When I was a kid how I felt about this book was this: it's stupid. The point of children's songs that parody other classic songs is that the parodies deal with "taboo" subjects and offend adults. This is what makes them funny. Think of every single "parody song" that is actually passed around by kids and spreads.
"This is land is my land, this land ain't your land, I got a shotgun, and you ain't got one. I'll blow your head off if you don't get off my land. This land was made for only me."
"Joy to the world, Barney's dead, we barbecued his head. Don't worry bout the body, we flushed it down the potty. around and around it goes."
"Dashing through the snow with a pair of broken skis. O're the hills we go, crashing into trees. Snow is turning red, think I'm almost dead. Wake up in the hospital with stitches in my head." (The version I learned would go into "Jingle Bells, Batman Smells" after this, though I'm sure a chorus that actually matches the verse exists somewhere.)
"I hate you, you hate me, we're an angry family with a great big punch and a kick to the head, glad to say that Barney's dead."
-
These songs are all, from a child's point of view, quite rebellious. Adults tell kids not to talk about murder, guns, blood, hating people, and toilets. These songs probably became popular because kids were forcibly subjected to the originals, grew bored/frustrated with them, and sang their humorous versions as an act of rebellion. For example, in elementary school, my class was rather fond of singing "This land ain't your land" when we were practicing for our patriotic music show.
These songs are also quite simple and easy to remember and spread around, while still being funny.
The songs in this book fit none of the patterns of songs that kids genuinely like, find funny, and spread around. No potty humor, Barney insults, or violence to be found here. The songs are also too complicated and differ too much from the originals to easily memorize and pass on to other kids (and before you say, "well duh, it's an actual book and the content needs to be better than things kids come up with to amuse themselves" - parody songs are actually funnier when they have lots of phrases that mirror the originals rather than just being to the same tune). The author does seem to be trying to mimic the kind of rebelliousness that appeals to kids, by writing from a child's point of view about things kids don't like. For example, the song about aunts demanding kisses, or gross food at summer camp. But it's too sanitized and G-rated to genuinely appeal to kids, and to make it more condescending half the songs end by showing the kid to actually be in the wrong. For example, the first song in the book is a kid complaining about being left in the bathtub too long, but the whole thing is the kid's fault, because when the mom comes for them they demand five more minutes.
The author should watch Jimmy Neutron or another Nickelodeon show to get how to do this kind of joke right.
On top of all that, the art is HIDEOUS. its trying to be what kids think of as funny but it's actually just ugly and not funny at all.
I remember thinking that in spite of MOST of the author's first "silly song" book being lame like this, it had a couple funny lines which made the book worth owning. But this book I always HATED.
On the other hand, the kids I work with were better behaved when I read/sang them this book than any other I ever have. I guess they can pay attention to music more easily than narrative, in spite of them all complaining about not getting to read a story. So there's that.
Anyway I know I probably analyzed too much and this review contains more text than the actual book. When I was reunited with it at work, all the childhood loathing I felt for this book came back and I felt compelled to vent now that I have the words to express why I don't like this book besides just "it's stupid."