Not quite what it says on the tin. A more accurate title would be: CIA Propaganda, Plus How The World Is So Scary You Need To Buy The Stuff I Sell. Hanson assumes that, while reading skin-deep summaries of spy ops, you will not notice the ways in which he himself is manipulating you. It's a nice trick.
The Spy Survival Tips on offer fall largely into three categories: stuff you've read about in any article about home and travel safety (seriously, ANY article); stuff you learned from watching 5 minutes of Doomsday Preppers; and stuff that is better-covered by Gavin de Becker's The Gift of Fear. (In that last category: social and psychological ways that we manipulate people and people manipulate us. De Becker's take is more "here's how to avoid this." Hanson's is more "haha, in the CIA we're so GOOD at mindf-cking people!!!!", which I guess he thinks is charming?) My point here is: you don't need this book. At all. You already know how to secure your house while you're in it, and if you want to prep for the fall of civilization, I'm sure you've already done so--but if you haven't, there are a ton of resources out there that are more complete than this and are free. Hanson is not trying to help you. He is trying to scare you into thinking that everyone really IS out to get you, and you totally DO need a safe room (if you are reading my goodreads reviews, the odds are that you do not need a safe room), and most importantly, that you need to buy his products and his books and take his classes because otherwise YOU WILL NEVER KNOW HOW TO BE SAFE!!11 And this, friends, is a lie.
Let's talk about the CIA-propaganda aspect for a second, because make no mistake, this is CIA propaganda. The stories in here are, shall we say, "of limited utility to the layperson," but do function well as fig leaves--e.g., a CIA officer claims they were in El Salvador to keep the US safe and *handwaving*, and not propping up a brutal regime that massacred civilians and saints--you know what, you can google it. It was bad. Again, Hanson (and the CIA, which apparently had to approve the manuscript) assumes you won't notice that he's pulling a fast one. He also assumes that, when an "asset" is recruited through subterfuge and manipulation, we'll be on the CIA's side. He assumes the same when that asset is unceremoniously abandoned. And when an asset is killed while working for the CIA, because their case officer screwed up, and the agent blames the ASSET? Both Hanson and the agent assume we'll be on the CIA's side, blaming the dead man. COOL STORIES, BROS.
Hanson also thinks we either don't know what "extraordinary rendition" actually means, or that we're cool with it as long as the agent involved in doing it pinkie-swears that the guy they're kidnapping is, like, really bad, you guys. I'm still not sure how insulted to be by that entire chapter.
And before I move on: I strongly suspect that there was no editor here beyond spellcheck. There are two reasons for this. One, Hanson talks about "diffusing" a bomb repeatedly--it's even in a section heading!--and no editor in the world could miss that so many times. Two, Hanson spends an entire paragraph talking about the Trojan horse, and he gets all of it wrong. All of it. (He has the Trojans inside the horse, ambushing Greeks--my guy, you even opened with "beware of GREEKS bearing gifts," do you not believe in Wikipedia?) There were other moments, but these two were the most horrendous. Beware of ex-spies who don't believe in editors.
And yet. I still gave this two stars. Why? Because those spy stories are, for the most part, fun to read (not you, El Salvador guy, or you, Extraordinary Rendition-eer--screw y'all), and Hanson did remind me to buy a water filter for the apocalypse. So there's that. This concludes the faint-praise portion of the review.
tl;dr Don't bother with this book. It's not the WORST book in the world, but you're better-served by reading The Gift of Fear, and watching The Americans.