"The Death of the Hat: A Brief History of Poetry in 50 Objects" is one of the "non-fiction" selections for Chapter and verse Book Club this year. We are reading it as a possible contender for the Robert F. Sibert Informational Book Medal. At the same time that the book list of award contenders for 2015 publications for our book club was released, "The Death of the Hat" appeared in a Star Tribune article on August 18th entitled, "Lovely Picture Books for Your Kids on Sharks, Poetry, North Woods Life and More." The title of this article introduces much of what I want to talk about in regards to this book.
This book is a conundrum. "Lovely Picture Book..." - yes, the book is packaged as a "picture book" in both size and illustrations. And the watercolor and ink illustrations are gorgeous and help add cohesiveness to the book, both in terms of style and repeated elements (the wildgoose, pastel color palette, etc.)
"For Your Kids..." - not so much. The book is recommended for grades three and up. Really? The text at the beginning of the book, which covers literary periods from the early middle ages to contemporary, would be well beyond the grasp of a third grader. For example, "First, early poets, particularly in the West, composed philosophical and spiritual meditations on life and death..." Yeah, a third grader would be all over that! The same is true of many of the poems Paul Janeczko selected for inclusion in the anthology. I felt the text was more appropriate for high school on up - who may have some context for what is covered here - most will have studied these literary and historical periods to some degree. However, they will NOT carry around a "Lovely Picture Book."
So, the question is, "Who is 'The Death of the Hat: A Brief History of Poetry in 50 Objects' for?" The book has received many starred reviews in professional review journals. It IS well-organized and IS fluent visually, in terms of the chronological coverage of literary time periods, and in terms of the "object" theme. It IS visually appealing. However, as many goodreads reviewers (many of whom were disappointed in the book and gave it one star) have stated, the book is not appropriate for its intended audience. This is something I very often see in "informational texts." I don't understand the insistence on using the large, picture book format when presenting material more appropriate for older readers. Perhaps secondary teachers might use the book in a study of poetry and/or literary time periods, but I don't see it as a big seller for independent reading at any age level.
I, personally, enjoyed it. But I don't necessarily think kids or teens will.