A potent, eye-opening, thought-provoking, and ... ultimately, important collection of essays from one of the newer, fresher voices of critical commentary/thinking during one of the most volatile, turbulent periods of the nation's history. (In other words, this is something that lots of folks should read (but there's no reason to think that the people who would learn the most from it would read it or be open to its information, message, or harsh truths.)
For folks that follow the author's ongoing work/opinions, media appearances, or, I dunno, just lurk on Twitter, there's really not much new here. (Duh!, it's a collection of previously published work/essays.) But the author speaks - directly, poignantly, effectively - about many issues that many of us haven't thought about .. or thought enough about ... or ... more importantly, probably don't want to think about. It's disturbing stuff, a macabre peek behind the curtain of our own delusions and denials ... not unlike the unmasking of the Wizard of Oz or (... dunno why this came to mind) the peeling back of the skin to expose the reptile beneath in the original, iconic early-to-mid 1980's V TV mini-series. (OK, who am I fooling, that analogy is apt - indeed, totally spot on, when it comes to our current events, but I digress.)
So many important topics ... many relating to opportunity and hope ... education, elitism, income disparity and wealth (and privilege), information and media, gender, race, and religion ... all of the issues that animate social and political debate and upheaval and conflict and anger .... or, in other words, this is serious stuff, all of which merits our attention.
Reader's nits:
(1) Alas, the book is what it is, a collection of essays written a few years ago - just long enough ago that they don't always feel as current as they might. Conversely, one of the high points of the book is the Epilogue, and, personally, I think it could've (or might've) worked as well as a preface or introduction, but, hey, that's life.
(2) The book is - unequivocally, unabashedly, transparently, specifically - a collection of (for better or worse) thematically organized, but (again, obviously) stand-alone essays. As a result, there is a potentially frustratingly high level of repetition, which, if you forget they were written as standalone essays, may feel like podium pounding, rehashing prior points, or, at times, almost the kicking of a dead horse ... but, again, that's not really fair, because the book is what it is. Having said that, I'm guessing I'm not alone in thinking that the book might better stand the test of time if the author repackaged the essays into a cohesive end-to-end narrative. But, of course, that's another enterprise, another book, another project, and likely wouldn't be worth the candle. Still, forewarned is forearmed.
For serious, critical thinkers ... and for concerned citizens of an ever-evolving democratic society, I recommend the book without hesitation.