Well, this was a big disappointment.
As a Jane Austen fan, I had really high hopes for this book. On top of that, this is written by Lucy Worsley! She's a fellow Austen fan and a history presenter for the BBC, meaning she knows her shit. And, one thing I can say I loved about The Austen Girls was how I knew I was in Regency England - Worsley's writing is easy and accessible, and interlaces her knowledge of the era very well into the narrative without it sticking out like a sore thumb. It flows really well, and there isn't an overabundance of historical facts. It was a perfect balance.
Another big thing I adored about this book was the very fact that Jane Austen herself is a character. She talks. She walks. She exists. Aunt Jane is by far the best character in this entire book, and I think that was Lucy Worsley's intention. Jane Austen is mysterious, secretive, possesses a quiet power at Godsmersham Park, is direct & intimidating, witty and has a strange sense of humour - almost alike to Mr Bennet's from Pride and Prejudice. And just magical. I practically squealed when she first appeared on the page from behind a newspaper. Her character was the only reason I kept on reading if I'm being really honest.
Here's the main thing that made me hate this: I get that sixteen-year-old girls were husband-hunting, and girls were married by twenty in the Regency Era, but as a twenty-one-year-old reading about children wanting to get married to much older men just made me feel ill. Lucy Worsley knows what she's talking about, but I think she should've made Fanny and Anna much, much older. One of the girls dances with a lord at one of the balls who is obviously nineteen or early twenties - she then claims to love him and wants to marry him. Next, the same girl gets engaged to a THIRTY-YEAR-OLD man, claiming to love him and going against her parents' wishes to proceed with the engagement (until she realises marrying him would be the dumbest thing ever!). Then, by the end, she's engaged again to another clergyman who's probably a decade older than her when she's still sixteen!. WTF! Fanny is consistently jealous of her cousin, Anna, throughout, because she doesn't receive a single proposal. They fight all the time. I hated Anna for the way she treated Fanny and her parents, especially. She was a bad egg, and I didn't care for her whatsoever. She felt very underdeveloped. Fanny had some character development and was more developed than Anna, but it was only until after her mother's death did she realise that perhaps she doesn't want to marry yet, and would rather take on her mother's role as a caregiver to her nine little brothers and sisters. It just felt odd. It felt too sudden and quite anti-climatic.
The romance (if I can call it that) was meh. Underdeveloped. Rushed. I didn't feel anything. I wished Mr Drummer had been more developed as a character. The dynamic was similar to Catherine Morland & Mr Tilney from Northanger Abbey - which in my opinion, was more friendship and platonic love than love love.
I know it says it in the synopsis on Goodreads, but it doesn't on my physical copy, that this was going to be a mystery?? Why? As soon as the mystery was introduced, the whole plot went out of whack. It was all over the place. The mystery was cool, and Lucy Worsley says at the back of the book that it was inspired by real crime happening at the time, but I don't think it should've been featured in this particular story. Also, the death of Fanny's mother was a big shock (even though it says it on the Goodreads synopsis), and I will admit, I did cry a bit when Fanny and her father were hugging each other.
Overall, there were more things I disliked than I liked, and that's why I feel like 2 stars is a very fitting rating.