Ways of Escape is a book that Anthony Bourdain said he read many times and kept coming back to. This recommendation, plus having just finished reading The Quiet American, compelled me to read it.
In Ways of Escape, Graham puts some of his novels, short stories, films, and plays into context. For Graham Greene fans, this book is a chance to see the world through the mind of a great writer.
Reflecting on his life, Graham concludes that he has always been trying to escape reality (i.e. responsibility). For Graham, writing is everything: “It is for the sake of creation that one lives…”
“I can see now that my travels, as much as the act of writing, were ways of escape.”
“I wonder how all those who do not write, compose, or paint can manage to escape the madness, melancholia, the panic fear which is inherent in the human situation. Auden noted: “Man needs escape as he needs food and deep sleep.””
Graham writes of his experiences surrounding his first novels and how he can barely stomach reading them now. A good lesson for aspiring writers: even exceptional authors wrestle with doubts and insecurities, and are ashamed of their earlier efforts. The goal is to get better. You have to start somewhere. And your beginnings will probably be crappy, even if they were published and successful. “I can only wonder why the book was accepted for publication.”
“What do I find when I painfully reread the novel (his own book: Rumor at Nightfall) today?…All is vague, shadowy, out of focus—there are no clear images, but the same extravagant similes and metaphors…There are far too many adjectives and too much explanation of motive, no trust in the reader’s understanding, and overlong description…The dialogue is ambiguous and dialogue in a novel as in a play should be a form of action, with the quickness of action.”
After a bit of success on his first novel, then two subsequent failures, he was in the dumps. But a mysterious Norwegian poet, Nordahl Grieg, entered his life. What was it about Nordahl that was so inspiring? Nordahl was a traveler, adventurer; he seemed to be everywhere all at once. He renewed Graham’s childlike sense of possibility, adventure, fun. “Any plan seemed possible for a few hours after I had read one of Nordahl’s letters.”
Graham represents most of us: he was too tied down, in reality and his imagination, to accept one of Nordahl’s spontaneous invitations to travel. After remembering how Nordahl once invited him to a ski hut near Oslo in the forest: “How I wish I had borrowed, begged or stolen the necessary funds and replied to at least one of those messages—“I arrive on Saturday.””
Nordahl was good company:
“There were always too many other things for Nordahl to talk about.”
With him there were always arguments but never a trace of anger. He always had goodwill and an open mind. “He not only had goodwill himself, but he admitted it in his opponent—he more than admitted it, he assumed it. In fact he had charity, and to me he certainly brought a measure of hope.”
Writers invent their world. Graham often wrote of places he had never seen. Of his novel set in Sweden: “I am amazed now at my temerity in laying the scene of a novel in a city of which I knew so little.”
On his friendship with Herbert Read. “A friendship can be a way of escape, just as much as writing or travel, from the everyday routine, the sense of failure, the fear of the future.”
“We were a generation brought up on adventure stories who had missed the enormous disillusionment of the First World War, so we went looking for adventure…I used to spend Saturday nights looking for an air raid, with little though that in a few months I should have my fill of them in London day and night.”
Graham loved watching movies and writing about them. We cannot plan for the future as it is always changing. The most wonderful things in our lives comes as complete surprises: “The idea of reviewing films came to me at a cocktail party after the dangerous third martini.” After the Spectator’s editor accepted Graham’s proposal, which he expected to be rejected: “I thought that in the unlikely event of his accepting my offer it might be fun for two and three weeks. I never imagined it would remain fun for four and a half years and only end in a different world, a world at war.
As Graham describes his constant writing and lonely travels, I can’t help but wonder what his relationship was like to his wife and kid(s).
“So it is that the material of a novel accumulates, without the author’s knowledge, not always easily, not always without fatigue or pain or even fear.”
“In 1938…trenches were being dug on London Commons, when our children were evacuated carrying gas masks in little cardboard containers to strange homes in the country” In school we learn of battles and bombings but not what it actual experience was like.
“To create a proper atmosphere for work, free from telephone calls and the cries of children, I took a studio in Mecklenburg Square.” How nice I think as my baby starts to cry in his bassinet. How many spouses today would put up this? Well, we get an answer a few pages later…”Sometimes looking back I think that those Benzedrine weeks were more responsible than the separation of war and my own infidelities for breaking our marriage.”
Writing was the only thing that engaged him. “What I was engaged in through those war years was not genuine action—it was an escape from reality and responsibility. To a novelist his novel is the only reality and responsibility.”
