Picking this book off of the new shelf at the library just because of the cover, I am perplexed how to react, and more so how to rate it. At one time I had a dress just like the girl's and loved those style sleeves with the dip in the middle. This book??? It's fantasy? It's romance? It's neither? It's horror or a ghost story? What it is FOR SURE, is unreliable. And not only in the narrator.
People could easily rate this anywhere on the scale of 1 to 4 stars, IMHO. And I could understand why depending upon their imagination level factors. Or maybe not that at all but dialogue banter improbability of belief levels? Well just say this; you need to be able to swallow huge gloats of either hubris or sentimentality or/and particularly insanity.
But it is all covered like a chocolate coated nut. So you would NOT get the inner morsel cognition of what you read until the end if you quit it half way. You may guess in dozens of accurate directions but you most probably won't be able to chew that entire piece of candy to any degree. So I can thoroughly understand the number of DNF readers for this one. But I also would not take their reviews as whole piece evaluations in any way except perhaps as a temporary reaction to not being able to take some of the dialogue as possible. Telling you why and anymore to detail will give you spoilers to the whole. Talking about any of the under characters will give you even more. So as long as this book became, if you like ghost stories then read it until the end or don't start it. Great ghost stories are those where you know far more of the whole picture than you do with this one and because of that the creepiness factor explodes way, way too late and never gets the repulsion and power it deserves. It could have been so much better and succinct!
So here we go- and know FIRST OF ALL that I thought it was a 1 star in some ways. And I know that for others who love the girly type romance/ picnic basket date or The Haunting kind of reading druthers, readers of those two persuasions- it could be for some readers, nearly a 4. For me, it was a 2.5 star but I did round it up for the scope Wendy Webb attempted. Few would go there.
Saying that- she is NOT a Shirley Jackson, but she did try. Way too long, and much too verbose for the underpinning of the story itself, IMHO.
It's a ghost tale done to a blown out scale. Kind of like what the Ten Commandments movie did to the story of Moses. (Many of you won't understand that, I do realize how dated that comparison is.)
But the narrator's eyes are kept steady throughout and the order of the book telling is 95% plus chronological in order. And nearly all the characters in the book have back up stories that are being "heard" by Eleanor, the narrator woman who has come to head the establishment in her new job.
Taking place in a stunning estate that is now an Arts haven (grants for solitude and fraternity to produce music, poetry, fiction, painting etc. etc.) which for many years and in origins was a TB rest and isolation facility. And all is on the shores of Lake Superior, several beaches and forests complete the estate itself, it isn't just the main building which housed the TB ridden, dying inmates.
It gets a 4 for the placement locale and the creepiness factors. Both are large, but deem smaller and smaller in scope for importance to rating the longer the book goes on. They did for me, anyway- because there is so much inappropriate and far-fetched emotive and "chance to meet" events/criteria that follow. Which just didn't "fit" with the job or the whole agenda for supporting fine arts production in this set up. But then, I like creepiness developed well but am always cynical when romance becomes adolescent flippant and silly cloying in description. Nate was always, from the very first meeting, a no-go persona or back story for me. For one thing, I can add and know the math.
But those of you who may hold patience to irrelevant conversation- much banter is beyond/ improbable for a 40 year old woman who was a crime investigator journalist and doesn't fit in her "eyes"- might enjoy this large scale ghost story more than I did. If you quit this one early or mid book, you'll not get all the red herring side trips and likey-poo affection that is out of place. You'll think that is just romance padding or chick lit prose to set Eleanor's choices and moods? Or that she is basically a ding-bat.
This is closer to a 2 star for the end product, but I'm giving her a 3 star for trying. TB sanitarium were ripe placements for these type of tales in every single creepy and dire category you can imagine. This one went really, really wide with that and added some extra mean. So know you are not getting a Manderley personality / emotive match of conflict- but a much closer "copy" to the folks who do those prison and "crazy" house Haunted House probe shows which now appear on a couple TV channels. Just featuring a lot more words. But it also has a housekeeper in prime character position, as Rebecca did.