Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Behemoth: β-Max (Rifters #3.1)” as Want to Read:
Behemoth: β-Max (Rifters #3.1)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Read Book

Behemoth: β-Max (Rifters #3 part 1)

3.75  ·  Rating details ·  1,612 Ratings  ·  57 Reviews
Starfish lit the fuse. Maelstrom was the explosion. But five years into the aftermath, things aren't quite so simple as they once seemed...

Lenie Clarke-rifter, avenger, amphibious deep-sea cyborg-has destroyed the world. Once exploited for her psychological addiction to dangerous environments, she emerged in the wake of a nuclear blast to serve up vendetta from the ocean f
Hardcover, 304 pages
Published July 1st 2004 by Tor Books (first published 2004)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Behemoth, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Behemoth

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
Chris Berko
Feb 02, 2018 rated it it was amazing
I love the direction this series has taken and I love the flawed characters that inhabit these pages. Without giving anything away, we're back underwater with the claustrophobia and sense of urgency that was present in book one and more harsh truths have been revealed. This is great science fiction and an end of the world scenario that is savage but pragmatic.
Man Ching
Jul 15, 2008 rated it liked it
Shelves: scifi, ebook
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Mar 30, 2011 rated it it was ok

Not that good, but a lot better than Maelstrom - that book really sucked. Again, he seems do best when his scope is artificially limited by setting - in the van in the wasteland, in the underwater complex. He has trouble with open world, but don't we all. More depressingly he took a turn toward the American Psycho, and frankly I hate that shit. Spare me the torture porn, even if you are trying to make a point. Honestly, he's kind of a violent and depraved guy if his books are any indication. In
Jun 03, 2008 rated it liked it
Shelves: scifi
Decent twists and turns in the plot and a nice solid ending outweighed the
occassional gruesome torture scene, but I still could have done without them.
Basic plot: two sociopaths band together to save the world from a third
sociopath. Well, at least they save what is left of the world after five years of
horrible plague and anarchy.

I read the two Behemoth books as one, uninterrupted e-book, so the review is the same for both.
Sep 27, 2007 rated it really liked it
This is the first half of the third book in the Rifters trilogy. Peter Watts' style isn't for everyone ... it's sparse and really pretty dark ... but I really enjoy his books. He has a fairly bleak vision of the future, and his characters aren't what you would typically consider likeable, but I think that's what draws me to his novels. No candy coating here.
Udayan Chakrabarti
Dec 28, 2017 rated it really liked it
The penultimate entry of this exceptional series keeps raising the stakes as the plot builds inexorably towards a nailbiting finale.
Honza Bulušek
Feb 08, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Dark depths of the ocean are back with all their glory. What's not to love?
Apr 22, 2018 rated it liked it
This isn’t a stand alone book, or even a complete novel. It’s part one of the last in the Rifters trilogy and if you haven’t read the first two, you’ll be absolutely lost. If you are continuing with the series, it will still be an effort to figure out what is going on. But it’s still worth the effort.
An uneasy truce between the corpses and the rifters, hiding out in the ocean depths, breaks down, when a new threat emerges. A threat and a cliff hanger that will take Luben and Clarke back to a mu
Mar 19, 2013 rated it really liked it
Długo wyczekiwane zwieńczenie trylogii o Ryfterach wreszcie nadeszło, a Peter Watts po raz kolejny udowadnia, że każdy fan hard science fiction powinien obowiązkowo zapoznać się z jego twórczością. Na kartach „ßehemota” należy więc spodziewać się jeszcze jednej porcji tego, za co polubiliśmy poprzednie tomy — naukowych zjawisk, szczególnie z zakresu biologii i cybernetyki, którym pisarz potrafi nadać realistyczny szlif, pogłębionej psychologii targanych traumami postaci, pesymistycznego nastroju ...more
Ian Mathers
Dec 04, 2013 rated it liked it
Shelves: 2013
The world is not dying, it is being killed. And those that are killing it have names and addresses.
Utah Phillips

As an epigraph for this book, it's hard to fault Watts' choice of the above; depending on how you read it, it mixes black comedy and social responsibility, a very human lust for revenge (even if it probably won't do the world much good) and a despairing awareness that we have very much either created or at least largely contributed to our own problems. This is the instalment where, at
Jun 06, 2013 rated it really liked it
Like other reviewers, I read the combined Creative Commons version of this novel, combining both β-Max and Seppuku. If you plan to read this, plan to read both novels in succession. I don't think the break will do this story justice.

