Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Blindsight (Firefall, #1)” as Want to Read:
Blindsight (Firefall, #1)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Read Book

Blindsight

(Firefall #1)

by
really liked it 4.0  ·  Rating details ·  20,905 Ratings  ·  1,902 Reviews
It's been two months since a myriad of alien objects clenched about the Earth, screaming as they burned. The heavens have been silent since - until a derelict space probe hears whispers from a distant comet. Something talks out there: but not to us. Who to send to meet the alien, when the alien doesn't want to meet? Send a linguist with multiple-personality disorder, and a ...more
Hardcover, 384 pages
Published October 3rd 2006 by Tor Books
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Blindsight, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
This question contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Luis Guimarães
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Dave Firefall is the series, Blindsight is book 1; Echopraxia is book 2.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
mark monday
Sep 01, 2011 rated it really liked it
what is Consciousness? how did the silly human race evolve beyond the herd instinct, beyond our reptile brain? how, and why? what is the purpose of our individuality, what is the need for our sense of self, what use is Human Connection, why are we even equipped with Empathy? for some naive, kinda-sorta spiritual folks (like myself), these things may explain the existence of God. but that's rather besides the point of the question. does empathy help us in the long run, does the ability of humans ...more
Terry
Jul 21, 2011 rated it really liked it
Shelves: sci-fi, canadian, horror
Wow. This was a tough one. It was a very good hard sf book that I don't think I'll be coming back to anytime soon. As others have said: "abandon all hope ye who enter here." A well written, excruciating exploration of the human "problem" where it turns out that it really is a problem. How do you take a book whose central premise seems to be that the development of self-awareness in human evolution was a wrong turn that wasn't meant to happen at all? That it was in fact contrary to the entire dev ...more
Carol.
Sep 16, 2018 rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: fans of hard sci-fi, first contact
Shelves: hugo, sci-fi, should-buy
This is a very dense book, packed with ideas. Although Watts mentions he's a biologist by training, you wouldn't know it, between all the astronomical events, the neurological side effects of radiation and methane exposure, and the philosophy of consciousness. It also is not an easy book. I ended up waiting to finish it on a vacation day, where the book and I could spend as much time as we needed. In this way, it reminded me a great deal of Miéville's Embassytown.

The narrative is fragmented into
...more
☽Luna☾
👽3.5/5👽

**So this review will be extremely short**

“He wasn't just grasping at the limb, I realized as I joined them. He was tugging at it. He was trying to pull it off.
Something laughed hysterically, right inside my helmet.”


Okay so I have decided hardcore sci-fi isn't my thing, I get confused with all the descriptions and literally had to google half the words in this book. The writing was a little tedious, 100 pages in and I still didn't have a clue what was going on and nearly put down as
...more
Becky


Yeeeaahhh... I'm kinda not sure what I just read or how I should feel about this book. So, I'm going to revert to my usual fallback position of "random typing to see what words show up" and call it a review.

Look ma, no consciousness! O_o

So, one the one hand, I can see how certain types of readers would think this book is brilliant and love it. This is smart, hard sci-fi, dealing with matters of humanity (as most SF does) and asking some really interesting questions about what sentience is and w
...more
Greg
Nov 12, 2009 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Greg by: Raja
You know you're in for trouble when the dedication of the book says:

"If we're not in pain, we're not alive."

One of the quotes before the novel starts is:

"you will die like a dog for no good reason"

And the quote that starts the first chapter is one by Ted Bundy!

But still, it's a sci-fi book about consciousness...how could I not love it?

-----------------------------------------

I've always loved Science Fiction, and not just because books about the future are inherently cool. The reason I've always
...more
Jenne
May 30, 2007 rated it it was ok
Shelves: didnt-finish
Okay, I gave this book TWO second chances because I had heard great things about it, but I eventually gave up.

