Monica Valentinelli's Blog: booksofm.com, page 103

Day 25: Face Yourself

One of the biggest lessons I've learned from going dark, is that there's a lot I can learn by talking to other people about their experiences with social media. This time, that insight comes from Ann Voss Peterson who recently conducted our local writer's workshop about characterization. Ann and I were talking afterward about social media, in part because she has co-written a thriller novel with J.A. Konrath entitled Flee and I was wondering what she was doing to promote it. We were talking about my 100 days experiment and I mentioned I've noticed a positive impact on my writing. She said something to the effect of: Well, of course. Because you wind up facing yourself.

Ever have one of those moments where everything starts swirling and you wind up in a scene from Mortal Kombat?

Yeah, okay. I did.

What does that mean? Face yourself. Shutting out social media means turning the mute button on two types of voices. First, you turn off other people's voices that sing/yell/whisper across your screen. By doing so, though, you are automatically shutting off a second voice. YOURS. The one you use to interact with people on these tools. Which is not the same as your author's voice, but a separate one. (And before you ask, I view blogging to be yet another voice.)

Just how profound is this? Well, I feel understanding what this means is crucial to self-promotion, time-management and good storytelling. After all, if you don't have any words on the page, then you have nothing to revise. If you have nothing to rewrite, you have no manuscripts to polish. If you don't have any finished manuscripts, then you don't have any stories to submit or hand in for your deadline.

Sure, every writer is different. Some can write fast; others not so much. Still others have no problem pounding out the words, connecting with people, and making it all work. For me, though, I need to have a foundation. I have to figure out what time I need to process my work, to wrap my head around my story, article, etc. I need to listen to "the Monica voice." To do that, to listen to that crazy girl, I had to tone down the number of voices and have a care to what she's saying. The more voices I jam into my head, the less I can hear my gut instincts. My inner girl o' awesome.

Is there some truth to this? That in order to be a better writer you need to face yourself?

For me? Yes, yes it is. Many other things have changed for me during this lights out period, because I wanted that silence to work on other goals. I feel like this simple phrase ("Face Yourself") sums up not only why I needed to do this, but also solidifies what is happening all around me as well. More on that later!

About 100 Days: From April 4th to July 13th I'm turning the lights off on Facebook, Twitter and IMs for personal use. Read 100 Days: Turning off the Lights on Social Media for more information. You can also read the 100 Days post archive.

Related posts: Day 7: De-Peopling Post-Con
Day 5 of 100: Social Media is More Than Noise
Day 4 of 100: Crowdsourcing Versus Experts

Need a Little Help from You (My Readers)

Hi,

So after being poked and prodded I'm finding I need to come up with a banner ad to promote The Queen of Crows. I feel I'm a little limited because I don't have Photoshop and I don't have the patience to learn GIMP. Instead, I use Paint.net. With various plug-ins and whatnot, there's a lot I can do with the software, but there are some very real limitations with it.

And before you ask… No, I can't afford to buy Photoshop right now. I know I'll need it eventually, especially since many of the positions I've been looking at require knowledge of the software. It's been a while since I've used it. At the moment, though, I'm teaching myself how to use CS5 and want to finish that before I move on to something else.

Anyway, back to the task at hand. So I can't create an animated *.gif file and think it'd be wholly ridiculous/unprofessional to use a free compiler. Most of those won't work for the size I have or they'll put a little thingy on the bottom portion of the image.

So my challenge is trying to figure out what to convey in a short period of time. Here's a few images I came up with.

</ br>

</ br>

Now, if you've read this e-book, you know that there's more than just a short story. I'm not sure if I mentioned this in my The Queen of Crows retrospective or not, but there are several points I could bring up in an ad. Historical dark fantasy. Illustrated. Enhanced. Well-reviewed. Etc.

That's where you come in. I need your help to figure out what should go into an ad promoting The Queen of Crows. What would entice you to download The Queen of Crows? Is it price? Something new? Because I wrote it? What?

I thank you, in advance. You can either post a comment or e-mail me directly at monica AT mlvwrites DOT com.

If you haven't seen this and need some more information, take a peek at The Queen of Crows trailer to see how I've promoted it in the past.

Related posts: Author Paul Jessup Interviewed Me
My Interview with Suvudu.com
It's Nice to be First Sometimes

Favorite Couple in a Genre Novel

Can't believe I've been talking about genre for the past week. Today's post is the end of a seven day run, and after today I'm going to take a short break because all the books I've read are starting to run together. Which is never a good thing, to be sure!

So what is my favorite couple in a genre novel? Tricky question. Tricky, tricksy. In my head, I automatically separate a romance novel (including paranormal) from any straight-up adventure novel. Why? Well, because I view romance novels as being heavily focused on relationships. For dark fantasy, which is the genre I like to read, I enjoy a good romantic relationship if there's other things going on in the story. My answer today may surprise you. And I'll tell you why in a minute.

