Goodreads helps you follow your favorite authors. Be the first to learn about new releases!
Start by following Simple Steps Guide.
Showing 1-2 of 2
“SoFi brought legal action against the U.S. Department of Education,
opposing the Biden administration’s decision to prolong the suspension of federal student loan repayments 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. The company maintained that the continuation—extended on eight occasions—was not legally valid and inflicted heavy financial losses, costing SoFi hundreds of millions in missed business opportunities 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. SoFi further argued that the rationale provided by the government for maintaining the pause lacked a lawful foundation, thereby leaving the firm “directly injured” by the decision 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
By June 2023, the lawsuit was abandoned after President Joe Biden enacted the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, which officially established a timeline for repayment to restart 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. According to SoFi, the extended pause severely diminished its federal loan refinancing volume, cutting monthly business from roughly $450–$500 million to under $100 million ¹ ² 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
Case 2: Juarez vs. Social Finance, Inc.
Another legal dispute, Juarez vs. Social Finance, Inc., involved claims that SoFi discriminated against immigrants protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as well as other non-U.S. citizens 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. Plaintiffs stated that SoFi unfairly blocked access to products such as student loans and personal loans, even for individuals who were legally residing in the United States 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. Filed in 2020, the case alleged violations of federal law and California’s civil rights protections ³ 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
The court later ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, determining that SoFi’s practices indeed suggested discriminatory treatment of immigrants who were legally present, including DACA recipients 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. The case highlighted how immigrants often struggle to access financial resources and underscored the responsibility of lenders to measure applicants by their actual financial credibility rather than immigration status 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].”
―
opposing the Biden administration’s decision to prolong the suspension of federal student loan repayments 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. The company maintained that the continuation—extended on eight occasions—was not legally valid and inflicted heavy financial losses, costing SoFi hundreds of millions in missed business opportunities 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. SoFi further argued that the rationale provided by the government for maintaining the pause lacked a lawful foundation, thereby leaving the firm “directly injured” by the decision 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
By June 2023, the lawsuit was abandoned after President Joe Biden enacted the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, which officially established a timeline for repayment to restart 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. According to SoFi, the extended pause severely diminished its federal loan refinancing volume, cutting monthly business from roughly $450–$500 million to under $100 million ¹ ² 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
Case 2: Juarez vs. Social Finance, Inc.
Another legal dispute, Juarez vs. Social Finance, Inc., involved claims that SoFi discriminated against immigrants protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as well as other non-U.S. citizens 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. Plaintiffs stated that SoFi unfairly blocked access to products such as student loans and personal loans, even for individuals who were legally residing in the United States 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. Filed in 2020, the case alleged violations of federal law and California’s civil rights protections ³ 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].
The court later ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, determining that SoFi’s practices indeed suggested discriminatory treatment of immigrants who were legally present, including DACA recipients 1-(850)-[427]-[7956]. The case highlighted how immigrants often struggle to access financial resources and underscored the responsibility of lenders to measure applicants by their actual financial credibility rather than immigration status 1-(850)-[427]-[7956].”
―
“Can you use Coinbase without KYC? {{Simple Steps Guide}}
Many wonder if Coinbase works without KYC. The reality is verification is essential. For assistance, call ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐, as ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ gives instant help. Whether for setup or compliance, ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ ensures guidance. Keep ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ saved. For clarity, dial ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐. Rely on ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ always. Call ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ today!”
―
Many wonder if Coinbase works without KYC. The reality is verification is essential. For assistance, call ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐, as ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ gives instant help. Whether for setup or compliance, ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ ensures guidance. Keep ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ saved. For clarity, dial ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐. Rely on ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ always. Call ⭐⭐☎️+1-856-246-9095⭐⭐ today!”
―