It's certainly a gutsy choice to have a person with no empathy as your main character, but it's pretty hard to get readers to care about someone who has only a vaguely intellectual interest in other people. Especially if the story is told in the first person by this character.
So as a result, we know that one guy is a vampire, and another guy has some kind of prosthetic senses, and there
...more
Bradley
This is one of those novels that make me feel like it's a wonder to be alive. Of course, that's a subjective statement implying consciousness, and therefore I am an evolutionary throwback who is spinning his wheels. And because I read this book and feel that the logic is unassailable, I still happen to think this novel makes me feel like it's a wonder to be alive.

Notice, of course, that this is the inverse of a depressive reasoning, and this is intentional, because this novel makes me feel like
...more
Twerking To Beethoven
BR with Pizza, spaghetti, mandolino, Luciano Pavarotti and you can't even sing who happens to be a way quicker reader than ole Twerk.

I learned an awful lot of new words while going through this book, mostly because I found myself being forced to in order to even follow its most basic level of dialogue. Hands up, you bastids, who knows what "malapropism" means? Ha! Gotcha. I do now, but that's because I googled that shit along with heaps of funny words that I have now forgotten.

In the really tec
...more
Manuel Antão
Jul 15, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2018
If you're into stuff like this, you can read the full review.

Epiphenomenal Consciousness: “Blindsight” by Peter Watts


“I am the bridge between the bleeding edge and the dead center. I stand between the Wizard of Oz and the man behind the curtain. I am the curtain.”

In “Blindsight” by Peter Watts


What if: There is only one consciousness that we all share? (Universal Consciousness)
What if: People are caught in the illusion of separation? (Encouraged by the limitations of the five senses)
What if:
...more
Oscar
Jun 07, 2009 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: fans de la ciencia ficción hard
Póngase una buena cantidad de H.P. Lovecraft. A continuación, añádase un buen chorro de Alastair Reynolds, y una pizca de Greg Egan. Y como ingrediente secreto, un chorrito de H.R. Giger. Agítese bien y ya tenemos el resultado: 'Visión ciega', de Peter Watts. Sírvase con precaución, ya que este cocktail no es para cualquier paladar.

Esta es una novela de primer contacto, pero maneja ideas tan complejas y poco comunes, que la alejan de cualquier otra novela que haya tratado este tema anteriormente
...more
Adam
Sep 15, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Crank up some Xenakis and Penderecki and abandon hope all ye who enter here. A book as monolithic and labyrinthine as the alien artifact at the heart of it. A grim yet psychedelic book which probably earns Watts place as the new James W. Campbell. A dystopia and a first contact story bent into odd shapes like a bristling metal sculpture. Disturbingly, as hallucinatory as most sections of this book are, Watts seemed to have scientific rational for most of it. A stunning look at consciousness, ide ...more
Alex
Jun 05, 2007 rated it liked it
Shelves: 2007hugonominees
I'm still having a hard time figuring out what I think about this book. I don't believe that it is well written, but I also don't believe that it is a bad book. Let's start with the first one. I've had a brief note up here for a while about this book that pretty much defines why I don't think it's well written. Take a look at this quote:

"There have always been those tasked with the rotation of informational topologies, but throughout most of history they had little to do with increasing its clar
...more
David
Aug 07, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Recommended to David by: Gendou
Shelves: science-fiction
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Stuart
Blindsight: Mind-blowing hard SF about first contact, consciousness
Originally posted at Fantasy Literature
This is ‘hard SF’ in the truest sense of the term - hard science concepts, hard to understand writing at times, and hard-edged philosophy of mind and consciousness. It aggressively tackles weighty subjects like artificial intelligence, evolutionary biology, genetic modification, sentience vs intelligence, first contact with aliens utterly different from humanity, and a dystopian future where
...more
George
Sep 26, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi
Was there ever a book with a more fitting title?
Michelle Morrell
In order to expand my reading, I've been making an effort to put more hard scifi into my rotation, to get out of the "fluff rut" I've been in, riding books that are easy to consume but ultimately unsatisfactory. So, after many rave reviews (and a Hugo nomination), I chose Blindsight.

