This edition has a strangely truncated table of contents, so I'll have to expand it myself.
I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: (by the editor, who also wrote the Introduction).
II BIOGRAPHICAL PREFACE: I wish I hadn't read this. I don't really want biographical information about an author, unless it's a literary biography, covering only the stories in the book, and the circumstances under which they were written.
III INTRODUCTION: (with footnotes). Again, most of this stuff seems to me to fall under the category of 'none of my business'.
IV NOTE ON THE TEXT: While this is a traditional part of 'classical' literature, I would say it was more than a little nitpicky.
V SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY: ? Is this edition intended as a class text? If it's not, why all the researcher's info?
VI A CHRONOLOGY OF H G WELLS: Here, too. Falls under the heading of 'too much background'.
VII YET ANOTHER (MORE DETAILED) TABLE OF CONTENTS
VIII THE JILTING OF JANE: This story at least admits the humanity of household servants. But it seems unable to recognize that there could come a time when nobody but the very rich would have any servants.
IX THE CONE: This is an ugly story, in many respects. It smacks of the style of architecture known as 'Brutalism', in which all the undergirdings are emphasized and outlined. Such techniques may have a sort of grandeur, but no true beauty. Endoskeleton on the INSIDE, please. Also, the murderer is a particularly cruel psychopath.
X THE STOLEN BACILLUS: More slander against anarchists. The 'terrorists' of their day, it was simply necessary to use the word 'anarchist' to stereotype all of the derogated class as unthinkingly violent, if not downright stupid.
XI THE FLOWERING OF THE STRANGE ORCHID: Audrey II?
XII IN THE AVU OBSERVATORY: At the time, it may have seemed plausible to posit unknown large vertebrates--in some parts of the world. Not so plausible nowadays, or course.
XIII AEPYORNIS ISLAND: So what's an AEpyornis? A now extinct (as of 1773) ratite bird, aka the elephant bird. The notion that it might not be quite as extinct as described isn't quite so farfetched as all that--or wasn't at the time. Now, with its native habitat of Madagascar losing soil at such a rate that from space, it seems to be hemorrhaging, it's rather less likely. As for whether the creature would be implacably violent...well, some ratites are known to be hostile, and some are not. In Australia, for example, I was told that an emu CAN kick you to death, and a cassowary WILL. Was the AEpyornis as aggressive as a cassowary? Maybe.
XIV THE REMARKABLE CASE OF DAVIDSON'S EYES: Was Davidson actually seeing a sunken ship--thousands of miles away? Personally I prefer Zenna Henderson's version, but then I usually DO prefer her version, if there is one.
XV THE LORD OF THE DYNAMOS: This is pure racist (and imperialist) propaganda.
XVI THE MOTH: Is the moth only Hawkins can see a vengeful ghost, an equally vengeful reincarnation, or just his own guilty conscience?
XVII THE TREASURE IN THE FOREST: Botaniphobia (the fear of plants) seems, for some reason, to be commonest in the British. Especially this is true, it seems, of the fear of TROPICAL plants.
XVIII THE STORY OF THE LATE MR ELVESHAM: Think Lily Tomlin and Steve Martin in All of Me. Except that in this case, the transmigration of souls is reciprocal--and is part of a plot for immortality.
XIX UNDER THE KNIFE: The sort of near-death experience one has varies, based on what is known. This astrogation story has not aged well, because we now know much more. But at the time, it would have made a handy little lesson in what was known astronomically.
XX THE SEA RAIDERS: I never have understood what people find so fearsome in cephalopods. There never has been, so far as I know, any authoritative account of violence against humans by octopoids. In fact, except for a few grainy photos and films, no one has ever even SEEN a living giant squid. Interesting sidenote--when I googled the supposed species name, one of the images was of a suspended sculpture I've walked under many times.
XXI THE OBLITERATED MAN: The man in question is in serious need of a shrink, I'd say. And fast, too.
XXII THE PLATTNER STORY: This is the story Dorothy L Sayers was referring to in her short story The Image in The Mirror. Plattner is said to have had his internal organs rearranged by travel through an alternate dimension. But where are the previous records?
XXIII THE RED ROOM: The Red Room is said to be haunted, and few observers disagree. But the question is, haunted by WHAT?
XXIV THE PURPLE PILEUS: "By golly, you were right! They ARE toadstools!". Or magic mushrooms, maybe? Note, by the way, that what's troubling the man is that the women are behaving like human beings, and not like footstools...
XXV A SLIP UNDER THE MICROSCOPE: Talk about your high-stakes testing! A man makes a mistake, confesses it, and is ruined thereby.
XXVI THE CRYSTAL EGG: Is, it seems, a remote imaging device. But what if it's two-way?
XXVII THE STAR: A fairly implausible Doomsday scenario. Not that it couldn't happen, of course. Just that it wouldn't be a surprise: people would have known about it centuries ago, and would have had quite a bit of lead time to work out a solution. Now if it were an impactor--we're still cataloging the PHOs (Potentially Hazardous Objects), and there's still a substantial risk that we'd miss one. It only has to happen once, after all. Or a couple of times, for subcritical, Tunguska size objects.
