If you are in any relationship that persists out of fear, obligation, and guilt (that’s where the FOG comes in), this book is for you. You don’t need the other person diagnosed as an official “narcissist," because that diagnosis almost never happens anyway. If a person in your life is totally self-absorbed, grudge-holding, thin-skinned, responsibility-avoidant, and is manipulative and controlling, that’s enough for you to need this book. The DSM-5 has a definition that causes many clinicians to miss narcissism, because not all narcissists are as obvious as, say, the Orange Menace. Many narcissists are the covert or vulnerable type, characterized by a need to be seen as vulnerable or fragile, constantly complaining, anxious, and envious. Coverts will often describe themselves as “introverts” and “highly sensitive people,” and while there’s a Venn overlap, these are not the same things.
This book is very focused on intimate-partner abuse but is still useful to people dealing with non-intimate-partner abuse, because all narcissist abuse shares some aspects. I’m highlighting some concepts that were especially relevant to me as someone who’s dealt with a non-intimate-partner narcissist.
Thought holes: a pothole of the mind. Thought holes are unintended bad advice from others that can derail our progress. Well-intended bad advice “encourages people to put themselves in situations or relationships that are a threat to their safety and/or sanity.” This bad advice can come from anyone: a therapist, a friend, a lawyer, a priest. With practice and research, it becomes easier to identify well-intentioned bad advice and ignore it.
What’s healthy vs. What’s “normal": The book is organized in an extremely helpful way as sets of simple dichotomies like this: what a normalized narcissistic concept is vs. what a healthy concept is. People coming out of narcissistic abuse are like people leaving a cult. They can’t see which way is up. They have warped ideas of what’s okay, stemming from both the narcissist’s abuse and from problematic cultural messages that support the narcissist. Morningstar reminds you that what's "normal" isn't always what is healthy, and she lays out what’s healthy in stark, easy-to-understand terms. All the dichotomies in the book have on one side a “healthy” concept, contrasted with the problematic one. Very grounding—really, for everyone.
It’s a problem vs. It could be worse. This is a thought hole. Just because it could be worse doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem. It’s absurd to say otherwise, but it’s one of our society’s favorite go-tos. “At least he didn’t hit you.” “At least you were fed and sheltered; lots of kids are homeless.” People will say these things to you, and you will say them to yourself. But if someone’s behavior is a problem, then it’s a problem even if it could be worse. If you’re still alive it could literally always be worse: that part is irrelevant. Are you supposed to wait until you’re dead to stick up for yourself?
Caring vs. Caretaking: Caring is about empowering others to troubleshoot their own problems, includes healthy boundaries, and allows people to suffer natural consequences of their actions without rescuing them. Caretaking is rescuing people and enabling bad behavior. It entails being stuck, not moving forward. Establishing healthy boundaries and deal breakers is critical, but difficult, for abuse survivors. When you care for someone, you have boundaries. When you caretake, you don’t.
Don’t hold out hope for a diagnosis: Narcissists are unlikely ever to be formally diagnosed, for several reasons: they don’t seek treatment because obviously they aren’t the problem, everyone else is. When they do seek treatment, therapists are unlikely to see personality disorders and abuse stemming from them because they rarely trained in these disorders. Instead they are trained to see everything as “an interpersonal problem” and to focus you on “what YOU can change to improve the relationship.” Finally, and this one is more my suspicion than what she says in the book, therapists aren’t going to piss off their clients by giving them a diagnosis that is basically, “You’re an irredeemable jerk.” (Some personality disorders are a little easier to own and work on than NPD.) So, since you will almost certainly never have the satisfaction of seeing you abuser formally diagnosed, let that hope go. Yes, it would be extremely validating, but you don’t need it to move forward.
You don’t have to justify why you are ending a relationship. Being treated poorly is reason enough to leave. If time spent with someone almost always makes you feel worse than before, that’s a signal that this person is toxic and you don’t need to fix them or keep them in your life. You don’t have to explain that to anyone or get permission.
A parent vs. a predator: Anyone who is fertile can have a child. A true parent nurtures and loves a child. “Just because a person has a child doesn’t make them a parent; it’s their parenting of that child that makes them a parent.” If you weren’t parented properly, then that person hasn't earned the benefits that go with the label “parent.” Many people use, abuse, and exploit their own children, and those children keep “holding onto hope that this predator can become the parent they always wanted or needed.” It’s incredibly painful to realize this will never happen, but the sooner you grok it, the sooner you can let that lead balloon go. You don’t owe adults anything merely based on their relation to you.
Fleas: Many people who’ve survived a relationship with a narcissist catch “fleas” of problematic behavior. The difference between a narcissist and someone who has picked up fleas is that the latter can recognize the behavior, take responsibility for it, and work to change it.
Acceptance vs. Allowance. Acceptance means you recognize that this is how the person behaves: this is who they were, are, and will always be. It’s an attitude, not an action. Allowance is an action: it means that you allow a person to stay in your life even though their behavior is disruptive, destructive, disempowering, destabilizing, exhausting, upsetting, and crazy-making.
