(Could) Someone (please help me) To Care about this story?
Again I seem to be missing my "sensitivity" chip while reading a Balogh HR. Instead of enjoying the heartwarming sentimentality of a story about love, family, and acceptance, I found myself annoyed and sometimes in danger of tooth decay from the sweetness I ingested here. One day this past week this story was offered at $1.99 so I snapped it up, since the usual price for a Balogh HR is a bridge too far for my budget. Well, even at that price I have buyer's remorse. Lordy, lordy, but this was tedious and repetitive and slow and annoying and tedious and repetitive and slow and annoying and tedious and repetitive... See, I told you. No sensitivity chip.
I guess I should have started with what's good about the story. It's that the H and h are mature individuals (39+ and 42 years of age, respectively). However, they're mature in years, not emotionally, so that positive aspect is somewhat nullified. Heroine Viola is the disgraced "widow" of the bigamous late Earl of Riverdale, who was married to another woman when he married her and hence her marriage and her three adult children have been de-legitimized. This all began in Book #1, SOMEONE TO LOVE.
At the beginning of this story #4, Viola is having an emotional crisis, even though things are going fairly well for her, with one daughter happily married, a son content to be off fighting in the Napoleonic Wars, and the youngest daughter doing fine at home with her. In addition, all family members both of her family and that of the late earl are kind and accepting of her. Of course, upper-crust London society wants nothing to do with her but this doesn't seem to be the problem. Viola wants to feel like a person in her own right, not just as a mother and grandmother. She wants to have someone to love and care for her as a woman.
So she runs off to be by herself for a while and accidentally meets up with our hero, Marcel Lamarr, the Marquess of Dorchester. They have a history, having met and been attracted to each other some 14 years ago when she was married and he was a womanizing widower. Now, in her emotionally-vulnerable state, she agrees to have an affair with him and they run off together to his cottage in Devon, where they have lots of sex and occasional outdoor recreation such as walks, runs down hills, or twirls on bridges.
Marcel, it must be noted, is an unrepentant libertine. But, of course, we will learn that the poor dear has a tragic backstory so we must all be forgiving of his "a$$wipery". Sorry. I can't do it. No excuse for leaving his twin babies, after the death of his wife, in the care of relatives and only visiting them twice a year up to the time of this story, some 16 years later. What kind of a father does this? And what does he do with all his time in these years that he is NOT spending with his children? Uses it in the pursuit of pleasure, and you know what that means. What a gem of a man. Yes, yes, he doesn't feel worthy of them or of love in general. I got that.
Well, the families of both Viola and Marcel descend upon them in surprise visits and Marcel feels himself obliged to declare that they are engaged to avoid ruining what little reputation Viola has left after what her miserable late husband did to her. But, of course, there must be scads of miscommunication, failure to communicate, etc. which causes each to doubt and misunderstand the other. And so on and so forth. Eventually it all gets worked out. Viola will feel cared for and Marcel will learn to appreciate family, forgive himself and not be such a jerk.
But, as I said earlier, this is all presented tediously, in Balogh's schoolmarm fashion which is even more schoolmarmish than usual. And there's too much village festival, Christmas preparations, way too much family, interminable internal rumination by both H and h, and too much failure to communicate. A good editor should have cut at least 50 pages out of this.
My apologies for this insensitive review.