You come home from a long, hard day at the country club and find that your child has murdered the family pets and scattered limbs and eyeballs all over your overpriced, matching living room set. And this just before important dinner guests arrive! Knowing that there is nothing your child can do that would cause you to lose love for your child, you take a moment, breathe deeply and imagine yourself unattached to any outcome, not needing any response from your child other than that they be exactly who they are and feel exactly what they feel in this moment. Lovingly, you affirm him as his head rotates 360 degrees and a line of projectile vomit launches into your face.
Welcome to the cult of childhood. Described here as a "new experiment in parenting where no party holds power over the other."
Is it healthy to have your child's entire upbringing be one long therapy session wherein they can say and do nothing "wrong" including miming and play-acting the violent deaths of siblings, parents, and neighbors? Deliberately and repeatedly ruining your work, chores, and possessions? Has there ever been a point in history wherein this would even be a question?
The therapy, btw, is for you, the parent, working through the horrible crimes your parents committed against you by not following this formula. Not for the child.
There is no research here. There is no science. There aren't even any adults raised in her "method" to speak to the veracity of her claims. There's just cult-leader telling you the One and Onlyth way to raise your kids is here, invented by none other than her, and don't you want to be part of her revolution in childrearing? ALL YOURS FOR THE LOW, LOW price of 300 dollars/hour for her personalized therapy sessions. (That's not made up, by the way. She really charges that.)
Without ever specifically mentioning race, this is one of the most white-privaledgy books I've ever read. Recommends things like reassuring your kid with "I just need a session with my therapist now." (Read: Ka-CHING-ga!)
It attributes ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT CAN GO WRONG in a child's life to mis-parenting. With no deviation for personality type, physiological or mental disability, effects of trauma, or the strains that arise from geo-political shifts or natural disasters. NOPE! Read this and be entered into the CULT OF CHILDHOOD.
So it's great if you're looking to guilt yourself for failing your kids, and even better if you're looking to find new ways to hate your parents for failing you. Do you have a phobia? Depression? Debilitating laziness? ANYTHING AT ALL that can go wrong is YOUR PARENT'S FAULT FOR NOT MAKING YOU FEEL SAFE AND UNDERSTOOD AT ALL TIMES.
I admit to googling to see if her kid turned out to be a serial killer, but it seems like this system worked for him-- he's done well as a child prodigy cellist, and he hasn't made any public statement about how his mother messed him up. But-- I honestly did wonder.
And-- edit that-- she actually has three children. Two of whom mysteriously don't show up anywhere on the Internet. Negative me would immediately assume they have major life problems as a direct result of terrible parenting, or that they are both the family black sheep for failing to bring honor to this wacko system. I do know there are other, more benign possibilities for their absence-- other than that they hate her or that she hates them. But . . . questions.
Also, apparently there was a forum thread that had research about her claims and her qualifications and that has also been mysteriously blocked and erased. Questions.
---
Advice from this book:
"Grant your child innocence and think twice before making any request. If your toddler comes in the house with muddy shoes and walks across the carpet, she has no awareness of any problem. You can simply state the facts: 'Your shoes have mud on them. Let me take them off for you.' Then clean the carpet.
"When we start cleaning the carpet, a toddler may or may not choose to help. It does not matter if she participates in the cleaning. Coercing or insisting that she help will only lead to feelings of failure, resentment, and guilt. These painful feelings prevent the development of an authentic desire to be helpful. On the other hand, watching us clean while feeling good about herself, or leaving happily and finding it clean later, allows the child to absorb our ways and eventually choose freely to participate with us. If your toddler offers to help, allow her to assist you without criticizing, helping, or cleaning up after her in her presence."
"No matter how gently or 'cooperatively' one establishes punishments, time-outs, or consequences, each method incurs a cost-- one we are often unaware of until, sometimes years later, the child demonstrates a lack of authenticity or assertiveness, depression, addictions, violence, or self-destructive behavior. A child cannot experience the parent's love while being controlled by him/her. Instead, she becomes dependent yet isolated and will later need to control others in passive or active ways."
Note again that there is absolutely no research done here, or adult testimonials of how great it was to be raised this way. Except for examples like this one:
Terry asked Mom to read him a book. "I am going to pick up the checkers game off the floor and then I will read to you," said Mom.
"Oh no, Mom," Terry whined. "Read to me now."
"I know you like me to read to you right away. I will be quick," said Mom.
Terry stamped his feet and said, "I hate you."
"Yes, I know," said his mom while finishing collecting the game.
After reading, Dad invited the family to eat lunch.
"I want Mom to make my sandwich," declared Terry.
"I thought you hated her," said Dad.
"That was then," responded Terry as a matter of fact."
That's the whole example. That's the whole proof of parents being 'emotionally safe' for their child. Problem: in this and many other examples the kid is being objectively horrid, (destroying other people's work, physically lashing out or injuring them, having to be forcibly removed from classroom situations) and generally behaving in ways that no adult can hope to maintain relationships if they have this as as set of expectations. It just feels like setting your kid up for spectacular failure while blaming your own parents for any negative emotions that go through your head.
When my oldest son, Yonatan, was six, he chose to take part in a summer art class. When I arrived to pick him up at the end of class, I looked into the room and Yonatan wasn't there. To my astonishment the teacher said that Yonatan had been disturbing the class and that she had sent him to the secretary's office upstairs.
As I started toward the stairs I heard my son's cheerful voice on his way down, talking happily to the secretary. When Yonatan saw me he said, 'I had a great time, Mom. I played with Tina in the office."
"Why did you go to the office?" I asked.
"I was painting a picture and the teacher disturbed me. She wanted me to stop and listen to a story and she said that after the story I would be doing another picture. I wanted to keep painting the first picture so she said to go to the office. I don't want to go to the art class again. I can paint at home without interruptions."
That's the whole story. It is being held up, unironically, as an example of the kind of self-confidence we all need to be instilling in our children.
But suppose, just suppose, you actually hope your child will be able to participate in a classroom setting WITHOUT being justifiably sent to the office? Suppose, just suppose, you DON'T have the kind of loose change that would allow you to let your child ditch ART LESSONS after you've paid for them? Suppose, just suppose, you were able to muster up some semblance of empathy for POOR TINA IN THE OFFICE WHO HAD TO SPEND THE DAY PLAYING WITH YOUR DYSFUNCTIONAL BRAT instead of doing her actual job?
I wanted to like this book for a calm, hopeful approach to parenting. I got a book by and for Queen Karens who fully intend to berate their child's employer for not fully emotionally supporting the useless human being they have foisted on the rest of the world.