Reacting vs. Responding: Reacting is the gut-level, instant reflex. Responding is thought-out. With time you can practice letting the reflexive reaction come and go, before consciously creating a thoughtful, calm response. (This is slightly different than what she said, but is my mindfulness spin on things.)
Healthy communication vs. Hoovering: Hoovering is designed to pull a person back into the abuser’s orbit though “saying all the right things, begging, pleading, texting and emailing multiple times, promising change, offering to do therapy, or messages that are designed to provoke or instill fear, such as ‘I’m going to kill myself tonight, I hope you’re happy.’” To that “fear” campaign, I would add any campaign that hits on the “obligation and guilt” factors of the FOG. Healthy communication isn’t crazy-making. People in healthy relationships don’t force you to stay in contact with them out of fear, obligation, or guilt.
Nobody is perfect vs. Tolerating abusive behavior. This is similar to “it could be worse.” It’s thought-hole that well-intentioned people may say to get a target to keep an abusive person in their lives. Like “it could be worse" and other thought holes, nobody has to say it. It's a cultural meme, a constant minimizer floating in the air. “Abusive behavior isn’t a mistake, and it’s not an anger issue, it’s intentional behavior that’s driven by power and control.” If you are walking on eggshells and “continually try to read the abuser’s mind and anticipate their mood,” this is a big problem. If someone tries to convince you to put up with a pattern of abusive behavior by telling you, “nobody is perfect,” you are being manipulated. If a relationship leaves you feeling depleted, worn down, depressed, or anxious, then it’s not about someone being imperfect: it’s about abusive behavior.
The right therapist vs. The wrong therapist. There are bad therapists out there, and well-meaning but mediocre ones, and ones that are excellent for some problems but not for yours. Personality disorders are weirdly overlooked in the therapy world. Very few therapists specialize in them, much less specialize in helping someone recover from narcissistic abuse. Do some research into NPD and abuse recovery, and search for therapists who list "narcissist-abuse recovery" as a specialty. Yes: it is a specialty that exists. Furthermore, and this is just me speaking, not summarizing the book: If a therapist doesn't know even as much as you can get from a few hours of research on narcissism, keep looking. In the meantime, find the YouTube channels of Dr. Todd Grande, Dr. Les Carter, and Dr. Ramani Durvasula. And read more books and/or listen to more podcasts on surviving NPD abuse.
Rehashing is OK: “What a person needs most when they are fresh out of a narcissistically abusive relationship is to feel validated, safe, believed, listened to, and empowered to keep finding their voice in all this.” A therapist who will do this is helpful. A therapist (or friend, or anyone) who wants you to “move on” and even worse, encourages you to “fix your relationship,” is not the right person for this situation. The “rehash” phase can go on for months or even years. Be patient with yourself.
Forgetting vs. Forgiving: “The concept of ‘forgetting’ is a popular among dysfunctional families, especially when there is abuse involved. … It often gets twisted into being a part of forgiveness, which in turn is twisted to mean reconciliation.” Life in a dysfunctional family “is all about being forced to walk on eggshells and avoiding elephants in the room.” Balance means developing healthy boundaries to keep yourself safe and sane, and realizing others may not be OK with you doing this. It can mean walking away from the flying monkeys, too. In fact, you don’t have to forgive or forget anything, certainly not for anyone else's convenience. But over time, you can process what happened and learn to put the abuse in its place so you’re able to move on. For me, "moving on" is about reclaiming my time and energies for something else. The narcissist in my life has already taken far too much from me—I want my thoughts back.
A few more quotes from the book on forgiveness:
“It is not being forgiving to allow a person who is dangerous and destructive (especially if they aren’t sincerely remorseful) to remain an active part of your life; that is being foolish, and will only set you up for further hurt and heartache.”
“You can forgive and forget a single instance of bad behavior if it is properly acknowledged—but if a pattern forms, then the apologies begin to sound hollow, and you question the person’s intent or ability to change behavior. … If they don’t have accountability, remorse, and if the issue keeps happening, and we keep forgiving them when all they offer up is more empty words, then this isn’t forgiveness, it’s us being in denial.”
Fairness vs. Growth: Accept that "fairness" isn't a thing. You may never get an apology, an acknowledgment, or see justice. The other people the narcissist is manipulating may never see things the way you do, may reject your framing of the situation, and you have to let that go: you can’t get what you want from the abuser, and you can’t make other people see the light until they’re ready—but you can still move on. And you can turn the unfairness of what happened to you into an opportunity for growth. There is a thing called post-traumatic growth (PTG): “With great pain can come great transformation.” This doesn’t happen for everyone but with effort, a survivor can turn their experience into clarity and self-actualization.
Editing/edition note: I'm reading other reviews now that note editing errors, including spelling, grammar, and repetition. There are paragraphs repeated verbatim in the book, which is an editing error, but which didn't bother me because I can use the repetition. I listened to and read the book both, often listening to a section and then re-reading it immediately after, as if for an exam, so I was already doing repetition. I do recommend the audiobook as she's a good narrator and somehow I absorbed the information better when I heard it. (Not always true of audio vs visual.) The other benefit of an audiobook is there are no spelling errors. :)