Always inventive and sharply observant, often witty, each of these stories is told in the same neurotic, emotionally detached, first-person voice. The dust flap says that this book “crashes through our carefully built mirages”. While I don’t feel it accomplishes this, it is often interesting and thought-provoking, and one of the stories ("Peking Duck") I have ranked among my top ten reads of the year!
Though each story is presumably told by a different character, the protagonists all feel the same. All are unhappy: unhappy with their romantic relationships, unhappy with their families, unhappy with where they live, unhappy with where they used to live, unhappy with their present, unhappy with their past. They tend to see everyone else as abusive to them, physically and/or emotionally. Sometimes this is clearly true, e.g., the ex-boyfriend who beat up one of the narrators, although it also sometimes feels like the result of just habitually looking for abuse wherever it can actually or allegedly be found, not hanging around where it cannot, and clinging to it once located, defining their lives by it, returning to it again and again.
That being said, I did enjoy aspects of most of the stories, and one in particular is worth reading even if you skip the rest of it.
Below is how I’d rank each of the individual stories:
"Los Angeles" 3/5 stars - clever magic-realism scenario (the woman’s 100 ex-boyfriends live with her and her family); witty; unsatisfying conclusion
"Oranges" 3/5 stars - great premise (a woman follows home the man who once beat her up); unsatisfying conclusion.
"G" 2/5 stars The most blatantly George Saunders-esque; includes clever riffs on the “what if” (“What if a drug could make one invisible?”); unsatisfying conclusion.
"Yeti Lovemaking" 3/5–witty; clever premise; some laugh-out-loud moments; insubstantially developed; unsatisfying conclusion.
"Returning" 3/5 a complex story in search of direction; the opening scenario of a husband abandoning his wife on a plane is intriguing; unsatisfying conclusion.
"Office Hours" 1/5: a tedious story of unhappy people in academia; Stephen King-esque magic-realism element that seems important but ultimately contributes nothing to the story; unsatisfying conclusion.
"Peking Duck" 4.5/5 Peking Duck is by far the most successful of the stories. Poignant. Complex. Multiply and importantly self-referential. At first it seems like the meta references are just going to be intellectually playful and show-offy, but in the end they turn out to be very important and profound. I’m glad the author doesn’t draw any conclusions about cliche vs lived reality in stories, or about appropriation, or about the efficacy of first-person narration, but they are topics worthy of being mentioned and reflected upon both in general and in reference to this story.
Note: Here, I believe we learn why I find each of the other stories has an “unsatisfying conclusion.” The narrator labels one of her grad student peers a “Plot Nazi” –suggesting perhaps that Ma does not like storylines; I do. Never the twain shall meet. Oddly, this is the story with the most satisfying plot.
"Tomorrow": 1/5: Disturbing, full-of-potential premise of a fetus’s arm that starts hanging out in the open early in a pregnancy; includes the other usual Ma-ian tropes: bad boyfriends, bad family, bad U.S.; storyline fails to pan out (no surprise now); unsatisfying conclusion.