Beginning a book is like entering someone's house for the first time. You might feel a little uncomfortable and unsure about your host; your initial apprehension may develop into a sense of ease and reassurance or, barely across the threshold, you might feel that you are about to have a experience you will savour, with someone whose every word and action is beguiling.
I was half way through the prelude to the first chapter of'The Snows of Yesteryear' when I felt completely beguiled. That feeling of being in the company of someone who not only had an engaging story to tell, but who could tell it with vivid details and astounding insight, using fully ripened language was there from the beginning and never let up until, at the point of departure, it faltered just a little.
Through five main chapters we learn about the life of a boy whose family is materially privileged but emotionally fractured. Each of those chapters focuses on a person who was central to Gregor's life as he grew towards manhood, beginning with Cassandra, a maid as untamed as she is spirited. Right at the start we learn that They had peeled her out of her peasant garb and had instantly consigned the shirt, the wrap skirt, the sleeveless sheepskin jacket and the leather buskins to the flames. Devoid of all her colour, Cassandra says: They turned a goldfinch into a sparrow. For Gregor she represents a whole other way of being. Described as "simian", she nonetheless introduces Gregor, in a casual, though not entirely unintentional way, to sensual experiences which, even at a young age, he recognises as significant: behind the black silken curtain of Cassandra's hair, in the baking-oven warmth of her strong peasant corporeality, I found refuge at all times from whatever pained me. Their closeness is a cause of irritation to Gregor's neurotic mother, but eventually it is age that begins to break the bond as, at age 8, the intrusive nature of potty time can be tolerated no longer and a rift occurs. But nothing can take from the impact that this woman with strong roots in the north of Romania has on a boy whose early childhood is marked by a sense of belonging nowhere.
Not only did the family have to flee Czernowitz, in Bukovina because of World War 1, but on making their way as far as Trieste they were forced, after less than a year, to move again this time to a village in Lower Austria. That idyll had to be abandoned too for a house in Vienna before an eventual return to Czernowitz. But had they never left Bukovina, the turmoil and empire-building of the 20th century would have meant that they would have been a part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, then Romania, then split between Romania and the Soviet Union before becoming a part of the Ukrainian SSR, at which time Czernowitz became Chernovtsy!
Little wonder that Gregor's mother was a deeply unhappy woman, but it seems that far more than history impinged on her and formed her into a woman who was incapable of being happy and who seemed to have no idea of how contentment might be achieved and so remained always in the rusting shell of her unapproachability. Dissatisfaction with a life that was permanently out of focus meant that she was continuously finding fault with those around her, with vexation all too easily turning into sharp cruelty. Even so I was shocked when Gregor said that All too often her demonstrations of maternity had had the earmarks of rape. It is difficult to find any evidence in Gregor's detailing of their relationship that quite justifies that accusation, but he has nonetheless an astonishing ability to incisively analyse the precise nature of his mother's dilemma:
The strictness of her own upbringing had established for her a world cast in primer-like simplicity, which contained no real human beings but merely standard roles whose comportment was assigned irrespective of individuality, character, temperament or nervous disposition...any deviation into the specifically individual was a step towards chaos
Another element in the unsatisfactory life of Gregor's mother is her marriage to a man whose passion is hunting which results in his being absent much of the time. In attempting to explain his father's compulsion to kill wild animals Gregor says: that his all consuming passion for hunting was in reality an escape to and a shelter from the reminder of a truer and unrealised vocation...A gesture of defiance stood at the very origin of his fixation- indeed, obstinate defiance was the determining trait in his character. He does have a job too which involves visiting old monasteries to examine the artifacts they possess. Some of Gregor's happiest times were spent accompanying his father on expeditions which encompassed both facets of his life and allowed Gregor to experience moments of transcendent and revelatory beauty:
We are guests of the abbot; with paternal kindliness the prior shows me fifteenth-century illuminated manuscripts in bindings of chased silver ; sunlight falls through the tall windows, in broad stripes alive with dancing motes of dust, into the semidarkness of the library, and outside, jays are heard quarreling in the pines; my longing thoughts wander to the glories of the autumnal forest beyond the church walls blazing in picture-book colours.
He portrays his father as a man who was far more even-tempered than his mother,but who had several dark and unpleasant aspects to his character too, most notably a vicious antisemitism which contrasts with Gregor's mother who was much liked by her Jewish neighbours.
Gregor's sister was four years older than him and he attached major significance to those years, believing that she had foundational experiences which steadied her life in a way which eluded him. But he would eventually become much older than her because her life was to end long before it should have when she succumbed to just the sort of disease her mother had spent her life worrying about and through this horrible affliction her mother finally found a purpose by attending constantly to the daughter who, when she was healthy had been much less favored by her mother. In contrast she had always been doted on, and indulged fully, by a father who, now that she was ill, withdrew completely and stayed where he could not witness the indignity of her final weeks.
Above, around and within this family the benign presence of the children's governess Bunchy prevailed. Warm and encouraging Bunchy whose laughter was reminiscent of pigeons cooing. Both children learned much from this deeply knowledgeable woman:
When a certain pettiness of outlook degenerated into stubborn narrow-mindedness , Bunchy's determined intervention drew our attention to basic discrepancies between the conception of life held by normal civilized people and that held by us. We then made haste to follow her implicit injunction
Although Gregor was not suited to the conventions of the school system he developed into a man with an outstanding ability to record the endlessly complicated ways in which people choose, or are forced, to live their lives. Bunchy, it would seem, more than any of the others opened up the world for him. Within that world Gregor had available to him four amazingly divergent examples of womanhood. Yet he is honest enough to tell us that he had, throughout his life and in his relationships with women, a cold heart.
I found some evidence of that cold heart in the epilogue to this book and I still can't decide whether or not it was wise to include it. By revisiting Czernowitz he was always going to be disappointed. What I feel he fails to appreciate is the extent to which a city of ones youth - a place in which one can , for a little while, believe in the limitless possibilities of oneself and of the city - can never be revisited because it was always more than just a physical reality. By recounting his understandable disappointments he risks being just another grumpy man, finding fault with the many ways in which the world has changed. Except that here, because of the subjugations of communism, almost nothing has changed: I couldn't get over it. There could be no doubt that this was indeed the Cernauti of my childhood, tangibly concrete and real- and yet it wasn't the Czernowitz whose vision I had carried in me for half a century. Famously, of course, you can't go home again and I'm inclined to wish he hadn't.
But this is a remarkable book, evocative, witty and beautifully written.