I've had Swift Rivers on my to-read list for many years due to its setting my state of Minnesota. It's a work of historical fiction set in northern Minnesota and along the Mississippi River in 1835. Seventeen year old Chris Dahlberg, an orphan who has long lived with his mean-spirited uncle, finds himself thrown out of his uncle's home. His aged grandfather lives nearby, and is quickly becoming too old to continue living alone and supporting himself. Chris and his Grandfather come up with a plan - They will cut timber to float downriver and sell at a faraway Mississippi River port. Chris can bring back the proceeds for them to live on.
The plan seems impossible, and Chris' uncle is opposed (and tries to stop them). But when the logs are cut, Chris, with the help of friends, begins the journey down a fictional tributary of the Mississippi, and on to the Mississippi itself - but not without encountering various challenges along the way and new friendships along the way.
The overall premise of the story is fine - It makes for a nice coming-of-age sort of story as the main character Chris needs to work hard and overcome challenges. I would probably give it four stars if it weren't for the many glaring historical and geographic inaccuracies in the portrayal of Minnesota in 1835. As it is, I only rate it 3 stars.
First, there are multiple references to a mountain range in northern Minnesota. There are no mountains in Minnesota (some nice river bluffs and a few quite large hills near Lake Superior that could almost be mountains, but definitely no mountain range as is mentioned numerous times).
Second, the dates for settlement of the frontier areas of the state are way, way off. The valley in which Chris' extended family resides is supposed to be in the northernmost reaches of the Louisiana purchase territory. This area was not open to European settlers in 1835, much less nearly a century earlier when the valley was supposedly settled. Chris' family is of Swedish descent, but with a couple of isolated exceptions, Swedish settlers didn't begin coming to Minnesota until 1845, and much more so in the 1850s and beyond.
Finally, geographically speaking, the placement for the mouth of the fictional river into the Mississippi makes no sense. The mouth of the river is described as being about 100 miles north of Prairie Du Chien, which would put it in SE Minnesota, south of Red Wing and north of Winona. Given actual Mississippi river tributaries and drainage patterns, it is really hard to imagine any river could start in the north where this river is supposed to have started, and not flow either earlier into the Mississippi or flow first into the Minnesota river.
To be honest, I found these major historical inaccuracies to be very distracting, and caused me to doubt the historical accuracy of portions of the book set further south along the Mississippi river. I have less knowledge of either these areas or about the process of taking logs down the river, so I can't really comment on the accuracy here either way.
I realize this book was written 90 years ago, and perhaps historical accuracy was not as prized in that time period by historical fiction writers (nor was information as easily available). However I know that Maud Hart Lovelace was writing adult works of historical fiction during this very same time period (late 20s through the 1930s), and her books are a much more accurate portrayal of Minnesota life in the frontier era - so clearly, information was available to authors even in 1932 if they sought it out.
In general, I think readers interested in frontier life, logging, or the steamboat era on the Mississippi river will find this book to be of interest - as long as you aren't expecting to read it to get an accurate feel of Minnesota in the time it was set!
Content Considerations:
Stereotypical portrayal of Native Americans - Native Americans are referred to as "red men" and "savages" as well as childlike and easily distracted by gambling.