The book starts with two letters that tell a heartbreaking story: a free black man has sold himself into slavery to be with the woman he loves. Despite the slave-owner promising to keep him together with his family (now including a baby girl who has been named Hester) he doesn't believe that the slave owner's son will honour the agreement. The second letter tells us the tragic end to the tale: the baby girl has been sold, separate from her mother, who has also been sold. The man is ill and will die soon. He begs his sister, the recipient of the letter, to find and rescue his baby girl. Her mother, accurately predicting the family's separation, had severed the tip of the baby girl's pinky finger, in order for her to be accurately identified later.
Unfortunately, after the letters, the writing of this novel becomes strange and stilted. Hester, the girl referenced in the letters, has been rescued and freed from slavery: the story picks up years later when she is an adult and one of the many people involved in the Underground Railroad.
I haven't finished reading this story yet, but I wanted to accurately reflect my thoughts here.
Hester is a free black woman, and a landowner who owns some hundred-and-change acres of land. She is not only involved in the underground railroad, she is a passionate abolitionist and advocate for civil rights... but for some reason, the characterization falls flat. Hester is depicted as painfully innocent and naive, sheltered to an absurd degree. Despite being a landowner and highly educated, Hester does not have a job or a source of income. She occasionally writes articles for publication, which provides her with some income, but she doesn't have an actual career or any employment... which is extremely anachronistic. She owns a lot of land, and has a lavish house with numerous rooms (some secret and accessed by hidden doors!) with more than one bathtub, and some indoor piping! Yet, for some reason she is also living in abject poverty? Destitute and forced to skip her own meals so that she can feed Galen (aka THE BLACK DANIEL).
While the writing of the novel itself is stilted and strange, the real thing that bothered me was the subtle, pervasive misogyny of all of Hester's interactions with Galen. There is a moment where Galen thinks to himself that Hester should be married and having babies, not working on the Underground Railroad.
Think about that. Galen, a black man (or a biracial half-white man, who cares) who works as a conductor on the Underground railroad, who risks his life helping people escape slavery, looks at the woman who is hiding him in her house and risking her life (and her freedom) to keep him safe, and he thinks that she would be better utilized playing house and having babies than assisting others in their flight to freedom. She wrote that. I was so fucking appalled reading that, I had to stop and take calming breaths. I still cannot believe ANY person could pen such thoughts (especially given the context.) Such a combination of racism and sexism could only come from an ignorant white man, and yet, the book was written by a black woman. What the fuck. WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK.
Galen's entire character seemed to me to be... an overwhelming mess of alpha-male stereotypes. He refuses to respect Hester's many requests to use her actual name, instead calling her "Indigo" because her hands are stained purple from her time processing dye as a slave. He spends a lot of time ogling her, and musing about her (presumed lack of) sexual history. He ignores her opinions/advice/concerns at every point during his stay with her, including the ones where she asks him to use a chamberpot, instead of the outdoor privy, because slave-catchers are in the area looking for someone of his description.
The worst part of this book so far is that the narrative seems to celebrate Galen's high-handed creepy ways, instead of depicting any of his behaviour as reprehensible. He yells at her for not eating and orders her to eat, and Hester simply acqiuesces, because obviously The Man Knows What Is Best For Her.
It's creepy and pervasive, a subtle (or in some cases, blatant) misogynistic (misogynoiristic) undertone that Hester cannot take care of herself because she is Just a Woman, and that her unrealistically innocent/pure/childlike demeanour is somehow Exactly What The Manly Men Want.
I enjoyed some of the descriptions of Hester-- seeing a black woman described as beautiful will never get old, especially not a dark-skinned black woman, but her constantly being flustered by flirtation and running away ... it's a romance trope designed to reflect upper-class white women living sheltered lives, not the lives of a hard-working black woman who used to be a slave.
I find the addition of historical facts the only good thing about this book-- which is sad, because they aren't at ALL well incorporated into the narrative. Rather than have characters discuss current events or having things happen that explain or introduce the readers to situational information, we're subjected to constant infodumps. I won't complain about this further though, becuase the infodumps are at least informative.
There are things that I cannot help but think of as anachronistic and highly out of character, though. How is Hester still so virginal and childishly innocent with regards to sex? She lived nine years as a slave, during a time when (as I learned during one of the infodumps) the importation of African slaves from outside the country was illegal. Slavery included rampant sexual abuse, but also breeding programs to increase the slave population. How was she not, at least, given some sort of sex talk as a little girl, in preparation for the sexual abuse that most black slaves were subjected to? How has this woman who is wealthy enough to own her own house AND a good area of land never thought to start a garden to supplement her food needs? Why doesn't she own chickens or pigeons, for the same reason? Why doesn't she work?
Oh right, it's because the author wants Galen to come in and "fix" her life.
It's obvious and not subtle, but Hester's helplessness is so clearly contrived and anachronistic that I hate it. I'm supposed to believe that a previously enslaved woman working on the underground railroad needs a man to rescue her? If I wanted to read about a Big Strong Man helping the Poor Impoverished Somehow Childishly Innocent Virginal Woman, I wouldn't have picked up a book about the Underground fucking railroad.
As a black woman I just cannot fucking believe the number of hoops the author jumped through to take Hester's agency away from her. I haven't even finished the book, but something tells me it isn't about to get better. Maybe I'll read on, and I'll update this review if I do, but somehow I doubt I'll be able to stomach it.
Actual quote from the book: "Galen thought she looked far too innocent to be in this business. In his mind, she should be married to a good man having his babies, not risking her life every day for a cause which appeared to have no end."
Are you fucking serious? What kind of black person writes that, especially when the "cause which appeared to have no end" is the LITERAL ENSLAVEMENT OF YOUR RACE. Hester WAS one of those people. What kind of privileged bullshit, who the fuck writes that. I am appalled and offended. Fuck this book.