DNF on page 324 (of 389 pages total)
**unmarked spoilers ahead, so please beware**
"The Stars We Steal," published in February 2020, is a Young Adult/YA sci-fi romance, and the second book by Alexa Donne.
I love watching Donne's YouTube/AuthorTube channel, and I really wanted to love "The Stars We Steal." I read her first novel, "Brightly Burning," with the same high hopes. Sadly, I was unable to finish either book. I hit a hard DNF point in "The Stars We Steal," and could barely force myself to skim the final pages, just to see how it ended. I was able to do so only for the purposes of writing this review.
"The Stars We Steal" was marketed and pitched as "PERSUASION meets THE BACHELOR in space." I have not read Jane Austen's "Persuasion," I have not seen "The Bachelor," but I do enjoy science fiction, and I did enjoy (most of) Kiera Cass's YA novel "The Selection" (published in 2012, a dystopian romance modeled after "The Bachelor"), so I thought I would be fine with the book's content.
And for the most part, I was. Because the story is initially given the same set-up as "Persuasion," the opening of the book was compelling. I was very interested to learn the details as to why Princess Leonie/Leo, the 19-year-old first-person protagonist, was so quickly convinced to break off her engagement to Elliot Wentworth three years ago. Formerly the son of Leo's family butler, Elliot is now an extremely wealthy, independent young man, and he is considered "the biggest catch" of the "engagement season" taking place on Leo's family spaceship.
I also really liked the fact that, when the story begins, Leo has designed a new water filtration system, a system that she wants to have the entire space fleet adopt. I always enjoy reading science and engineering-focused protagonists, of any gender, so this character detail was highly engaging.
But although the book's content sounds promising, its execution ended up being the biggest problem I had. Leo's interest in water filtration did not feel authentic; there was nothing in her interior monologue, dialogue, or behavior that ever convinced me that Leo actually cared about science, engineering, or water conservation. It was no more a part of her character than, say, an eleventh-grader who takes band in high school and plays the clarinet, has no real interest in being a musician, and is only taking the class because it's an easy elective. That's how much water filtration mattered to Leo's character. As in: not at all.
The "engagement season" is also nothing like watching "The Bachelor," where women compete for the attentions of one man, a bachelor who chooses which of the contestants passes each "dating round" and advances to the next part of the show. The cover of this book features a beautiful gold rose, which is what the women competing in "The Bachelor" receive before advancing to the next dating round. But there are no roses being given out in "The Stars We Steal." Roses don't even exist on the page. There isn't even a "dating competition" in this story. There are just a bunch of young men and women mingling together at random throughout the book, like college students. If you took a college campus, registered everyone on the same dating app, and called their time spent together on campus "an engagement season," you would have this book. The setup really isn't like "The Bachelor" at all.
As to the details I was most interested in learning -- namely, the backstory concerning how Leo was convinced within 12 hours of her engagement to Elliot to break up with him -- that information is not in the book. The story does not provide any information about Leo's wrenching night of the soul, and what had been on her mind to make her break up with Elliot.
Leo simply never gets any interior space in this story. The reader is told she has invented a water filtration system, but Leo has no thoughts or feelings about it. It's just there, a "thing" that exists that she supposedly cares about, driving her actions throughout the plot. The reader never sees Leo doing any science or engineering work in the book, yet we are told she "invented" a system that she spends no time working on, obsessing over, or even thinking about.
The situation is the same with the romance. The reader is told Leo finds Elliot attractive, and still has feelings for him three years after breaking off their engagement. But again, her interior space is just nonexistent. None of Leo's complicated emotional backstory is ever shown to the reader, and that means her current thoughts and feelings are never shown, either. Leo reads as a cipher, a blank space, a body that exists only to follow a three-act plot:
Act I: meet the boy she broke up with three years ago
Act II: reconnect with him
Act III: use that renewed relationship to stop the Big Bad/Ultimate Villain and Save the Day by the end, because sci-fi dystopian fiction.
This is a rare YA novel that bluntly addresses the fact of class oppression. The topic is brought up, but it is not handled well, and it is largely just dropped from the second half of the story. The reader is told that Leo "cares" about poor people in Act II of the book, and that basically concludes the subject of class oppression. Leo also helps defeat the Big Bad at the end, so the reader is probably supposed to feel like class liberation has occurred, because love conquers all and the Big Bad is now in jail.
But class oppression is not created because one Big Bad leader makes shitty decisions. In the first half of the book, "The Stars We Steal" honestly addresses the hard facts of class oppression: poverty, starvation, lack of medical resources, premature death, hopelessness, etc. But the book doesn't address the real causes of class oppression, much less any solutions, within its pages at all. Instead, the story just drops the issue after the reader is told, with certainty, that Leo "cares" about poor people, and the final third of the book plays out like a typical YA fantasy does: the star-crossed lovers are reunited and the Big Bad is vanquished.
Because "The Stars We Steal" follows a three-act structure, there is a "big reveal" that separates Acts II and III. At the end of Act II, Leo learns that the real source of Elliot's new wealth is not from whiskey sales, but thievery. Elliot uses a group of associates to steal from the rich, and then he sells the stolen goods on the black market.
It honestly grossed me out *so much* to discover this -- especially because some of the stolen items included Leo's dead mother's wedding dress, and other personal items -- that I almost DNF'd the book right then. To find out that the love interest in a YA story is a Depraved Shithead at the very end of Act II is an extremely bitter pill to swallow. I do NOT find thieves "attractive," and anyone who has ever had their personal belongings stolen should certainly know how awful it feels. To have someone enter your home and take treasured mementos, especially cherished personal items like your dead mother's wedding dress that you had hoped to wear at your own wedding, is such a harsh violation, that I totally lost all interest in Elliot as a love interest. I thought he belonged in jail.
I forced myself to keep reading because I wanted to see how Donne handled this development.
And I was so disappointed.
Given that the story just rolls on along like any typical YA fantasy does, I must say I don't think the revelation was handled well at all.
Instead of keeping the two leads, Leo and Elliot, together on the page, to discuss this horrible development and work out their differences, Donne separates them for nearly all of Act III. Leo distances herself from Elliot, dates another guy for pages on end, and Elliot avoids all contact with Leo.
Much later, near the end of Act III, Leo decides to read the letter Elliot wrote for her right after she discovered he was a thief, a letter telling her he was sorry and confessing his love for her, and so the story ends up running on the "if only they had just talked to each other, all would have been well and every tragedy avoided" scenario that I never find very appealing, and certainly didn't here.
To summarize my main thoughts on this book: "The Stars We Steal" felt very empty; empty of genuine characters with genuine thoughts and feelings. It just felt like I was reading a plot, a plot that I was not invested in at all because the characters themselves were not invested in it at all. Despite a compelling and interesting opening chapter, I never felt any stakes, I never felt worried or concerned, I never felt like I had to keep turning pages.
Three stars. This isn't a terrible book. It's just very flat.