3.0 stars. First, let me say that I think the Dark Tower series is among the best fantasy works ever written. Also, being a fan of the graphic novel format, I was thrilled to hear that Marvel was doing a set of graphic novels that would “fill in” certain aspects of the Dark Tower series that were mentioned but not dealt with specifically in the novels. Therefore, I think it is fair to say that I someone to whom these books should definitely appeal.
That said, my overall impression of the book is that…I liked it. I didn’t “really” like it and I certainly didn’t think “it was amazing” though I was certainly expecting the former and hoping for the latter when I began the story. Before I mention the reasons why I did not rate this higher, I want to mention several aspects of the graphic novel that I thought were very good to exceptional (some of what follows may contain spoilers for those of you completely unfamiliar with the Dark Tower series, but I am assuming you are familiar with the background of the story from the novels).
First, the handling of the character of Cort was exceptional, especially his dialogue after he is injured. I thought this portion of the story was 5 star worthy. Along those same lines, I think the basic handling of each of the characters was good in so far as they resemble the characters that King created. In addition, I thought the reference to Arthur Eld and the defenses he incorporated into the building for Gilead was very good (and the kind of thing that the graphic novel series needed to do more of as I will discuss below). Finally, I thought the artwork showing the initial siege of Gilead was well done and gave a very good impression of the size of the Good Man’s army.
So why only three stars? It is because after reading this graphic novel, the reader doesn’t KNOW much more than they knew after reading the novels, which in my opinion is a wasted opportunity. These graphic novels provided a means to “expand” and provide new details about a pivotal event in the history of the Dark Tower while remaining true to the canon established by the novels, similar to the better examples of tie-in books set in well established universes (e.g., Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.). For example, I was hoping for more background (maybe even a history) of John Farson (i.e., the Good Man) or some new and memorable character that was never mentioned in the books or some other fresh insight into the world of the Gunslinger. The reference to Arthur Eld and the defenses of Gilead (mentioned above) is a prime example. That was a brand new “fact” that added to the story without contradicting anything from the novels. MORE PLEASE!!!
Being a big fan of the series, this lack of new information is what disappointed me the most about this graphic novel. The writing and the artwork are good for what is there, I was just a little disappointed by what was NOT there.