I was disappointed in this book. I love the first three books of the Wolves Chronicles, but this one not so much.
I had previously had it marked as Read, but I realize now that I had started but never finished it until now. And if I read through this series again, I'll probably skip it, though I do like it better than The Stolen Lake, which I skipped this time.
The imaginary Pacific island of Aratu is very attractive in some ways, but seriously weird. There's a great deal of supernatural stuff in this story, unlike in the first three Wolves books. The island's main problem seems to be its European colonizers, but they are becoming less of a problem, in some reasonable ways (emigration) and some bizarre ways, like turning into hyenas, which I found amusing.
Readers should be aware of triggers, including suicide and the death of a child. In fact, suicide is presented as potentially a laudable option, to prevent overpopulation, for instance. There's a child born out of wedlock, though that is not clearly spelled out. There's a religion which is clearly not Christian.
I don't think I would give this book to a child, but if one 10 or older found it, I wouldn't forbid him or her to read it. A responsible adult might want to read it, too, if that happensb- it could lead to good discussions. (Technically I DID give this book to my son, but he was over 20 at the time. If I had read it first, I probably wouldn't have. He never read it anyway.)
The novels of this loose series were not all written in chronological order - some were written later and interpolated in between earlier ones. I read recently a reader's opinion that the ones written earliest are the best. She might be right. Though she said the very last written, The Witch of Clatteringshaws, is good.
In general, I prefer to read series in publication order rather than based on internal chronology, but if I did that with this one, I might just skip the later books.
Update: Having just reread The Cuckoo Tree, which I had pretty thoroughly forgotten, I think the author may have been trying in Dangerous Games to counter some of the impressions she'd given in The Cuckoo Tree. In the latter book there are two witches, both of whom are evil and one of whom is from the fictional West Indian island of Tiburon. In Dangerous Games there are many witches, all or nearly all good, and almost all of them natives of a small tropical island, albeit in the Pacific rather than the West Indies. I'm not sure why she decided that she didn't want to contribute to the stereotype of wicked witches, but I do appreciate her sticking up for tropical islanders.
The confusing thing, of course, is that Dangerous Games comes before (right before)The Cuckoo Tree in the internal chronology of the series, but was written 27 years later. So it's like she was trying to go back in time to retract the wicked-islander-witch thing before she wrote about it.