A shower of sparks streak from the sky, flashing the entire planet in what is obviously an outside intrusion, an alien snapshot. A crew of genetically modified people are sent to find first contact before it finds t
...more
Guillermo
Aug 01, 2012 rated it really liked it
"How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of conciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of the Djin, when Aladdin rubbed his lamp." -Thomas Huxley

Blindsight is a very imperfect creation. It sputters and starts, it rears it's head, looks around, drops a poop on your lawn and asks you to just figure it out in your spare time please. I'm going to piggy back a little bit on some of the great reviews I just read (especially Ma
...more
Rob
Jun 27, 2007 rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: self-styled xenobiologists
...I absolutely tore through this book. An utterly fascinating read; well-done in both its science and its style. Watts makes some clever choices in structuring his narrator (and consequently, the narrative) without it coming across as a gimmick or some other bit of contrivance. So we have this faithful guide working in our favor and a good entry point for the story.

And then he slowly unfurls idea after idea that link together into a shillelagh to bash your brain in. At one moment near the end,
...more
Roy
Oct 09, 2017 rated it really liked it
A real clever and thought provoking read. Deals with a tonne od subjects, consciousness, identity, philosophy, gender, death way too many topics to list. I loved the heavy science element and the characters. Its a first contact novel with a twist. I think the only negative for me, is that it occasionally got lost in its own cleverness which made some of the plot a little scattered or uneven to follow. Not one yo usually be obsessed with heavy scifi novels, but this is one the better ones i read ...more
Ben Babcock
I’ve had this book on my to-read list for several years now, and I feel like the me who added this book would have liked it more than the me who ended up reading it. One of the nice things about having Goodreads to help me track my reading, what I’ve read and what I want to read, is that sometimes I can remember why I’ve put something on my list. In this case I can’t, specifically, except maybe that I heard about Peter Watts or Blindsight somewhere, maybe io9, and it seemed like something I coul ...more
11811 (Eleven)
Feb 21, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites, reread
I bumped this up a star after the second read. It's not the author's fault that I'm too dumb to appreciate this in its full five star entirety. Some (a lot) of this was far over my head but I can honestly say I've never read anything like it.

Hard sci-fi and horror haven't crossed paths like this since Who Goes There?. Some of that was also far over my head until John Carpenter turned it into THE THING and then my dumb ass was like 'oh yeah, that's terrifying.' If you are a fan of this genre comb
...more
Simeon
Jun 16, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi
Why do putatively brilliant scientists insist on explaining simple shit to one another? Their sole purpose appears to be strolling out at key intervals of the story and expounding on pop science.

"Oh hi, did you know that according to Game Theory the most efficient cooperative strategy is reciprocal altruism?" Game theory may not be common knowledge, but it's hardly arcane either. The UK actually has a TV show built around it.

Similar bleeding edge opinions on consciousness, neurology, and lingu
...more
Lightreads
Dec 28, 2008 rated it really liked it
Yes, it is not quite as good as I’d been told, but orders of magnitude more brilliant than anyone had conveyed. Which statement will be very puzzling to anyone who hasn’t read the book, but just take my word for it: it makes perfect sense. And yes, this book will deservedly win this year’s Hugo, if the rumblings are right. Sorry, Temeraire, you’ll have another shot, I’m sure.

