Brigitte Hamann's account is based on documents and often gives the floor to eyewitnesses and the empress herself. The author does not ignore the many rumors surrounding the figure of Elisabeth, showing that most of them are speculation. To better understand the origins of the negative rumors, we have to turn back to the early years of the future empress.
Sisi was born into the family of a Bavarian duke of the Wittelsbach dynasty (the younger branch of the same family that produced the famous King Ludwig II of Bavaria). The Bavarian princess spent her childhood in an informal environment, enjoying nature and not being particularly burdened with studies. No one planned for the girl to become the wife of the Austrian emperor, as this role was assigned to her older sister. The young emperor Franz Joseph, however, chose Sisi, whose youthful, unsophisticated beauty was in contrast with the artificial refinement and playfulness of the Viennese aristocracy. There is ample evidence that Franz Joseph, against all odds, retained warm feelings for his wife until the end of her life, which did not prevent him from having affairs, including his infatuation with the actress Katharina Schratt.
The young, inexperienced Sisi had difficulty adjusting to the new realities. Life at the center of the ceremonial Viennese court, where most were only too happy to find a reason to criticize her, was draining.
Elisabeth's natural shyness, her desire for privacy, and her fear of crowds played a role. She tried to avoid public outings under various pretexts. Some of the rules of the Viennese court sound amusing today. Thus, the empress of Austria should not wear the same pair of shoes twice, for instance.
Sisi, a passionate supporter of all things Hungarian, promoted the rapprochement between the emperor and the Hungarian elite and the creation of the bi-united Danube monarchy (Austria-Hungary), into which the Austrian Empire was transformed in 1867. Her sympathy for Hungary contrasted with the dislike of the Viennese establishment for this country.
The empress influenced the education of her son, Crown Prince Rudolf. His father wanted the boy to be brought up as a future soldier. The tutor intimidated the sensitive child and tormented him with drills. Sisi insisted that the crown prince be given a liberal tutor. She gave the emperor an ultimatum: "Either the tutor goes or I go." If Sisi had not intervened, things might have turned out badly. But it was a rare occasion when she showed such concern for Rudolf. Elisabeth was not particularly close to her children, except her youngest daughter Marie Valerie, who was described as "the only child in the family." As Sisi herself said, it was only with Marie Valerie that she experienced the joy of motherhood, while she was forced to "give" the older children to her mother-in-law. Marie Valerie, who spent much time with her mother before her marriage, left a diary, a valuable testimony of the family's private life.
Years have passed. The woman has changed. The world around her has changed, though perhaps not so much. We see the heroine grow up, realize her attractiveness, gain self-confidence, and suffer from misunderstandings, prosaicness, and emptiness of "life on the throne."
Her life comes to an end in Geneva when, at the age of sixty, Elisabeth becomes the victim of an Italian anarchist.
He fatally wounded her because he saw a high-profile murder as a protest against the ruling class.
Carmen Sylva (Queen Elisabeth of Romania), a poet and friend of the empress, wrote that Sisi's tragic death might seem terrible to others, but for the aged empress, death on the shores of her favorite Lake Geneva, which came quickly and painlessly, was beautiful and peaceful.
It was Carmen Sylvia who once said: “The republican form of government is the only rational one; I can never understand the foolish people, the fact that they continue to tolerate us.”
Elisabeth seems to have sympathized with this view.
Perhaps an expert on the Habsburg dynasty and this period, which I am not, would have found flaws in this biography, but it struck me as relatively neutral and engaging.
"She played none of the roles assigned to her by tradition and her surroundings: not the role of loving and devoted wife, not the role of mother, not the role of principal figurehead in a gigantic empire. She insisted on her rights as an individual—and she prevailed. That her self-realization did not make her happy is the tragedy of her life—aside from the tragedies that befell her most immediate family, set in motion by her refusal to be co-opted."
According to Hamann, the decline of the Danube monarchy is embodied in Elisabeth, who refused to live as an empress.
"
Madness? Wisdom? An understanding of the inevitable? Or simply convenience and whim?
"
Perhaps a little bit of everything.