The Outcasts of 19 Schuyler Place was an interesting book at the time I read it. At a glance Margaret Rose Kane is like any other protagonist in a story, only to grow as the story continues. From a very basic summary Margaret is sent to a summer camp while her parents supposedly neglect her in favor of a trip to Peru. Her attitude towards the camp is one that emits negativity, refusing to do anything the counselors say just to spite everyone around her. To her credit this attitude eventually succeeds, although not in the most exciting fashion, and she finds herself at her uncles' house 19 Schyyler Place.
19 Schuyler Place holds three gigantic towers that her uncles have passionately created over their lifetime. It is these three towers that become a focal point of the story as the neighborhood plan to demolish the three towers. Their reasoning differs from my recollection - from endangering neighboring houses, to disrupting the flow and regulations of the area.
As the story progresses the uncles slowly begin to wane in their prevention of the demolition. They begin to spend more time away from the house, presumably to not show their pained expressions to Margaret. For the stubborn Margaret Rose however, she is not willing to let the towers go down without a fight and she begins her elaborate plan.
All that summary could have been taken away by the blurb of the book, which I admittedly used to refresh my memory (because it has been so long since I've read the story), but from a review standpoint it was difficult to give it a solid rating. I find it difficult to give books a proper numerical rating as I was in ALL of my prior "reviews". Before it was simple enough to just give it a 5 if it met entertaining status, a 4 if it had noticeable flaws, and anything lower would be based on my judgement. However now that 5-6 years have passed I realize that this book shouldn't be measured or compared against the other books I "reviewed". If I were to give it a four - does that mean it was worse than a five? Better than a three? No. It's not to compare this book to another based on how many stars it holds on a site. It just means that at the time of the review, I thought it deserved this much out of a total five.
Margaret Rose develops as much as any other protagonist would, like you expect from a novel that is directed towards young readers. Despite that there were simple allusions that would sometimes throw the reader for a loop. At certain points in the story it seems like the government had won, there was no winning solution in a losing fight, when they were outnumbered from the start. Margaret gains allies slowly and by doing so she gains confidence and new insight towards characters that she once saw as differently.
As the blurb read it said, "Margaret Rose is outraged and determined to strike a blow for art, for history, and for individuality". 4-5 years ago when I first read this I thought nothing more about it. Now however it seems that the symbolism in the tower is not just these three traits, but the stake of being different. Having the towers in the backyard of 19 Schuyler Place IS different. It's something that not many people can say they have. In the eyes of the neighborhood, such a drastic change is something that can't be overlooked and that it must be conformed to otherwise looks like a everybody else. It's an odd take on the book, believe me I couldn't quite understand my own thinking myself, but it's one that looks more and more believable if you look at all the little telltale signs the book gives. Being different, being the same or fitting in - it's a topic that many young readers can connect to. Especially in the classroom and outside of it, there's an ever-going battle of accepting difference. This becomes more and more obvious at the ending or you could look no further than the title - Outcasts.
The Outcasts of 19 Schuyler Place manages to be very poetic at times where I don't expect it to. The writing came across as very simple, but required some thought process to be used to see an underlining meaning that the story was inferring.
An example of that is the internal conflict between Margaret and her parents. This conflict could've been more played out but I'm guessing that wouldn't have made for the best read for students. This conflict reveals itself to be something more serious towards the end, but the story is still very safe with domestic conflict. This isn't the only thing that needs to be inferred upon but it's one that's revealed early on and not expanded upon until later.
That being said I'm not sure who I would recommend this for. It's not for adult readers, but I can't wholeheartedly recommend it to the very young as well. In actuality I think it's fine to read this in junior high and high school as well, although the diction might seem a little too easy at that education level. The story ends with what I thought was a satisfying ending. It ties up the loose ends of certain characters that you may not have given a second thought to, although it's more like a brief summary than an epilogue. There are some thoughts that I would like to have answered, but it's not realistic to be able to put a lifetime of stories into a simple book.
It did leave me wanting to know more about Margaret - but hopefully Silent to the Bone answers some of my questions. I find it odd how I read the "prequel" before Silent to the Bone - especially since Silent to the Bone was written four years prior to 19 Schuyler Place. However I love the book as a standalone, so I'm not sure how I'm going to approach Silent to the Bone (if I even bother to). There is even an allusion to the book in the epilogue, Margaret even mentions the main character of Silent to the Bone.
In the end I found myself liking Margaret, even more so after all these years later rereading the book. As many changes as there will be in an ever-changing world 19 Schuyler Place will always rest between it's neighbors 17 and 21.