Disclaimer: This is an entire literary analysis that I wrote for English class, so bear with me.
Jason Quinn, the author of Gandhi: My Life is My Message wants readers to think that Gandhi was a noble person who stood by his morals to get through tough times; a beacon of hope and a source of inspiration and awe even with his faults. This is shown through the details that were included in and omitted from the novel, along with the use of different literary devices, as to not tarnish his image. But have you ever considered that the Great Soul may not be so great after all?
Quinn did not hesitate to include many details that framed Gandhi in quite a positive light. He fasted to atone for the sins of others, rather than punishing them. He preached non-violence, wanting only peace in the world. He stood up for untouchables when they were segregated from others in their own community. However, you can find that many details were quickly skimmed over, or even omitted altogether, if you look closely. A quick search on the internet provides a large variety of sources that all claim disturbing things about Gandhi. Many articles state that Gandhi, while portrayed as a hero, was actually a racist individual who sexually abused and degraded women. It is documented that in 1903, the Great Soul himself expressed that he thought “the white race in South Africa should be the predominating race.” He also took it upon himself to say that black people are “troublesome, very dirty and live like animals,” while lamenting the fact that Indians are considered to be closer in relation to black people than white. It has also been discovered that he slept with his grandnieces when he was an old man and they were teenagers as an alleged test of willpower to overcome his sexual desires. He would force women to bed him with promises of purification and salvation. He conducted twisted “experiments” on many individuals, forbidding them from sleeping with their own husbands in favor of indulging his own wishes.
None of this is represented in any way in the novel, which leads one to think that perhaps the author does not want to acknowledge Gandhi’s major flaws, only cherry picking certain smaller faults of his that would make him seem like an actual human rather than a shiny copper statue or a monster that clawed its way up from hell. Instead of showing him as a corrupt individual who brought pain into the lives and legacies of many, he is portrayed as a good man who made simple mistakes as we all do, stressed over things that we all would stress about, yet still always does what is right. He sticks to his faith and his morals to make the correct decisions, even accepting his death with God’s name on his lips. In reality, Gandhi frequently did not uphold his Hindu faith, oftentimes twisting the concepts and morals he claims to solidly stand by to suit his own needs at the time.
One thing, however, that is touched on in the novel is Gandhi’s mistreatment of his wife, Kasturba. This was likely included due to the fact that it is quite inevitable, as Kasturba did play a large role in his life, though the majority of their interactions see her as a victim to his aggression and neglect. Gandhi repeatedly leaves his wife and family to pursue his current interests, not taking her advice, and treating her like she knows nothing. He rids her of all her possessions, saying that she is being selfish and that they should go to the better of the community rather than one person. He fails to look after his family time and time again, then comes running back to them expecting everything to be normal. However, characters in the novel rarely question this, accepting him back immediately with open arms. Any slip ups and mistakes made by Gandhi, big or small, are quickly brushed over in the novel. The author even implies that Gandhi was in the right in many distasteful situations that occurred due to him. This is a clear sign of bias, as the author wants to paint him in a positive light, and is very forgiving of his faults.
Many patterns surface in the events that occur in this novel, both visually and through the events that take place. This can be a good thing in some cases, but a bad thing in others. The use of visual repetition – usually through colors – helps the reader decipher the tone of certain parts of the story, and also ties events together using a common element throughout the book.
However, the use of repetition in events that occur is a whole different story. This novel sees the same things happening over and over again, resulting in a muddled mess of what is supposedly Gandhi’s entire life. He runs into a problem. He solves it peacefully. He runs into another. He fasts. The cycle repeats. He is able to worm his way out of all the issues that come his way, using his “morals” and his “faith” to back him each time. However, he repeatedly changes the meaning of his beliefs to suit his current situation, and this is always brushed off like it’s nothing. Then the cycle repeats once more. This creates a storyline that is difficult to follow, as similar events occur frequently, yet the standards that are set for the reader are constantly changing. This can prove to be quite confusing, as readers wouldn’t be able to recall a consistent and solid plot for this novel since everything blends together simultaneously like bananas in a smoothie and sheets of metal in a food processor, with events drawn out and repeated but messages and themes strewn all over the place. The use of colors too, in this case, suddenly becomes a negative aspect of the novel, as it makes all the events jumble together even more.
The same themes do resurface often, but in different ways from before and unexpected places. The idea of nonviolence is an example of something that comes up often in the novel, yet is portrayed by the characters in a peculiar way. Gandhi pledges to this ideal, refusing to ever harm another person and resolving to solve every conflict through peace and negotiation. However, he has handled arguments with his wife physically, threatening to throw her out of the house and dragging her forcefully through a doorway. He also demonstrates violence in non-physical ways, harming his son emotionally through threatening to hurt himself if he misbehaves, slapping himself and planning to fast in order to teach his son a lesson for doing something as trivial as buying and eating a piece of candy. This can be even more scarring than any act of physical violence, and Gandhi is repeatedly shown to be quite manipulative of those around him too. However, as per usual, this is disregarded and quickly dismissed, being briefly sandwiched between the cycles of conflicts and “peaceful solutions.”
Through all of this, Gandhi is still always portrayed as a saint. Juxtaposition is often used in this book as another method to highlight the positive traits of our main character, and emphasize the bad sides of others. Gandhi is juxtaposed with war hardened soldiers as a kid to emphasize his innocence, and with rich politicians as an adult to show that he stayed humble throughout his life. This is a simple method, yet a very effective one all the same. It makes it seem so that even if you believe he is not a great person, he is still at least the lesser of evils in a situation where nobody is completely right. However, for the most part, Gandhi is still framed as a good person through comparisons with others, seeming like a person who simply wants the best for everybody even if that may not always be true.
Personally, I don’t quite agree with the author’s methods for writing this novel. Nobody should be praised as a hero, as we all have flaws. And taking in the things that Gandhi actually did, I’d say that his actions are more than just mistakes, and he should be held accountable for them instead of being painted as a saint who did no wrong. The author does a pretty good job of making Gandhi look like a good person, but the amount of censorship in the story makes for a choppy plotline, and it’s difficult to remove all of his wrongdoings completely. Trying to make him seem like a flawless hero backfired in a way, as it sets expectations that are not easily met, especially by a person like him. Many of the events that occur in the novel are historically accurate, but there were definitely fictional events that were included to help boost Gandhi’s image. Generally, I think that the author’s detail choice was a bit questionable as it makes for quite the boring read, and not everything adds to the story or is important in any way. Still, kudos to the author and the artists for this novel for putting in so much effort to make a graphic novel like this one. A product like this takes a lot of time, but the faulty plotline and apparent bias push me to say that it was not worth the read.
Jason Quinn, the author of Gandhi: My Life is My Message wants readers to think that Gandhi was a noble person who stood by his morals to get through tough times; a beacon of hope and a source of inspiration and awe even with his faults. It works, in some ways, but in others it falls flat. Recurring themes and detail choice make for a pretty picture of a seemingly perfect life. While there are some lessons that can be learned from this figure, he must be remembered for his wrongdoings as well, and not only the things he did right.