Perhaps of my readings of Goodreads of 2017 "Jurgen" was the borest of my readings. "Jurgen" is the 7th novel of the cycle The Life of Manuel. The reason because i read this novel is that i would want to investigate one thing, and this novel was not "The Golden Compass" was written by Philip Pullman. This novel is very influenced of the european literature of the 17th century, and the 18th century. I thought in the german novel "The adventurer Simplex Simpliccissimus" was written by Grimelhausen, without transcendence and high moral register of the german novel. I was thinking in the Voltaire,s novels "Candide", and "Zadig" the novel of fantasy journey. I was thinking in the "Faust" was written by Goethe. The main character has contact with the devils and the magic and he recovered the lost youth, and he has an affair with Helen of Troy. The main character Jurgen (he wants to escape of his wife Lise, who eliminate his capacities a overnatural creature kidnaps her, and Jurgen starts an Odissey to recover her, without glad). The main chacter has the chance to have an affair with Guinevere, Ainatis (The maid of the Lake), Cloris (a Driad), Helen of Troy, a vampire Florimer, while he travels around several magical realms between them the Inferno and the Heaven. The main character is a phantom as the Baron of Mulchausen, and he invented stories. Jurgen rises in the status scale he become emperor and the inexisted Pope John XX. The novel is very misoginist (indeed their strikes against the marriage reminded me the skecth of the spanish producer Jose Luis Moreno Wedingiad). James Branch Cabell is very influenced by one o his masters Mark Twain, certainly the women who read this novel will not be very staisfied, especially femens.
The only passage who entertained to me because as Ceravantes and Pliny said there are not a bad book, which has something good. In this case the passage of the main character striking the puritanism, and defending Poe, Whalt Whitman, and Mark Twain the inferno is a parady of the Dante`s book "Divine Comedy" (no, it is not the "Da Vinci`s Code" or "Inferno" of Dan Brown :-)). The novel is a hard strike against the christianity we can look in his passage by the inferno and Heaven (without this novel would have been forgotten, because this novel get old really bad, and it is very bored). The main problem is that James Branch Cabell is heavy i interrump the reading because i slept reading it, and when i continue the reading i have to pass several paragraps running, because i want to finish inmediatly to pass other book. The author want to become Mark Twain, but he is not as funny as the genius american writer, neither he is George MacDonald he drank of pures spring the german romanticism for this reason their world are more believable, and he is not Lord Dunsany. Only for the mixture of Greek, Celt, Athurian, and Jew myth and to typewrite several words did not convert in the king of the Epic Fantasy (Tolkien, not George R.R. Martin), besides i do not understand why in a fantasy world he mixed element of mythology. He employs really bad the mythology, he reminded me to Salman Rhusdie in "Children of midnight". James Branch Cabell is a uriosity, but very bored, and he is not the Wavian`s predecessor this honor is for Edwin Abott, Lewis Carroll, and George MacDonald. I hope to pass more interesting books.
............................................................................................................................................................................
Quizás de los libros, que he leído en Goodreads este haya sido el más aburrido de todos. Parece ser, que "Jurgen" es la séptima novela del ciclo la Vida de Manuel. El motivo, por el que lo leí es que quería comprobar una cosa, y finalmente pude comprobar lo que buscaba, pero pese a alguna sátira o burla "Jurgen" no es la "Brújula dorada" de Pullman. Es una novela, que bebe mucho de la literatura del siglo XVII, y el siglo XVIII. Pensaba en el parecido con "El aventurero Simplex Simplicissimus" de Grimelhausen. También pensé mucho en las novelas de Voltaire, como el "Cándido" o el "Zadig", y tiene también algo del "Fausto de Goethe", porque igual que el héroe de la novela de Goethe el protagonista Jurgen (quiere librarse de una mujer que lo anula Lisa, y le ha impedido triunfar y un personaje demoníaco se la lleva, y emprende una odisea para recuperarla sin mucho entusiasmo), y tiene la oportunidad de cortejar Ginebra, Ainatis, Cloris, Helena de Troya, y una vampiresa, mientras viaja por diversos mundos en busca de su esposa. El protagonista es un fantasma, que como el Barón de Mulhausen se inventa historias, y va ascendiendo llegando a ser emperador y Papa (el inexistente Juan XX). La novela es muy misógina (de hecho sus ataques contra la vida matrimonial me recordaron, pero sin su gracia a las matrimoniadas de José Luis Moreno). James Branch Cabell bebe mucho de uno de los maestros de Branch Cabell, que es Mark Twain. Ciertamente no saldrán muy satisfechas las mujeres que lo lean, sobre todo las feministas. El único pasaje, porque como dicen Plinio y Cervantes no hay libro tan malo que no tenga nada bueno es el pasaje de los Filisteos, dónde ataca el puritanismo, porque la novela tiene mucho de crítica contra las religiones organizadas, sobre todo el cristianismo, lo que se ve en los pasajes de Jurgen por el Cielo, y el Infierno (Creo, que sin eso esta novela habría acabado en el olvido). Lo único bueno la defensa del autor a Poe, Whitman, y Twain contra el puritanismo de la época. El problema es que el autor libertino Branch Cabell es aburridísimo. Yo tuve, que interrumpir la lectura y reanudarla meses más tarde, y después cuando continué su lectura había pasajes en los que me aburría. El autor quiere ser Twain, y no es tan divertido como Twain, ni tampoco es George MacDonald con su evocación de mundos, ni Lord Dunsany, y no tiene la prosa bella de los ilustrados franceses y alemanes. Por mucho, que mezcles como Rhusdie en "Hijos de la medianoche" mitología en este caso mitología griega, celta, Artúrica y judía no te convierte en el nuevo Tolkien, porque Cabell no tiene esa habilidad. Así que Branch Cabell es una curiosidad, pero muy aburrida, y no el precursor Waviano, porque antes que él estaban Abott, Carroll, y George Macdonald. Ojala pueda pasar hacia conquistas/libros más interesantes.