This book was a disappointment beyond belief. It had all the making of a great story: glimpses from the past, archeology, an old sect, adventure, romance, danger, a completely insane antagonist ... what could possibly go wrong?
I'll tell you: This story could not only have been good, it could have been sublime ... if it weren't for the lead characters who spoil just about anything.
Main offender: Candice Armstrong, the female lead whose name is a dead givaway for a Mary Sue. When the reader meets her, she is at the lowest point of her life: Currently unemployed, disrespected from her peers because she thinks that Nefertiti was a Pharao (which is by the way a valid thesis, and I know little about egyptian mythology. Author clearly thinks reader is stupid). Okay, let's be fair. Her own stubbornness has gotten her into trouble, she's highly intelligent but underrated and she's unemployed, so she's the underdoog, right?
No, she is sitting in a nice cottage, has running internet and pities herself. She's currently applying for a tv job, which just might - woe of woes - forbid her to spread her Nefertiti-theory. Feeling sorry for her yet?
But it gets better. She is constantly described as competent and the story calls for a historian, but strangely enough, aside from a translation, she does nothing but looking good and getting internally praised by the male lead. But other than her backstory, she shows no personality whatsoever. She is described as feminine and smart, but aside from knowledge about an ancient language that isn't even her field of expertise (bad research), my knowlege in archeology exceeds hers, and I'm not even an academic, let alone formally schooled in this area.
Second offender: Glenn Marsters ... ho boy, where to start? He's constantly described as good-looking, and his major "flaw" are anger issues ... which are never adressed. He is afraid to pick up a gun and specializes in hostage-situations (which must be quite the problem where he lives, since he doesn't seem to travel much and makes a name out of himself for something like this). So, this unarmed pacifist is no pacifist at all, the gun-thing is just a gimmick to make him unpopular with his peers, so the reader can root for him.
So, we have Candice Sue and Glen Stu running around with an ancient order named the Alexandrians all over the place, hunting them down and trying to kill them. The head of this organisation is some creep named Philo, who in turn was obsessively in love with Glenn's late mother.
Why is this even published?
Next point: Romance. Candice ... sorry, Dr. Armstrong is supposedly a grown woman. Yet she thinks like a teenager in Glenn's presence, her designated love interest and the only thing they ever talk or disagree on is a) they don't want the other to get hurt and are able and willing to ignore each others saying in this and b) that they are in pain. So much pain. But that's all they talk about, I don't see them hurting. Ever. The reader is only informed about their traits, but these are never ever shown. There is no character arc, there is no chemistry, they talk about nothing, they know nothing about each other and have only known each other for two weeks and shared a measly kiss before a painful corny scene, in which Glenn gets down to his knees and aks her to marry him. That's not romance, that's just stupid and far from reality.
Why have I so much invested in this book? Why am I still writing? Because there are little scenes about Alexandrians, about their order and their destiny written in, collected over time in different time periods. There's a story about a young man who learns the meaning of love and sacrifice in prison, a story about a deathseeker knight who killed his wife in rage and finds redemption in himself, a story about Librarians who sacrifice themselves to safe knowledge - these little stories are pure gold. Whenever Candice, Glenn and Philo leave the stage, this book is *good*. In fact, I the short stories have more substance than the overarching plot (or the lack thereof) and they have what Candice & Co desperately needed: A Character Arc. A-R-C. The reader is constantly told that there's everything at stake for Candice and Glenn, but it's a run for their lives. They are never confronted with choices, they never show their true character. They are both attractive people who must fall in love with each other and live happily ever after. We never see any consequences of their flaws (in Candice's case, there is no flaw except for her being shunned by her peers).
The author has a good and playful style, she has the ability to create great characters and stories. How could she fall so low with her leads? How could this book anger me so badly that I wanted to commit the ultimate insult and burn it? Because it insulted me. It insultet any research in history, it insulted a good author who suddenly wrote bad characters, it insulted people who know the meaning of suffering without sitting in a cozy cottage, it insulted atheists, it insulted the reader's intelligence because nothing makes sense in the end.