#Binge Reviewing my previous Reads #Indian Food
K.T. Achaya’s The Story of Our Food is one of those books that doesn’t just ask you to think about what you eat but forces you to reckon with the centuries of cultivation, conquest, trade, ritual, and survival that have gone into shaping even the simplest meal.
Reading it feels less like going through a cookbook or a nostalgic food memoir and more like sitting in a dense history seminar, except the history is edible, and the lecturer is intent on showing you how every grain of rice, every drop of ghee, and every pulse or spice in the Indian thali carries within it an entire story of civilisation.
Achaya was a scientist, food technologist, and historian, and this tri-fold identity shows in the way the book is written: there is rigour, there is breadth, and there is also a strange affection for the material, as though the author could not separate himself from the subject because food is not an academic curiosity but a lived fact. For me, reading this text after lighter narrative food histories like Chitrita Banerji’s or even Colleen Taylor Sen’s was like suddenly having to change pace—gone is the lyricism, the anecdotal digression, and instead arrives the insistence on evidence, cross-referencing ancient texts, inscriptions, travelogues, and agricultural records. It is a demanding book, but rewarding, because once you’ve gone through Achaya’s pages, you can never look at your own plate in the same way again.
What stands out immediately is Achaya’s longue durée approach: he begins from the very origins, from the Harappan civilisation’s food habits, moving through Vedic rituals, Mughal kitchens, colonial agriculture, and modern nutritional science. The sweep is breathtaking. Most food books restrict themselves to a particular era or geography; Achaya insists on everything, a full narrative from prehistoric times to post-independence India.
In the process, he creates a mosaic where the continuity of certain foods is as striking as the ruptures. Rice, for example, as the axis of sustenance in the east and south, stretches across millennia, while wheat gradually asserts itself in the north, and millets, so central once, are marginalised in modern diets. Achaya does not merely note these shifts—he probes them, looking at irrigation, soil, climate, social hierarchy, and even political economy. To him, food is not just taste but survival and governance, the very foundation of a society.
One of the most illuminating parts of the book is how Achaya reads ancient texts as food archives. The Rig Veda is mined not for cosmology but for references to offerings and feasts; Buddhist and Jain texts are scanned for dietary rules and prohibitions; Sangam literature is invoked for its descriptions of landscapes tied to particular food practices.
The Arthashastra is treated almost as a proto-agricultural manual, and foreign travellers like Al-Biruni or Ibn Battuta are used to triangulate what was eaten, how it was cooked, and how it was valued. In this way, Achaya transforms literary and historical sources into culinary evidence. It is almost forensic in method, and it reveals to the reader how deeply embedded food is in the very texture of cultural production. For me, the joy of reading these sections was in seeing how seamlessly he connects the dots – how the description of a sacrificial ritual links with the archaeological evidence of grain storage and how the mention of butter in a poem resonates with the technological possibilities of churning in that period. It is scholarship, but alive.
Achaya is also unsentimental. Unlike memoir-driven food writers who often glorify the sensual pleasure of eating, he is willing to point to scarcity, hunger, inequality, and the politics of distribution. He reminds us that India has always lived with paradoxes: opulent banquets for kings alongside widespread famine for peasants, intricate temple offerings contrasted with the everyday monotony of porridge for the poor. He charts how caste hierarchies structured diets, how certain groups were excluded from milk or ghee, and how ritual purity determined what could be eaten by whom.
This is not the romantic India of spices and colour but a stratified, unequal food culture, and Achaya does not let us forget it. Yet, he also shows resilience: how communities created variety even in scarcity, how pulses, pickles, and fermentation expanded nutrition and taste, and how local wisdom ensured sustenance. Reading this, I felt the weight of history behind the most ordinary dal I eat daily—it is not just a dish; it is a survival technology honed over centuries.
Another striking aspect is his focus on technology and trade. Achaya constantly asks: how did people grow, store, preserve, and transport food? From the introduction of irrigation systems in ancient India to the spice trade routes that connected Kerala to Venice, from the arrival of the chilli from the New World to the role of railways in moving wheat during colonial times—food is always technological and global.
He details the role of fermentation, of oil extraction, of the grinding stone, of the hand mill, and later the mechanised mill, each as an invention that shaped taste and availability. For someone like me, accustomed to reading food through cultural memory, this focus on science and economics was refreshing—it forced me to realise how much of what we consider “traditional” is actually mediated by innovations, imports, and shifts in infrastructure. Even the Indian kitchen, with its masala dabba and pressure cooker, is a site of technology as much as it is of ritual.
Reading The Story of Our Food In the current moment, when India’s food culture is being debated in terms of vegetarianism vs non-vegetarianism, globalisation vs local food, and purity vs hybridity, one sees how prescient Achaya was. He insists that Indian food has always been syncretic, always layered with influences from outside—Central Asian, Persian, Portuguese, and British—absorbed, modified, and indigenised.
The very category of “Indian food” is a palimpsest, not a singular origin. He also shows how modern nutrition science, with its obsession for proteins, vitamins, and calories, often clashes with traditional wisdom but sometimes also validates it. Achaya’s scientific background makes him comfortable moving between Ayurveda and modern biochemistry, and though at times his narrative is dry, it gains authority precisely because he refuses to romanticise. For him, the story of our food is not just about taste but about nourishment, balance, and sustainability.
Personally, reading Achaya was a humbling experience. I went into the book expecting perhaps a cultural history sprinkled with anecdotes. What I got instead was an encyclopaedic yet coherent narrative that forced me to think of food as history itself. Each time I eat rice now, I cannot help but recall his analysis of paddy cultivation and its ties to irrigation tanks and monsoon cycles. Each time I encounter the word “curry”, I remember his insistence that the category is colonial shorthand, far removed from the specific regional names like sambar, korma, or dalna. Each time I see packaged foods in a supermarket, I think of his chapters on processing and preservation, and how the act of eating is always tied to commerce. Achaya’s gift is that he alters your everyday perception, so that food is never innocent again—it is always historical.
If there is a limitation, it is perhaps the dryness of tone at times, the density of facts, or the sense that Achaya is more comfortable with data than with narrative colour. Compared to Banerji’s lyricism or Sen’s brisk journalistic style, Achaya can feel austere, closer to a textbook. Yet this austerity is also a kind of integrity; he does not dress food up, he gives you its bones, and in those bones lie the truth of a civilisation. For readers like me, who crave immersion and are willing to wade through the density, the reward is immense.
Ultimately, The Story of Our Food is exactly that: a story, but told with the precision of a scientist and the sweep of a historian. It makes you realise that food is never just about appetite but about ancestry, never just about cooking but about cultivation, distribution, and memory. In Achaya’s pages, the Indian kitchen becomes not just a place of recipes but a map of civilisation itself.