polka Doodles. The clarinetist, whose name is Daren or Dare, becomes smitten with another young man, Jonah, who shows up at many of the band's performances, because he dutifully serves as his grandmother's and/or great aunt's chauffeur, escort and dance partner. There'll be pain in this story, and maybe a touch of tragedy, but I hope the gentle humor will more than compensate for it. And I plan on having a very good time with the secondary characters.
There you have it. A true story of literary (I use the word loosely) inspiration. I know I don't have a winner on my hands, but when has that ever stopped me? ;-)
           
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 06, 2012 08:54

February 1, 2012

Corvette Cocks



This coming Saturday, February 4, I'll be at the Chicks & Dicks blog for their "Non-traditional Heroes" month. Why? Because Anne Tenino invited me, that's why. And I was raised well enough not to turn down an invitation unless I have a believable excuse handy death in the family or a debilitating illness/injury.

I suppose it's obvious to readers familiar with my stories that I shy away from creating high-powered heroes. On Saturday, I'll explain why. This doesn't mean I like slothful characters, and it doesn't mean paranormal-type protagonists are out of the question for me -- obviously. But it does mean that in my mind even a vampire can get gas, like Ridley Barron in the Utopia-X series, and even a wizard can have a midlife crisis, like Jackson Spey in Carny's Magic (not yet published), and small-town guys can be every bit as admirable as urban billionaires and crime-busters.

It should be an interesting month at Chicks & Dicks. Genre luminaries like Marie Sexton and Damon Suede, among others, are also scheduled to appear. Click on the post title to get there.
1 like ·   •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2012 07:26

January 29, 2012

By our letters and special symbols shall ye know us.

I'm not sure how this came about and even less sure why it's necessary, but in recent years, somebody somewhere decided to identify non-heterosexuals through letters and symbols. The process started simply enough, with GLBT. Then Q was added. Then a Q with an asterisk or two. Then another Q, and an I.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm quickly losing track of the floats in this typographical parade.

What's going on here? Who, exactly, is dreaming this stuff up? Is there a Nonheterosexual Denomination Committee somewhere? And why haven't non-Caucasians adopted this system? More to the point, why would anybody want to be identified in such a way, rather than as an individual?

If this goes on, the PC police (who, I imagine, have a Top Secret facility somewhere near Area 51) will soon have us typing something like the following to indicate Nhet persons -- and fill us with guilt for being unconscionably insensitive if we don't.

B!B( )B=L:-}3L~I?TT/XX-->XYTT/XY-->XXT...T-$XX%*X%*GRRRHEHEHOHOMWOo }{+&#GQG<3G

Here are the meanings of the abbreviations. Commit them to memory. There will certainly be more to come. (Note: V can be added where necessary to indicate "virgin" or A to indicate "autoerotic.")

B! (bisexual with a preference for men)
B( ) (bisexual with a preference for women)
B= (bisexual with no distinct preference)
L;-} ("lipstick" lesbian)
L~ ("butch" lesbian)
I (intersex/middlesex)
? (undecided; fluid)
FT/XX-->XY (fully transitioned female to male)
FT/XY-->XX (fully transitioned male to female)
T... (transition in progress)
T-$ (can't afford transition but identifies as other gender)
X (cross-dresser)
X% (drag queen)
*X%* (especially egotistical/flamboyant drag queen)
[The following are optional variations of/additions to G, mostly.]
GRRR (bear)
HEHE (twink)
HOHO (slut)
M (top)
W (bottom)
O (prefers oral)
o (prefers anal)
}{ (prefers frottage)
+ (sub, likes bondage)
& (sub, likes rope bondage)
# (sub, likes pain)
GQ (slave to fashion)
G$ (gay for pay)



Now, I think I'll just sit  back and await the arrival of these:

4 likes ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2012 11:17

January 20, 2012

If you thought cross-dressers couldn't be sexy . . .

Wow. This is some kind of  HOT. NSFW (that's for you, Tam).
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 20, 2012 12:45