The sins of the father is one of those ambiguous titles which may fit more than one character. But the most sinful AND the most fruitful of them is Hugo Barrington. The way the book is written simplifies reading. Each section carries its own motivations and villains. The most enjoyable passages for yours truly were the Maysie Clifton and Hugo ones.
The sins of the father unabashedly panders to being a commercial page turner. Having read a couple of Jeffrey Archer books about 20 years ago, I've come to the thought, having read this book, that the author has simplified his writing to confirm a boost in sales. The story has few surprises, for a historical novel where the main person is supposed dead. This choice may have forced the author when he decided not to make his protagonists suffer too much.
When Harry is incarcerated, I was totally certain that there will be grim accounts of him being subject to amorous advances from customers criminally tougher than Harry. The words rape and butt sex kept coming to me and I wanted such accounts to be dealt through quickly so we can move to saner things. But my fears were unfounded. I can offer no clearer evidence of how sanitized this book is than to mention the lack of prison rape.
Like I said, the writer treats his character with great care. The saddest chapter, IMHO, is the very first one. Each section of the book is dedicated to one character. And these sections consist of tiny arcs where good and bad things happen quickly and successively. The people concerned never suffer much, and if they do, it's not for long. The deaths of Terry Bates, Quinn and doubtlessly, Olga are rushed. I was so sad for Olga. Her motivations are fake, but this fake person suffered the most in the book. For me, her case is even more a waste of life than those fallen in war.
Jeffrey Archer had to write a book with conflict, but he does his utmost to keep rewarding his readers with a flurry of mini happy endings. What's more, the writer pitched a series of happy endings at the end and punctuated the book with a cliffhanger. Return of the King, eat your heart out. This is why I believe that the writer accepted the limitation on his imagination and embraced his book's paucity of originality. I think the author's first notes didn't differ from the final output in quality. And that is not a sin. I recommend this book to people who like to read bestsellers.