Like any pursuit that requires intense concentration, writing requires stability and minimal distraction. Unfortunately for Greene: “Work was not made easier because the booby traps I had heedlessly planted in my private life were blowing up in turn. I had always thought that war would bring death as a solution…but here I was alive, the carrier of unhappiness to people I loved…” He even contemplated suicide. I heard somewhere that he played russian roulette (update: he mentions it in this book, too).
“A novelist often makes a bad husband or an unstable lover.” No shit. Though I love novels, nothing of what Graham says in this book would inspire me to want to write one.
Writing, like life, comes down to decisions. “I couldn’t for months get the character Wilson off his balcony…To get him off the balcony meant making a decision. Two very different novels began on the same balcony with the same character, and I had to choose which one to write.”
The good writer is never satisfied. “It was to prove a book more popular with the public, even with the critics, than with the author. The scales seem too heavily weighted, the plot overloaded, the religious scruples of Scobie too extreme.” The meaning the reader finds in the novel is not what the author intended: “I had meant the story of Scobie to enlarge a theme…the disastrous effect on human beings of pity as distinct from compassion…The character of Scobie was intended to show that pity can be the expression of an almost monstrous pride.”
“Sometimes one wonders why one bothers to travel, to come eight thousand miles to find only _____ at the end of the road…Places in history, one learns, are not so important.”
When asked to write on a decisive battle of his choice, Dien Bien Phu came immediately to his mind. The battle occurred in 1954, and Graham wrote, “The battle marked virtually any hope the Western Powers might have entertained that they could dominate the East...That young Americans were still to die in Vietnam only shows that it takes time for the echoes even of a total defeat to encircle the globe.”
Graham publishes his first play in his fifties. But he had been writing plays since he was 16 years old. Great writers write way more than gets published: “my life as a writer is littered with discarded plays, as it is littered with discarded novels.”
He goes to Havana and spends time in the seedier parts of the city. On why he went to Havana: “ I came there for the sake of the Floridita restaurant, for the brothel life, the roulette in every hotel….the Shanghai Theatre, where for one dollar and twenty-five cents one could see a nude cabaret of extreme obscenity with the bluest of blue films in the intervals. Suddenly it struck me that here in this extraordinary city, where every vice was permissible and every trade possible, lay the true background for my comedy.”
At the Shanghai Theatre, Graham sees Superman perform in person and is underwhelmed (as uninspiring as a dutiful husband’s).
He bought cocaine from his taxi driver but it turned out to be boracic powder. When Graham returned to Havana on a later trip, he sought for the taxi driver who swindled him with boracic powder because he “had no desire for a dull and honest man to be [his] daily companion on this long trip.”
“A writer isn’t so powerless as he usually feels, and a pen, as well as a silver bullet, can draw blood.”
“I felt some pride—as I had when Papa Doc so furiously attacked me—that a mere writer could irritate a dictator so irremovable.”
A few of his stories originated from dreams he had. He frequently mentions how the narrative is always working in the subconscious. “The unconscious collaborates in all our work.” If he ran into an insurmountable obstacle, he would read the day’s work and then sleep on it, and the solution was often waiting for him when he woke up—“perhaps it came in a dream which I have forgotten.”
He says somewhere that the adverb and adjective are overused and signs of bad writing. Describing a good novel: “There is almost a complete absence of the beastly adverb—far more damaging to a writer than an adjective.”
When he first began to write short stories, he experienced boredom. Based on everything he’s written so far in this book, his disinterest in the short story isn’t surprising. The short story is too planned and precise for him. “I knew too much about the story before I began to write—and then all the days of work were unrelieved by any surprise.” A novel, on the other hand, is long enough to get lost and find something unexpected.
But later in life he realizes that he was mistaken in his view of the short story: “It was only the surface of the story which I knew as I began to write—the surprises might not be as far reaching as the novel, but they were there all the same. They came in the unexpected shaping of a sentence, in a sudden reflection, in an unforeseen flash of dialogue.”
Graham said that when writing a novel he sometimes began to dream AS the character. “Sometimes identification with a character foes so far that one may dream his dream and not his own.”
He says somewhere that the reader notices the same faults that the writer notices, but unconsciously. Where did he say that? “One can’t underestimate what Trollope calls “the unconscious critical acumen of the reader.” What the novelist notices the reader probably notices too, without knowing it.”
“I know very well from experience that it is only possible for me to base a very minor character on a real person. A real person stands in the way of the imagination.”
He ends the book with a funny story. For years a con artist, pretending to be Graham Greene, circles the globe, living off Graham’s fame. They never met but the real Graham was impressed-“an adventurous spirit indeed.” His doppelgänger is worthy of a character in one of his own novels. I would read that novel.