Man when I get on a non-fiction kick, I read some strange books lol. This was thrown up in my recommends after finishing Mommie Dearest via Kindle Unlimited. I saw the writing in chapter one was pretty good, so I gave it a go. It's a harrowing memoir of childhood abuse at the hands of Catholic nuns in an orphanage in Kentucky in the 60s... and the only reason I know it was the 60s is literally at the END of the book in the lawyer's afterward it finally said so.
Which brings me to my primary issue, and why it has to be 3 stars for me. You can tell the book is self-published. Not by any fault of the writing, which is above average, but in the content organization and structure. This needed a professional editor or maybe a ghostwriter to help? Not that the book is bad. It's not... but it feels narratively incomplete and at times was confusing, as well as repetitive. I couldn't tell when anything was happening, thus I was missing what feels like essential context.
Because I wasn't anchored in the exact timing of the past, I was also fuzzy on the timing of the present--the book jumps back and forth between the lawsuit with the church and the past. I ended up having problems there, too--that's actually where a pro editor was most needed. Being super recent and very emotionally taxing, the "present" sections with the deposition raised more questions than they answered; yes we got some upsetting descriptions of mean lawyers but rarely did we get to "hear" Ms. Richardson's responses, and the book failed to weave the present with the past in a satisfying narrative manner the way I'd expect a trad pubbed book to. (Meaning if this were trad pubbed it would have been run through a few editorial passes with additional material and more narrative transitions) Similarly I felt unmoored, re: HOW Richardson managed to turn into a functional adult, about the mechanics of her life in the present, beyond loving her husband a lot. The nuns called her a racial slur (related to Native Americans) and I NEVER KNEW WHY--why on EARTH wasn't that context in the book? When Kim apparently goes to live with a family for a few months and I was very confused b/c she told us, the reader, it was only for a weekend? I was just confused A LOT. And then it was just repetitive or had lots of superfluous detail. Didn't need the story about the random dead cat, or the thing with Regina knocking the cookie out of her hand, or the repetitive stories, re: vomiting oatmeal. These are the things a pro editor would develop with the writer. Just feels like a loss for the reader.
The book relies heavily on lots and lots and lots of super descriptive recountings of horrific abuse. I realize there's a whole subgenre particularly in indie publishing where readers love this, but I don't read for the titillation of the abuse... I want the context too. The arc of the story. Historical and social analysis. Because the narrative balance was off, it just made for a one note reading experience. I also couldn't help but wear thin on the juvenile tone of the majority of the book--it's a LOT being in the "head" of a desperate 7-year-old for so long... but the narrative also didn't seem to age? 9-year-old Kim felt as juvenile as 7-year-old Kim which struck me as odd--I remember being 9/10 as a HUGE leap in maturity? I did wonder more than once how on earth 50-something Kim could possibly so vividly recall precisely everything that happened and exactly how she felt/thought/reacted--I barely remember my childhood and I'm in my 30s; while I do believe abuse will crystallize a lot of moments for people, it still beggared belief at times. Not that it happened--I wholeheartedly believe every story--but some of the artifices of the narrative (textural details, etc.) felt too good to be true. Again where a strong co-writer or ghostwriter or editor could have helped.
Ultimately, this book couldn't be what I wanted it to be, which isn't it's fault, but also means I'm not going to rate it on par with books I find more narratively satisfying. I couldn't help but imagine a version of the book that had a broader, journalistic approach. Actually including recollections from Kim's sister, for one--how did SHE perceive the things that happened to Kim? Reflections on her own horrific abuse? Interview other survivors--40 of whom did the lawsuit together! More historical context, re: the orphanage, it shutting down, the nuns, etc. Some memoirs do achieve this kind of scope and focus; but this just isn't one of them and that's ok. THAT SAID if all you want is a harrowing first person account of horrific abuse by nuns and don't mind the present stuff that doesn't do a whole lot, honestly it's vividly well written. It's also a short, fast read (but that was part of my issue lol).