(originally published at my website carsonwinter.com)
The best opening I can conceive of for this review is an honest one. I’ve been poking at it for awhile; I’ve tried relating it to what I want as a reader, who I am as a writer; I took a stab at asking a big, fat rhetorical question about what short fiction is really about—as if somehow, by asking said question, I’d become qualified to answer it. All those attempts at creating a hook really, really sucked, so I’ll just say this instead: Gemma Files’ new collection, In That Endlessness, Our End is really fucking good.
Here’s the facts: Gemma Files is a Canadian author with a lot of work under her belt, including, but not limited to the collection Spectral Evidence and Experimental Film, a novel that dazzled me with its portrayal of human relationships as much as it did with its lost film conceit. The latter had been my only direct experience with Files’ work, but it left enough of an impression on me to see her as a major force in today’s literary horror scene. Her new collection continues to make this case, with some of the most creative, distinctively voiced short fiction I’ve read in years. In That Endlessness, Our End feels right at home in Grimscribe Press’s small catalog of authors who exist insistently as themselves on every page.
Files has a syntax and style all her own that stands in sharp contrast to a lot of her peers who write similarly high-brow weird horror. The style here is well-represented by fundamentals that can follow their bloodline all the way back to Poe, of course, but it’s the twists on the fundamentals that provide Files with her voice. Point in case: the first person narrator.
As I know it, the default narrator for the weird horror story has become a stock character. If one were to write a modern post-Ligotti weird tale right now, they might easily fall into a familiar lead archetype—nervous (as Poe would say: “TRUE!—nervous”), academic, cold, and exceedingly alienated. This is a narrative voice that genre auteurs such as Jon Padgett, Thomas Ligotti, and Matt Cardin have formed into something nearing a cliche in their (yes, excellent) work. But Files eschews the modern Weird blueprint and works from a more naturalistic and modern palate. Her characters speak like humans, not academics on the edge of breakdown. They are products of contemporary life, not detachments meant to highlight their own detachment. In this, Files work feels conversant with the present and very much alive.
In That Endlessness, Our End has a bold streak that runs deeper than Files first-person narratives though, there’s also her sense of rhythm as a storyteller. Not too long ago, I read Chuck Palahniuk’s Consider This, a book on writing that I thought was actually pretty great—filled to the brim with pragmatic writing advice that didn’t try to turn the act of writing into some metaphysical exercise in muse-chasing. One bit of tangible advice that managed to stick to my brain-folds was the notion of eliminating scene breaks. For the inexperienced, the scene break is the sort of crutch you lean on when you don’t know how to link scenes, or end scenes, or really know what to do with a scene at all. They exist as something you saw once in a book, then ruthlessly liberated as an ill-considered element of style. Files is the counterpoint to this. Her fiction is brimming with sharp scene breaks, maybe more than I’ve ever seen employed before. It’s a confident bit of style that makes her stories feel like moving snapshots, or a constellation of stab wounds. They have a pace all their own, and it works in harmony with the quick, modern voices that do the telling.
An interesting aspect of In That Endlessness, Our End—to me, anyways—is the conversation it has with the state of modern horror. Namely, the merging and restructuring of what is popular and what is respected. Gemma Files writes literary horror informed by the Weird—a style that has become the respected end of a genre, where serious writer’s writers write stories that will inevitably please other writer’s writers. On the other end of the genre, is the populist side—rollercoaster horror, as I call it. This is the stuff that’s supposed to be an amusement park ride, or a campfire story to make your next piss in the dark an exercise in hyper-awareness. One side wants to be art, the other side wants to be fun—the war wages on. “Venio,” possibly one of my favorite stories I’ve read in recent years, feels like a meeting of these two worlds, where the strange conceit is a game not unlike the games that form the basis for what is probably the least respected (and fittingly, the most read) form of horror short storytelling, the creepypasta. The story's hook is big and sharp and it drags the reader along through a frankly unsettling story, told with all the depth of a writer who cares a lot about good writing. Through a certain lens, “Venio” can be viewed as permission to be scared, to have fun along the way—an olive branch to the rollercoaster.
There are other examples of these sorts of high-concept pitch-lines translated into the world of delicately crafted and personal art, but there’s also some outright subversion. “Come Closer” comes to mind as a haunted house story where the house is treated like Michael Myers, a big lug of a follower who gets closer every time you turn around.
Creepy, right?
Files is good at shit like that, finding just the right twist on an old trope so that it feels relevant and newly unsettling. “The Puppet Hotel” is another one of these stories, a true highlight, that features the very now concept of the AirBnB-as-haunted entity. Sometimes, in comparison to her contemporaries, Files seems as if she’s engaged in a constant war on the artifice and antiquity that has driven the genre for years Post-Lovecraft. It’s as if she’s grabbing us by the collar, frothing at the mouth, reminding us in her fast, athletic voice that the present is plenty scary.
These concepts also mold the framing of her stories, such as in “Bulb,” which is presented as a podcast transcription with a surly guest; as well as the ambitious and creepy “The Church in the Mountains,” where Files uses her knowledge of Canadian film once again to craft a compelling tale of a half-remembered television show (which, so it happens, is another common trope in the world of creepypasta). Both of these stories reflect a relationship with media that is complex—in Files stories, media is the continuation of another of horror’s eldest darlings: the dream sequence—an uncontrollable unreality that whispers truths we’d rather not hear.
In That Endlessness, Our End is a stunning collection brimming with style and verve. Gemma Files deserves to be talked about. Her fiction deserves to be explored. Her characters are complex and anxious and sometimes difficult. They represent a diverse sampling of the population. What can I offer at the end of this review that I couldn’t offer at the beginning?
Nothing, really. Only a request.
Please, I beg you: read this fucking book.