“Could he really say anything about classical concepts of art, and therefore beauty, being based on harmony, as opposed to modern theories, post-industrial-revolution, post-psychoanalysis, based on sickness and dysfunction?”
The master of body horror, David Cronenberg, has written an esoteric debut novel that proves that the director is confident with a narrative story beyond dialogue and images. He allows the reader to form the visuals themselves that he graphically describes in print. Cronenberg leaves some psychological motivations to the imagination, but as far as vivid body mutilation, not much is left to ponder there. He captures it, almost casually, raw, and sometimes with an absurd delicacy. It isn’t for the weak of stomach or the faint of heart! And, like certain exotic diets, it won’t go down or digest well with everybody.
Two photojournalist lovers, Naomi and Nathan, often communicate through their technology because they are usually traveling for work at different ends of the world. Here, Naomi is in Paris investigating a celebrity academic couple, Aristide and Célestine Arosteguy, existential and possibly nihilistic philosophers. An allegation that Aristide has killed his wife, mutilated her, and eaten her, is being investigated. Meanwhile, Nathan travels to Budapest to photograph an unlicensed surgeon perform cutting edge surgery on a young woman with breast cancer. How these two stories finally connect is through people, technology, a rare STD, North Korea, global politics, cannibalism, Body Integrity Disorder (particularly apotemnophilia) and Cronenberg's active, vivid imagination about the concept of beauty and artistic innovation.
Cronenberg pulls off a quasi-linear narrative (albeit with some accessible jumps back in time to reveal history) that, while shocking, failed to really seduce me while I was reading it, fascinating though it was. It was cold, cerebral, and detached. However, I waited several days to write this review to see how it would linger in me. My conclusion is that the director was effective in transmitting florid and shadowy images behind my eyes, even as the characters fade. And, as a film director, it is what he does best. He frightens through hyper-surrealism, and leaves you with fears beyond the savage acts of his characters. The finale is both coy and suggestive, which conveys that the horror of being monitored, of privacy quashed by a terroristic government, may not be many steps apart from our society of social media fetishism. The crimes and the criminals have some blurry lines to navigate, and our obsession with images, the “other,” and social media have consequences.
There are many themes to explore here, and Cronenberg is no doubt an intrepid genius and techno-obsessed (especially Apple and Nikon). I have to admit, though, that I didn’t enjoy this book, but was riveted by his combo of psychological and body horror, and felt compelled to see where it was going. Like watching surgery on LSD. I did feel that Cronenberg’s characters are largely straw-like—the relationships often felt contrived—selected only to further his themes and harrowing plot. Aristide did come alive, as did Sophie Roiphe, at intervals. But it was not enough to convince me to empathize. Of the Davids, I prefer Lynch.
This is certainly a filmic book, in the Cronenberg-esque vintage way. And this may appeal to certain fans of the macabre. But, it is a matter of taste. It went down hard and cold for me.