My favorite couple in a genre novel is…

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Richard Cypher and Kahlan Amnell from the first book in Terry Goodkind's series called "The Sword of Truth." The book is dubbed Wizard's First Rule.

To be clear, they're my favorite couple — until they get together.

Okay, let me back up for a second and explain this little Gordian knot before your heads explode. The reason why I like this romantic relationship is because it's one that, from the start, is never supposed to be consummated. They cannot touch one another. In this book, we don't know how uber-powerful-rare either one of them is. We know they are battling evil and we know they are falling in love in the midst of all these chaotic things.

But they can't touch. No smooches. Not even a little peck on the cheek. If she did, she would turn Richard into a mindless slave that did whatever she wanted.

To me, that's impressive worldbuilding and great conflict because there's a tangible reason why these two kids shouldn't be together. Kind of like Buffy and Angel. They get happy, Angel loses his soul and changes back into Angelus. So they can never be happy. Ever.

The reason why I said only the first book, is because although this premise is inventive, they eventually get married and discover they're not as limited as they thought. (If at all.) The first book is, by far, the strongest one in their relationship because their love happens gradually, highlighting how they get together and how they're vested in one another. As the series continues, the characters become more and more powerful, and the relationship arc begins to look the same, even with the obstacles and other women thrown in their way. The minute they become oh-so-powerful, my interest wanes because of the type of reader that I am. To connect with the characters, I tend to get into those that don't evolve into (for lack of a better word) gods.

Now, what's funny about all of this, is that Wizard's First Rule is Terry Goodkind's first novel. I thought it was a solid first for his characters and for his work. The story does teeter more on the dark side, so this is more of an adult novel than one I'd recommend for kids.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
My Favorite Genre Character
An Underrated Genre Novel
What I Read for Guilty Pleasure
A Character I Most Identify With (Or Wish I Was)
Most Annoying Character (Type)

</ br>

Related posts:An Underrated Genre Novel
My Favorite Genre Character
The First Genre Novel I Read Is…

Day 22: A Video about the Value of Time Off

Today I'd like to share with you a video Wil Upchurch (Thank you, Wil!) had sent me in an e-mail. This talk was given by Stefan Sagmeister and discusses the value of time off. Every seven years he takes a one-year sabbatical to refresh and rejuvenate his creativity.

I really enjoyed the video not only because it resonates with my social media experiment now, but because there's a lot of truth to what he's saying. Constant production — whether it be words or art or whatever — takes its toll. Add deadlines on top of that or some other kind of pressure (e.g. marketing, promotion, social media, other people, etc.) and the quality can (and will) suffer.

Sometimes it's hard to recognize when that quality takes a dive. Sometimes it's difficult to understand why or to catch it before it does. In a way, this video reminds me of a mantra I've once heard: Americans live to work; Europeans work to live. Here, Stefan shows how the work can be more fulfilling if you take time off to pursue personal projects. Powerful stuff, because he's not advocating that you stop doing whatever it is you love, but to redirect your talent into a different direction to help your baseline grow.

In my case, I've removed social media because I perceived its effects on me. Have I learned anything from this? On that "deep" personal level? I'm starting to. The reason why I am didn't come from me, though. That insight came from another author and I'll be writing about that later this week.

Take a minute and check out this video of Stefan Sagmeister: The Power of Time Off at TED.

Related posts: [Video] Cat + Dolphin = Win
VIDEO: The End of Publishing
[Video] Printing Process for THE LOST SYMBOL

Most Annoying Character (Type)

Well, I suppose it had to happen sooner or later. Today I'm supposed to talk about my most annoying character, but I'm going to alter that slightly to "type." It's not any one particular character, but it's the way that they are portrayed.

Yeah, okay I'm not a fan of Jar Jar either…but let's not go there.

There's a particular thing that bugs me about characters. Useless characters bother me to no end. You know the kind. They're the ones you wonder why the author threw them in the book when they have no bearing on the plot or feel like an add-on just to get killed. They're there to highlight the pretty world or culture, but don't do anything except turn into meat shields or make the main characters look more competent than they really are. They're a pet, a token, a staple. But you feel nothing and every time they show up you skip through that section to get back to the main plot.

Mind you, I have no problem with a red shirt. Yes, sometimes the pawns-to-the-slaughter are necessary, but I like to have an emotional or a vested interest in the character. Adding in a character to be killed without characterizing the meat shield doesn't horrify or scare me. It tells me very terrible things are happening, but not to anyone I care about.