The conclusion of the Rifters trilogy was not what I expected, in much the same way that Maelstrom was not either. In the aggregate, I think I got more out of it this way.

Watts picks up the story 5 years after Lenie Clarke ushers in armaggedon because she felt like i
Bill Purdy
Mar 30, 2009 rated it liked it
Is it me, or is this guy (Watts) most constrained when he's writing about the environment he supposedly knows best (10,000 feet underwater)? Maelstrom felt so much more unbound (pun intended, especially for those of you who've read some of the twisted "erotic" scenes contained therein) than Starfish, and here, when the story returns to the murky depths of the Atlantic ocean, it feels a lot like Starfish all over again -- cold, sterile, and utterly inhuman. Of course, that's precisely what Watts ...more
Brent Werness
Dec 30, 2011 rated it really liked it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Jan 04, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Still has the Wattsian flare, but I feel his narrative is a bit all over the place. Also, this book takes a much bigger step into the sadism side of things, but thankfully it's not overdone. The book definitely picks up in the last third when the tensions are somewhat released and the action kicks off.

It also kind of annoyed me because there felt like a lot of 'recaps' from the previous books. So characters would talk like 'oh yeah well I had to do X back then' and of course, the reader is alrea
Ed French
Feb 17, 2016 rated it really liked it
Probably the best reasons to read this trilogy is the unique perspective the author brings to the table. He's a marine mammal biologist, which has deeply informed the hard science as well as the characterization.

The prose is tight and the world he creates is barely illuminated within it, but it's deeply compelling and draws you into its dark world. It's underwater cyberpunk centered less on digital data and more on simple, brutal, living and killing biological machines.

By the end of the trilogy
Tom Tresansky
Oct 07, 2013 rated it liked it
I think this was my favorite of the series so far. Loved how every motive was suspect and no facts seemed certain, especially about Behemoth and the fate of the surface. Enjoyed the return to the ocean floor setting, but disliked its exclusivity, after opening up the world and scope so much in Maelstrom. Lenie's getting whiny, don't understand why so many people want to follow her now, liked her better as The Destroyer of Worlds. Is Desjardins supposed to be a sympathetic character or a villain? ...more
Compared to the previous book, Maelstrom, this book had significantly fewer passages that focused primarily on technology and science. This third book was more character and story-driven and I thought it moved at a faster pace.

This story held my interest, but it never quite captured me like the first book (Starfish) did. Perhaps it’s because in Starfish the world and the characters were still new and interesting. The story in Starfish was good, but I think it was elevated by the uniqueness of th
Aug 19, 2010 rated it really liked it
short review in ukrainian:
трилогія rifters того ж таки вотса — в дещо іншому жанрі: три частини складаються у пост-апокаліптичний роман-катастрофу, але з елементами кібер-панка, детектива, місцями психологічного трилера, і з елементами фантастики. читається повільно, тому місцями важкувато, але в цілому — цікаво.

* starfish
* maelstrom
* behemoth

трилогія доступна на сайті в різних форматах (див. сторінки кожної частини), а сам ве
Mar 29, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: at-home
The first of the two part last book of the Rifters Trilogy, this is almost a full and complete story in itself, however it is only the first part of an actual full and complete story. At this point, we're still following our hero, but other characters from the previous book Maelstrom are still around. This is five years after the end of the last book.

