What do you think?
Rate this book


282 pages, Kindle Edition
First published February 19, 2019
. . . agents opened the door to a bedroom closet and found a five-gallon Igloo cooler filled with white powder. Who keeps five gallons of white powder in a cooler on the floor of a bedroom closet? The team immediately though it might have found enough of the peroxide-based explosive TATP to take down the entire building. So, on an already full day, Denver had to cordon off the area, lock down the apartment complex, evacuate the building, and bring in bomb-recovery personnel. It turned out the bucket the agents had left in place contained . . . five gallons of flour.Then there’s this passage when he speaks of the difficult aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing:
. . . the entire crime scene, the zone encompassing the scene of the attack on Boylston Street and the area around it, had been filled with spectators,, most of whom got away unscathed. Practically all of these people, when the bombs went off, dropped whatever they were carrying—backpacks, purses, briefcases, bags of groceries—and ran. So at a scene where bombs had likely gone off inside some sort of bag, the ground was covered with thousands of bags and backpacks, everyone of which had to be cleared by a bomb team before we could even begin the process of evidence recovery. And how would we keep track of everything?Unfortunately, his command of detail deserts him when he defends himself against the findings of “lack of candor” issued in a report by the Inspector General. He declines to be specific about the circumstances—namely, that he authorized a leak to The Wall Street Journal in order to defend his own reputation and later deceived Comey about it—and instead speaks of how, during the interview with the IG staff, he was “disconnecting from questioning,” “wasn’t following their questions,” that his “mind was elsewhere.” (In McCabe’s defense, this interview was also the first time he encountered the notorious Strzok-Page texts, a public relations bombshell that must indeed have been distracting. Still, the “my mind was elsewhere” defense seems incommensurate with the circumstances, especially coming from a veteran counter-terrorism interviewer like himself.)
”He started off telling me, We fired the director, and we want you to be the acting director now. We had to fire him—and people are very happy about it. I think people are very happy that we finally got rid of him. I think there’s a lot of people in the FBI who are glad he’s gone. . . . The president claimed there had been a rebellion inside the FBI and asked me if it was true that people disliked Director Comey. I replied that . . . the general feeling in the FBI about this director seemed positive. He looked at me, with a tilt of the head, an expression of dismay or disagreement, or both. I had not given the answers he expected or wanted. The subtext of everything he was saying to me, clearly, came down to this: Whose side are you on?McCabe is also good on the subject of Comey, and even better when he speaks of Mueller:
Mueller would kick back in his chair, sitting very straight. Put his hand to his mouth. Circle his chin—really, polish it—with his knuckles. You could see him thinking, making connections, preparing questions. . . . If he learned forward, it was a very bad sign. Mueller leans forward only when frustrated. . . If he leaned forward, looking at the chart, and then smacked the side of his hand against his head—then it was all over . . .Now that this review is all over, I have decided that, even if McCabe may be a little boring, he hasn’t written a boring book. He has been close to the center of action in very interesting times, and has more than a few interesting things to say.