Sheesh. I feel like I'm not making any sense. Okay, let me try to explain it another way. Take the news for example. Say a tsunami hits. Terrible thing. Bodies washed up on the beach. People starving. Yes, this is an emotional gut punch. Now, watch an interview the little girl who lost her puppy or the grandmother who managed to survive. Right there, I feel something because I identify with them. I may not have experienced their specific pain, but I relate to them. And it sticks.

Does that make sense? Meat shields for the sake of having meat shields doesn't do anything for me — even if it's to express the terrors that lurk in the night. I'm not a fan of gore porn or gratuitous violence for the sake of having it, nor am I a fan of exploring setting for the setting's sake. I like my plots tight and my characters to have a purpose.

Er… Something like that.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
My Favorite Genre Character
An Underrated Genre Novel
What I Read for Guilty Pleasure
A Character I Most Identify With (Or Wish I Was)

</ br>

Related posts:A Character I Most Identify With (Or Wish I Was)
My Favorite Genre Character
Adding Depth to Character Backgrounds

Day 21 of 100: What I Miss about Social Media

The other day I ran into a friend at a coffee shop and, in an effort to schedule lunch, she had mentioned to catch her on Facebook. I mentioned to her my experiment, and we worked around it, but the interesting thing was that this led to a discussion about what social media meant to her.

Both of us are authors and both of us are tired of people who use social media to heavily promote themselves. She uses Facebook primarily for the community-related aspects. Facebook has allowed her to connect with similar-minded authors. Since she's of the same mind I am (e.g. meet people rather than opportunities) she gets a lot out of Facebook because the people there motivate and support her.

When I got offline initially, I talked about how I was inundated with noise and updates. What I've missed, though, is the community-related aspects. It's strange, though, because I don't really feel I have been using the tools to interact with a community. I used to. Back in the day I was on message boards, forums, LiveJournal, etc. But now? I've been using them to interact with individuals I already know, within the gaming and publishing communities, and meet new people. Is that the same thing? Not sure. Add a new element–readers or personal friends–on top of that, and the community gets a bit stranger, doesn't it? Now there's multiple communities as opposed to just one.

I don't miss the noise, but I miss the people. Not sure if that makes any sense to you or not. To me, it's telling me that some people get online to foster a community around themselves or their own work. I'm not that kind of an author and right now, that doesn't make any sense. I'd rather take my cue from my readers as opposed to acting like author deity. (Although, I would make a rather smashing literary goddess. Wouldn't you say? Hah, hah!) When I do get back online, I'm wondering if I should take a look at new opportunities to connect with a community as opposed to looking for new ways to share my thoughts or simply promote.

Related posts: Day 5 of 100: Social Media is More Than Noise
100 Day Experiment: Turning the Lights Off on Social Media
New Guest Post at SFWA: Social Media and Your (Lack of) Privacy

A Character I Most Identify With (Or Wish I Was)

Today I'm talking about a character again. This time, I'm naming a character I most identify with (or wish I was).

This task is a huge challenge for me, because one of the characters I really admire doesn't come from a book. She comes from a video game. When I was a lot younger, I used to identify with characters more often — especially in high school when I read many coming-of-age novels. Now, though, it takes a lot for me to immerse myself in a character. I find there's no better way for me to do that than through an RPG-style game or by watching a television series like Buffy: the Vampire Slayer or Doctor Who.

For the character I most identify with, I would have to say that honor goes to Yuna. It's no secret I'm a huge fan of Final Fantasy, nor that I enjoy watching anime or delving into Asian mythology. The illustration pictured here comes from Wikipedia to help you see what Yuna looked like during Final Fantasy X, before her character transformation in Final Fantasy X-2.

Yuna starts out by doing what is expected of her, no matter how much it hurts her or puts herself down. In the beginning, she is resigned to her fate. Through the course of the story, she finds her own voice through the support of her friends and the love of one of her guardians. The journey she takes transforms her from a passive female character to a strong one. Not only does she deal with tragedy, but she turns down the hand of a man she doesn't love, watches her lover die, and fights back regardless of the odds. She is the character who never, ever gives up.

It is Yuna's persistence and perseverance I greatly admire. Her travels aren't easy, but with the help of her lover and her friends, she sees her task all the way through to the end.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
My Favorite Genre Character
An Underrated Genre Novel
What I Read for Guilty Pleasure

</ br>

Related posts: My Favorite Genre Character
Adding Depth to Character Backgrounds
Love My Nintendo DS and Square Enix

What I Read for Not-So-Guilty Pleasure

Today's post about genre books is what I read for my guilty pleasure. Since I never feel embarrassed about reading any book, I'm going to call this my "not-so-guilty" pleasure instead. After all, I don't have a particular book, mind you, but more like a type of read.