XXVIII THE MAN WHO COULD WORK MIRACLES: So why doesn't he just ask for what he needs--an understanding of what the consequences of actions are ahead of time?
XXIX A VISION OF JUDGEMENT: It's not the grand, destructive sins that cause people the trouble--it's the petty, embarrassing ones. Sigh. Anyway, Game Over--and let's try this one more time, okay?
XXX JIMMY GOGGLES THE GOD: I kept trying to make 'goggles' a verb. Another bit of racist, imperialist trash. I see this, and raise it with a picture I once saw: balloonists were making descensions into and ascencions out of sacred cenotes in northern South America. The local people had never seen a hot-air balloon--yet the children were coming out to act as ground crews: and they were wearing Incredible Hulk T-shirts.
XXXI MISS WINCHELSEA'S HEART: Miss Winchelsea is the leader of a village women's group from the UK who are traveling abroad on a once-in-a-lifetime trip. She's looking for romance, as well as Italian art. One out of two ain't bad, I suppose.
XXXII A DREAM OF ARMAGEDDON: A man dreams that a fatal battle is (or will be) his fault. Classic responsibility dream, I'd say. I often dream myself that the universe will end if I don't do something I'm not sure I can. Does this mean it's likely to happen? Well, it hasn't so far. As for the notion that a society civilized enough to have abolished war, but that still hasn't abandoned apparently meaningless relationship taboos, to the point where they will strip someone of influence and power if the transgressor fails to conform...I'd like to say I think that it's absurd. And it is, of course. But that doesn't necessarily mean it won't happen.
XXXIII THE VALLEY OF SPIDERS: Arachnophobia redux.
XXXIV THE NEW ACCELERATOR: Many of these stories are the sort of "It makes a hell of a mess, and we don't have to clean it up ourselves." type. Why SHOULD people take a drug that enables them to move much faster than before? Leaving aside the problems with navigation (All right, you can GO faster. You may even be able to THINK faster. But what about inertia and momentum?), what would be GAINED thereby? We're ALREADY doing things too fast, as it is.
XXXV THE TRUTH ABOUT PYECRAFT: This is much more about the emotional problems of the sadistic, fat-shaming narrator than anything about Pyecraft. Out of interest, if the narrator's family has an antigravity formula, why aren't they USING it for things like spacecraft?
XXXVI THE MAGIC SHOP: I'm less worried about the existence of the shop than about the judgmental attitudes of its keepers.
XXXVII THE EMPIRE OF THE ANTS: "Well, Kendrick, still think I'm an alarmist?". Actually, I do. About a dozen gorillas marching with clubs isn't really that scary, come right down to it. And in this story, army ants are already scary enough. But if they can communicate by gestalt, and develop into intelligent colonies--tell me again why that's sure to be a bad thing?
XXXVIII THE DOOR IN THE WALL: A boy begins having visions of a door in a wall. Except for the first time, he can't go through into the Elysian community on the other side of the door, because he has duties in our world. But finally, he chooses the door--right in the middle of a political campaign. The surprise ending isn't, much.
XXXIX THE COUNTRY OF THE BLIND: In said country, the one-eyed man is a freak, of uncertain value. There are two versions of this story in this volume (the second is Appendix 2). In both versions it's argued that the natives of the Country of The Blind have lost something irreplaceable. Around the same time the original version came out, Tesla was arguing that intelligence is a product of light, because we learn about the cosmos (almost) SOLELY by means of sight. Tesla himself was a little uneasy about this argument, because after all, was Homer not intelligent? Was Helen Keller? Tesla was only tentatively able to resolve the conundrum by arguing that, all right, blind people CAN be intelligent--but only because they're the descendants of people who could see--not a particularly convincing argument. Cf Varley's Persistence of Vision, for example. And I myself realized pretty early on that people with hypersensitive perceptions might not be able to distinguish signal from noise--or at least, not easily. There's a story in that, but I've never been able to finish it.
The intolerance is not all on one side, of course. The inhabitants of the Country of The Blind ALSO don't seem to be able to tolerate difference.
XL THE BEAUTIFUL SUIT: The man who wears the beautiful suit seems to be a little less than fully topped up. He's fatally delusional--and I'm not so sure it matters whether he dies happy.
XLI APPENDIX 1: WELLS' ORIGINAL INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTRY OF THE BLIND, AND OTHER STORIES (1911) Wells discusses the problems with short story writing, and his selection process for the first edition of the anthology.
XLII APPENDIX 2: THE 1939 VERSION OF THE COUNTRY OF THE BLIND: In a late-life bid for kingship, Wells introduces a massive rockslide/avalanche to the story. Given the timing, it's not surprising Wells was a bit paranoid. In fearful situations, sensible people are afraid. What IS a little surprising is that he assumes his own (fore)sight is significantly better than other people's. Having read other essays, stories, etc from the time, I think he may have been underestimating people. Anyway, a warning's not much use unless you can propose a solution, even if all that amounts to is a Pythonesque "Run Away!", surely?