I’m a fan of the TV series, Peaky Blinders (BBC), so I was delighted to receive this is a gift from a relative. I really wanted to love this book, or at the very least enjoy it, but it was a real slog (no pun intended) to finish. It was difficult to assign a star rating to it – the depth of research that’s gone into it should make it at least a 3* - but unfortunately, it was a rather dull, needlessly drawn out book full of grammatical mistakes, which is why I’ve classified it as a 2*.
The author has clearly done a great deal of research, which is the main reason why I feel so guilty giving it a low rating. The way that this information has been presented, in overly long chapters that lack any linear narrative, was a source of real frustration. Chinn uses a combination of police archives, newspaper articles and testimonies of those who lived in the neighbourhoods at the time to paint a picture of the real working-class Birmingham and its criminals. It was very interesting to see how fact differed from fiction – there was no real “Peaky Blinder” gang, the peaky blinders (coined by the newspapers) operated before the First World War (not after), and they were actually common criminals who terrorised ordinary people (unlike the more sympathetic antihero portrayal in the TV show). After I finally finished the book, I felt like I learned a lot and I particularly liked the chapter about the real men that some of the characters from the TV series are based on – Billy Kimber, Alfie Solomon(s), and Darby Sabini.
Unfortunately, this chapter only made up a small part of the book and was not covered in much depth. The rest is waffling filler that goes back and forth about “slogging gangs”, “pitch and toss”, “sloggers”, and more “pitch and toss”. It was very repetitive and focussed too much on minor characters and events (who were basically the same people with different names and injuries). The book did not need to be as long as it was and was badly let down by its poor editing – in fact, I don’t think this book was proofread at all. I lost count of the amount of lazy grammatical mistakes, and a good chunk of the first half of the book should have been seriously slimmed down. I could have forgiven this lack of editing if it had been self-published, but the editors should have done a much better job and have not, in my opinion, done this book justice. I agree with other reviewers who have said that it felt more like reading a dissertation with little attempt at creating a story, which made for a very dry prose lacking any direction.
I’m glad that I read this book so I now have accurate knowledge of the real Peaky Blinders. What frustrates me is that it could easily have been 4* if the editing team had done a proper job. A real shame.