I honestly have no idea how to rate this. Hopefully I will come to a conclusion by the end of this.
(I decided on 2.5 stars. Just in case you don't want to read this whole review.)
So to start off, I should let you know that I probably wouldn't have just picked this book up. It does have a pretty cover, and the title is definitely something that is intriguing enough, but it's not the type of nonfiction I usually read. However, at my high school graduation party, I asked people to give me a book that I should read before I finished college, and somebody wrote down this one. So here we are.
What you should know going into this book that I did not know: this is a Christian book. It is a book about Christianity and Jesus and God.
Why do I mention this? Because I was completely thrown by this. It's not that I'm necessarily against Christian books, but there was absolutely zero indication on the cover and in the blurb that Christianity was a main focus of this book. And it really is. I swear to God, there were portions where Jesus was written in every single sentence. I can't really be mad at Goff personally for this since he wasn't in charge of the marketing, but I can be mad at the publisher. Like, honestly how can you have an entire book about Christianity and not indicate to potential readers that's what it is about? I just really would have appreciated a heads up. Shame on whoever wrote the summary. And whoever decided on the subtitle since that is definitely not an accurate description.
What I was expecting from the title and the description was something on the self-help side of things, all about love and open-mindedness. I expected things such as strategies for dealing with "setbacks and difficult people." I have to say, when I thought of "difficult people" I thought much more about like, co-workers you find annoying. Not like, witch doctors in Uganda who sacrifice children. Like, I'm just saying, not super relatable to my life personally.
This is something that a LOT of other reviewers have mentioned, but basically Goff's anecdotes were frequently completely unrelatable for regular people. Stuff like flying planes. He was clearly writing from a place of privilege. You can go read some other low reviews to hear more about this, but the class privilege was super insane.
What bothered me in terms of his privilege more than that was his lack of specificity of audience. He was a privileged white Christian male, writing to mostly other privileged white Christians. But he doesn't explicitly explain that, and seems to forget that some of the things he says can be interpreted differently by who is reading it. For example, if you say something like "you should even love people who make you uncomfortable," (this is not a direct quote, I'm generalizing) the meaning changes based on the audience. With a conservative Christian audience, it might read like "you should accept and love gay people." But what if a marginalized person is reading it? Who makes gay people uncomfortable? Homophobes. Are we going to tell queer people they need to love and accept homophobes? Maybe some queer people are okay with that idea, that they should unconditionally love everyone, including homophobes. But what about the ones that are lynching people? I don't know. I'm just not sure how far that love is supposed to go. I don't think a cishet person is allowed to have a say in that.
Anyway, my point is that part of Goff's privilege means he totally forgot that anyone other than conservative white Christians might be reading, and because of that, some things don't come off so well. I think the book would have been more powerful if, instead of being super broad, he had just come out and been more specific. It would have been better if he had made it clear who he was talking to, and if he had been more specific in his demands, like "the Christian community should be loving and accepting marginalized groups, including queer and nonwhite people."
Another thing that is more about him personally that came from his place of privilege was his anecdotes that demonstrated a complete ignorance of consent. In one anecdote, he mentions a tradition of "laying hands" on someone who is hurting. So at the end of the service, without asking first, he decided to initiate them crowd-surfing his friend. Now, maybe he knows his friend well enough to know it would be okay. But personally, I would really not appreciate if someone spontaneously decided that I should crowd-surf and initiating it happening without actually asking me first. The other one was where he bought a house without consulting his wife. Who does that? That's so inappropriate to make that kind of decision without consulting your spouse first.
And then there's just the deal that it's so westernized. He talks about climbing Kilimanjaro (which, again, privilege) and for some reason feels the need to compare the height to an American mountain? First off, number of football fields would have made more sense to the average person anyway. Second off, I don't see how it was necessary. Then there's just the whole deal where he talks about some messed up things in other (mostly third world) countries without ever really acknowledging any of the messed up things in America. So it was really perpetuating western views. Yeah, the privilege was strong in this one.
Moving on! The book was fairly readable, which I was grateful for, but it started to get a bit much by the end. Every chapter basically read like a sermon, with an anecdote followed by somehow connecting that anecdote to Jesus. By the time I hit the 80% mark, I was pretty done.
Okay, now to get personal. I guess I do have to give some credit to this book because it really helped me notice how much I am just...not really religious. I was raised Catholic, but haven't identified as such in a looong time for obvious reasons regarding the church as a whole. But I've always still carried around this assumption that I was still kind of Christian. But reading all this stuff about God and Jesus made me feel absolutely nothing. Like, I do actually agree with some of the central themes and messages of the book about doing your best to love everybody, always (hah), and doing good in the world without needing to receive credit for it, and that you will never be perfect but you just have to keep trying your best. But I don't believe that I should do any of those things because it will bring me closer to Jesus. I just think I should be doing them because it will make the world a better place, and as a human in the world it's my moral imperative to try to make the world a little better as best I can. Like, I just think it's the right thing to do, but my reasoning really doesn't trace back to religion in any way.
So anyway, thanks to Bob Goff for helping me realize I'm not religious!
Now that I've written that whole thing, do I have a rating? I'm thinking 2.5 stars. Might have been higher if I was Christian and was actually interested in what he had to say about Jesus, but alas, I am now decidedly not.
Maybe I'll send this to my grandparents though...it would be a good payback for them getting me "From the Pit to the Pulpit" for my high school graduation.