I didn't realize how much I didn't know about harvesting the energy of the sun. Without exaggeration, my very favorite thing in the world to think about and study is how forms take in, circulate, and expel energy. It's an obsession really. People, especially people in my family, are sick of me talking about it. I want to think about it and talk about all day.
----------
Sivaram started off by providing a history of how human's tried to harness solar energy:
- Mostly civilizations focused on using the sun to heat water.
- 3000 years ago, the Chinese used mirrors to direct sunlight to start a fire, which is the oldest known form of solar energy.
- In the 7th century BCE The Chinese also had summer and winter houses with different pitched roofs to either block out the sun or let the sun come in and warm everything, which is an indirect way of trying to harness solar energy or shield oneself from too much of that energy.
- The Romans used a glass to build their buildings called bathhouses because the glass allowed fairly effective capture of the sun's heat.
- Eventually, civilizations began to learn how to convert solar energy into mechanical work. In the 1st century CE, Hero of Alexandria built a solar siphon that heated air, which expanded to propel water from one Chamber to another. I read about this in Smil's Energy and Civilization and this engine has been my cover picture on Facebook ever since. It's beautiful. I recommend searching images.
- Leonardo da Vinci built a 4 mile long mirror to heat a factory's boiler. He never finished it.
- August Mouchot made the most progress when envisioned three uses of solar power that are still being used today; driving a heat engine, generating electricity, and producing portable fuels. In 1874 he built the first solar engine using 8 foot mirrors to focus the suns energy on a boiler that drove a half horse power engine . That is roughly enough energy to run a machine in a woodworking shop.
- In 1879 Mouchot figured out how to convert solar radiation into electricity by reflecting sunlight to heat the junction of two metals soldered together, generating and electric current. He used this electricity to split water atoms into hydrogen and oxygen, and planned to use the hydrogen as fuel. None of his applications were cost effective, but they served to inspire modern uses of solar energy (this reminded me of Elon Musk).
- First solar panel, was developed 60 yrs ago but it’s been in the making for centuries.
-------------
After recounting the history, Sivaram examined the practical nature of solar panels:
- It is not enough to really produce more solar panels. We need a lot of other aspects to fall into place for solar energy to really take off and become more officiant, and reduce our reliance on fossil fuel’s.
- There was a solar war but ended in bankruptcy or some pretty important companies in 2013. China one out with their cheaper solar panels. And amid this disruption solar power came of age
- There are two ways in which solar panels work. One way is to heat up water and produce steam. The other way is to convert the suns energy directly into electricity.
- Rooftop solar panels overloads the grids in local neighborhoods, the local grits.
- Utility scale solar might be helpful
-------------
How do solar cells work and how effective can they really be?: (this is the stuff I LOVE. I did know the following, but it fills me with sheer bliss every time I read about anything that resembles the process that generates ATP)
(I am trying to quote page 148, but I took the notes by dictation on my phone, so forgive any typos)
"Silicon cells convert sunlight into electricity by using two particles, the photon and the electron. Photons are wispy particles of light with different wavelengths. Energy is directly related to what color the photon is. For example, blue photons are a shorter wavelength and have more energy than red photons . Invisible ultraviolet photons have even higher energies, but infrared photons, which are also invisible, are low energy . .......
The electron is negatively charged and surrounds the positive protons . A solar cell recruits both particles by transferring the energy from each incoming photon to an electron (remind anyone of the awesome electron transport chain?:). Once endowed with an energy boost, the electron can break free from its atom end can leave the solar cell. The stream of electrons leaving the solar cell represents the electricity, and the amount of energy pumped out by the solar cell depends on two values. First, the 'electric voltage" is tied to how much energy is in each electron that flows out of the solar cell.
Second, the "electric current" depends on the total number electrons leaving the solar cell each moment. The power output of a solar cell - how much electric energy is pumped out every second - is just the voltage multiplied by the current.
If a solar cells could transfer all of the energy from every single incoming photon to an electron, and make sure that every energized electron could leave the cell and do useful work, it would maximize its electric voltage, current, and power output to be 100% effective. But, even the very best silicon cells can muster only 25% because they are a semi conductor , A material that can toggle between acting as an insulator and a conductor. This allows electrons to switch between staying put and moving around when photons strike them . And semi conductors have a fundamental feature that limits their efficiency. The more photons the cell absorbs the less energy Per for time it can transfer to electrons . In other words, there is a trade off between The maximum current in the voltage that a solar cell can produce, even though both quantities matter for the cell power output.
The more current there is the less voltage. The more voltage the less current. Because electrical outlet is simply voltage times current, you can never reach 100% proficiency.
The voltage current trade off stems from the semiconductor property called the band gap. The amount of energy and electron needs to break free from its post at him and contribute to the cells Electric output . A photon with less energy than the band gap will flow right through A solar cell. A photon with more energy than the band gap will transfer only a band gaps worth of energy to the electron , thus wasting the rest of the photons energy because it is released as heat and does not transfer to the electron .