It's hard for me to read books without noting their structure and the techniques an author uses to tell a story. So, to give my mind a break, I turn to a type of book I don't typically write. Young Adult fiction is tops on that list; I also read romance and mysteries on occasion. Some of these books, like the Faery Tale series by Holly Black, are darker and have more mature or experimental themes than I've read in similar stories. Others, like the Harry Potter series, are dark to a point, but a hero (or heroine) always prevails.

When I'm reading for not-so-guilty pleasure, I don't care if the author followed all the appropriate techniques and did all the right things an author is supposed to do, because I'm reading to have a good time. It's my "light read" or my "sitting-by-the-beach-drinking-margaritas read." I'm often more forgiving of a book when I'm not critiquing it, unless there are glaring errors like typos or problems with the voice. First person, for me, can be really hard to read and get into if I'm not grounded in the story. Does this mean those books are bad? Hardly. Typos and grammatical errors aside, my challenge with first and second person narrative isn't necessarily what other people's complaints are, for some books were written by popular authors.

With as fast as I read, I can tell how much I'm enjoying a book if I polish it off in one or two nights. The longer it takes for me to read something, the more committed I am to the story, and the more intense the experience. My not-so-guilty pleasure books are those afternoon reads that are typically light-hearted, fun and…of course…full of heroes.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
My Favorite Genre Character
An Underrated Genre Novel

</ br>

Related posts: The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
[New Release] Read "The Message" at Bewildering Stories
Do You Need Your Own Website? Read My New SFWA Article

An Underrated Genre Novel

Today's question required me to think about a genre novel I read that I feel is underrated. While there are many original stories that haven't gotten as much acclaim as others, I feel that many tie-in novels get overlooked simply because they are tie-in novels.

So, my vote for an underrated genre novel is one penned by Christopher Golden. It's called Hellboy: The Bones of Giants and it's a tale after my own heart. This book stars Hellboy and the hammer lovingly known as "Mjolnir." Norse mythology crossed with my favorite comic book character? Awesome stuff.

The thing is, this type of a story is extremely hard to pull off for a few reasons. First, there's the issue of designing the story within the Hellboy universe. Second, Golden had to also blend in Norse mythology without breaking the setting and providing something new to the reader, something we haven't seen. In Hellboy: The Bones of Giants, Golden accomplishes this by making Moljnir sentient. The legendary hammer has memories that affect Hellboy. Yes, we've seen this before in Hellboy: Sword of Storms, but that's part of the reason why this makes the novel so good. There are a lot of technical aspects that needed to be accomplished in this novel, but the work is seamless. As a reader, I didn't notice the stitches, I was completely immersed in the novel.

For these reasons, Hellboy: The Bones of Giants is an underrated genre novel and one that I feel readers shouldn't overlook.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
My Favorite Genre Character

</ br>

Related posts: My Favorite Genre Character
The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
Genre Fiction and Why I Can't Look at a Piece of Pie

My Favorite Genre Character

Okay, so I thought today's part of the 30 Day Genre Meme hit a little too close to home. For those of you who are familiar with gaming, this is the part where I tell you about my character. My favorite character that is.

The only trouble is, I found it was really hard to pinpoint just one! Memorable characters are important to me for different reasons. In some cases, I remember a character because they were different, so unusual in the way that they were portrayed it stuck out in my mind. Kind of like the characters in the Otherland series by Tad Williams or The Stand Unabridged by Stephen King, where an array of characters from different ages, backgrounds and cultures, all come together to tell a story.

For female characters, my vote would be Morgaine from the time-traveling series written by C.J. Cherryh. She's the reluctant hero, the keeper of the mysteries, the ultimate mistress — but is she? A mysterious character, everything we know, imagine and feel about her is filtered through the viewpoints of other characters. In this way, for this science fantasy setting, Morgaine is an outstanding character not in the way she's described, but for all the things we don't know. You can read about Morgaine in a collected tome called The Morgaine Saga.

For male characters, my vote is Haplo from The Death Gate Cycle series by Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman. The first book in the series is called Dragon Wing. Like Morgaine, Haplo is enigmatic but for a different reason. Part of why I like his character so much, is not because of his fierce independence, but because Haplo is what I call an "intentional" character. Everything that he is and does–independent, reluctant to trust, determined–is because of the setting. In my mind, The Death Gate Cycle represents an excellent example of how worldbuilding can (and should) have an impact on the main character's appearance, personality and demeanor.

In both of these examples, what drew me to these characters was the technique the authors employed. Other memorable characters stand out in my mind due to their inventiveness and their quirks and whether or not they're different from the others in the book.

Previous Days

The First Genre Novel I Read Is…

</ br>

Related posts: The First Genre Novel I Read Is…
Adding Depth to Character Backgrounds
Emotional Connection and Writing