I enjoyed this one because we return to the depths of the ocean and some of the social dysfunction of the first book. It is sadly only the first pa
Andreea Pausan
Mar 20, 2015 rated it really liked it
After the strangeness of the deep and the revenge carried by Lennie across the continents, 5 years later, the civilization is almost destroyed. Virtual Lennie survives and fights and replicates and dies in the remaining jungle of the Maelstrom. Achilles Desjardins is a demi-god finally giving in to his sadistic psychopath nature while holding the fort against the catastrophes plaguing the planet. At the bottom of the Atlantic, "fish-heads"and "corpses" have a fragile alliance, ready to collapse ...more
Jan 13, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: science-fiction
Part one of the conclusion of the Rifters trilogy opens five years after Maelstrom, in a world in which Lenie and a bunch of Rifters have an uneasy truce with the "corpses" (corporate types) in their subsea station, a disjunctive development I didn't find entirely plausible, but of course it doesn't last, as things get even worse. Not really a stand-alone; ends on a cliff-hanger, with a new biothreat, called Seppuku, on the loose, and Clarke and Lubin headed back to the surface for what one can ...more
Aug 29, 2015 rated it it was ok
Verschenen in twee boeken (βehemoth: β-Max en βehemoth: Seppuku). Ik heb de online versie in één volume op mijn Kindle gezet.

Ik ga er heel erg kort over zijn: No Sir, I Didn't Like It.

Ik heb er mij doorgesleept, maar het was met tegenzin. Ergens een fijn idee, daar niet van, maar ik had de indruk dat de man zijn boek gewoon niét heeft laten nalezen voor het gepubliceerd werd: minstens de helft te lang. En een einde dat geen einde is. Hopelijk is het vervolg even goed als het mij beloofd was. Ve
Aug 14, 2013 rated it it was ok
Oh man, we've really hit bottom haven't we? While the computerese in the previous one was awful, in this one it is plain ridiculous. And the plot is, by now, a tired old thing. Behemoth in the first book was a superbug, in the second they have something they can do about, and in the the third somebody tweaks it? What, just to carry the story forward? Run out of ideas have we, Mr. Watts?

I'm giving up on Seppuku.
May 22, 2012 rated it liked it
well written with a lot more emphasis on the people and I'm glad to have Lenie back in the water but ultimately there's something about this book I just didn't enjoy (prbly Nolan).Lenie seems to have lost most of her punch and while it's nice to have her be the more grounded sympathetic character she's lost whatever it was that made her the meltdown Madonna and now she's just a passenger along for the ride.
Oct 03, 2013 rated it really liked it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Jan 27, 2016 rated it liked it
Definetly meant to be read as part of a whole, breaking up Behemoth into two books means this book really feels like a middle part, with no real ending. If you have read the first two in the series it is worth reading to see to the end, but if you haven't, start at the beginning. It would be hard to jump in this late in the story.
Dec 24, 2009 rated it really liked it
I really like how this author combines so much science into the books. For someone coming from that background, while I'm not sure all of the stuff is feasible, it certainly makes for an interesting story.
Jul 17, 2011 rated it liked it
Eh. Finished Part 1 (this book), now on to Part 2. So far not impressed. Too many characters, and too many unnecessary uses of the word rape - enough to make me uncomfortable. Still, I have the entire second part, so we'll see if it redeems itself.
Mar 12, 2012 rated it really liked it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Jim Phillips
Sep 21, 2011 rated it did not like it
Shelves: science-fiction
There needs to be an option for "Given Up On".

Starfish was a decent, tight little story. Malestom was something of a mess, but still entertaining enough. But this is just terrible. I made it about 50 pages, and quit. This now takes the distinction as the only book I've ever given up on.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Scratch Monkey
  • Star Dragon
  • Eastern Standard Tribe
  • Neptune Crossing (Chaos Chronicles, #1)
  • Deadstock
  • Moonseed (NASA Trilogy, #3)
  • Postsingular
  • Ascending (League of Peoples, #5)
  • Worldwired (Jenny Casey, #3)
  • A Call to Arms
  • Ghost War
  • Cretaceous Dawn
  • Ventus
  • The Collected Stories of Vernor Vinge
  • Everyone in Silico
  • The Cassandra Complex (Emortality, #1)
  • The Ascent of Everest
  • The Caryatids

Other books in the series

Rifters (3 books)
  • Starfish (Rifters, #1)
  • Maelstrom (Rifters, #2)
  • Behemot (Rifters, #3)
“Failure to converge. Confidence limits exceeded.

Further predictions unreliable.”
“If there’s one thing I’m the world’s greatest expert on, it’s how it feels to be me. And” 0 likes
More quotes…