December 30, 2014,
I wrote most of the below review back in April, and looking back on it now I was clearly overreacting to a little public embarrassment. That being said, I did discover one or two other minor factual errors in this tome that some thorough editing should have discovered. In truth, no large nonfiction book is without unintentional errors or typos, and the few that I found here did little, in the long run, to mar my experience.
The American Patriot's Almanac is actually a quite useful book. You'll find reprinted herein many of the most important documents of the American Republic: The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, including The Bill of Rights and the other Amendments, The Gettysburg Address, and The Emancipation Proclamation. You'll also find the official guidelines for handling and displaying the American Flag, and a rundown of the basic facts, statistics, and symbols of the 50 U.S. states. The daily readings are also a wealth of interesting anecdotes from the U.S. history and the myriad of colorful individuals who have lived it.
It's quite clear that the two authors are proud to be Americans and are proud of all that this great nation has achieved. At the same time they are still mindful of the tragic mistakes of the past and how much more needs to be done if the United States is to live up to those founding principles of Liberty, Justice, and Equality under the Law for all.
I've decided not to delete what I previously wrote about this book, and it is printed below if you wish to read it.
My final verdict is that this book is a great companion to any history buff or armchair historian.
***
One of the most important concepts in writing is the “rhetorical triangle,” also called the “reader/writer triangle.” This concept envisions a piece of writing as a transaction involving three principle components: The author, the written word, and the audience. In all writing, but particularly in nonfiction, it is the writer’s responsibility to establish and maintain credibility with the reader. If that credibility is lost, you have lost the reader. That’s why, more than anything else, accuracy is of primary importance in nonfiction. The presence of a single inaccuracy or misstatement of fact (whether by deliberate deception or a simple honest error) can cause a whole book or article to be suspect. Remember, the easiest thing for a reader to do is to stop reading.
Amazingly, some authors appear to take these seemingly obvious notions for granted. Let me share a case in point I encountered just today.
On page 117 of The American Patriot’s Almanac (2010) is a list of noteworthy events in American history that happened on today’s date, April 2. The last item on the list states that on April 2, 1953 “[the] journal Nature publishes a paper by British scientist Francis Crick and American scientist James Watson, describing a double helix structure for DNA.”
Having no reason to doubt the information, I took the authors at their word and posted the supposed fact on Twitter. Unfortunately for me, it is not true. Within a few minutes, Nature magazine itself responded to my post and corrected me. Watson and Crick’s landmark paper was submitted to Nature on April 2, 1953. It was not published until April 25. A small discrepancy, but facts matter. I was mortified. I had tweeted to my 170 plus followers information that I believed to be accurate because I trusted the source and so did not verify it first.
William J. Bennett and John T. E. Cribb have written what they claim to be a history book. You would assume they would have taken the time and due diligence to verify every fact contained therein. As anyone familiar with academia and peer reviewed journals knows, there is a big difference between the date an article is submitted for review and the date of its final publication. Of course, inaccuracies can slip past even the most meticulous editors. I have no reason to believe that the error was intentional or that the book is littered with deliberate falsehoods. All the same, my trust in the authors’ credibility has been broken. My faith in the accuracy of their information was shattered in a very humiliating way in the very public forum of social media. It makes me question how vigorous their editorial process was, and if other inaccuracies may exist in the book due to poor editing.
It is hard to continue reading a book when you are constantly questioning the accuracy of the text. Few readers have the time or patience to fact check everything in a large book. That is why the implicit contract of credibility between author and audience is so important in nonfiction. I haven’t decided whether I’ll continue to read The American Patriot’s Almanac. If I do, I will almost certainly be more guarded about what I take as implicit fact. Not to mention double checking things before I post them on the internet.
If anyone has any thoughts please feel free to comment!