(insert my usual preamble about my eh-ness about short story collections)
That said, again, this book has some of the problems I normally have with short story collections, but there is a difference. Where too many authors have story collections that end up blending into what is basically the same story just told a bunch of different ways with some different characters and things happening and they might all seem different on the surface they are just treading on the same ground. See for example the suburban / familial angst authors, or the great but basically unhappy, drunk and smoking stories of say Raymond Carver, or the set something up so that there can be a ironic O. Henry-esque twist sort of story. These are just a few types, the science fiction story can be thrown in here, the George Sauders-esque surreal story, the edgy drinkin' druggin' fightin' & fuckin' of the Bukowski descendants, etc. It's not the authors fault that so many collections have stories that just blend into one another, it's just that they have this authorial voice and well it's the same voice in most of the stories, even if sometimes they are holding something in front of their mouth to get it to sound a little different.
This collection isn't like that. Matt Bell takes on a variety of different types of stories, he takes from different genres and while there is a 'voice' that runs through most of these stories, it feels like each story is an attempt at doing something formally different. The tone of most of the stories is fairly bleak, the world either the whole world, or just the personal world of the characters seems quite often on the brink of total destruction, but how he gets to these points varies. When an author keeps trying new things though sometimes some of the attempts are going to fail with certain readers (well with me, maybe you will love all the stories. Maybe you will hate them).
When the collection is at its low points the reading isn't unenjoyable or tedious, it's just more of a why do I care about this? But since they are only short stories and I have a fairly decent attention span I can keep going through twenty pages of I'm not really loving this, I can't get into this, or whatever goes on in my head when I'm reading something that isn't fully engaging without getting angry at the book for not delivering one hundred percent pure unadulterated Entertainment. To be fair, the stories I liked least were the ones, I didn't get. The ones that didn't seem to have an opening for me to squeeze understanding into. I'm not always the best reader, I read sometimes in less than optimal conditions, like squeezed into a subway car during rush hour, so it's quite possible I could have enjoyed the stories more if I gave them more attention. Sometimes, too, the stories that I wasn't enjoying too much for say the first half or more came together in a satisfying way towards the end.
But why dwell on the negative? This collection has some really great stories in it, and they are worth reading this book to get to. I just took a short break from writing this review to leaf through the book, and I realized that I liked more of the stories than I thought I did. Even ones that I thought were only so-so when I first read them, looking back at the titles and leafing through the pages I realized that they almost all had some great moment, and with the longest (and maybe most so-so story) clocking in at just under forty pages, it's an impressive feat that there are so many awesome moments in such a small number of pages (13 stories, 238 pages).
Why can't I be one of those reviewers who do a great job with short story collections? Why can't I muster up the energy to review each story? Why must I just turn every review into a tedious exercise of vomiting everything insignificant thought I have onto the page to be posted unedited?
Fuck.
Still with me?
My favorite story in the collection is probably the last one. Which surprises me a little bit because it's not really a story in the traditional sense. "An index of How Our Family Was Killed" is just what the title promises, it's an index about a family of five that has had three of its members murdered, separately. It's an index of trying to understand what happened and how to continue surviving when you're part of a family that has a tendency to get killed violently.
Insurance, policies, as in, Good luck getting one, if you're me. They never tell you that being from a family of murder victims is a risk factor, but it is.
The whole 'story' is just an alphabetical list of what could be the index for a personal dealing with tragedy. It's a list composed with what I kept thinking of as an Oulipo sort of constraints, it's alphabetical and it manages to unfold a story through mere pointers that generally destroy the rule of show don't tell, it tells just enough to spark the imagination to make up its own narrative to support this index. At moments when reading this I was amazed at the construction, maybe I was giving the formal aspects too much credit, and maybe these entries could have been jumbled up in any order and basically done the same thing, but I like to think that there is a careful unfolding here and there is a part of me that loves shit like this, just because it's tough enough to tell a good story, it's even more difficult when you have to tell the story plus keep everything within some narrow range of what you can or can't do.
Most of the other stories are more traditional than this one, quite often they have some post-modern or meta-fiction playing around going on, but they could be looked at by an average reader and be recognized as a story. I'm really sorry I'm not the sort of reviewer who reviews each story in a collection, I think this book does deserve that kind of treatment, but I'm just too lazy.
I have no idea where I'm going with this review. Maybe one day I'll try to make it better, but probably not. The collection is better than this review.
Resist denouement, resist the solving of mysteries and the revealing of truths, because it is only through these that you may be judged.