I struggle with rating this one because, on the one hand, I really like the idea of it. The 51 women in this volume cover a range of eras and experiences and most definitely deserve the title 'badass.' It is fun to see them all in one place and sort of glory in their combined epicness.
On the other hand, I had a lot of problems with this book, not the least of which is that it just isn't interesting. I forced myself through most of it. Despite (perhaps because of?) the bantering language, it just isn't a smooth read. It frequently feels disjointed. At any rate, I never really looked forward to picking it up again.
But here are some other, more specific problems I had a whole:
1. The modern, 'woke' language and forced slang completely undermines how truly badass these women were.
The author tries to be super trendy and it comes across like a slap in the face. I wish I could give an exact quote, but I already returned this one to the library. So here is what it sounds like:
So and so was a 62 year old woman who wanted to lead a rebellion after an evil dictator murdered her son, but no one thought she'd make a good general. Because sexism is the worst. She then formed a rebellion anyway that survived six months before getting annihilated.
...
Is sexism the worst? Well, that is a whole other can of worms we can discuss later. But these women did amazing things and overcame crazy odds and the author's main comment is usually some version of patriarchy/sexism/racism/American history is the worst.
Such sweeping statements undervalue the true achievements of these women and minimize the circumstances they faced.
2. The author undermines the feminine experience by constantly stressing how these women 'fought the patriarchy'/gender norms/etc. in their society.
Now obviously, there is an entire conversation that could be had about gender norms and the opportunities available to these women compared to their male counterparts. I don't want to minimize that. But, by constantly comparing these women to the males of their time, the author ignores the unique motivation and experience that guided them. She lightly names the scarring, emotional experiences that drove some of these women to do what they did (murdered family members, tortured fathers, lost husbands) and instead acts like they fought for some universal girlhood. There is so much richness in each story and what motivated each woman to defy her times. And I understand that in a page or two, it is nigh impossible to truly express that motivation. But to minimize it like she does is to truly minimize what these women lived and fought for.
3. Most of the females portrayed win the glory for assuming traditionally male roles.
Again, different conversation about whether this is good or not, and I appreciate that the author does make an attempt to balance the stories of women warriors and pharaohs with women dancers and...well, mostly dancers. And also, who doesn't want to hear about the awesome Mongol woman who promised to marry the man who beat her in wrestling...and then promptly beat every man who tried? It makes a great story.
But again, the author tries so hard to highlight how these women stacked up to the patriarchy/males around them that all that seems to remain is the comparison. Take Sybil Ludington, the female Paul Revere and a personal favorite of high school Amy. By constantly making snide comments about how much farther she rode and how much more effective she was than Paul Revere, the main takeaway I got was that Paul Revere wasn't as badass as I was taught. Not that Sybil Ludington is a super cool person worth learning more about.
I could go on but I think my complaints would sound repetitious after a while. While I admire the author's efforts to bring more female representation to the history books, I find her manner of doing it immensely frustrating and sorely lacking.