Title: The Case of A Missing Marquess
Author: Nancy Springer
Rating: 1/5
Likes: Concept. Mrs. Lane (Hope she is more developed and has more limelight).
Dislikes: CHARACTERIZATION. The so-called “cipher”. Everything about this book actually written.
Plot: Moderate. Predictable. A bit boring. In certain parts, a bit unrealistic. Quite disappointing. Not smart in the very least. (The code used is too simple, and used to repetitively without any variation.)
Writing Style: More telling than showing. Would be better in third person point of view. A lot of redundant details. Does not flow very smoothly.
Protagonist: ENOLA HOLMES. In three words: smug, snobbish, stupid. She does not see sense. Very childish. Head-strong to the point of not listening to advices of the more experienced. A lot of inconsistencies and lack of realism. Some instances of it:
1. Clueless one moment and the next moment, suddenly, street-smart.
2. She was supposed not to have upper-class upbringing and mingled all her life with lower class, but despised the lower class.
3. She admitted that she has no practical relationship with her mother. Poof, mother disappeared, she suddenly formed an attachment to her mother.
4. She knows of things children of her age with similar sheltered life would know nothing about. Such as procreation.
Beside the lack of consistencies, the protagonist also lacks a brain. The author tries hard to establish the protagonist with some pseudo-smart; it just fails miserably. Some examples:
1. Someone tried to help protagonist with her life and future, she just ran away (to a place she knows nothing about, based on a childhood fantasy) and when she realized her fantasy is just a fantasy, she has no sense to mend her ways.
2. The protagonist’s plan A failed due to her mistake, then instead of conceiving a plan B, she went on with Plan A, regardless of the fatal consequences.
3. She was able to buy a property even though she is under-aged, in disguise and knows nothing of those sorts of things (she lived in the country all her life and was not educated).
This character is just very unlikeable. I cannot empathize or relate to this protagonist. Just does not work. It may be better if the protagonist is older (maybe 18), better educated, and better developed with some character and common sense. Corporal punishment and discipline (like her brother suggested) will do her a lot of good. She is definitely not a role model for preteen girl, to whom this book is targeted.
Antagonist: The antagonist in the case regarding the marquess is very predictable and has so minute role. The whole book just revolves around protagonist being high and mighty.
However, the real antagonist in this book, in my opinion, is actually a woman by the name of Lady Eudoria Vernet Holmes. Mrs. Holmes is one of the few characters I actually hate, and having not meet her in this book, I would rather not meet her at all. Ever.
She is a very accomplished “villain” and “liar”. A very successful one, rather. Mrs. Holmes, has successfully ruined her offspring’s life and future. Congratulation.
The main problem is lack of reason for her hate for her children. (I call this hate, because one simply does not treat another this way, unless one hates her). I would blame the child’s problem on the mother. However, Mrs. Holmes does not seem to have any excuse for neglecting her child like that. There is no scandal or any reasonable cause for one. I think she may have serious mental problem. I think whatever brilliance the children possess comes from their father. Too bad, Enola seems to have inherited her mother’s empty brain. (Or maybe, Mrs. Holmes had taken up with the gardener or the postman. And that would be insulting to the gardener and the postman.)
There is also some inconsistency in the character of Mrs. Holmes. Such as Mrs. Holmes is supposed to be very liberal. She mingles with the unsavoury and lower class, she does no give her daughter proper education for a squire’s daughter, she lets her child does things others would frown upon, but does not dare to carry out her late husband’s last wishes for fear of scandal.
This character is, in addition, a cocktail of lack of judgement, mental and social problems. She is childish when she is supposed to be more of half a century old. I was hoping for some exciting, potentially fatal justification of her abandoning her child. Disappointed. This character is very materialistic and does not value her own children. Money is not everything, Mrs. Holmes. You may give a great deal of pretention and lip service, but love is shown by action, not by words.
Conclusion: The long paragraph containing much ranting evidently testified to my personal feeling toward this particular book. The concept is very exciting and showed a lot of potential. However, the author choose to keep it save in some kind of Victorian Nancy Drew, but less exciting and less consistent. The book does not even feel very Victorian. The problem is when one chooses to write about a well-known classic character such as Sherlock Holmes, which is one of the most iconic literary characters, the expectation is set ever so high. It requires a bit of brilliance, and a bit of genius. Both are absent in this author’s work.
Moreover, I really don’t like the way the author brought up the theme of woman suffrage. The theme is exciting enough. However, I think the author is missing the point. Woman suffrage is about democracy and liberalism. The author seems to confuse this with anarchy. Woman suffrage is about equality and fairness, not lawlessness.
The overall theme has the strong presence of materialism and lack of respect for education and parental guidance. This is horrendous. The book advertises that money can solve everything. This is palpable, when a 14-year-old uneducated child can do everything she likes because she has a lot of money her mother embezzled. And the mother actually convinced her stupid child that the child actually deserved it, when the child had done nothing to earn it. Lack of education and parental guidance is the main problem for this child. When one just let her child does whatever the child wants and say or do nothing about it, the child is headed straight to ruin. She will run wild and all.
Thus, in conclusion,
It is not worth reading.
It is utterly ghastly.
It is a waste of my hard-earned money.
Recommended for: This is a book I will not recommend at all to children or young adult (teenagers).