So. The actual review. Summarizing this book is quite difficult without being far too parsimonious or far too verbose. It
...more
Doyle
Dec 25, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sci-fi
I spent a majority of this book being lost. Not so lost in the ludicrous amounts of science jargon as I was confused by the "who/what is this?" Though the author sacrifices story and pacing at every convenience to flex his brain and show off all the cutting edge science theory he reviewed to prepare for writing this, my main bitch is simply not being able to follow even basic conversations held between characters. Every character/space ship/astral body in this book has a name, and possibly an ad ...more
Wealhtheow
Jul 30, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: sci-fi
Really interesting, chock full of ideologies, debates, and fascinating new technologies. It's great scifi. The only problem is that I completely disagree with the main premise of the book, which turns out to be that sentience is in fact a *problem* rather than Our Specialness. It's a cool twist to the usual first contact with alien life scenario, but unfortunately it makes no sense to me. I just don't get it. Yeah, a consciousness means that you second guess decisions and are slower to make them ...more
Apatt
Jan 02, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I posted a review on this one months ago but it seems to have fallen into a blackhole and I have no backup. This was a very difficult book for me due to the prose style. I just found it a little rambling, unclear and unfocussed. I kept losing track of where the current scene is taking place and which characters are present, not to mention what exactly was happening. In all fairness this probably my own failure and not the author's, his prose style just does not resonate with me.

That said this bo
...more
Gary
Sep 04, 2018 rated it it was amazing
RTC
Alan Baxter
Jul 21, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science-fiction
The benchmark by which all first contact stories should be judged

I first read this book a while ago and recent conversations with a friend triggered me into reading it again. It blew me away the first time and it blew me away again on a second read. Honestly, I could read this book several times and get more from it on every go.

Peter Watts’ knowledge of biology is excellent – he has a doctorate in Marine Biology – but it doesn’t stop there. His knowledge and exploration of biology, anatomy, psyc
...more
Megan Baxter
Jun 29, 2016 rated it liked it
I really really tried with this book, but it was always a book that required that I slog through, trying to find snippets of enjoyment. Unfortunately, they were few and far between. I wanted to like this book a great deal more than I did, but I ended up stubbing my toe on the distance between the author and his readers, the lack of exploration on the themes I did find interesting, and something that happened near the end that both baffled and upset me.

Note: The rest of this review has been withh
...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Fantasy Buddy Reads: Blindsight [Oct 20, 2018] 46 25 Nov 06, 2018 01:08AM  
Sci-Fi Group Book...: Blindsight 12 28 Mar 08, 2018 09:45PM  
Science Fiction A...: * Blindsight - Tad's Pick 14 58 Oct 19, 2016 01:50PM  
2017 Reading Chal...: Blindsight, by Peter Watts 1 16 Feb 03, 2016 03:30PM  
Непонятки в книге 2 39 Nov 30, 2015 05:02AM  
  • Diaspora
  • Eifelheim
  • Ship of Fools
  • Ventus
  • Blind Lake
  • Glasshouse
  • The Golden Age (Golden Age #1)
  • The Quantum Thief (Jean le Flambeur, #1)
  • A Deepness in the Sky (Zones of Thought, #2)
  • His Master's Voice
  • Perfekcyjna niedoskonałość
  • Learning the World: A Scientific Romance
  • River of Gods (India 2047, #1)
  • The Quiet War (The Quiet War #1)
  • Stories of Your Life and Others

Other books in the series

Firefall (2 books)
  • Echopraxia (Firefall, #2)
“Stars, everywhere. So many stars that I could not for the life me understand how the sky could contain them all yet be so black.” 90 likes
“Evolution has no foresight. Complex machinery develops its own agendas. Brains — cheat. Feedback loops evolve to promote stable heartbeats and then stumble upon the temptation of rhythm and music. The rush evoked by fractal imagery, the algorithms used for habitat selection, metastasize into art. Thrills that once had to be earned in increments of fitness can now be had from pointless introspection. Aesthetics rise unbidden from a trillion dopamine receptors, and the system moves beyond modeling the organism. It begins to model the very process of modeling. It consumes evermore computational resources, bogs itself down with endless recursion and irrelevant simulations. Like the parasitic DNA that accretes in every natural genome, it persists and proliferates and produces nothing but itself. Metaprocesses bloom like cancer, and awaken, and call themselves I.” 74 likes
More quotes…