Think of the band gap in a solar cell as the amount of energy needed to get the flow going, just as you would get ketchup flowing. If you hit the ketchup with just the right force it will start the ketchup flowing out of the bottle. If you hit the ketchup bottle with two little force, you won’t get the catchup flowing. If you hit it with just the right force you will get the ketchup flowing (this reminds me of action potentials in the brain). If you hit the ketchup with a sledgehammer, you will still get the catchup flowing but you will have a high cost of waste for that energy. That is like a high energy ultraviolet photon transferring its energy to an electron. There is a lot of waste . To make affective solar cells that can transfer a high percentage of the suns energy, researchers need to choose materials with the right band gap. If the band gap is too high, most photons Will lack the energy needed to eject photons from the cell and generate a very low current . If the band gap is too low, most photons will set electrons free but they only transfer a dribble of energy to each one resulting in a low voltage. Silicon happens to have a decent band gap somewhere in the middle, although it is a little lower than some ideal materials such as gallium arsenide which is used to make more efficient solar cells but unfortunately it’s too expensive to have commercial success. So you have to weigh your options with cost and efficiency."
-----------
News from Caltech:
Nate lewis is looking into how to create a machine that would convert the suns energy just like plants do by taking in water and sunlight and spitting out gaseous oxygen and hydrogen. “No bugs, no wires“ meaning that unlike plants in nature it would outperform natures best plans.
Plants are shockingly terrible at converting the suns energy into work. Photosynthesis is in efficient . For example black leaves would be far better at absorbing the suns rays. Yet, a plants leaves are green. Plants turn carbon dioxide into sugar. Even the most efficient plants convert less than 1% of the suns energy. Early on in photosynthesis plants split water and release oxygen to the atmosphere and hydrogen that goes into reactions.
Nature is not a pyromaniac and has found a brilliant way to stop combustion. First, it separates the two reactions into different photo systems, photosystem one and photosystem two. This design keeps hydrogen from combusting in the presence of oxygen . Second, Also each of the photosystems where light is absorbed, also contains catalysts , which are molecules that speed up the respective Half reactions. In fact we can thank the manganese catalyst that speeds up accelerates the plants production of oxygen for all of the oxygen in the earths atmosphere. (Wow, I never thought of the manganese catalyst as producing all of the oxygen in our atmosphere). Third, plants separate the 2 half reactions with a membrane that not only keeps hydrogen and oxygen apart, but also allows charged ions to pass through it , which is important to avoid an imbalance in charge that would halt the 2 half reactions. ( I love this!) Constantly creating this equilibrium to create energy potential‘s. (Nature is the fucking bomb!)
To mimic this, Nate lewis wants to create a solar fuel generator /hydrogen generator with two photo electrodes immersed in water. to absorb light energy to perform each of the two half reactions to split water. Two catalysts would speed up each of those half reactions. And, and a membrane stops the whole contraption - called a photo electro Chemical cell (PEC) - from exploding.
But the similarities and there.... Just like when we invented flight we modeled birds but far surpassed them by constructing planes. Nate Lewis thinks we can model our generators from plants and surpassed them. PECs of the future probably will not use two green photo electrodes that compete with each other to absorb the same part of the sun spectrum. Rather, one of them, the anode , which creates oxygen from water, should harness high energy photons, leading Low energy photons pass through it to be absorbed by the other One below, the cathode , which produces hydrogen. (I was unaware of Nate Lewis and want to keep following it.)
---------
Be carful! Think about safety:
PEC’s are not very safe . To keep oxygen and hydrogen from combining an exploding, a PEC needs a membrane to keep them separated. But the half reaction that produces oxygen from water, of course leaves a lot of hydrogen. We know that hydrogen makes that water very acidic . Where as the half reaction that produces hydrogen turns the water basic. Acids are what digest food in your stomach and bases are what clean your drain . If safety were not a concern and the membrane could be eliminated, the acids could combined with the bases and neutralize each other . But with the membrane in place scientists have to find materials for electrodes and catalysts that do not get Dissolved or corroded in acidic or base conditions . That rolls out the many cheap materials that would not survive these conditions .
A PEC could actually achieve 30% efficiency if you can buy the right parts for the membrane .
--------
Are microbes the answer?:
Can genetically modify microbes act as catalysts. If so, using GMO microbe/catalysts could really raise efficiency, but some organic catalysts were incompatible with inorganic catalysts, which produced forms of reactive oxygen that destroyed the bacteria's DNA. So, it took some pretty ingenious work to find appropriate catalysts. Finally they found a phosphorus cobalt catalyst that seem to work very well - this catalyst not only left the bacteria unharmed, but also self assembled out of solution, mimicking The self healing catalysts found in nature. (That is amazing !) The catalyst and bacteria working together in harmony has boosted efficiency to 10%. That is actually an incredibly high efficacy rate in converting sunlight into alcohol fuels . With this bacteria and in organic catalyst combination, we might be able to fix nitrogen! Which means that sunlight instead of fossil fuel’s could fix nitrogen. This would be huge . But biological things tend to be sensitive and difficult to work around. Bacteria is sensitive to acids and other things in the environment.
-------
The author also discussed, at length, the super grid pros and cons, which led nicely into discussions about the pros and cons of decentralized grids.