As always, short story books are a mixed bag. Some stories are good, some are ok, and others are just bad. In this particular book, I've decided to evaluate each story. Mostly because some are quite enjoyable and I found others to be almost offensive.
Audubon in Atlantis is a short story based in Turtledove's Atlantis series. An elderly Audubon goes out on potentially his last trip to find a species of bird nearly extinct in Atlantis. As in Madagascar and New Zealand, Turtledove's Atlantis is separated from the mainland for potentially millions of years and so the creatures on the island, as in the two in our world, are different than on the mainland. The arrival of man threatens the existence of a myriad of unique animal and plant life. This is well written and the discussion and thoughts of Audubon are quite good.
Bedfellows is a juvenile and offensive attempt to hammer a point home that really doesn't need such attempts. Honestly, it's the worst thing I've ever seen come out of Turtledove. He attempts, in the following story, to excuse himself by saying you can't judge a persons politics by his stories. Of course, you can to a certain extent. I didn't feel that the story was an attempt at much of a political point so much as an attempt to score points with certain readers, much like a middle school boy tries to score points with his friends by making boob jokes. He might have been better off discussing what would have happened should either of the two characters NOT been a player in the world at that time. That's more to his strengths and he could have made the same point in much more interesting and less offensive ways.
News from the Front is less offensive and makes certain points about journalism in the US and how Americans react to the press. I think he went a bit overboard in the whole concept and really underestimated American's in general, not to mention FDR who, I believe, was a lot more intelligent than he gives credit for. Not to mention that the press was more divided at that time and he gave no play to the media that would have been supporting FDR. Conceptually interesting but overall, the story failed to impress.
The Catcher in the Rhine was an interesting story but that's about it. No points really, just a little time travel story. Fun but underwhelming. I think he could have done a lot more with it with a bit more time and length.
The Daimon is one I've read before. The concept is that when Alkibiadis leaves Athens in the Peloponnesian War, Socrates goes with him and, through Socrates typical annoying questions, convinces Alkibiadis not to return to Athens to answer charges made by his enemies but continue on to Syracuse and the rest of the campaign. At that point, it's all conjecture but fun. One of the better stories in the collection.
Farmer's Law is a story of little consequence. It's interesting to a point but don't look for too much here.
Occupation Duty has a divergence point about 3k back in history and is in the modern day middle east. Basically, it expresses the importance of the area that is not Palestine/Israel/Jordan etc in the world whether the Jews had ruled the area or not. Interesting as far as it goes.
The Horse of Bronze tells a story of mythical creatures and the introduction of man. All I can say about this is mythical critters have huge inferiority complexes. Other than that, it was a fun story.
The Genetics Lecture is a short twist story. Everything seems normal until the twist at the end. I saw it coming, well, not the exact twist but a twist of that nature but it was fun anyway.
Someone is Stealing the Great Throne Rooms of the Galaxy was fun. Not going to go into it much but I enjoyed the silly little tale.
Uncle Alf is told by letters of an Uncle to his niece. In the modern US, uncle Alf would be in prison. I was of mixed opinion of this story. In some sense, it was interesting, in others, I wanted someone to shoot Alf. You can make your own decision of it.
The Scarlet Band is a weak Sherlock Holmes ripoff set in Turtledove's Atlantis. For all of that, I enjoyed it. Now the names are changed, of course, which helps. I can ignore some of the weaknesses that way and just enjoy the story.
Again, you must remember this is a short story collection. It's not a best of anything but a collection of stories by Turtledove. I think he's better when he writes them out as novels and gives stories more depth. Maybe he should have spent more time on those than some of his other tales.
The good stories are worth reading. The bad should make you demand your money back. The rest kill some time I guess. Hopefully, he can do better next time.